Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Pritchard Elmon Marozva

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2022, 10, 241-253

https://www.scirp.org/journal/wjet
ISSN Online: 2331-4249
ISSN Print: 2331-4222

Laser Beam Welding of 600 MPa Quenched and


Tempered High-Strength Steel

Pritchard Elmon Marozva1*, Bruno Roberts Mose2, Abdel-Monem El-Batahgy3,


Thomas Ochuku Mbuya4
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation,
Nairobi, Kenya
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
3
Manufacturing Technology Department, Central Metallurgical Research and Development Institute (CMRDI),
Cairo, Egypt
4
Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

How to cite this paper: Marozva, P.E., Abstract


Mose, B.R., El-Batahgy, A.-M. and Mbuya,
T.O. (2022) Laser Beam Welding of 600 Conventional fusion arc welding of high-strength quenched and tempered
MPa Quenched and Tempered High-Strength steel can be improved through the use of non-conventional laser beam weld-
Steel. World Journal of Engineering and
ing. This article presents the investigations of autogenous bead on plate and
Technology, 10, 241-253.
https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 butt CO2 Laser Welding (LW) of 7 mm thick high-strength quenched and
tempered low alloy SM570 (JIS) steel plates. The influence of laser welding
Received: March 1, 2022 parameters, mainly welding speed, defocusing distance and shielding gas flow
Accepted: May 8, 2022
rate on the weld profile, i.e., weld zone penetration depth and width, micro-
Published: May 11, 2022
structure and mechanical properties of welded joints was determined. All
Copyright © 2022 by author(s) and welded joints showed smooth and uniform weld beads free from superficial
Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
porosity and undercuts. The selected best welding conditions were a laser
This work is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International power of 5.0 kW, welding speed of 500 mm/min, argon gas shielding flow
License (CC BY 4.0). rate of 30 L/min and a defocusing distance of −0.5 mm. It was observed that
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ these conditions gave complete penetration and minimized the width of the
Open Access weld bead. The microstructure of the welded joints was evaluated by light
optical microscopy. The weld metal (WM) and heat-affected zone (HAZ)
near weld metal achieved maximum hardness (355 HV). The tensile fractured
samples showed the ductile mode of failure and ultimate tensile strength of
580 MPa.

Keywords
Laser Welding, High-Strength Steel, Quenched and Tempered, Bead on Plate
Joint, Butt Joint, Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ), CO2 Autogenous Laser
Welding, Mechanical Properties

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 May 11, 2022 241 World Journal of Engineering and Technology
P. E. Marozva et al.

1. Introduction
Quenched and tempered high-strength steels are desirable for use in many in-
dustrial applications because they contain low carbon composition and prefera-
ble thermomechanical properties. High-strength quenched and tempered low
alloy steels derive their strength from quenching, a process by which the steel is
rapidly cooled to room temperature and temper heat treatment where the steel is
heated to a temperature well below the melting point at a suitable rate, to in-
crease the steel ductility, toughness and the grain size of the matrix. The quench-
ing and tempering processes produce a microstructure largely made up of tem-
pered martensite with little amounts of lower bainite [1] [2] [3].
These steels have the capability to meet the demand for higher-strength con-
struction grade material. Due to their ability to protect products from environ-
mental degradation, their reduced weight, high-strength and high impact values,
quenched and tempered high-strength steels are widely used in the construction
of numerous critical applications including bridges, ships, large-scale petroleum
storage tanks and containers [4] [5] [6].
The welding of high-strength steels has had major drawbacks such as cold
cracking, residual stresses and distortion where conventional fusion arc welding
processes such as SMAW, GMAW, SAW have been employed [7] [8] [9] [10]
[11] and in most cases, precautions such as preheating and post-weld heat treat-
ment (PWHT) are employed [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]. These treatments are
however costly and associated with some hazards. To maintain the mechanical
properties as well as minimize distortion of arc welded joints which are a great
challenge because of the associated high heat input, there is a need to explore
new solutions in the production process on improving the weldability of these
steels. The use of high energy density and low heat input process in Laser Beam
Welding ensures narrow welds, a smaller heat-affected zone (HAZ), which cools
very rapidly with very little distortion, and a high depth-to-width ratio [17] [18]
[19] [20]. Previous investigations have demonstrated that the weld metal’s mi-
crostructure and the HAZ of steel are influenced by the welding speed, defocus-
ing distance, and shielding gas flow rate [21]-[27]. In addition, the stability of
the keyhole and the escape of hydrogen in the molten pool are largely influenced
by defocusing distance and gas shielding which often leads to the formation of
undesired porosities during welding [28] [29] [30]. Inevitably, it is expected that
the microstructure and the mechanical properties of welded joints of high-strength
quenched and tempered low alloy SM570 (JIS) steel are affected by the welding
process parameters.
To achieve the best product quality and high production rates, the present
work was conducted to explore the effect of laser power, welding speed, defo-
cusing distance and shielding gas flow rate on the microstructure and mechani-
cal properties of welded joints of quenched and tempered high-strength steel.
Since welding is widely used in the fabrication of various engineering compo-
nents, understanding the factors affecting the quality of welded joints is critical

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 242 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

for maintaining their mechanical properties.

2. Experimental Procedure
The 7.0 mm thick plates of SM570 low alloy high-strength steel with the highest
strength and toughness among the steel grades under JIS G3106 welded struc-
ture steel, were chosen for laser welding experiments. Their chemical composi-
tion and mechanical properties are given in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.
Both bead-on-plate (Figure 1) and autogenous square butt-welded joints
(Figure 2) were produced using a CO2 laser system with 5 kW maximum output
power (CW) and a CNC welding head. Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration
of the butt joints of 7 mm thickness. The steel plates were machined to geometry
of 150 mm × 100 mm × 7 mm and then welded perpendicular to the rolling di-
rection.

Figure 1. BOP image of the welded JIS G3106 SM570 plate.

Figure 2. Experimental setup of laser beam welding.

Table 1. Chemical composition (wt%) of the used base metal.

Base metal C Mn Si S P

JISG3106 SM570 0.18 1.60 0.55 0.035 0.035

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 243 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

Table 2. Mechanical properties of the used base metal.

YS (N/mm 2) UTS (N/mm 2) Elong (%) Charpy absorbed energy-5 C (J)

460 min 570 - 720 26 min 47 min

Table 3 shows the investigated laser welding parameters were laser power (P),
welding speed (S), defocusing distance (Dd), and shielding gas flow rate. At a
constant laser power of 5.0 kW, the welding speed varied between 0.5 and 3.0
m/min, the defocusing distance varied between 0.0 mm and 1.0 mm. To protect
the weld bead from contamination and to reduce the formation of absorbing
plasma, argon gas shielded both the weld pool top and bottom at a flow rate be-
tween 15 and 30 L/min.
Visual examinations of laser beam welded joints showed neither internal nor
external welding defects. Then, various specimens were cut in the cross-sections
of the welds and prepared through grinding with grinding papers of various grit
sizing from coarse to fine in the order 120, 240, 320, 600, 800 and 1000 and sur-
face polishing with alumina paste. Natal solution was used for etching 2% Nitric
acid (HNO3) and 98% Alcohol (CH3OH). A low-magnification stereoscope was
used to determine the weld structure and an optical microscope was used for
microstructure analysis. To investigate the hardness distributions through the
weld, heat-affected zone and base metal, microhardness was measured at a load
of 300 g by a Vickers testing machine (Matsuzawa, Akita, Japan). Tensile testing
was performed by a universal tensile testing machine (Sinofound CO., Beijing
China) integrated with computerized control and data acquisition system. Flat
tensile specimens were prepared from the laser beam butt welds (Figure 3(a))
according to ASTM A370 [31]. Impact test specimens were prepared by etching
(2% nital) to indicate the weld metal (WM), HAZ and the base metal (BM). A
flaw or notch was introduced on the impact test specimens in the 3 different
weld zones in order to examine the weld toughness at these locations (Figure
3(b)). The amount of energy absorbed by the material during fracture was de-
termined at −20˚C.

3. Results and Discussions


3.1. Macrostructure Investigation
3.1.1. Effect of Welding Speed
The influence of welding speed on the weld profile was investigated at the se-
lected laser power (5 kW) and a defocusing distance of −0.5 mm. Initial results
of the bead-on-plate laser welding showed incomplete penetration for the 10
mm thickness with variations in welding speed from 3 to 0.5 m/min, Figure 4.
However complete penetration was achieved on the 7 mm thickness (see Fig-
ure 5). Figure 6 shows the relationship between welding speed and fusion zone
depth/width ratio. Increasing the welding speed from 0.6 to 1 m/min results in a
sharp increase in the depth/width ratio from 1.23 to 1.38.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 244 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3. Schematic illustration and dimensions of (a) transverse tensile test specimen of
the welded joint, (b) V-notch location of the impact test specimen in the BM, HAZ and
WM.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 4. Macrostructure on cross-sections of the bead-on-plate welds produced on 10.0


mm thick plates of JIS G3106 SM570 by laser power of 5 kW, defocusing distance −0.5
mm, shielding gas flow rate of 30 L/min and variable welding speeds of (a) 3 m/min, (b) 2
m/min, (c) 1 m/min, (d) 0.5 m/min.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 245 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 5. Macrostructure on cross-sections of the bead-on-plate welds produced on 10.0


mm thick plates of JIS G3106 SM570 by laser power of 5 kW, defocusing distance −0.5
mm, shielding gas flow rate of 30 L/min and variable welding speeds of (a) 1 m/min, (b)
0.8 m/min, (c) 0.8 m/min, (d) 0.6 m/min.

Figure 6. Influence of welding speed on weld depth/width ratio of 7 mm thickness.

Table 3. Welding parameters used for laser welding.

Power Welding Speed Defocusing Shielding


(P) (kW) (S) (m/min) Distance (Dd) (mm) Gas/Flow Rate (L/min)

5 0.5 - 3.0 0.0 to −1.0 Argon/15.0 - 30.0

The results showed a significant increase in the fusion zone size at lower
welding speeds and consequently a decrease in depth/width ratio. Complete pe-
netration with a relatively acceptable fusion zone size for the 7 mm base metal
thickness was achieved at a welding speed of 0.6 m/min as shown in Figure 5(d).

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 246 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

At high welding speeds, penetration is usually low because of the drop in heat
input. However, in this case, the rate of increase of the weld width was signifi-
cant, leading to a low depth to ratio at lower speeds although it remained within
an acceptable range. The fusion zone was found to be symmetrical about the axis
of the laser beam (Figure 7). The butt joint is symmetrical in shape with com-
plete fusion. This is the expected geometry of a laser-welded joint, without excess
penetration from the root side or visible porosity in the joint.

3.1.2. Effect of Defocusing Distance


The focus position, distance between the optical focal point and specimen sur-
face, also referred to as the defocusing distance, were investigated. Figure 8
shows the face sides of the 7 mm welds made at various defocusing distances.
Visual inspection of the laser-welded joints made with a defocusing distance of
0.5 mm below the specimen surface gave sound weldments with complete pene-
tration and without defects like porosities and undercuts, Figure 9.

Figure 7. A cross-section of butt weld made using P = 5 kW, S = 0.5 m/min, Dd = −0.5
mm.

(a)

(b) (c)

Figure 8. Face side of 7.0 mm thick plates of JIS G3106 SM570 produced by laser power
of 5 kW, welding speed of 0.5 m/min, shielding gas flow rate of 30 L/min and defocusing
distance (a) 0.0 mm, (b) −0.5 mm, (c) −1.0 mm.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 247 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

(a)

(b)

Figure 9. Butt welds of 7.0 mm thick plates of JIS G3106 SM570 produced by laser power
of 5 kW, welding speed of 0.5 m/min, shielding gas flow rate of 30 L/min and defocusing
distance of −0.5 mm (a) face side, (b) root side.

3.1.3. Effect of Shielding Gas Flowrate


The influence of gas shielding flow rate is determined by increasing the Argon
shielding flow rate from 15 to 30 L/min at constant laser welding parameters:
Laser Power of 5 kW, welding speed of 0.8 m/min and defocusing distance of
−0.5 mm. Increasing the argon gas flow rate, prevented excessive plasma forma-
tion, maintained the stability of the keyhole and in turn brought about full pene-
tration of the weld. In addition to that, at 30 L/min the cross-section of the weld
was smoother with a narrower weld face and the weld root wider, Figure 10.

3.2. Microstructure Investigation


The base metal (BM) has a microstructure consisting of martensite and a small
proportion of ferrite grains. The butt joint in this case contains identical chemi-
cal constituents to the base metal. This is because of the autogenous laser weld-
ing process in which no filler metal is used meaning the joint microstructure is
also made up of martensite. Since the heat input in the HAZ was slightly below
its melting point, it was sufficient enough to cause microstructural changes to
give finer grains. Solidification in the weld metal (WM) led to coarse columnar
grains in the microstructure (Figure 11).

3.3. Mechanical Properties


Figure 12 shows tensile after testing and it was observed that failure occurred by
ductile rupture in the base metal. The ultimate tensile strength was 580 MPa ac-
ceptable and within the tensile strength of the base metal of 570 - 720 MPa, in-
dicating the correctness of welding parameters, particularly laser power, defocusing

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 248 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

(a) (b)

Figure 10. Macrographs showing weld quality produced by laser power of 5 kW, welding
speed of 0.5 m/min, a defocusing distance of −0.5 mm and a shielding gas flowrate of (a)
15 L/min, (b) 30 L/min.

(a)

(b) (c)

Figure 11. Optical microscopic photographs at a magnification of 50 μm of the (a) used


base metal used, (b) HAZ of full penetration square butt welded joint, (c) weld metal of
full penetration square butt welded joint.

Figure 12. Macrographs showing fractured location in the tensile specimen.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 249 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

distance, and welding speed and gas flowrate. Visual inspection also showed no
structural changes which have a significant influence in decreasing mechanical
properties usually brought about by the laser welding thermal cycle. Metallo-
graphic examinations also support the retaining of the material structural cha-
racteristics.
Figure 13 gives the hardness distribution of the base metal, HAZ and weld
metal of JIS G3106 SM570 steel. High hardness of between 300 - 355 HV in the
WM and HAZ near the weld metal. However, the least hardness of 218 HV was
observed as we approach the BM. This is expected because the mechanical prop-
erties of steel, in general, are characteristic of its microstructure in these different
zones. Complete penetration of 7.0 mm thickness had a width of 4.0 mm and a
minimized HAZ width of 1.5 mm.
To determine the impact resistance (toughness) of JIS G3106 SM570 steel, the
amount of energy absorbed during fracture was ascertained by the Charpy-V
notch test. The impact toughness of the laser-welded butt joint was investigated
in three different positions. The results of the Charpy-V impact toughness in the
base metal (BM), HAZ and weld metal (WM) at −20˚C are shown in Figure 14.
There was an uneven distribution of toughness along the butt welded joint, with
the lowest impact energy observed at WM while the highest impact energy was
observed in the BM. However, all measured values in all the different zones ex-
ceed the minimum required absorbed energy.

Figure 13. Hardness distribution.

Figure 14. Impact absorbed energy distribution.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 250 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

4. Conclusion
In this study, autogenous laser welding of both BOP and butt joints of JIS G3106
SM570 steel was investigated. From the study, it was found that the difficulty re-
lated to conventional fusion arc welding of high-strength quenched and tem-
pered steel can be avoided using the non-conventional laser beam welding
process. The selected optimal welding conditions were a laser power of 5.0 kW, a
500 mm/min welding speed, an argon gas shielding flow rate of 30 L/min, and a
defocusing distance of −0.5 mm. An optimum butt weld with a narrow weld zone,
a small heat-affected zone (HAZ), very little distortion, and a high depth-to-width
ratio was made. Subjected to examination and tests, a good combination of me-
chanical properties including hardness (355 HV), tensile strength (580 MPa) and
toughness (1.4 J/mm2) of welded joints was observed. Laser welded joints cha-
racterised by minimum distortion as well as microstructure and mechanical prop-
erties; close to those of the base metal will enhance the application of high-strength
quenched and tempered low alloy steels in bridges, ships, large-scale petroleum
storage tanks, etc.

Acknowledgements
This research is funded by the Pan African University through the Institute of
Basic Sciences, Technology & Innovation (PAUSTI), Kenya. The authors grate-
fully acknowledge the help of the Laser-X Co. Ltd.-Japan in conducting the laser
welding experiments and the Central Metallurgical Research and Development
Institute (CMRDI), Cairo for their support in material testing, examinations,
workshops and related industrial visits. The research work is jointly supervised
by both PAUSTI and CMRDI. Assistance provided by Ahmed Saiyah, CMRDI
during this study is highly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this pa-
per.

References
[1] ASM International (2006) Handbook Committee, ASM Handbook, Volume 5: Heat
Treatment. ASM International, Material Park, 591.
[2] Hwang, B., Lee, C.G. and Kim, S.-J. (2011) The Low-Temperature Toughening Me-
chanism in Thermomechanically Processed High-Strength Low-Alloy Steels. Me-
tallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 42, 717-728.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0448-3
[3] Shaojun, S., Zeng X.P. and Sun, C.T. (2018) Heat-Treatment and Properties of
High-Speed Steel Cutting Tools. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and En-
gineering, 423, Article ID: 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/423/1/012031
[4] Mohrbacher, H. (2015) Guest Editorial of “Application of High Strength Steels in
Lightweight Commercial Vehicles”. Advances in Manufacturing, 3, 1-2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-015-0098-1

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 251 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

[5] Lange, J. and Wohlfeil, N. (2010) Examination of the Mechanical Properties of Steel
S460 for Fire. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 1, 189-204.
https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2317.1.3.189
[6] Lagneborg, R. (1991) New Steels and Steel Applications for Vehicles. Materials &
Design, 12, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3069(91)90086-J
[7] Jindal, S., Chhibber, R. and Mehta, N.P. (2012) Issues in Welding of HSLA Steels.
In: Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 365, Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Bäch,
44-49. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.365.44
[8] Gyasi, E.A. and Kah, P. (2016) Structural Integrity Analysis of the Usability of High
Strength Steels (HSS). Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 46, 39-52.
[9] Lobanov, L.M., Poznyakov, V.D. and Makhnenko. O.V. (2013) Formation of Cold
Cracks in Welded Joints from High-Strength Steels with 350-850 MPa Yield Strength.
The Paton Welding Journal, 7, 7-12.
[10] Zhao, M.S., Chiew, S.P. and Lee, C.K. (2016) Post Weld Heat Treatment for High
Strength Steel Welded Connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 122,
167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.015
[11] Chuvas, T.C., Garcia, P.S.P., Pardal, J.M. and Fonseca, M.D.P.C. (2015) Influence of
Heat Treatment in Residual Stresses Generated in P91 Steel-Pipe Weld. Materials
Research, 18, 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.006315
[12] Pandey, C. and Mahapatra, M.M. (2016) Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstruc-
ture and Hot Impact Toughness of Various Zones of P91 Welded Pipes. Journal of
Materials Engineering and Performance, 25, 2195-2210.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2064-x
[13] Pandey, C., Mahapatra, M.M., Kumar, P. and Saini, N. (2017) Diffusible Hydrogen
Level in Deposited Metal and Their Effect on Tensile Properties and Flexural
Strength of P91 Steel. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 139, Ar-
ticle ID: 031004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035764
[14] Paddea, S., Francis, J.A., Paradowska, A.M., Bouchard, P.J. and Shibli, I.A. (2012)
Residual Stress Distributions in a P91 Steel-Pipe Girth Weld before and after Post
Weld Heat Treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 534, 663-672.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.024
[15] Landowski, M., Świerczyńska, A., Rogalski, G. and Fydrych, D. (2020) Autogenous
Fiber Laser Welding of 316L Austenitic and 2304 Lean Duplex Stainless Steels. Ma-
terials, 13, 2930. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132930
[16] Ridha Mohammed, G., Ishak, M., Ahmad, S.N.A.S. and Abdulhadi, H.A. (2017) Fi-
ber Laser Welding of Dissimilar 2205/304 Stainless Steel Plates. Metals, 7, 546.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met7120546
[17] Kumar, A. and Pandey, C. (2022) Autogenous Laser-Welded Dissimilar Joint of
Ferritic/Martensitic P92 Steel and Inconel 617 Alloy: Mechanism, Microstructure,
and Mechanical Properties. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 22, 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00365-6
[18] Weglowski, M.S. (2018) High Strength Quenched and Tempered Steels: Weldability
and Welding. In: Branco, R., Ed., High-Strength Steels: New Trends in Production
and Applications, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, 143-224.
[19] Uchihara, M. and Fukui, K. (2003) Tailored Blanks of High Strength Steel-Comparison
of Welding Processes. Tech. Rep., SAE Technical Paper.
https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2829
[20] Kang, Y., Park, G., Jeong, S. and Lee, C. (2018) Correlation between Microstructure

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 252 World Journal of Engineering and Technology


P. E. Marozva et al.

and Low-Temperature Impact Toughness of Simulated Reheated Zones in the Mul-


ti-Pass Weld Metal of High-Strength Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions
A, 49, 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4384-3
[21] Sreenivasan, N., Xia, M., Lawson, S. and Zhou, Y. (2008) Effect of Laser Welding on
Formability of DP980 Steel. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 130,
Article ID: 041004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2969246
[22] Steen, W.M. (2003) Background and General Applications. In: Laser Material Pro-
cessing, Springer, London, 11-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3752-8_2
[23] Gáspár, M. (2019) Effect of Welding Heat Input on Simulated HAZ Areas in S960QL
High Strength Steel. Metals, 9, Article No. 1226.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met9111226
[24] Njock Bayock, F., Kah, P., Layus, P. and Karkhin, V. (2019) Numerical and Experi-
mental Investigation of the Heat Input Effect on the Mechanical Properties and Mi-
crostructure of Dissimilar Weld Joints of 690-MPa QT and TMCP Steel. Metals, 9,
Article No. 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9030355
[25] Di, H., Sun, Q., Wang, X. and Li, J. (2017) Microstructure and Properties in Dissi-
milar/Similar Weld Joints between DP780 and DP980 Steels Processed by Fibre La-
ser Welding. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 33, 1561-1571.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.09.001
[26] Odebiyi, O.S., Adedayo, S.M., Tunji, L.A. and Onuorah, M.O. (2019) A Review of
Weldability of Carbon Steel in Arc-Based Welding Processes. Cogent Engineering,
6, Article ID: 1609180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1609180
[27] El-Batahgy, A.-M., Khourshid, A.-F. and Sharef, T. (2011) Effect of Laser Beam
Welding Parameters on Microstructure and Properties of Duplex Stainless Steel.
Materials Sciences and Applications, 2, 1443-1451.
https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2011.210195
[28] Wang, L., Xu, X.Z., Wang, K.H., Li, H. and Huang, Y. (2020) Effect of Shielding Gas
and Defocusing on Porosity during Laser Beam Welding of 7A52 Alloy. China
Welding, 29, 20-25.
[29] Schmidt, L., Schricker, K., Bergmann, J.P. and Junger, C. (2020) Effect of Local Gas
Flow in Full Penetration Laser Beam Welding with High Welding Speeds. Applied
Sciences, 10, 1867. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051867
[30] Fellman, A. and Kujanpää, V. (2006) The Effect of Shielding Gas Composition on
Welding Performance and Weld Properties in Hybrid CO2 Laser-Gas Metal Arc
Welding of Carbon Manganese Steel. Journal of Laser Applications, 18, 12-20.
https://doi.org/10.2351/1.2164481
[31] American Society for Testing and Materials (2017) Committee A-01 on Steel, Stain-
less Steel and Related Alloys. Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechani-
cal Testing of Steel Products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.

DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2022.102015 253 World Journal of Engineering and Technology

You might also like