A4
A4
A4
Abstract
Background This paper is devoted to a narrative review of the literature on emotions and academic performance
in medicine. The review aims to examine the role emotions play in the academic performance of undergraduate
medical students.
Methods Eight electronic databases were used to search the literature from 2013 to 2023, including Academic
Search Ultimate, British Education Index, CINAHL, Education Abstract, ERIC, Medline, APA Psych Articles and APA Psych
Info. Using specific keywords and terms in the databases, 3,285,208 articles were found. After applying the predefined
exclusion and inclusion criteria to include only medical students and academic performance as an outcome, 45
articles remained, and two reviewers assessed the quality of the retrieved literature; 17 articles were selected for the
narrative synthesis.
Result The findings indicate that depression and anxiety are the most frequently reported variables in the reviewed
literature, and they have negative and positive impacts on the academic performance of medical students. The
included literature also reported that a high number of medical students experienced test anxiety during their study,
which affected their academic performance. Positive emotions lead to positive academic outcomes and vice versa.
However, Feelings of shame did not have any effect on the academic performance of medical students.
Discussion The review suggests a significant relationship between emotions and academic performance among
undergraduate medical students. While the evidence may not establish causation, it underscores the importance of
considering emotional factors in understanding student performance. However, reliance on cross-sectional studies
and self-reported data may introduce recall bias. Future research should concentrate on developing anxiety reduction
strategies and enhancing mental well-being to improve academic performance.
Keywords Emotions, Medical students, Academic performance
*Correspondence:
Nora Alshareef
Dr.nourat@gmail.com
1
King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you
give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the
licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation
or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 2 of 17
studies had to explicitly reference academic performance, were excluded, and the study did not limit itself to a par-
test results, or GPA as key outcomes to address the ticular type of research. Qualitative studies were excluded
research question. from the review because they did not have the quantita-
tive measures required to answer the review’s aim. This
Exclusion criteria review excluded articles on factors impacting academic
The study excluded individuals beyond the undergradu- performance, those analysing nursing students, and gen-
ate medical student demographic, such as students in der differences. The reasons and numbers for excluding
other health fields and junior doctors. There was no articles are shown in Table 1.
imposed age limit for the student participants. The
research specifically focused on articles within medi- Information sources
cal schools, excluding those from alternative settings. It Eight electronic databases were used to search the lit-
solely considered full-text articles in English-language erature. These were the following: Academic Search
peer-reviewed journals. Letters or commentary articles Ultimate, British Education Index, CINAHL, Education
Abstract, ERIC, Medline, APA Psych Articles and APA
Table 1 The reasons and numbers for excluding articles Psych Info. The databases were chosen from several fields
Main reason No. of articles based on relevant topics, including education, academic
Excluding any duplicates and letters and commentary 1592 evaluation and assessment, medical education, psychol-
Other Factors Affecting Academic Performance ogy, mental health, and medical research. Initially, with
Mentoring 3 the help of a subject librarian, the researcher used all the
Emotional intelligence 20 above databases; the databases were searched with spe-
Studying habits 10 cific keywords and terms, and the terms were divided
Testing scales 19 into the following concepts emotions, academic perfor-
Conference papers 3 mance and medical students. Google Scholar, EBSCO-
Gender discrimination 5 host, and the reference list of the retrieved articles were
Environment 13 also used to identify other relevant articles.
Physiological factors (menses, sleep) 22
Motivation 5 Search strategy
Perfectionism 3
This review started with a search of the databases. Eight
Computer use 5
electronic databases were used to search the literature
Grading system 4
from 2013 to 2023. Specific keywords and terms were
Socioeconomic factors 6
used to search the databases, resulting in 3,285,208 arti-
Only exam anxiety 1
cles. After removing duplicates, letters and commentary,
Math course 1
this number was reduced to 1,637 articles. Exclusion and
Smoking 9
inclusion criteria were then applied, resulting in 45 arti-
Depression 7
cles. After two assessors assessed the literature, 17 arti-
Patient safety 1
Stress management 5
cles were selected for the review. The search terms are as
Counselling 1
follows:
Clerkship 1
Keywords: Emotion, anxiety, stress, empathy, test anxi-
Quality of life 12 ety, exam anxiety, test stress, exam stress, depression,
Only Empathy 7 emotional regulation, test scores, academic performance,
OSCE/ Assessment tools 6 grades, GPA, academic achievement, academic success,
Mindfulness 11 test result, assessment, undergraduate medical students
Medication 3 and undergraduate medical education.
Mental health 7 Emotions: TI (Emotion* OR Anxiety OR Stress OR
Communication skills 3 empathy) OR emotion* OR (test anxiety or exam anxi-
Academic Engagement 5 ety or test stress or exam stress) OR (depression) OR
Compassion 1 AB ((Emotion* OR Anxiety OR Stress OR empathy) OR
EEG 1 emotion* OR (test anxiety or exam anxiety or test stress
Neuroimage 2 or exam stress)) (MH “Emotions”) OR (MH “Emotional
Music 3 Regulation”) DE “EMOTIONS”.
Nursing students 20 Academic performance: TI (test scores or academic
Junior doctors 1 performance or grades or GPA) OR (academic achieve-
Not Medical 3 ment or academic performance or academic success)
Primary health care 1 OR (test result* OR assessment*) OR AB (test scores or
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 4 of 17
academic performance or grades or GPA) OR (academic (e.g., midterm, final exams), Clinical assessments (e.g.,
achievement or academic performance or academic suc- practical exams, clinical rotations), Overall grade point
cess) OR test result* OR assessment*. average (GPA) or any other relevant indicators of aca-
Medical Students: TI (undergraduate medical students demic achievement.
OR undergraduate medical education) OR AB (under- Data were sought for all outcomes, including all mea-
graduate medical students OR undergraduate medical sures, time points, and analyses within each outcome
education), TI “medical students” OR AB “medical stu- domain. In cases where studies reported multiple mea-
dents” DE “Medical Students”. sures or time points, all relevant data were extracted to
provide a comprehensive overview of academic perfor-
Selection process mance. If a study reported outcomes beyond the pre-
This literature review attempts to gather only peer- defined domains, inclusion criteria were established to
reviewed journal articles published in English on determine whether these additional outcomes would be
undergraduate medical students’ negative and positive included in the review. This involved assessing relevance
emotions and academic performance from January 2013 to the primary research question and alignment with the
to December 2023. Their emotions, including depression, predefined outcome domains.
anxiety, physiological distress, shame, happiness, joy,
and all emotions related to academic performance, were Quality assessment
examined in quantitative research and mixed methods. The quality and risk of bias in included studies were
Moreover, to focus the search, the author specified and assessed using the National Institute of Health’s (NIH)
defined each keyword using advanced search tools, such critical appraisal tool. The tool evaluates studies based on
as subject headings in the case of the Medline database. the following domains: selection bias, performance bias,
The author used ‘MeSH 2023’ as the subject heading, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other
then entered the term ‘Emotion’ and chose all the rele- biases. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of
vant meanings. This method was applied to most of the bias in each included study. Reviewers worked collab-
keywords. oratively to reach a consensus on assessments. Discrep-
Studies were included based on predefined criteria ancies were resolved through discussion and consensus.
related to study design, participants, exposure, outcomes, In cases of persistent disagreement, a third reviewer was
and study types. Two independent reviewers screened consulted.
each record, and the report was retrieved. In the screen- To determine the validity of eligible articles, all the
ing process, reviewers independently assessed each arti- included articles were critically appraised, and all review-
cle against the inclusion criteria, and discrepancies were ers assessed bias. The validity and reliability of the results
resolved through consensus during regular team meet- were assessed by using objective measurement. Each arti-
ings. In cases of persistent disagreement, a third reviewer cle was scored out of 14, with 14 indicating high-quality
was consulted. Endnote library program was used for research and 1 indicating low-quality research. High-
the initial screening phase. This tool was used to identify quality research, according to the NIH (2013), includes
duplicates, facilitated the independent screening of titles a clear and focused research question, defines the study
and abstracts and helped to retrieve the full-text articles. population, features a high participation rate, mentions
The reasons for excluding the articles are presented in inclusion and exclusion criteria, uses clear and specific
Table 1. measurements, reports results in detail, lists the con-
founding factors and lists the implications for the local
Data collection process community. Therefore, an article was scored 14 if it met
Two independent reviewers extracted data from the eli- all criteria of the critical appraisal tool. Based on scor-
gible studies, with any discrepancies resolved through ing, each study was classified into one of three quality
discussion and consensus. If the two primary reviewers categories: good, fair or poor. The poorly rated articles
could not agree, a third reviewer served as an arbitra- mean their findings were unreliable, and they will not
tor. For each included study, the following information be considered, including two articles [16, 19]. Seventeen
was extracted and recorded in a standardised database: articles were chosen after critical appraisal using the NIH
first author name, publication year, study design, sample appraisal tool, as shown in Table 2.
characteristics, details of the emotions exposed, outcome
measures, and results. Effect measures
For each outcome examined in the included studies,
Data items various effect measures were utilised to quantify the rela-
Academic performance as an outcome for medical stu- tionship between emotions and academic performance
dents was defined to include the following: Exam scores among undergraduate medical students. The effect
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 5 of 17
Table 2 (continued)
No. Author/year Country Methodology Aim Population Tools Findings Quality
scoring
5 Del-ben (2013) Brazil Cross-section 1. To assess (n = 85) 1. Beck’s There was no cor- 8/14
academic motiva- 1st-year Anxiety and Beck’s relation between Fair
tion, anxiety, medical Depression academic motiva-
depression and students 2. Social Adjust- tion, anxiety and
social adjustment ment Scale depressive and
among first-year 3. The Academic social adjustment
medical students Motivation Scale with academic
2. Determine 4. GPA achievement
the influence on
their academic
performance
6 Dendle (2018) Australia one-year pro- Examine the (n = 126) 1. Kessler psycho- There was no cor- 9/14
spective cohort impacts of 1st year logical distress relation between Good
study workplace and medical scale the anxiety
study-related students 2. The Gen- and academic
stress factors on eral Health performance
students’ psycho- Questionnaire
logical distress 3. Sources of
and academic workplace stress
performance 4. Academic
during their first scores
clinical year
7 Green (2016) Connecticut/USA Cross-section & 1. Determine (n = 25) 1. Westside test 1. Test anxiety 10/14
RCT the relationship 2nd-year anxiety negatively corre- Good
between test medical 2. USMLE score lated with USMLE
anxiety and per- students be- 3. Medical college step 1 (r= − 0.24)
formance on the fore USLME admission test 2. A test-taking
(USMLE) exam step-1 strategy course
2. Determine relatively reduced
the impact of a anxiety but did
test-taking strate- not increase test
gies course on scores
test anxiety and 3. Anxiety may im-
USMLE scores pair performance
by interfering
with attention to
task-relevant infor-
mation, decreas-
ing the cognitive
resources available
for task processing
8 Hahn (2017) Germany Quantitative To investigate (n = 200) 1. Multiple Choice 1. Anxiety did 5/10
Explorative study the relationship Second-year Vocabulary Intel- not correlate Poor
between anxiety, medical ligence Test with depressive
depression and students 2. State-Trait-Anxi- symptoms or past
academic perfor- ety Inventory or future academic
mance among 3. Beck’s Depres- achievement
medical students sion Inventory II 2. Depression
did not correlate
with academic
performance
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 7 of 17
Table 2 (continued)
No. Author/year Country Methodology Aim Population Tools Findings Quality
scoring
9 Hautz Swiss RCT To further (n = 49) Experimental 1. Students train- 9/14
(2017) (Shame) enhance the 4th and 3rd shame scale. Out- ing with a stan- Good
understanding of medical come assessed: dardised patient
state shame students number of lumps experienced more
and its influence correctly docu- shame during
on learning mented during training
final performance 2. Shame does not
assessment, time have any effect on
on task and OSCE OSCE scores
score
10 Hayat (2018) Iran descriptive-cor- The role of (n = 370) 1. Academic 1. Motivation 9/14
relative study medical students’ medical emotions (β = 0.56) and Good
emotions and students Questionnaire positive emotions
motivation in 2. Work prefer- (β = 0.11) increase
their academic ence inventory medical students’
achievement 3. Academic score academic perfor-
mance, explain-
ing 40% of the
variance
2. Negative
emotions: anger,
anxiety, hopeless-
ness, shame, and
boredom, were
found to have a
negative and sig-
nificant correlation
with the academic
achievement of
learners (r=-0.15,
r = 0.24, r = 0.23, r=-
0.215, and r=-0.21)
(small effect)
11 Kausar (2018) Pakistan Cross-section To explore the ef- (n = 79) Medical Student Pre-exam stress 9/14
fect of pre-exam Students of Stressors enhances medical Good
stress levels of final medical Questionnaire students’ academ-
final-year medi- year ic performance
cal students on x2 = 23.52 (p = 0.00)
their academic (W = 0.78 large
performance effect)
12 Kim Korea Cross-section Investigate the (n = 101) 1. Korean Achieve- 1. Test anxiety is 7/14
(2016) effect of test 3rd and 4th ment Emotions moderately associ- Fair
anxiety on OSCE year medical Questionnaire ated with achieve-
among Medical students ment emotions in
students the class, which
are anxiety and
boredom (r = 0.46
and 0.32, p < 0.00)
2-Test anxiety is
not significantly
correlated with
the OSCE scores
(r = 0.09, p = 0.40)
or GPAs (r = 0.09,
p = 0.41)
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 8 of 17
Table 2 (continued)
No. Author/year Country Methodology Aim Population Tools Findings Quality
scoring
13 Junaid (2020) Saudi Arabia Analytical Prevalence of (n = 247) 1. Beck Anxiety Anxiety was high 5/14
Cross section anxiety and its medical Inventory and negatively Poor
effect on the students 2. GPA correlated with
academic perfor- academic
mance among performance
medical students mean CGPA = 3.93,
SD = 0.88, p = 0.00
Cohen’s
d = 1.1 (large effect
size)
14 Mihailescu Romania Quantitative Association (n = 254) 1. Zung Self-rating Depression and 9/14
(2016) Cross-section between anxiety 1st and 2nd- Anxiety scale anxiety are nega- Good
and depression year medical 2. Zung Self-rating tively correlated
and academic students Depression Scale with academic
performance 3. GPA performance in
medical students
(rho=-0.14,
p < 0.05), (rho=-
0.19, p < 0.05)
15 Moreira (2018) Portugal Cross-section Prevalence of Total 1. Socio-demo- Depression is 7/14
anxiety and (n = 750) graphic survey associated with Fair
depression in students 2. Hospital Anxiety poor academic
Portuguese (n = 512) and Depression performance but
medical students medical Scale (HADS) is not statistically
compared to students significant. Anxiety
non-medical and (n = 238) negatively signifi-
students nonmedical cantly associated
students with the average
curricular grade
χ2 = 4.49; p < 0.00
(W = 0.76 large
effect size)
16 Nazir et al. Pakistan Cross-section Assess test (n = 680) 1. Test anxiety There is a signifi- 7/14
(2021) anxiety and its medical inventory cant association Fai
influencing fac- students between test anxi-
tors on medical ety and academic
students performance, with
excellent students
exhibiting lower
levels of test anxi-
ety compared to
those with lower
academic grades
OR = 1.47 (95%
CI:1.05, 2.06),
P = 0.02
17 Zalihic (2017) Bosna and Cross section Examine the (n = 100) 1. Anxiety Sensi- Anxiety has a 8/14
Hercegovina impact of anxiety 1stand 5th- tivity Index positive statisti- Fair
sensitivity on the year medical cally significant
success of medi- students on academic
cal students performance
OR = 1.28 (95% CI:
1.16–1.51), p = 0.00
measures commonly reported across the studies included and the statistical analysis conducted in each study. These
prevalence rat, correlation coefficients, and mean dif- measures were used to assess the strength and direction
ferences. The reviewer calculated the effect size for the of the association between emotional factors and aca-
studies that did not report the effect. The choice of effect demic performance.
measure depended on the nature of the outcome variable
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 9 of 17
The synthesis method the critical influence of control and value evaluations on
The findings of individual studies were summarised to students’ emotional experiences and academic achieve-
highlight crucial characteristics. Due to the predicted ments [21, 22].
heterogeneity, the synthesis involved pooling effect esti-
mates and using a narrative method. A narrative synthe- Data extraction
sis approach was employed in the synthesis of this review For this step, a data extraction sheet was developed using
to assess and interpret the findings from the included the data extraction template provided by the Cochrane
studies qualitatively. The narrative synthesis involved Handbook. To ensure the review is evidence-based and
a qualitative examination of the content of each study, bias-free, the Cochrane Handbook strongly suggests that
focusing on identifying common themes. This synthesis more than one reviewer review the data. Therefore, the
was employed to categorise and interpret data, allowing main researcher extracted the data from the included
for a nuanced understanding of the synthesis. Themes studies, and another reviewer checked the included,
related to emotions were identified and extracted for excluded and extracted data. Any disagreements were
synthesis. Control-value theory [20] was used as an over- resolved via discussion by a third reviewer. The data
arching theory, providing a qualitative synthesis of the extraction Table 2 identified all study features, including
evidence and contributing to a deeper understanding of the author’s name, the year of publication, the method
the research question. If the retrieved articles include used the aim of the study, the number and description of
populations other than medical, such as dental students participants, data collection tools, and study findings.
or non-medical students, the synthesis will distinguish
between them and summarise the findings of the medical Finalisation of references and study characteristics
students only, highlighting any differences or similarities. PRISMA sheet and the summary of final studies that have
The Control-Value Theory, formulated by Pekrun been used for the review
(2006), is a conceptual framework that illustrates the When the keywords and search terms related to emo-
relationship between emotions and academic achieve- tions, as mentioned above, in the eight databases listed,
ment through two fundamental assessments: control 3,285,208 articles were retrieved. After using advanced
and value. Control pertains to the perceived ability of a search and subject headings, the number of articles
learner to exert influence over their learning activities increased to 3,352,371. Similarly, searching for the sec-
and the results they achieve. Value relates to a student’s ond keyword, ‘academic performance,’ using all the
significance to these actions and results. The theory sug- advanced search tools yielded 8,119,908 articles. Search-
gests that students are prone to experiencing good feel- ing for the third keyword, ‘medical students’, yielded
ings, such as satisfaction and pride when they possess 145,757 articles. All terms were searched in article titles
a strong sense of control and importance towards their and abstracts. After that, the author combined all search
academic assignments. On the other hand, individuals terms by using ‘AND’ and applied the time limit from
are prone to encountering adverse emotions (such as fear 2013 to 2023; the search narrowed to 2,570 articles. After
and embarrassment) when they perceive a lack of control duplicates, letters and commentary were excluded, the
or worth in these particular occupations. These emo- number was reduced to 1,637 articles. After reading the
tions subsequently impact students’ motivation, learning title and abstract to determine relevance to the topic
strategies, and, eventually, their academic achievement. and applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria men-
The relevance of control-value theory in reviewing medi- tioned above, 45 articles remained; after the quality of
cal student emotions and their influence on academic the retrieved literature was assessed by two reviewers, 17
performance is evident for various reasons. This theory articles were selected for the review. The PRISMA flow
offers a complete framework that facilitates comprehend- diagram summarising the same is presented in Fig. 1.
ing the intricate connection between emotions and aca- Additionally, One article by Ansari et al. (2018) was
demic achievement. It considers positive and negative selected for the review; it met most inclusion and exclu-
emotions, providing a comprehensive viewpoint on how sion criteria except that the outcome measure is cogni-
emotions might influence learning and performance. tive function and not academic performance. Therefore,
The relevance of control and value notions is particularly it was excluded from the review. Figure 1 shows the
significant for medical students due to their frequent Prisma flow diagram (2020) of studies identified from the
exposure to high-stakes tests and difficult courses. Gain- databases.
ing insight into the students’ perception of their power
over academic assignments and the importance they Study characteristics
attach to their medical education might aid in identify- Table 2, summarising the characteristics of the included
ing emotional stimuli and devising remedies. Multiple studies, is presented below.
research has confirmed the theory’s assertions, showing
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 10 of 17
achievements. One study explored the influence of shame academic performance, indicating a significant effect size.
on medical students’ learning. However, Del-Ben (2013) et al. did not provide the sig-
nificant impact of affective changes on academic achieve-
Study quality ment, suggesting trivial effect sizes for these factors.
The studies were assessed for quality using tools created In conclusion, anxiety and depression, both indica-
by the NIH (2013) and then divided into good, fair, and tors of psychological discomfort, are common among
poor based on these results. Nine studies had a high- medical students. There is a link between distress and
quality methodology, seven achieved fair ratings, and poor academic performance results, implying that this
only three achieved poor ratings. The studies that were relationship merits consideration. Table 3 below shows
assigned the poor rating were mainly cross-sectional the specific value of depression and anxiety in retrieved
studies, and the areas of weakness were due to the study articles.
design, low response rate, inadequate reporting of the
methodology and statistics, invalid tools, and unclear Test anxiety
research goals. In this review, four studies examined the relationship
between test anxiety and academic performance in medi-
Outcome measures cal education [27–30]. The studies found high rates of
Most of the outcome measures were heterogenous and test anxiety among medical students, ranging from 52%
self-administered questionnaires; one study used focus [27] to as high as 81.1% [29]. Final-year students tend to
groups and observation ward assessment [23]. All the experience the highest test anxiety [29].
studies used the medical students’ academic grades. Test anxiety has a significant negative correlation with
academic performance measures and grade point average
Results of the study (GPA) [27–29]. Green et al. (2016) found that test anxiety
The prevalence rate of psychological distress in the was moderately negatively correlated with USMLE score
retrieved articles (r= − 0.24, p = 0.00); high test anxiety was associated with
Depression and anxiety are the most common forms of low USMLE scores in the control group, further suggest-
psychological distress examined concerning academic ing that anxiety can adversely affect performance. The
outcomes among medical students. Studies consistently findings that a test-taking strategy course reduced anxi-
show concerningly high rates, with prevalence estimates ety without improving test scores highlight the complex
ranging from 7.3 to 66.4% for anxiety and 3.7–69% for nature of anxiety’s impact on performance.
depression. These findings indicate psychological distress Nazir et al. (2021) found that excellent female medi-
levels characterised as moderate to high based on com- cal students reported significantly lower test anxiety
mon cut-off thresholds have a clear detrimental impact than those with low academic grades, with an odds ratio
on academic achievement [16, 24–26]. of 1.47, indicating that students with higher test anxi-
The studies collectively examine the impact of psy- ety are more likely to have lower academic grades. Kim’s
chological factors on academic performance in medical (2016) research shows moderate correlations between
education contexts, using a range of effect sizes to quan- test anxiety and negative achievement emotions such as
tify their findings. Aboalshamat et al. (2015) identified a anxiety and boredom, but interestingly, this anxiety does
small effect size (η2 = 0.018) for depression’s impact on not significantly affect practical exam scores (OSCE) or
academic performance, suggesting a modest influence. GPAs. However, one study found that examination stress
Mihailescu (2016) found a significant negative correla- enhanced academic performance with a large effect size
tion between levels of depression/anxiety (rho=-0.14, (W = 0.78), with stress levels at 47.4% among their sam-
rho=-0.19), academic performance and GPA among med- ple, suggesting that a certain stress level before exams
ical students. Burr and Beck Dallaghan (2019) reported may be beneficial [30].
professional efficacy explaining 31.3% of the variance in
anxiety has a negative impact on their academic success study examined the effects of test anxiety on working
[36, 37]. In the cultural context, education and anxiety memory capacity and found that test anxiety negatively
attitudes differ widely across cultures. High academic correlated with academic performance [44]. Therefore,
pressure and societal expectations might worsen anxi- the evidence from Song’s study suggests a small but sig-
ety in many East Asian societies. Education is highly val- nificant effect of anxiety on working memory capacity.
ued in these societies, frequently leading to significant However, another cross-sectional study revealed that test
academic stress. This pressure encompasses attaining anxiety in medical students had no significant effect on
high academic marks and outperformance in competi- exam performance [45]. The complexities of this rela-
tive examinations. The academic demands exerted on tionship necessitate additional investigation. Since the
students can result in heightened levels of anxiety. The retrieved articles are from different countries, it is critical
apprehension of not meeting expectations can lead to to recognise the possible impact of cultural differences
considerable psychological distress and anxiety, which on the impact of test anxiety. Cultural factors such as dif-
can appear in their physical and mental health and aca- ferent educational systems, assessment tools and societal
demic achievement [38, 39]. expectations may lead to variances in test anxiety expe-
rience and expression across diverse communities [46,
Test anxiety and academic achievement 47]. Culture has a substantial impact on how test anxi-
The majority of the studies reviewed confirm that test ety is expressed and evaluated. Research suggests that the
anxiety negatively affects academic performance [27– degree and manifestations of test anxiety differ among
29]. Several studies have found a significant correla- different cultural settings, emphasising the importance of
tion between test anxiety and academic achievement, using culturally validated methods to evaluate test anxi-
indicating that higher levels of test anxiety are associ- ety accurately. A study conducted by Lowe (2019) with
ated with lower exam scores and lower academic per- Canadian and U.S. college students demonstrated cul-
formance [40, 41]. For example, Green et al. (2016) RCT tural variations in the factors contributing to test anxiety.
study found that test anxiety has a moderately significant Canadian students exhibited elevated levels of physiologi-
negative correlation with the USMLE score. They found cal hyperarousal, but U.S. students had more pronounced
that medical students who took the test-taking strategy cognitive interference. These variations indicate that the
course had lower levels of test anxiety than the control cultural environment has an influence on how students
group, and their test anxiety scores after the exam had perceive and respond to test anxiety, resulting in differ-
improved from the baseline. Although their test anxiety ing effects on their academic performance in different
improved after taking the course, there was no signifi- cultures. Furthermore, scholars highlight the significance
cant difference in the exam scores between students who of carrying out meticulous instruments to assess test
had and had not taken the course. Therefore, the inter- anxiety, which are comparable among diverse cultural
vention they used was not effective. According to the cohorts. This technique guarantees that the explanations
control-value theory, this intervention can be improved of test scores are reliable and can be compared across
if they design an emotionally effective learning environ- different populations. Hence, it is imperative to com-
ment, have a straightforward instructional design, foster prehend and tackle cultural disparities in order to create
self-regulation of negative emotions, and teach students efficient interventions and assistance for students who
emotion-oriented regulation [22]. encounter test anxiety in diverse cultural environments.
Additionally, according to this theory, students who Therefore, there is a need for further studies to examine
perceive exams as difficult are more likely to experi- the level of test anxiety and cultural context.
ence test anxiety because test anxiety results from a stu-
dent’s negative appraisal of the task and outcome values, Shame and academic performance
leading to a reduction in their performance. This aligns The review examined three studies that discuss the
with Kim’s (2016) study, which found that students who impact of feelings of shame on academic performance
believed that the OSCE was a problematic exam experi- [23, 24, 48]. Generally, shame is considered a negative
enced test anxiety more than other students [9, 22, 42]. emotion which involves self-reflection and self-evalua-
In the wider literature, a meta-analysis review by von tion, and it leads to rumination and self-condemnation
der Embse (2018) found a medium significant negative [49]. Intimate examinations conducted by medical stu-
correlation (r=-0.24) between test anxiety and test perfor- dents can induce feelings of shame, affecting their abil-
mance in undergraduate educational settings [43] . Also, ity to communicate with patients and their clinical
they found a small significant negative correlation (r=- decisions. Shame can increase the avoidance of intimate
0.17) between test anxiety and GPA. This indicates that physical examinations and also encourage clinical prac-
higher levels of test anxiety are associated with lower test tice [23, 24, 48].
performance. Moreover, Song et al. (2021) experimental
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 14 of 17
One study found that some medical students felt hampered their decision-making process, and negatively
shame during simulations-based education examina- affected their self-esteem, which is consistent with the
tions because they had made incorrect decisions, which academic achievement emotions literature where nega-
decreased their self-esteem and motivation to learn. tive emotions are associated with poor intrinsic motiva-
However, others who felt shame were motivated to study tion and reduced the ability to learn [3].
harder to avoid repeating the same mistakes [23]. Shame The study also emphasises that mild anxiety can have
decreased with more clinical practice, but shame did positive effects, corroborated by Gregor (2005), which
not affect their learning or performance [48]. The litera- posits that moderate degrees of anxiety can improve
ture on how shame affects medical students’ learning is performance. The author suggests that an ideal state of
inconclusive [31]. arousal (which may be experienced as anxiety) enhances
In the broader literature, shame is considered maladap- performance. Mild anxiety is commonly seen as a type
tive, leading to dysfunctional behaviour, encouraging of psychological stimulation that readies the body for
withdrawal and avoidance of events and inhibiting social upcoming challenges, frequently referred to as a “fight
interaction. However, few studies have been conducted or flight” response. Within the realm of academic per-
on shame in the medical field. Therefore, more research formance, this state of heightened arousal can enhance
is needed to investigate the role of shame in medical concentration and optimise cognitive functions such
students’ academic performance [49]. In the literature, as memory, problem-solving skills, and overall perfor-
there are several solutions that can be used to tackle the mance. However, once the ideal point is surpassed, any
problem of shame in medical education; it is necessary additional increase in arousal can result in a decline in
to establish nurturing learning settings that encourage performance [53]. This is additionally supported by Cas-
students to openly discuss their problems and mistakes sady and Johnson (2002), who discovered that a spe-
without the worry of facing severe criticism. This can be cific level of anxiety can motivate students to engage in
accomplished by encouraging medical students to par- more comprehensive preparation, hence enhancing their
ticipate in reflective practice, facilitating the processing performance.
of their emotions, and enabling them to derive valu- The reviewed research reveals a positive correlation
able insights from their experiences, all while avoiding between positive emotions and academic performance
excessive self-blame [50]. Offering robust mentorship and a negative correlation between negative emotions
and support mechanisms can assist students in effec- and academic performance. These findings align with the
tively managing the difficulties associated with intimate control–value theory [8, 22], which suggests that positive
examinations. Teaching staff have the ability to demon- emotions facilitate learning through mediating factors,
strate proper behaviours and provide valuable feedback including cognitive learning strategies such as strate-
and effective mentoring [51]. Training and workshops gic thinking, critical thinking and problem-solving and
that specifically target communication skills and the han- metacognitive learning strategies such as monitoring,
dling of sensitive situations can effectively equip students regulating, and planning students’ intrinsic and extrin-
to handle intimate tests, hence decreasing the chances sic motivation. Additionally, several studies found that
of them avoiding such examinations due to feelings of extrinsic motivation from the educational environment
shame [52]. and the application of cognitive and emotional strategies
improve students’ ability to learn and, consequently, their
Academic performance, emotions and medical students academic performance [23, 24, 32]. By contrast, negative
The literature review focused on three studies that exam- emotions negatively affect academic performance. This is
ined the relationship between emotions and the academic because negative emotions reduce students’ motivation,
achievements of medical students [23, 24, 32]. concentration, and ability to process information [23, 24,
Behren et al. (2019) mixed-method study on the 32].
achievement emotions of medical students during simu-
lations found that placing students in challenging clini- Limitations of the study
cal cases that they can handle raises positive emotions. This review aims to thoroughly investigate the relation-
Students perceived these challenges as a positive drive ship between emotions and academic performance in
for learning and mild anxiety was considered beneficial. undergraduate medical students, but it has inherent
However, the study also found non-significant correla- limitations. Overall, the methodological quality of the
tions between emotions and performance during the retrieved studies is primarily good and fair. Poor-quality
simulation, indicating a complex relationship between research was excluded from the synthesis. The good-
emotions and academic performance. The results quality papers demonstrated strengths in sampling tech-
revealed that feelings of frustration were perceived to niques, data analysis, collection and reporting. However,
reduce students’ interest and motivation for studying, most of the retrieved articles used cross-section studies,
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 15 of 17
and the drawback of this is a need for a more causal rela- provide effective solutions for managing test anxiety. This
tionship, which is a limitation in the design of cross- gap highlights the need for practical solutions informed
sectional studies. Furthermore, given the reliance on by Pekrun’s Control-Value Theory. Ideally, a longitudinal
self-reported data, there were concerns about potential study measuring test anxiety and exam scores over time
recall bias. These methodological difficulties were noted would be the most appropriate approach. it is also neces-
in most of the examined research. When contemplating sary to explore cultural differences to develop more effec-
the implications for practice and future study, the impact tive solutions and support systems tailored to specific
of these limitations on the validity of the data should be cultural contexts.
acknowledged. The impact of shame on academic performance in
The limitation of the review process and the inclusion medical students was inconclusive. Shame is a negative
criteria restricted the study to articles published from emotion that has an intricate influence on learning out-
January 2013 to December 2023, potentially overlook- comes. The inadequacy of current literature emphasises
ing relevant research conducted beyond this timeframe. the imperative for additional research to unravel the
Additionally, the exclusive focus on undergraduate medi- nuanced role of shame in the academic journeys of medi-
cal students may constrain the applicability of findings to cal students.
other health fields or educational levels. Overall, emotions play a crucial role in shaping
Moreover, excluding articles in non-English language students’ academic performance, and research has
and those not published in peer-reviewed journals intro- attempted to find solutions to improve medical stu-
duces potential language and publication biases. Reli- dents’ learning experiences; thus, it is recommended that
ance on electronic databases and specific keywords may medical schools revise their curricula and consider using
inadvertently omit studies using different terms or index- simulation-based learning in their instructional designs
ing. While the search strategy is meticulous, it might not to enhance learning and improve students’ emotions.
cover every relevant study due to indexing and database Also, studies have suggested using academic coaching to
coverage variations. However, the two assessors’ involve- help students achieve their goals, change their learning
ment in study screening, selection, data extraction, and styles, and apply self-testing and simple rehearsal of the
quality assessment improved the robustness of the review material. Moreover, the study recommended to improve
and ensured that it included all the relevant research. medical students’ critical thinking and autonomy and
In conclusion, these limitations highlight the need for changing teaching styles to support students better.
careful interpretation of the study’s findings and stress
the importance of future research addressing these con- Supplementary Information
straints to offer a more comprehensive understanding The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1186/s12909-024-05894-1.
of the nuanced relationship between emotions and aca-
demic performance in undergraduate medical education. Supplementary Material 1
Funding 18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al.
No funding. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.
Data availability 19. Hahn H, Kropp P, Kirschstein T, Rücker G, Müller-Hilke B. Test anxiety in
all included articles are mentioned in the manuscript, The quality assessment medical school is unrelated to academic performance but correlates with an
of included articles are located in the supplementary materials file no. 1. effort/reward imbalance. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):1–13.
20. Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions,
corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educa-
Declarations tional Psychol Rev. 2006;18(4):315–41.
21. Graesser AC. Emotions are the experiential glue of learning environments in
Ethics approval and consent to participate the 21st century. Learn Instruction. 2019.
Not applicable. 22. Pekrun R, Perry RP. Control-value theory of achievement emotions. Interna-
tional handbook of emotions in education: Routledge; 2014. pp. 120 – 41.
Consent for publication 23. Behrens CC, Dolmans DH, Gormley GJ, Driessen EW. Exploring undergraduate
Consent of publication was obtained from the other authors. students achievement emotions during ward round simulation: a mixed-
method study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):316.
Competing interests 24. Burr J, Beck-Dallaghan GL. The relationship of emotions and Burnout to Medi-
The authors declare no competing interests. cal Students’ academic performance. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(5):479–86.
25. Zalihić A, Mešukić S, Sušac B, Knezović K, Martinac M. Anxiety sensitivity as
Received: 8 March 2024 / Accepted: 12 August 2024 a predictor of academic success of medical students at the University of
Mostar. Psychiatria Danubina. 2017;29(Suppl 4):851–4.
26. Del-Ben CM, Machado VF, Madisson MM, Resende TL, Valério FP, Troncon
LEDA. Relationship between academic performance and affective changes
during the first year at medical school. Med Teach. 2013;35(5):404–10.
References 27. Nazir MA, Izhar F, Talal A, Sohail ZB, Majeed A, Almas K. A quantitative study of
1. Weurlander M, Lonn A, Seeberger A, Hult H, Thornberg R, Wernerson A. test anxiety and its influencing factors among medical and dental students. J
Emotional challenges of medical students generate feelings of uncertainty. Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021;16(2):253–9.
Med Educ. 2019;53(10):1037–48. 28. Green M, Angoff N, Encandela J. Test anxiety and United States Medical
2. Boekaerts M, Pekrun R. Emotions and emotion regulation in academic set- Licensing Examination scores. Clin Teacher. 2016;13(2):142–6.
tings. Handbook of educational psychology: Routledge; 2015. pp. 90–104. 29. Ben Loubir D, Serhier Z, Diouny S, Battas O, Agoub M, Bennani Othmani M.
3. Camacho-Morles J, Slemp GR, Pekrun R, Loderer K, Hou H, Oades LG. Activity Prevalence of stress in Casablanca medical students: a cross-sectional study.
achievement emotions and academic performance: a meta-analysis. Educa- Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:149.
tional Psychol Rev. 2021;33(3):1051–95. 30. Kausar U, Haider SI, Mughal IA, Noor MSA, Stress levels; stress levels of final
4. Aboalshamat K, Hou X-Y, Strodl E. Psychological well-being status among year mbbs students and its effect on their academic performance. Prof Med
medical and dental students in Makkah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J. 2018;25(6):932–6.
Med Teach. 2015;37(Suppl 1):S75–81. 31. Hautz WE, Schröder T, Dannenberg KA, März M, Hölzer H, Ahlers O, et al.
5. Mirghni HO, Ahmed Elnour MA. The perceived stress and approach to learn- Shame in Medical Education: a randomized study of the Acquisition of
ing effects on academic performance among Sudanese medical students. intimate Examination skills and its effect on subsequent performance. Teach
Electron Physician. 2017;9(4):4072–6. Learn Med. 2017;29(2):196–206.
6. Baessler F, Zafar A, Schweizer S, Ciprianidis A, Sander A, Preussler S, et al. Are 32. Hayat AA, Salehi A, Kojuri J. Medical student’s academic performance: the
we preparing future doctors to deal with emotionally challenging situations? role of academic emotions and motivation. J Adv Med Educ Professionalism.
Analysis of a medical curriculum. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1304–12. 2018;6(4):168–75.
7. Rowe AD, Fitness J. Understanding the role of negative emotions in Adult 33. Deeks JJ, Riley RD, Higgins JP. Combining Results Using Meta-Analysis. Sys-
Learning and Achievement: a Social Functional Perspective. Behav Sci (Basel). tematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta‐Analysis in Context. 2022:159 – 84.
2018;8(2). 34. Aboalshamat K, Hou X-Y, Strodl E. The impact of a self-development coach-
8. Pekrun R, Frenzel AC, Goetz T, Perry RP. The control-value theory of achieve- ing programme on medical and dental students’ psychological health and
ment emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. Emotion academic performance: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ.
in education: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 13–36. 2015;15:134.
9. Zeidner M. Test anxiety: The state of the art. 1998. 35. Jamil H, Alakkari M, Al-Mahini MS, Alsayid M, Al Jandali O. The impact of
10. Cassady JC, Johnson RE. Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. anxiety and depression on academic performance: a cross-sectional study
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2002;27(2):270–95. among medical students in Syria. Avicenna J Med. 2022;12(03):111–9.
11. Tangney JP, Dearing RL. Shame and guilt: Guilford Press; 2003. 36. Mirawdali S, Morrissey H, Ball P. Academic anxiety and its effects on academic
12. Fang J, Brown GT, Hamilton R. Changes in Chinese students’ academic emo- performance. 2018.
tions after examinations: pride in success, shame in failure, and self-loathing 37. Al-Qaisy LM. The relation of depression and anxiety in academic achievement
in comparison. Br J Educ Psychol. 2023;93(1):245–61. among group of university students. Int J Psychol Couns. 2011;3(5):96–100.
13. York TT, Gibson C, Rankin S. Defining and measuring academic success. 38. Cheng DR, Poon F, Nguyen TT, Woodman RJ, Parker JD. Stigma and percep-
Practical Assess Res Evaluation. 2019;20(1):5. tion of psychological distress and depression in Australian-trained medical
14. Abdulghani HM, Irshad M, Al Zunitan MA, Al Sulihem AA, Al Dehaim MA, Al students: results from an inter-state medical school survey. Psychiatry Res.
Esefir WA, et al. Prevalence of stress in junior doctors during their internship 2013;209(3):684–90.
training: a cross-sectional study of three Saudi medical colleges’ hospitals. 39. Lee M, Larson R. The Korean ‘examination hell’: long hours of studying,
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:1879–86. distress, and depression. J Youth Adolesc. 2000;29(2):249–71.
15. Moreira de Sousa J, Moreira CA, Telles-Correia D, Anxiety. Depression and aca- 40. Ali SK. 861 – Social phobia among medical students. Eur Psychiatry. 2013;28:1.
demic performance: a Study Amongst Portuguese Medical Students Versus 41. Bonna AS, Sarwar M, Md Nasrullah A, Bin Razzak S, Chowdhury KS, Rahman
non-medical students. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(9):454–62. SR. Exam anxiety among medical students in Dhaka City and its Associated
16. Junaid MA, Auf AI, Shaikh K, Khan N, Abdelrahim SA. Correlation between Factors-A cross-sectional study. Asian J Med Health. 2022;20(11):20–30.
academic performance and anxiety in Medical students of Majmaah Univer- 42. Kim K-J. Factors associated with medical student test anxiety in objec-
sity - KSA. JPMA J Pakistan Med Association. 2020;70(5):865–8. tive structured clinical examinations: a preliminary study. Int J Med Educ.
17. MihĂIlescu AI, Diaconescu LV, Donisan T, Ciobanu AM, THE INFLUENCE 2016;7:424–7.
OF EMOTIONAL, DISTRESS ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN UNDER- 43. Von der Embse N, Jester D, Roy D, Post J. Test anxiety effects, predictors, and
GRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS. Romanian J Child Adolesc Psychiatry. correlates: a 30-year meta-analytic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:483–93.
2016;4(1/2):27–40.
Alshareef et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:907 Page 17 of 17
44. Song J, Chang L, Zhou R. Test anxiety impairs filtering ability in visual 53. Gregor A. Examination anxiety: live with it, control it or make it work for you?
working memory: evidence from event-related potentials. J Affect Disord. School Psychol Int. 2005;26(5):617–35.
2021;292:700–7.
45. Theobald M, Breitwieser J, Brod G. Test anxiety does not predict exam
performance when knowledge is controlled for: strong evidence against the
interference hypothesis of test anxiety. Psychol Sci. 2022;33(12):2073–83. Publisher’s Note
46. Lowe PA. Examination of test anxiety in samples of Australian and US Higher Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
Education Students. High Educ Stud. 2019;9(4):33–43. published maps and institutional affiliations.
47. Kavanagh BE, Ziino SA, Mesagno C. A comparative investigation of test
anxiety, coping strategies and perfectionism between Australian and United Nora Alshareef is a PhD student in Lancaster university, faculty of health and
States students. North Am J Psychol. 2016;18(3). medicine. The author is also a medical doctor, and her main interest is to help
48. Mihăilescu AI, Diaconescu LV, Ciobanu AM, Donisan T, Mihailescu C. The medical students to succeed.
impact of anxiety and depression on academic performance in undergradu-
ate medical students. Eur Psychiatry. 2016;33:S341–2. Dr Ian Fletcher is a senior lecturer in mental health and wellbeing in the
49. Terrizzi JA Jr, Shook NJ. On the origin of shame: does shame emerge from an workplace.
evolved disease-avoidance architecture? Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:19.
50. Epstein RM. Mindful practice. JAMA. 1999;282(9):833–9. Dr Sabir Giga is a senior lecturer in organisational health and wellbeing.
51. Hauer KE, Teherani A, Dechet A, Aagaard EM. Medical students’ perceptions of
mentoring: a focus-group analysis. Med Teach. 2005;27(8):732–4.
52. Kalet A, Pugnaire MP, Cole-Kelly K, Janicik R, Ferrara E, Schwartz MD, et al.
Teaching communication in clinical clerkships: models from the macy initia-
tive in health communications. Acad Med. 2004;79(6):511–20.