Cole 1970
Cole 1970
Cole 1970
A Thesis
Presented to
the Department of Mathematics
The Kansas State Teachers College of Emporia
"*'
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Arts
by
-
Sheryl A. Cole
June 1970
aAo.xddv
PREFACE
,
,I,~'
"1,1'1
TABLE OF CONTENTS .
CHAPTER PAGE
I. A HISTORY OF JACOBI • • • • • • • • • • • • 1
CONCLUSION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 28
FOOTNOTES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 30
BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • · .. • • • • • 32
CHAPTER I
A HISTORY OF JACOBI
.lo '_
3
maticians do "drill their own ideas, and as little else· as
possible" into their students. Thus, they offered the
student little help and encouragement.
After staying approximately one half year at the
University of Berlin, he took a position as lecturer at
the University of Konigsberg. A year later (1827) he was
promoted to assistant professor largely due to a publica
tion of his works on cubic reciprocity. His greatest work
FUNDAMENTA NOVA THEORIAE FUNCTIONUM ELLIPTICARUM (New
Foundations of the Theory of Elliptic Functions) was com
pleted and published in 1829.
The death of his father in 1832 resulted in the
ultimate loss of the family fortune. However, Jacobi
continued to work hard in producing works of mathematics.
In fact, he worked so diligently that it began to affect
his health. Jacobi's physician suggested that he take an
active part in politics to get his mind away from his
mathematical works. This decision nearly cost him his
position of favor with the King of Prussia.
Jacobi soon became the stoolpidgeon for the local
liberals and gained the wrath of his only remaining
monetary benefactor, the King.
At the age of 45, real poverty had finally struck.
He had neither his job nor the family fortune, and a wife
and seven children to support. A generous offer from Vienna
.
"
4
helped him solve this problem. Germany did not want to,
lose one of their greatest mathematicians, so the King
reconsidered. IIe returned to his position at the University
of Konigsberg. He died shortly thereafter (February 18,
1858) of e1e small pox.
~
ax; ~
2
... .~
n
~1 ~
2
.
J I:
a(Yl,Y2, • • • •X,n ) I:
I'M'x
0\ 1
,x 2 , •••• x
n
1
•
•
;~n aYn
~ ••••••••
1 2
,; .,
CHAPTER 2
au au
ax dy
dV av
ax ay
ax ax
au av
2Z ~
au, av
. "
9
au: = 6x-y au = -x
ax ay
av = 2y 2
ax
av
ay .. 4xy + 3y2
I I I I I I "I I .. U
I I 1 1 1 1(27,0)1
10
Example 2. GIVEN: u - x + 2z
v = 2y + 3z
w = 2x - 2y + Z
au
ax - 1 au
ay = 0 au
az 11:1 2
av • 0 av 2 av 3
ax ay
11:1
az
11:1
aw aw aw
ax 11:1 2 ay = -2 az
11:1 1
.I-~ tI I~ tI j~ ~21
1 o 2
THUS J • 10 2 3 11:1 1 ·-0 + 2 11:1 0
3 -2 1
This transformation has no inverse by theorem ,1, but there is
a functional relationship of the form ~(u,v,w)= o.
By ~e following methods one can arrive at this
relationship.
Example 3. GIVEN: u = x + 2z
v = 2y + 3z
w 11:1 2x - 2y + Z
1 o 2
"J. 10 2 31 11:1 0
2 -21
. ".
11
Example 4. GIVEN: u = 2x + 2y
v = 5x + 7y
au =2 au IOl 2
ax ay a(u,v) _ J
a(x,y)
IOl
1;;1 • 4
av = 5 av =7
ax ay
Since this Jacobian will never equal zero, it is a 1-1
transfor.mation. Thus their exists the following inverse:
By using determinants to solve for x and y:
J; ~I y = I; ~I
x -
I; ~ j I; ~ I
NOTE: Notice that the determinant in the denominator is
actually the Jacobian.
x = -7 -1 y = 5 u +-l
lU+"2v "4 -ZV
a (x,y). _ J-1 =
-7
4"
1
'!
I 1
="4
a(u,v) 5 -1
"4 '!
This inverse could als9 have been found by finding the
inverse matrix associated with J, solving for x and y is
not necess.ary, but is possible.
It is noted that JJ-I = 1.
Example 5: GIVEN: u =
2x + 3y - z
V x -7y + z
I:
15 7 4
14 14 14
J-1 • I iIT1 -5
4I'
3
4I' = -1
4I'
-8 -1 17
iIT iIT iIT
It is noted again that J and J-I are reciprocals.
Assume that one wishes to evaluate the Jacobian of a trans
formation at a specific point. Given T(x,y) = (2x + 3y,
J ..
1~2
x+Y
-x-l
(x+Y) 2 • ~
x+y 2 - (x+Y)
(-x-l~ ..
1 1
I
--1:
-rffir
x+Y 2
1:1
x+Y
13
CHAPTER 3
TRANSFORMATIONS OF AREA
lim ~Axy
Auv
1:1
Ia(u,v) I
a (x ,y)
Example 1. u =XiY
v = xi Y
Suppose one wishes to transform the area bounded by the
followi~g lines to the uv-plane: x =y
x = 1
Y • 4 •
y
-"
IC
,,'\
~
15
I ~J!li('..u £
~ y II 4
X I 1.1 I 1 I 1 I - X
I 'ttL!. nLE"" 1 1 1 1 I - u
o
"I "
:I :I
y: I
y=o u
~4f(H::t-=:;;rfi~:>,)';'j;I'4';:~I \ x
~ )x
UiU2
/ V1V2 1
"":' I ull vi sin e
THEOREM 4.
Example 3.
Find the linear transformation that takes the
following parallogram into the unit square. What is its
Jacobian? Its Area?
y v
( 3,8)
(0,1 ) ( I, I)
r I I I I I I I ) X xx<*t I
(1,0)
~~ -~)
The transformation is
Example 4.
Given a parallelogram with vertices (0,0) ,(2,1),
'-
(5,0),(3,-1) under a transformation defined as x = 2u + ~:
3v and y = u - v. Express ~(x + y) dA in the form 11 du dv.
"
I'
Since this transformation was discussed in example" 2
one knows the limits of integration are 0 and 1.
lSv + lOv 2
~ ... ~
J' 0
12 1/2
cos e -r sin e
=r .
sin e r cos e
CYLINDRICAL COORDINATES:
The transformation for rectangular coordinates to
cylindrical coordinates is the same as for polar coordi
nates except a z coordinate is added as follows:
~
x • p cos e y .p sin e ~. z •
o a 1
SPHERICAL COORDINATES:
Spherical coordinates and rectangular coordinates are
related in the following manner:
x • r sin ~ cos e
!
P(ll,y,Z)
22
y = r sin ~ sin e
)I;
-r 2sin 4> •
SURFACE AREA
is 1 (CE) •
Coser
B 1"1'1
I ~ii!
I
I
I
I
I
I
a;'
A lt ' 'F
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I,
C
I
E
»)(
FIGURE'
24
One can at this time find another angle equal to « and thus
a method of evaluating the angle ex:. V f is the direction
of greatest change at a point and is perpendicular to a
point on the segment. af at this same point would be
ay
perpendicular to thexaxis. (see fig. 2) The angle between
the gradient (Vf) and a unit vector in the direction of af
ay
is equal to ex:. So the cos CIC can be evaluated by the formula
at divided by the length of Vf. It might be well to note
ay
here that it is necessary to know the identity IVfjcosc
• af (directional derivative) •
as
I::'
y af ,
ch
A,ee:
I
- , IF
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I >x
c E
FIGURE 2
dimensional illustration.
One can be a little more explicit in explaining this
in reference to figure 3. If one wishes a good approxima
tion to the area of !:J.S one can use the area of !:J.D/cos lit •
) ~~ A ) Y
x FIGURE 3
AS
l
I
I
I
J.._
,'"
,." "
",-' AD
FIGURE 4
26
All of this is related to the Jacobian. Let one presume
figure 5 to be the small piece of the tangent plane in
figure 4 projected on the xy plane.' Although the axis
have been moved this will no~ change the final result.
The area of this projection (~D) is the area of a
parallelogram with (u , u , u ) and (v , v , v ) as its
. 1 2. 3 1 2. 3
FIGURE ~,
27
u may be thought of as au since in the xy plane x is held
1 ay
constant and the movement takes place in the y direction for
this coordinate. Likewise, u as au; v as dV ; and v as
ax 1 ay
2 2
;
v)
~
dV
~
-ax I
dV
~
- d (u,v)
cHx,y)
I
I "
" ""
...v/
(u/,u ,O)
2
I'
X
FIGURE 6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. BOOKS
B. ENCYCLOPEDIAS