sewak2008
sewak2008
sewak2008
50
B. Load Condition:
0
i) Continuous efforts have been made to develop empirical
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
M ACHINE NO.
formulae to predict endwinding vibration levels at load
AT 1 0 0 % In S C C AT 1 0 0 % Vn OC C using factory test-run data [4]. The relationship was given
as,
Fig.-6: Vibration behaviour of generators during factory-run test
Gwmax 2Gwsc +G woc
coupling between core and endwinding. This was reported where,
by others as well [1][4]. Gwmax = Maximum endwinding vibration level at any load
Gwsc = Endwinding vibration level at rated current
The resin rich insulation system being thermosetting in G woc= Endwinding vibration level at rated voltage
nature offer very little or no damping once cured, to winding
system subjected to vibratory forces. Consequently, In another Reference [8], authors duo have proposed
relatively high endwinding vibration were encountered on multivariant calculations of vibration in an individual end
such generators. On the other hand, old bituminous arc considering, the overhang bar structure as a
thermoplastic insulation system, due to its inherent nature, homogeneous orthotropic curvilinear bar having elastically
offers greater damping ability and hence lower vibrations. damped attachment fittings. The vibrations are described
This was corroborated by the data gathered on one of the of by set of differential equations and shown that results
equivalent rating turbogenerators with bituminous insulation obtained are in “good agreement” with the actual data. It
where vibration levels recorded were nearly 1/3rd to that of was deduced that in “loaded mode the vibration
the generators with the thermosetting insulation system. displacements are roughly 1.5 times those in the three-
phase (sustained) short-circuit mode”.
b) The electromagnetic forces on overhang system are Notwithstanding above, in our experience, both these
reported to be higher in tangential / circumferential direction formulations mentioned above do not validate the practical
rather than radial direction [2][3] . However, number of data recorded at loads (Fig. -7). Indeed, the levels obtained,
generators have exhibited maximum endwinding vibrations either remained more or less similar to factory test-run
in radial direction only (Table-1) even though the levels in the levels or had gone down. The data were recorded at a
tangential direction are of comparable magnitude to those in particular time by a portable vibration monitoring system
radial direction. as well as by a ‘continuous on-line monitoring system’
available with the utility, and mostly, after 2 to 3 years of
Table-1: Direction-wise comparison of endwinding vibrations commissioning / modernization.
No. of TGs. 35
% of TGs recording maximum vibration level in In our experience, the above formulas may be exception
80 % rather than general rule when analysing the practical data.
Radial Direction in any regime
% of TGs recording maximum vibration level in The complex nature of both the forces and overhang
20 %
tangential direction in any regime
structure coupled with their boundary conditions, make the
prediction of endwinding vibrations quite difficult. In our frequency of overhang system, degree of tightness, thermal
view, the vibration levels at full load remain more or less expansion of winding etc.
in the similar range as obtained during factory test-run
30
under normal operational conditions.
Disp.(pk-pk) micron
DISP.(PK-PK MICRON)
150 20
100
10
50
0
60 80 100
0
% Of Rated Cureent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
M ACHINE NO.
Fig : 9 : Vibration trend during SCC regime
100%In SCC 100%In OCC FULL LOAD
150
DISP. (PK-PK MICRON)
100 50
50 100 150 200
50 Load in MW