Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views40 pages

Fracture Mechanics

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 40

Fracture and

Fracture Mechanics
Fractured vessel in dry dock Bilge keel from which the fracture initiated

In 1979, the Kurdistan oil tanker broke completely


in two while sailing in the North Atlantic

The combination of warm oil in the tanker with cold water in contact with the outer
hull produced substantial thermal stresses. The fracture initiated from a bilge keel
that was improperly welded. The weld failed to penetrate the structural detail,
resulting in a severe stress concentration. Although the hull steel had adequate
toughness to prevent fracture initiation, it failed to stop the propagating crack
Fracture

 What is Fracture?
 Separation of an object under stress
 Results in two or more new surfaces

 How does fracture proceed?


 Crack initiation
 Crack propagation
Types of Fracture

 Brittle / Fast Fracture


 Structural elements fail with little or no plastic deformation
 Often sudden failure; no prior warning
 Usually strain is < 5%

 Ductile Fracture
 Appreciable plastic deformation occurs prior to and during
the fracture process
Classification of Types of Fracture

 Based on strain to fracture


 Ductile or brittle

 Crystallographic mode of fracture


 Shear – extensive slip on an active slip
plane
 Cleavage – little or no slip
 Appearance of fracture surface
 Fibrous (shear) or granular (cleavage)
Classification of Types of Fracture
Examples

Some types and causes for engineering fractures


 Low temperature tensile fracture
 Separation of atomic bonds under static loading
 High temperature tensile fracture
 Atomic bond separation assisted by diffusional flow
 Fatigue fracture
 Cyclic stress induced
 Embrittlement
 Environmentally aided fracture
 Hydrogen embrittlement
Fracture Mechanics

 FRACTURE MECHANICS is the science of predicting the load


carrying capabilities of structures and components containing
cracks

 It is based on a mathematical description of the stress field


that surrounds a crack in a loaded body

 Categories

 Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and

 Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM)


Fracture Mechanics

 Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics


 Crack tip is sharp and there is only a small amount of plastic
deformation at or near the crack tip

 LEFM is used for high-strength metals, such as high-strength steels,


titanium, and aluminum alloys

 Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics


 Used when the crack tip is not sharp and there is some crack tip
plasticity (blunting)

 EPFM is used in the design of materials, such as lower-strength,


higher-toughness steels
Why do Materials Fail?

Are typical loading conditions severe enough to rupture


interatomic bonds?
NO
Since we know the stress that is required to break bonds, why do
materials fail in service?
DEFECTS or FLAWS
Concentrate stress locally, levels are high enough to rupture the bonds

So are material perfect?


For almost all engineering materials, there is always some
statistical distribution of flaws
Griffith Theory
for Brittle
Fracture
Griffith’s Theory of Brittle Fracture

 Fracture strength of a solid should be a function of the cohesive forces


that hold the atoms together

 Using this criterion, the theoretical cohesive strength of a brittle elastic


solid can be estimated to be in the range of E/10, where E is the
modulus of elasticity

 However, the true fracture strengths of real materials are much lower,
normally 10 to as much as 1000 times below their theoretical values

 In the 1920s, A.A.Griffith, while testing glass rods, observed that the
longer the rod, the lower the strength

 This led to the idea that the strength variation in the glass rods was due
to defects, primarily surface defects. As the rods became longer, there
was a higher probability of encountering a flaw
Stress Concentrators

 Defects act as stress concentrators

Defect Free Solid Defect in Solid


Forces are Forces concentrate
distributed evenly in local region

Stress distribution Causes stress


is uniform concentration
Stress Concentration

Consider an elliptical crack in a large plate


 𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 stress at the ends of the major axis
of crack
 𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 average stress away from the
crack
𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 2𝑐
= 1+
𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 𝑏
 The radius of curvature at the end of
the crack is
𝑏2
𝜌= ⇒ 𝑏 = 𝜌𝑐
𝑐
𝑐
𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 1 + 2
𝜌
Stress Concentration

 For very sharp cracks (where c>>𝜌), we can neglect the 1 in bracket,
thus
𝑐 𝑐
𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 2 = 2𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚
𝜌 𝜌

 The term in bracket represents the Stress Concentration Factor


𝑐
𝐾𝑇 = 2
𝜌

 Then 𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 𝐾𝑇


 As crack length increases or the radius of curvature decreases, 𝐾𝑇
increases and thus 𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 increases
 At fracture 𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜍𝑇𝐶𝑆 and 𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 = 𝜍𝑓 What is the stress concentration
factor for a round hole?
Stress Distribution Around Flaws

𝐹
𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚 =
𝐴

𝑐
𝜍𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2𝜍𝑛𝑜𝑚
𝜌
Fracture Process Summary

 Flaws concentrate stress

 When concentrated stress reaches 𝜍𝑇𝐶𝑆 bonds


break at crack tip and crack propagates

 Fracture related to stress concentration factor


Griffith Theory for Brittle
Fracture

 Developed a criterion for the elliptical crack in a plate using an


energy balance approach

 Two things happen when a crack propagates:

 Elastic strain energy is released in a volume of material, and two


new

 Crack surfaces are created, which represent a surface-energy


term

 Crack will propagate when the elastic energy released as a


result of crack propagation exceeds the energy required to
propagate the crack
Energy Balance

As the crack extends, new surface area (dc) is created. There is an


elastic strain energy term, 𝛾𝑠 , associated with this new area
Energy Balance

 For an infinitely large plate containing an elliptical crack, the elastic


strain energy released due to presence of a crack is
𝜋𝜍 2 𝑐 2 𝑡
𝑈𝐸 = −
𝐸
where 2c is the length of the centre of the crack and t is the thickness of
the material

 The increase in surface energy of the plate due to an increase in


crack length
𝑈𝑆 = 2𝑐2𝑡𝛾𝑆 = 4𝑐𝑡𝛾𝑆

where 𝛾𝑆 is the surface energy for a brittle material


Energy Balance

 Thus
𝜋𝜍 2 𝑐 2 𝑡
∆𝑈 = 𝑈𝐸 + 𝑈𝑆 = − + 4𝑐𝑡𝛾𝑆
𝐸
 the crack will propagate under a constant applied stress σ if an incremental
increase in crack length produces no change in the total energy of the system; i.e.
the increased surface energy is compensated by a decrease in elastic strain
energy.

 The equilibrium crack length (𝑐 ∗ ) can be determined by differentiating the potential


energy expression w.r.t half crack length c and setting the result equal to zero
𝑑∆𝑈 2𝜋𝜍 2 𝑐𝑡
=0=− + 4𝑡𝛾𝑆
𝑑𝑐 𝐸

2𝐸𝛾𝑆
𝜍=
𝜋𝑐

which gives the stress required to propagate a crack of length c in a brittle material
Energy Balance

2𝐸𝛾𝑆 2𝐸𝛾𝑆
𝜍𝐹 = 𝜍𝐹 =
𝜋𝑐 𝜋𝑐(1 − 𝜈 2 )

Plane Stress Plane Strain


(Biaxial stress) (Triaxial stress)

Thus we can calculate the maximum tolerable crack dimension (i.e.


flaw size) for a given state of stress
OR
The maximum allowable stress if the maximum crack dimension is known

 These equations only apply to brittle elastic solids


 For plastic solids, other relationships must be developed
Fracture in
Ductile
Materials
What about Ductile Materials?

 Even metals that fail in a completely brittle fashion undergo some


plastic deformation prior to fracture
 The fracture strengths of a material that yields before fracture > that
for a perfectly brittle elastic solid

Why?

 Plastic deformation at the root of the crack increases the radius of


curvature at the crack tip
 Reduces stress concentration at crack tip
 This increases the fracture strength of the material
Fracture in Ductile Materials

 Orowon (1952) suggested that a plastic work term, 𝛾𝑃 ,should be


added to the Griffith equation to make it applicable to metallic
materials
 𝛾𝑃 represents the plastic work necessary to extend the crack front
 The modified Griffith equations becomes

2𝐸(𝛾𝑆 +𝛾𝑃 )
𝜍𝐹 =
𝜋𝑐

 For ductile materials i.e. metals and most polymers

𝛾𝑆 ≈ 10−4 𝛾𝑃 𝑖. 𝑒. 𝛾𝑃 ≫ 𝛾𝑆

 Thus we can neglect 𝛾𝑆 in ductile materials


Fracture in Ductile Materials

 Irwin (1958) replaced the 2(𝛾𝑆 +𝛾𝑃 ) in Orowan’s modification


with 𝐺 where 𝐺 is defined as the Strain Energy Release Rate or
crack extension force

𝐸𝐺
𝜍=
𝜋𝑐

 The parameter 𝐺 represents the rate of transfer of energy from


the elastic stress field to the crack extension process
Fracture in Ductile Materials

 The critical value of 𝐺 that makes the crack propagate to


fracture is 𝐺𝑐
 𝐺𝑐 is Critical Strain Energy Release Rate also known as
toughness or crack resistance force
 𝐺𝑐 is a material parameter

 The conditions for crack growth can be represented as

𝜍𝐹 𝜋𝑐 = 𝐸𝐺𝑐

Represents the driving force


for crack propagation
Stress Intensity
Approach
Stress Intensity Approach

 Let 𝐾𝑐 = 𝜍𝐹 𝜋𝑐
 In general we can state

𝐾 ≈ 𝜍 𝜋𝑐

 When 𝐾 = 𝐾𝑐 , unstable crack growth occurs leading to fracture

 𝐾𝑐 is a material parameter known as the Fracture Toughness


where 𝐾 is Stress Intensity Factor

 Thus 𝐾𝑐 is independent of 𝜍 or 𝑐
Stress Intensity Approach

 Value of 𝐾𝑐 depend upon many factors including

 Type of loading on the crack face

 The material being loaded

 Geometry of the sample or structure???


Stress Intensity Approach

Modes of Fracture in Fracture Mechanics

Mode I Mode II Mode III


Tensile Fracture Shear Fracture Out of Plane Shear Fracture
Forces open crack tip 𝐾𝐼𝐼𝑐 , 𝐺𝐼𝐼𝑐 Tearing
𝐾𝐼𝑐 , 𝐺𝐼𝑐 𝐾𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑐 , 𝐺𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑐
Stresses at
Crack Tip
Stress Analysis at Crack Tip

 Introduce a crack → redistribution of stress


 Westergaard (1939) and Irwin (1957) related stresses in front of a
crack tip to the stress intensity

𝜍𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝜋𝑐
𝜍𝑡𝑖𝑝 = 𝐹(𝜃)
2𝜋𝑟

𝐾
𝜍𝑡𝑖𝑝 = 𝐹(𝜃)
2𝜋𝑟
Stress Analysis at Crack Tip

𝐾 𝜃 𝜃 3𝜃
𝜍𝑥𝑥 = cos 1 − sin − sin
2𝜋𝑟 2 2 2
𝐾 𝜃 𝜃 3𝜃
𝜍𝑦𝑦 = cos 1 + sin − sin
2𝜋𝑟 2 2 2

𝐾 𝜃 𝜃 3𝜃
𝜏𝑥𝑦 = sin cos cos
2𝜋𝑟 2 2 2

 For plane stress

𝜏𝑥𝑧 = 𝜏𝑦𝑧 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜍𝑧𝑧 = 0


General Expression

𝐾𝐼𝑐 = 𝑌𝜍𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝜋𝑐𝑐

Plane strain Depends on Critical crack


fracture specimen length
toughness and crack
geometry

 Allows calculation of maximum allowable stress for a given


flaw size
Design Philosophy

𝐾𝐼𝑐 = 𝑌𝜍𝑐 𝜋𝑐

Material Design stress Allowable


Property: flaw size
Material
Selection

 Allows calculation of maximum allowable crack size for a


given stress
Fracture toughness and failure
mechanism
Typical Fracture Behaviour of Materials
Energy Balance

 Total energy of the cracked plate


𝑈𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝑈𝑂 + 𝑈𝐸 + 𝑊𝐿 + 𝑈𝑆 + 𝑄
where
 𝑈𝑂 = elastic energy of uncracked plate (constant)
 𝑈𝐸 = change in elastic energy when crack is introduced
 𝑈𝑆 = surface energy resulting from formation of two new crack faces
 𝑊𝐿 = work done by external forces (load x displacement)
 𝑄 = other energies which are not part of internal energy (e.g. kinetic
energy, thermal energy, acoustic energy, etc.)

𝑊𝐿 contributes to 𝑈𝐸 (assuming fixed external forces, 𝑊𝐿 = 0)


𝑄 is not of concern in most fracture problems

You might also like