MATEC Web of Conferences 53, 01029 (2016)

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20165301029
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016

The Information Technology Project

Andrei Smirnov

St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2-Krasnoarmejskaja, 4, Saint-Petersburg,
1

190005, Russia

Abstract. The author raises the question of suitable use of different software in construction.
Currently, there are several design techniques using computer technology. The various stages
of the project require their parameters and software settings. Comparison of programs is
fundamental in this work. The author also raises the question of the unification of all the
software and the possible establishment of an absolute tool for the design in the future.

1 Introduction
All data modeling programs may be divided into two big groups: CAD (Computer-Aided Design) and
BIM (Building Information Modeling). The first one is based on drawings, preparing, special
standards application and software management and development. The second group of data modeling
programs uses another way. BIM-software is used for full model making [1]. Ready model is very
useful in each stage of construction and building: project, erection, maintenance, engineers'
cooperation, etc.
BIM-prepared project presents structure in realistic conditions. The model considers all stresses
and deformations of the structure, the effect of different parts of the building to each other and allows
designing engineering systems with the building.
Nowadays there is a big amount of proposed BIM-software in the world. They are divided into 6
groups: architecture, sustainability, structures, MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing),
construction and facility management programs. The most popular in the world are ArchiCAD and
Revit. There are popular software in different regions, such as Nemetschek in Germany or Tekla in
Finland [2].
Most of design and building companies cooperate, and there is a problem to choose the one
program for joint working. There are a lot of reasons to use certain program: habit, personnel training,
different agreements, etc. In other words there no absolute program used by all building industry
members.
3D-visualization simplifies the understanding of the project by all interested parties, as well as
reduces the risk of making mistakes during installation. However, even 85% of engineers in Europe
still prefer to use a 2D-program. Partly this is explained by the fact that the standards for the
documentation are created under this format. A legal document recognized as a traditional drawing
and expensive 3D-model is a welcome addition to the status of the project. And there are no special

a
Corresponding author: andrewsmirnov@inbox.ru

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 MATEC Web of Conferences

laws about mandatory use of specific software. In addition, not all allied partners for the development
and equipment suppliers are willing to receive information in the form of 3D-models [3].
Thus, the choice of software begets a problem in cooperation between building industry members.
The vantage of 2D works is the reason of slow development and promotion of 3D technologies in
building design. Probably the absolute program will be the decision of these problems.
The first stage of each project is an architectural design. The architect has to explain his own idea
accessibly and technically correct. Also the final project has to be applicable for fellow engineers' and
builders' working. CAD-models are very useful, but other members of building process have to have
imagination for full project understanding. By the way, CAD-model may be in 3D. But BIM-models
allow understanding the idea very graphically. And further working with this model are more
comfortable and effectively because of import and cooperation abilities.
Thus, to construct the base architectural clear need to choose suitable software. Possibly select
multiple criteria such as: the speed of the proposed instruments, the possibility of importing into other
programs, library facilities and so on. As a global provider of software spectrum is important to
choose taking into account the specific characteristics of each company and the particular specialist.

2 CAD-software: AutoCAD and SketchUp

The absolute market leader for the design of the proposed program is AutoCAD. It is safe to assume
that about 90% of the world's construction industry uses this software. The remaining 10% comes
from similar programs, such as nanoCAD or DraftSight [4]. Analogous programs are usually offered
for free or much cheaper than AutoCAD. Often, however, the functionality is much lower, and export
opportunities are limited at best, IFC-format (Industry Foundation Classes), and sometimes non-
existent [8].
AutoCAD offers a wide range of intuitive tools for creating drawings. All manner of plugins allow
to automatically producing documentation to the required standards.
Newer versions of AutoCAD can support 3D-modeling. Creators from Autodesk are developing
new technologies to accelerate the process [4].
Therefore, skill in AutoCAD is a prerequisite of successful work of the designer in our time. This
program became the absolute software in the CAD-design, which is so lacking in BIM. All the
necessary legislation and project drawings, specifications and cost estimates may be prepared using
AutoCAD.
However, there are drawbacks. Despite extensive export opportunities in other software
AutoCAD's formats (including IFC) are not supported by the majority of known visualization
software. In other words, for the manufacture of the classic model for 3D -presentations AutoCAD is
insufficient. It is possible to use a secondary program such as Revit or SketchUp to solve this
problem.
Also, because AutoCAD is the CAD-software, it cannot edit user in the case of engineering error
or offer the best solutions for a particular design.
SketchUp is a very progressive software design. Simple intuitive operation allows obtaining 3D-
models of any complexity. It is widely used not only in construction but also in the production of
furniture and interior planning. The great advantage of SketchUp is a huge library of ready
components, where possible to find everything from small interior items and household appliances to
aircraft and the world's interest. The user can create a project of any configuration with wider
surroundings. The time spent on the production of realistic 3D-model via SketchUp is minimal [5].
However, it is advisable to use SketchUp in the initial stages of design: explanation of ideas,
presentation, and marketing. This program does not manufacture finished drawings, sections, and
plans. It is possible to estimate the volume of work required, compared with the existing facilities, but
own experience and third-party software using. Also SketchUp cannot correct any errors or to offer
solutions of design problems.
Own SketchUp graphics are "cartoonish"; not the quality for a presentation. But SketchUp format
files are supported by most visualization programs. For example, SketchUp-Lumion ligament model

01029-p.2
 SPbWOSCE-2015

allows producing the highest quality photorealistic render. It is also possible to make a video or
panorama.
Both programs have the actual drawing tools: lines, shapes, polylines, etc; auxiliary editing copy,
reflection, "squeezing" in 3D, zoom, etc. In other words, the user manually makes the necessary
structural elements.
Thus, the CAD-software is an indispensable tool for the manufacture of the design documentation,
calculation and presentation. However, the functionality of this technology is quite low as compared
to BIM. In fact, a large number of works which can be performed automatically, is done by hand [8].
When producing 3D-model, the user should automatically receive all the necessary sections, plans and
specifications, but it is not available for the CAD-software.

3 BIM-software: ArchiCAD and Revit

Undisputed leaders in the BIM-technologies are two competitors: ArchiCAD and Revit. Similar in
functionality, they, however, have different audiences [8].
ArchiCAD was established in 1984 under the name of the company by Graphisoft Radar CH,
working only with the water supply. The latest version is ArchiCAD 18 and it is already a complete
solution for the design of buildings and structures. Despite the name, containing the product range
CAD, this program is a classic example of BIM-software. The fact that this name was given before
specific wording BIM, and in order to maintain the audience Graphisoft members decided to keep the
brand ArchiCAD [6].
Revit is a product of Autodesk, the largest provider of software for architects, engineers and
designers. For example, a well-known AutoCAD - is also a product of this company. And Revit was
created specifically as a competitor for ArchiCAD. The first version was introduced in 2000 in the
form of three programs: Revit Structure, for engineering calculations; Revit Architecture, for
architects; and MEP-version for the design of communications structures. But in 2013, all three
branches have been merged into one program as a result received a powerful tool conceived to fully
integrated design of all building systems [7].
These two programs use similar construction elements that have counterparts in the real world:
walls, columns, windows. To create shells have special manual tools. This is one of the fundamental
differences between the CAD-software. Binding system is based on the preliminary establishment of
the grid axes and elevation plans, on the basis of which all objects are built. Also, both programs have
intelligent systems that allow the user to adjust in the case of engineering error or offer more optimal
solutions of structural problems [8].
According to the survey, ArchiCAD used by about 30% of active users. Revit's audience is about
25% [8]. The spread is small, linked, rather, to the fact that ArchiCAD was introduced to the market
for a much longer time to collect specific targeted clientele. Revit, however, the number of users
reduces the gap each year [2].
ArchiCAD and Revit are categorized BIM-software. Therefore, their use in stages from design to
operation is quite appropriate. However, Revit has a much wider field of application. This program
not only prepares the complete drawings of all building elements, but some specifications and sheets
for further operation and even dismantle the building. Also, as has been said, Revit combines
opportunities for all designers: structural engineers, MEP software, engineers, architects, and so on.
ArchiCAD cannot yet boast full internal integration. It requires separate programs for different
sections of the design.
A very important issue is the creation time of the project. Models of ArchiCAD and Revit are
much more time consuming. Even the creation of the elementary project in the first stages of the
design must require a fairly large amount of time for the placement of axes and elevations, installation
of all design elements, further imaging process. Therefore, if the initial stages of the project requires
only to explain ideas and presentations, ArchiCAD and Revit - not always the best choice [8].
Exporting abilities of Revit is much higher than that of ArchiCAD. For example, visualization
programs Artlantis, Lumion and V-Ray work with Revit format files. There is also an export from

01029-p.3
 MATEC Web of Conferences

AutoCAD. ArchiCAD in this plan falls behind. Artlantis has been specially created for it, with no
problems exporting. But if the user wants to use the other software, then it is required to transfer
finished ArchiCAD models in IFC-format, which is fraught with losses, bugs, time-consuming [1] [2]
[6, 9-12].
Both programs have their own tools for visualization. Assign different texture layers model
transforms the image into a realistic object. However, in comparison with similar methods render that
offer Lumion or Artlantis, own visualization of ArchiCAD or Revit looks worse as they are simplified
to the minimum necessary, so no settings of light and shade, reflection, reflections, transparency,
global illumination, etc. For the presentation of the object, making of clips, panoramas and displays
need to use third-party software [13-15].
Thus, these programs have their own advantages and disadvantages. The possible association of
the experiments would create a product that is suitable for everyone [16, 17]. This is what Autodesk is
currently seeking by perfecting Revit each year to obtain new customers and consumers. At the same
time Graphisoft is releasing a new version, that does not much change the functionality and flexibility
of the software, but appeals to a closed circle of conservative admirers of the software, valuing
stability and not spending time learning new techniques and technologies on a broad scale [18-21] .

4 Conclusions
Thus, it is possible to draw the following conclusions:

 In the various design stages require different indicators. To produce a model of the facility
as soon as possible it is better to use CAD-software. If do not needed presentation-quality 3D-
models to
explain all the ideas and proposals, it is logical to use AutoCAD. But in case of the need for photo-
realistic images and objective indicators of exteriors and interiors of the building is better to use
tools of SketchUp followed by visualizing.
 CAD-software can export to IFC-format and BIM. Such a course of action to accelerate
the initial
basic design with subsequent upgrades in complex project for further work during construction and
operation. However, more time may be the cost of bringing objects from one program to the
requirements of the other.
 In the case of the initial solutions for integrated project and construction work at several
engineers
or companies it is advisable to use a BIM-software. Parallel works of engineers of different
specialties require the use of such technologies. BIM-program will take into account the impact of
all the elements and structures of the building on each other.

However, the question remains about the absolute program, which will use the vast number of
users, is still open. In the case of CAD-software the leader is AutoCAD, and already it is doubtful that
any other product will be able to take its place. A possible candidate for the same position in BIM-
technology is Revit, which is developing rapidly.
Thus, at the moment of virtual design technology are in a stage of rapid development. New ideas
emerge every year, and the degree of optimization are becoming higher and higher. So perhaps, in the
future there will be introduced a mandatory design through modeling or predictive calculation with
attendant checks and correcting.

References
1. B. Hardin, D. McCool, BIM and Construction Management: Proven Tools, Methods, and
Workflows. 2nd Edition (Indianapolis, 2015)

01029-p.4
2. M. Hergunsel Benefits of building information modeling for construction managers and
BIM based scheduling (Master's Thesis, Worcester, 2011)
 SPbWOSCE-2015

3. M. Day, AEC Magazine, 1(47), 16-19 (2013)

4. L. Allen AutoCAD Professional Tips and Technique (San-Rafael, 2014)
5. A. V. Petelin 3D-modyelirovaniye v SketchUp 2015 in 2 volumes (St. Petersburg,
2015)
6. N. I. Malova ArchiCAD 18 v primerah (St. Petersburg, 2015)
7. J. Vandezande, P. Read, E. Krygiel Autodesk Revit Architecture 2013: Autodesk Official
Training Guide (San-Rafael, 2015)
8. A. V. Smirnov The comparison of the architectural design softwares (Bachelor's Thesis,
Lappeenranta, 2015)
9. V.L. Kvint, V.V Okrepilov, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84 (3), 188-
200 (2014)
10. Z. Jakgic, D. Ladjinovie, M. Trivunio, N. Harmati, N. Vatin, (2015) Procedia Engineering,
117 (1), 507-520 (2015)
11. K. Strelets, N. Vatin, (2015) Rocznik Ochrona Srodowiska, 17 (1), 104-112 (2015)
12. N. Harmati, Z. Jakgie, N. Vatin, (2015) Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 791-799 (2015)
13. A. Milajie, D. Beljakovie, D. Davidovio, N. Vatin, V. Murgul, Procedia Engineering,
117, 916923 (2015)
14. B. Stamatovic, R. Upadhyay, Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 660-667 (2015)
15. Z.Popovie, L. Lazarevic, N. Vatin, Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 846-853 (2015)
16. M. Jevrie, M. Knekvie, J. Kalezie, N. Kopitovie-Vukovie, I. Cipranic, Tehnicki Vjesnik,
21 (4), 873-879 (2014)
17. M. Lazarevska, M. Kne2evie, M. Cvetkovska, A. Trombeva-Gavriloska, Tehnicki Vjesnik,
21 (6), 1353-1359 (2014)
18. N. Pavlieie, M. Perazie, D. Durie-Jocie, M. Kneievie, Journal of Applied Engineering
Science, 12 (1), 11-18 (2014)
19. B. Melovie, S. Mitrovie, A. Djokaj, N. Vatin, Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 807-812
(2015)
20. B. Kovaele, R. Kamnik, A. Strukelj, N. Vatin, Procedia Engineering, 117 (1), 800-806
(2015)
21. S. Rutegie, J. Cetkovic, M. Kneievie, M. Zarckovic, N. Vatin, Procedia Engineering, 117
(1), 642650 (2015)

01029-p.5