Lecture 17 - Game Theory
Lecture 17 - Game Theory
Lecture 17 - Game Theory
town and it is estimated that 600 people will die. Which of following two drugs, A or B will you recommend to combat the epidemic given the following information?
If Drug A is used: 200 will be saved If Drug B is used: 1/3 chance that all 600 will be
town and it is estimated that 600 people will die. Which of following two drugs, C or D will you recommend to combat the epidemic given the following information?
If Drug C is used: 400 will die If Drug D is used: 1/3 chance that nobody will
Explains : Why prices in such markets tend to be very similar But does not explain : how & why this price is established in the first place
Game theory
How individuals make decisions - when they are aware that their actions effect each other & when each individual takes this into account
The perquisites:
Interdependence Your decisions effect others & their decisions effect you Uncertainty You dont know what decisions will they take nor do they know what decisions will you take
STRATEGY
In Oilgopolistic market situation
A Strategy is a course of action or policy which player or participant in a game will adopt during the play of the game.
The various alternative strategies are: 1) Changing the price 2) Changing the level of output 3) Increasing advertisement expenditure 4) Varying the product
A firm behaves strategically, that is while taking its decision regarding price, output, advertising it takes into account how its rivals firms will react assuming them to be rational i.e they will do there best to promote their interest while making decisions. Kinds of Games: Cooperative Games: A binding contract that permits them to adopt a strategy to maximise joint profits. Non- Cooperative Games: Competing firm take each other actions into account but they take decisions independently and adopt strategies.
Dominant Strategy
A Strategy which will be successful or optimal for a firm regardless of what others do, i.e no matter what the strategy the rival firm adopts.
For example: Two companies A & B Firms need to promote its sales and profits Strategy for them is to Advertise or Not Advertise
F I r m A
Advertise
5 10
15 8
2 10
Not Advertise
F I r m A
Advertise
5 10
15 8
2 20
Not Advertise
adopts. Advertising strategy is optimal for firm A, given that firm B adopts the same. Non- Advertising by firm A is better given that firm B adopts the same.
Thus there is no Dominant strategy existing But how does firm make an optimal decision regarding choice of
Nashs Equilibrium
Nash equilibrium (named after John Forbes Nash) is a
of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only his or her own strategy (i.e., by changing unilaterally).
If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can
benefit by changing the strategy while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute a Nash equilibrium.
Nashs Equilibrium
In a Nash equilibrium, each player must respond negatively to the question: "Knowing the strategies of the other players, and treating the strategies of the other players as set in stone, can I benefit by changing my strategy?
However, Nash equilibrium does not necessarily mean the
best cumulative payoff for all the players involved; in many cases all the players might improve their payoffs if they could somehow agree on strategies different from the Nash equilibrium (e.g. competing businessmen forming a cartel in order to increase their profits).
optimal or best choice regardless of what strategy the other player adopts
Whereas
best or optimal for him given the strategy of the other player
Prisoners Dilemma
Dominant Strategy SUSPECT 1 Confess Not Confess Dominant Strategy S U S P E C T 2 Confess 4 4 7
1 1
2 2
Not confess
Prisoners Dilemma
In this model the decision of each prisoner in favour of
confession is quite rational because each person works in self- interest and tries to make the best of the worst outcome in an uncertain situation.
Prisoners
Dilemma can never be resolved if you approach the problem from outside, that is from the others viewpoint first. The problem offers a resolution only if you approach the problem from inside, that is , from your own self.
Prisoners Dilemma
The only way to resolve the dilemma is to ask,
Whats the right course of action that could be best for BOTH. If you look inward, no matter how selfish you are, you will find the correct resolution to the dilemma.
5 5
25 2 15 25
15
Equilibrium State
cartel.
100150
0
50075 0
Steal
100150
If its a one time game then a the chances of steal are high but a repeated game would make the players split.
cheat.
However in case of repeated games the oligopolist may
penalise the other for his previous bad behaviour Tit for TAT Strategy
Nashs Equilibrium
PEPSI High Price Low Price High Price 200
150 20
C O K E
200 20
150
Low Price
50
50
Firms will form a cartel and go for high price than cheating on one another