Ethics-1 3

VALUE
• What reasons do we give to decide or to

judge that a certain way of acting is either
right or wrong?
• A person’s fear of punishment or desire for

Reasoning reward can provide him a reason for acting in
a certain way. **
• In a certain sense, fear of punishment and

desire for reward can be spoken of as giving
someone a “reason” for acting in a certain
way.
But the question then would be:
Is this reason good enough?
• The promise of rewards and the fear of punishment
can certainly motivate us to act, but are not in
themselves a determinant of the rightness or
wrongness of a certain way of acting or of good or
the bad in a particular pursuit.
• Asking the question “why” might bring us to no more

than a superficial discussion of rewards and
punishments, but it could also bring us to another
level of thinking.
Beyond rewards and punishments, it is
possible for our moral valuation – our
decisions and judgments – to be based on a
principle.
• We can define principles as rationally
established grounds by which one justifies and
maintains her moral decisions and judgments.
• A moral theory is a systematic attempt to

establish the validity of maintaining certain
moral principles.
• Insofar as a theory is a system of thought or ideas,
it can also be referred to as a “framework.”
• We can use the term “framework,” as a theory of

interconnected ideas, and at the same time, a
structure through which we can evaluate our
reasons for valuing a certain decision or judgment
(ethical framework).
SOURCES OF
AUTHORITY
• Several common ways of thinking about ethics
are based on the idea that the standards of
valuation are imposed by a higher authority that
commands our obedience.
• It is supposed that law is one’s
guide to ethical behavior.
• Philippines; criminal and civil

Law
codes; provincial laws and city
ordinaces.
• The term positive law refers to the different
rules and regulations that are posited or put
forward by an authority figure that require
compliance.
• Taking the law to be the basis of ethics has

the benefit of providing us with an objective
standard that is obligatory and applicable to
all.
• So, we would not be surprised if we were to hear
someone say, “Ethics? It is simple. Just follow whatever
the law says.”
• But the question is: can one simply identify ethics with
the law?
• The law cannot tell us what to pursue, it only tell us what

to avoid. (e.g., bystander effect)
• “Love the Lord, Your God,
therefore, and always heed his
charge: his statutes, decrees,
and commandments.” (New
Religion American Bible)
• One is obliged to obey her God

in all things – divine command
theory
• Taking religion as basis for ethics has the
advantage of providing us with not only a
set of commands but also a Supreme
Authority that can inspire and compel our
obedience in a way that nothing else can.
• “thou shall not kill,” “thou shall not steal,”

and “thou shall not commit adultery.”
• Problems with Religion:
1. Multiplicity of religions
2. Clarification
• Our exposure to different
societies and their cultures
makes us aware that there are
ways of thinking and valuing that
are different from our own.
Culture
• Cultural Relativism – what is

ethically acceptable or
unacceptable is relative to, or
that is to say, dependent on one’s
culture.
• Aesthetic differences – (e.g., Japanese
art vs. Indian art)
• Religious differences – (e.g., Buddhism
vs. Christianity)
• Ettiquette differences – (conflicting
behaviors regarding dining practices)
• Appealing on Cultural Relativism:
– Conformity on experience
– Standards on culture
– Tolerance
• So, we would not be surprised if we were to hear

someone say, “Ethics? It is simple. Just follow
whatever your culture says.”
• Problems with Cultural Relativism:
– Premised on the reality of difference

– We are in no position to render any kind of
judgment on the practices of another culture
– We are in no position to render any kind of
judgment on the practices of even our own culture
– We can maintain only the culture by following the
presumption of culture as a single, clearly-defined
substance or as something fixed and already
determined
Thank you
Todo Esta en la Mente

Twitter: @mrpurefaculty
Instagram: gabrielsilang_

Ethics-1 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ethics-1 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ethics-1 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

VALUE

• What reasons do we give to decide or to

• A person’s fear of punishment or desire for

• In a certain sense, fear of punishment and

• Asking the question “why” might bring us to no more

• A moral theory is a systematic attempt to

• We can use the term “framework,” as a theory of

• Philippines; criminal and civil

• Taking the law to be the basis of ethics has

• The law cannot tell us what to pursue, it only tell us what

• One is obliged to obey her God

• “thou shall not kill,” “thou shall not steal,”

• Cultural Relativism – what is

• So, we would not be surprised if we were to hear

– Premised on the reality of difference

Todo Esta en la Mente

You might also like