Finite Element Analysis

Dr. Muhammad Farhan

Finite element formulation for

1D elasticity using the
Rayleigh-Ritz Principle
Reading assignment:

Lecture notes, Logan 3.10

Summary:

• Stiffness matrix and nodal load vectors for 1D elasticity

problem
 Axially loaded elastic bar
y A(x) = cross section at x
b(x) = body force distribution
F (force per unit length)
x E(x) = Young’s modulus
x
x=0 x=L
Potential energy of the axially loaded bar corresponding to the
exact solution u(x)
2
1  du 
L L
 (u)   EA  dx   bu dx  Fu(x  L)
2 0  dx  0

Potential energy of the bar corresponding to an admissible

displacement w(x)
2
1  dw 
L L
 (w)   EA  dx  0 bw dx  Fw(x  L)
2 0
 dx 
Finite element idea:

Step 1: Divide the truss into finite elements connected to each

other through special points (“nodes”)

1 2 3 4

El #1 El #2 El #3

Total potential energy=sum of potential energies of the elements

2
1  dw 
L L
 (w)   EA  dx   bw dx  Fw(x  L)
2 0  dx  0
 x1=0 x2 x3 x4=L

El #1 El #2 El #3

Total potential energy

2
1  dw 
L L
 (w)   EA  dx   bw dx  Fw(x  L)
2 0  dx  0

Potential energy of element 1:

2
1  dw 
x2 x2
 1 (w)   EA  dx  x bw dx
2 1
x
 dx  1

Potential energy of element 2:

2
1  dw 
x3 x3
 2 (w)   EA  dx  x bw dx
2 2
x
 dx  2
 x1=0 x2 x3 x4

El #1 El #2 El #3

Potential energy of element 3:

2
1  dw 
x4 x4
 3 (w)   EA  dx   bw dx  Fw(x  L)
2 x3  dx  x3

Total potential energy=sum of potential energies of the elements

 (w)   1 (w)   2 (w)   3 (w)

Step 2: Describe the behavior of each element

In the “direct stiffness” approach, we derived the stiffness matrix

of each element directly (See lecture on Springs/Trusses).

Now, we will first approximate the displacement inside each

element and then show you a systematic way of deriving the
stiffness matrix (sections 2.2 and 3.1 of Logan).

TASK 1: APPROXIMATE THE DISPLACEMENT WITHIN

EACH ELEMENT
TASK 2: APPROXIMATE THE STRAIN and STRESS WITHIN
EACH ELEMENT
TASK 3: DERIVE THE STIFFNESS MATRIX OF EACH
ELEMENT (this class) USING THE RAYLEIGH-RITZ
PRINCIPLE
 Summary
Inside an element, the three most important approximations in
terms of the nodal displacements (d) are:

Displacement approximation in terms of shape functions

w(x)  N d (1)

Strain approximation in terms of strain-displacement matrix

ε(x)  B d (2)

Stress approximation in terms of strain-displacement matrix and

Young’s modulus
  EB d (3)
The shape functions for a 1D linear element

1 1
x2 - x x - x1
N1 (x)  N 2 (x) 
x 2  x1 x 2  x1
x1 x2 x
El #1
Within the element, the displacement approximation is
x2 - x x - x1
w(x)  d1x  d 2x
x 2  x1 x 2  x1
 For a linear element

Displacement approximation in terms of shape functions

 x 2 - x x - x1  d1x 
w(x)    d 
 x 2  x1 x 2  x1   2x 
Strain approximation
dw 1 d1x 
ε   1 1  
dx x 2  x1 d 2x 
Stress approximation
E d1x 
  Eε   1 1  
x 2  x1 d 2x 
 Why is the approximation “admissible”?

x1=0 x2 x3 x4=L

El #1 El #2 El #3
For the entire bar, the displacement approximation is
w(x)  w (1) (x)  w (2) (x)  w (3) (x)

Where w(i)(x) is the displacement approximation within element (i).

Let use set d1x=0. Then, can you seen that the above approximation
does satisfy the two conditions of being an admissible function on
the entire bar, i.e.,
(1) w(x  0)  0
dw
(2) exists
dx
TASK 3: DERIVE THE STIFFNESS MATRIX OF EACH
ELEMENT USING THE RAYLEIGH-RITZ PRINCIPLE

Potential energy of element 1:

1 x2 x2
1 (w)     Adx   bw dx
2 x1 x1

Lets plug in the approximation

w(x)  N d ε(x)  B d   EB d

1 T
1 (d)  d
2  x2

x1
T

B EB Adx d  d
T

x1
x2
N
T
b dx 
Lets see what the matrix

x2

T
B EB Adx
x1

is for a 1D linear element

Recall that
1
B 1 1 
x 2  x1

Hence 1  1 1
T
B EB  E 1 1 
x 2  x1  1  x 2  x1
E  1 E  1  1
 2    1 1    1 1 
 x 2  x1   1   x 2  x1  2  
 
x2

x1
T
B EB Adx 
1
 x 2  x1 
2
 1 1 x2
 1 1  x1 AEdx 
 
x1
x2
AEdx  x x 
2
1
1
2
 1 1
 1 1 
 

Now, if we assume E and A are constant


x2

x1
T
B EB Adx   x1
x2
AEdx  x x 
2
1
1
2
 1 1 AE(x 2  x1 )  1 1
 1 1  
   2 1 
x  x
2 
 1 1 

AE  1 1
  1 1 
 x 2  x1   
Remembering that (x2-x1) is the length of the element, this is the
stiffness matrix we had derived directly before using the direct
stiffness approach!!
Then why is it necessary to go through this complicated procedure??
1. Easy to handle nonuniform E and A
2. Easy to handle distributed loads
For nonuniform E and A, i.e. E(x) and A(x), the stiffness matrix of
the linear element will NOT be

EA  1 1
 1 1 
 x 2  x1   

But it will ALWAYS be

x2
k   B EB Adx
T
x1
Now lets go back to
   
1 T  x2 T   x2 T 
1 (d)  d   B EB Adx  d  d  x N b dx 
T

2   x1          1     
 k   fb

1 T T
 d k d  d fb
2
Element stiffness matrix
x2
k   B EB Adx
T
x1

Element nodal load vector due to distributed body force

x2
f b   N b dx
T
x1
Apply Rayleigh-Ritz principle for the 1D linear element
Π1 (d) 
 0
d1x  Π 1 (d )
  0
Π1 (d) d
 0
d 2x 

Recall from linear algebra (Lecture notes on Linear Algebra)

1 T T
 1 (d )  d k d  d f b
2
 1 (d)
  kd  fb
d
 Hence

Π 1 (d )
0
d

 kd  fb

Exactly the same equation that we had before, except that the
stiffness matrix and nodal force vectors are more general
 Recap of the properties of the element stiffness matrix
x2
k   B EB Adx
T
x1

1. The stiffness matrix is singular and is therefore non-invertible

2. The stiffness matrix is symmetric
3. Sum of any row (or column) of k11
the stiffness matrix is zero!
Why?
Sum of any row (or column) of the stiffness matrix is zero
Consider a rigid body motion of the element
1 Element ε0Bd
d
2
1 1 strain

d1x=1 d2x=1 k d 
x1
x2 T

B EB Adx d
x2
  B E  Bd  Adx
T
x1

0 
 
0 
 k11 k12  1 0
kd    
k 21 k 22  1 0
 k11  k12  0 and k 21  k 22  0
The nodal load vector
x2
f b   N b dx
T
x1

b(x) 2  N1 ( x) 
1 x2
f b   N b dx  
x2
  b dx
x1 x1
 N 2 ( x) 
d1x d2x
 x2 N ( x) b dx 
 f 1x   x1 1 
    x2 
 f 2x  x N 2 ( x) b dx 
 1 
x2
f 1x   N 1 ( x) b dx
x1
x2 “Consistent” nodal loads
f 2x   N 2 ( x) b dx
x1
 b(x) /unit length 1 2
1 2 f1x f2x
Replaced by
d1x d2x
d1x d2x

A distributed load is represented by two nodal loads in a

consistent manner
e.g., if b=1
x2 x2 x 2  x1
f1x   N 1 ( x) b dx   N 1 ( x) dx 
x1 x1 2
x2 x2 x 2  x1
f 2x   N 2 ( x) b dx   N 2 ( x) dx 
x1 x1 2
Divide the total force into two equal halves and lump them at the
nodes
What happens if b(x)=x?
Summary: For each element
Displacement approximation in terms of shape functions
w(x)  N d
Strain approximation in terms of strain-displacement matrix
ε(x)  B d
Stress approximation
  EB d
Element stiffness matrix
x2
k   B EB Adx
T
x1

Element nodal load vector

x2
f b   N b dx
T
x1
What happens for element #3?
2
1  dw x4 x4
 3 (w)   EA  dx  x bw dx  Fw(x  L)
2 3
x
 dx  3

For element 3
 x 4 - x x - x 3  d 3x 
w(x)    d 
 x 4  x 3 x 4  x 3   4x 
 w(x  L)  d 4x
The discretized form of the potential energy
1 T
 3 (d)  d
2 
x3
x4 T

B EB Adx d  d
T

x3
x4
N
T

b dx  Fd 4x
What happens for element #3?
Now apply Rayleigh-Ritz principle
Π 3 (d )
0
d

0 
 k d  fb   
F

Hence there is an extra load term on the right hand side due to the
concentrated force F applied to the right end of the bar.

NOTE that whenever you have a concentrated load at ANY

node, that load should be applied as an extra right hand side
term.
Step3:Assembly exactly as you had done before, assemble the
global stiffness matrix and global load vector and solve the
resulting set of equations by properly taking into account the
displacement boundary conditions
 Problem:
6” E=30x106 psi
=0.2836 lb/in3
Thickness of plate, t=1”
12”
24”

P=100lb Model the plate as 2 finite elements and

3”
(1)Write the expression for element stiffness
x matrix and body force vectors
(2)Assemble the global stiffness matrix and
load vector
(3)Solve for the unknown displacements
(4)Evaluate the stress in each element
(5)Evaluate the reaction in each support
 Solution (1) Node-element connectivity chart
Finite element model Element # Node 1 Node 2

1 1 2
1
El #1 12” 2 2 3

2
El #2 P=100lb 12” Stiffness matrix of El #1
3
x
k 
(1) 12

0
T
B EB Adx 
E
(12) 2 
0
12
A( x)dx 


 1 1
1 1 

12 12 12

0
A( x)dx   t (6  0.125 x)dx  t  (6  0.125 x)dx  63 in3
0 0

E  1 1 6 1 1
2 
63 
(1)
k    13.125  10  
(12)  1 1   1 1 
 Stiffness matrix of El #2
6 - 0.125x
6”
k
(2)

24

12
T
B EB Adx 
E
(12)2 12
24
  1 1
A( x)dx 
 1 1 
 x
12”
24 24 24

12
A( x)dx   t (6  0.125 x)dx  t  (6  0.125 x)dx  45 in3
12 12 4.5”
 1 1 1 x
E 6  1
2 
45  
(2)
k    9.375  10  
(12)   1 1    1 1 

Now compute the element load vector due to distributed body

force (weight)
x2
f b   N b dx
T
x1
For element #1

12 12
fb
(1)
  N b dx   N
0
T
0
T
  A  dx
12
   N A dx
T
0

12  N1(1) ( x)  1
   (1)  t(6 0.125 x) dx
0
 N 2 ( x) 
   N1(1) ( x)
A( x )

33 12”
 0.2836   lb N 2(1) ( x)
30  2
El #1
12  x
9.3588 N1 ( x ) 
(1)
x
  lb 12
 8.508  x
N 2 ( x) 
(1)

12
Superscript in parenthesis indicates
element number
For element #2

24 24
fb
(2)
  N b dx   N
12
T
12
T
  A  dx
24
1
   N A dx
T
El #1 12”
( 2)
12
N ( x)
2 2
24  N 2(2) ( x) 
   (2)  t(6 0.125 x) dx El #2 12”
  

 N 3 ( x) 
12
A( x )
N 3( 2 ) ( x) 3
24  x
 0.2836   lb
 21 24  x
6.8064  N ( x) 
( 2)
2
 12
 lb
5.9556  x  12
N 3 ( x) 
( 2)

12
Solution (2) Assemble the system equations
 13.125 13.125 0 
K  106   13.125 22.5 9.375
 0 9.375 9.375 

f  fb  f concentrated load

 9.3588 
 
f b  8.508  6.8064 lb
 5.9556 
 
 0 
 
f concentrated load  100 lb
 0 
 
 9.3588 
 
 f  115.3144  lb
 5.9556 
 
Solution (3)
Hence we need to solve
 13.125 13.125 0   d1x  9.3588  R1 
   
106   13.125 22.5 9.375 d 2x    115.3144 
 0 9.375 9.375  d 3x   5.9556 

R1 is the reaction at node 1.

Notice that since the boundary condition at x=0 (d1x=0) has not been
taken into account, the system matrix is not invertible.
Incorporating the boundary condition d1x=0 we need to solve the
following set of equations

 22.5 9.375 d 2x  115.3144 

10  
6
   
 9.375 9.375 d
  3x   5.9556 
 Solve to obtain

d 2 x  0.92396 105 
  5 
in
 d3 x  0.98749 10 
Solution (4) Stress in elements

Notice that since we are using linear elements, the stress within
each element is constant.
In element #1
(1) (1)
 (1)  EB d
E  d1x 

x2  x1
 1 1  
d 2x 
30  106
 d 2x d1x  0
12
 23.099 psi
In element #2
(2) (2)
 (2)  EB d
E d 2x 

x3  x2
 1 1  
d 3x 
30 106
  d3x -d 2x 
12
 1.5882 psi
Solution (5) Reaction at support
Go back to the first line of the global equilibrium equations…

 13.125 13.125 0   d1x  9.3588  R1 

   
106   13.125 22.5 9.375 d 2x    115.3144 
 0 9.375 9.375  d 3x   5.9556 

 R1  130.6288 lb (The –ve sign indicates that the force is in the –ve x-direction)
R1
Check 6” The reaction at the wall from force
equilibrium in the x-direction
12” 24
24” R1  P    A( x) dx
x 0
24

P=100lb  100   t  (6  0.125 x) dx

x 0

3”  130.6288 lb
x
Problem: Can you solve for the displacement and stresses
analytically?

Check out

 4.727 109 x 2  9.487 107 x for 0  x  12

uanal  9 2 7 6
4.727  10 x  2.0797  10 x  8.89  10 for 12  x  24

Stress

duanal 6 duanal
 ( x)anal E  30 10
dx dx
Comparison of
-4
displacement solutions
x 10
1.2

Analytical solution
1

0.8
Displacement (in)

0.6

Finite element solution

0.4

0.2

0
0 5 10 15 20
x (in)
Notice:
1. Slope discontinuity at x=12 (why?)
2. The finite element solution does not produce the exact
solution even at the nodes
3. We may improve the solution by
(1) Increasing the number of elements
(2) Using higher order elements (e.g., quadratic instead of
linear)
Comparison of stress solutions
30

25

20
Stress (psi)

15
Finite element solution
Analytical solutions
10

-5
0 5 10 15 20
x (in)

The analytical as well as the finite element stresses are

discontinuous across the elements