Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Power and District Heating: Pram Majumdar

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

POWER AND DISTRICT

HEATING
PRAM MAJUMDAR
PRINCIPAL DRIVERS
Heatin
Power Needs Layout
g
Hot
Fossil Civil
water Profiling
works
Solar Steam
Grid
Wind Gas Control
connects

Disrupted
Severe Imperative
GHG thermo-
Ozone Hole weather Low Carbon
emission haline
conditions Future
circulation
CORE ACTION IDENTIFICATIONS

Operation
Maintenanc
Control e Disaster
Protection recovery
Sizing and Interlocks
Rating of
Energy equipment Operate
sources for
Topology Heat and Commissi
Grid Power Erect on
Consumer
Heat Power connects for Procure
mix heat, power
Specify Preventive
Design QA norms Maintenance
Fault
Concept Optimize Tolerance
Cost Condition
Monitoring
Time
Optimize
Exergy
PRODUCING POWER AND HEAT Vector

Steam/Gas Turbine Solar/Wind Turbine Off-beat


• Cross compound ST with • Distributed/ Concentrated • Organic Rankine Cycle
steam tap off Solar • Kite power, floating wind
• KALINA cycle turbines
• IGCC • Twisted blade/ Helical blade • Gas sourced from Fracking-
• Micro GT /non-blade wind turbine geothermal GT
• Aeroderivative GT • Pumped, mine storage

Gas Heat Brine Heat


Molten Salt Mineral Oils Heat Pumps
Exchanger Exchanger
PROCESS PINCH POINTS- THE DUCK SHOULD
FLY • Road Permits

Fuel • Port
• Rail
• Pipeline

Line
pack for
Layou • Effluent disposal
• Natural drainage
• Wind dispersion
Gas
Network Geology
Civil Works
t • Fire, Explosion
BLEVE
• VAR Compensation
Access Rights
Booster
stations
Grid • Sub-Harmonic Filters
• K-factor
• Load Flow studies

e-NTU (for
Heat
Exchanger G53/G98 G59 G99
sizing)
DUCK CURVE
In certain times of the year, net load curves
produce a “belly” appearance in the mid-
afternoon that quickly ramps up to produce an
“arch” similar to the neck of a duck—hence the
industry moniker of “The Duck Chart”.

The duck has to fly

by reducing over generation and

ensuring adequate ramping rates


by efficient/economic Load
Balancing
Shaving the peaks and
troughs- making the duck
fly

Realistic
Scenario 1: Scenario 2:
Mitigation by
Overgeneratio Complete
Load
n Mitigation Balancing
Balancing
Levellize
d Cost of
Energy
CONTRACTUAL AWARENESS - DYNAMIC
WORLD

CONSUMERS ACTIVISTS

BALAN
CE
REGULATOR FINANCERS
S
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND
PATIENCE.
QUESTIONS ?
PROS AND CONS OF DISTRICT HEATING
Fue Perceived as natural
l
monopoly
Mi
x High Fixed
Lower Re
Carbon Costs for
tro
Emissions ROI
fit
High Efficiency for Co- Di
generation ffi
LEVELLISED COST OF ELECTRICITY- LCOE- INPUT
Paramete Definition Unit
r
TCR Total Capital Requirement in base year £
FCF, FCFL Fixed Charge Factor, <Levellised> fraction
MW Net Power Output of Plant (MegaWatt) MW
CF, CFL Annual Electricity Generation = Capacity Factor x 8766 fraction
x MW , <Levellised>
FOM Fixed O&M Costs £/year
VOM Variable O&M Costs, excluding fuel £/MWh
HR Net Power Plant Heat Rate MJ/MWh
FC Fuel Costs £/MJ
r Interest rate or discount rate of capital fraction

T Economic life Time of Plant Year/month


li, er, einf levellisaton factor, escalation factor for real and inflation
LEVELLISED COST OF ELECTRICITY- LCOE FORMULAS

 TCR  FCFL   l1  FOM 


LCOE   l 2 VOM   l 3  HR  FC 
 MW  CF L  8766

li 

ki 1  k i
T

A 1  k 
T i

e  1  e 1  e   1
1  1  r 
T 1  ea ,i
A T

r
k i

1 r a ,i r ,i inf

 r 1  r  T   CF  t
CF L   1  r  T  1 t 1  r  t
 

You might also like