This document defines and discusses the crimes of robbery and theft under Philippine law. It provides details on the elements that must be present for each crime, including that robbery involves violence, intimidation or force against a person or thing, while theft does not involve such actions. The document also gives examples to illustrate differences between the crimes and discusses investigative techniques for solving robbery cases.
This document defines and discusses the crimes of robbery and theft under Philippine law. It provides details on the elements that must be present for each crime, including that robbery involves violence, intimidation or force against a person or thing, while theft does not involve such actions. The document also gives examples to illustrate differences between the crimes and discusses investigative techniques for solving robbery cases.
This document defines and discusses the crimes of robbery and theft under Philippine law. It provides details on the elements that must be present for each crime, including that robbery involves violence, intimidation or force against a person or thing, while theft does not involve such actions. The document also gives examples to illustrate differences between the crimes and discusses investigative techniques for solving robbery cases.
This document defines and discusses the crimes of robbery and theft under Philippine law. It provides details on the elements that must be present for each crime, including that robbery involves violence, intimidation or force against a person or thing, while theft does not involve such actions. The document also gives examples to illustrate differences between the crimes and discusses investigative techniques for solving robbery cases.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
Art. 293. Who are guilty of robbery
- any person who with intent to gain , shall take any personal property belonging to another, by means of violence against or intimidation of any person, or using force upon thing, shall be guilty of robbery. Robbery • Classification of robbery: 1. Robbery with violence against, or intimidation of persons. 2. Robbery by the use of force upon things.
• Personal property – The property taken must be
personal property, for if real property is occupied or real right is usurped by means of violence against or intimidation of person, the crime is usurpation. ROBBERY • Elements of robbery in general: a. That there be (1) personal property; (2) belonging to another. b. That there is (3) unlawful taking of that property. c. That the taking must be (4) with intent to gain; and d. That there is (5) violence against or intimidation of any person, or force upon things. ROBBERY • In robbery, the personal property of another is taken by the offender against the will of the owner. • Belonging to another – Thus, one who by means of violence or intimidation, took his own property from the depositary is not guilty of robbery. ROBBERY • Unlawful taking, when complete: 1. As to robbery with violence against or intimidation of person. - From the moment the offender gains possession of the thing , even if the culprit has had no opportunity to dispose the same the unlawful taking is complete. - The fact that the defendant in his flight threw away the property stolen or that it fell without his knowledge, does not affect the nature of the crime. ROBBERY • Unlawful taking, when complete: 2. As to the robbery with force upon things. Ex: When the culprit had already broken the floor of the bodega, had entered it and had removed one sack of sugar from the file, but was caught in the act of taking out the sack of sugar through the opening on the floor, it was frustrated robbery only. (The thing must be taken out of the building to consummate the crime). ROBBERY Personal property belonging to another and intent to gain must “concur.” Ex: 1. If the accused with intent to gain, took from another, personal property which turned out to be his own property not belonging to another, he cannot be held liable for robbery, even if in making it, the accused used violence against or intimidation of person, or force upon thing. ROBBERY • Personal property belonging to another and intent to gain must “concur.” Ex: 2. If he took personal property from another, believing that it was his own property, but in reality it belonged to the offended party, there being no intent to gain, he cannot be held liable for robbery, even if the accused used violence or intimidation of person, or force upon things. ROBBERY • Violence or intimidation, as an element of robbery. – The violence must be against the person of the offended party, not upon the thing taken. Ex: Theft, not robbery, was committed in a case where the accused cut with a bolo the strings tying the opening of a sack containing palay and then took the palay. ROBBERY • Using force upon things – But the use of force upon things will not make the taking of personal property robbery, if the culprit never entered a house or building. Ex: Removing by force the tires of an automobile while parked on the street and taking them away is not robbery, because the culprit did not use force to enter a house or building. ROBBERY • Style and Tactics in Robbery cases 1. The Ambush – is the least planned of all and is based on the element of surprise. 2. The Selective raid – involves a minimum of planning but some casing of the robbery scene. 3. The planned operation – is carefully structured and the robbery group examines all aspects of the situation, plans for all foreseeable contingencies. ROBBERY • Types of Robbers: 1. Amateurs – motivated by greed, want, the desire for a thrill or need for self testing. 2. Professionals - are described as those persons who worked at robbery as a trade making it their living and having other no other means of income. ROBBERY • Method of Operation (modus operandi) of Robbers: 1. Tutok- Kalawit 2. Martilyo Gang 3. Bunggo-bunggo Gang 4. Kursunada-bugbog Gang 5. Termite Gang 6. Akyat-bahay, Hog tied Gang 7. Roof entry 8. Hide-in-entry ROBBERY • Physical Evidence to be collected: 1. Footprints 2. Fingerprints – areas of breaks, closets, doorknobs, dresser, pieces of furniture, bottles and glasses, walls, tools, desk. 3. Clothing – leather jackets that has been exchanged by the robbers from that one found. 4. Paint – ex. May adhere to the crowbar used by the robber. 5. Tool marks, tools, cords and ropes 6. Firearms used 7. Get-away vehicle 8. Stolen articles/ properties. ROBBERY • Investigative Techniques: 1. Determine the point of entrance and point of exit by the perpetrator. 2. Determine the full description and value of stolen articles. 3. Gather physical evidence 4. Determine the modus operandi of the perpetrator. 5. Full description of the get-away vehicle. ROBBERY •Investigative Techniques: 6. Coordinate with other law enforcement agencies. 7. Exploit investigative leads 8. Take written testimony of the complainant, witnesses. 9. Develop informants in the local underworld 10. Conduct surveillance – people engage in fence, known burglars. 11. Accumulate information on various robbers whether they are in or out of prison. 12. In cases homicide is committed, follow the pattern of homicide investigation. THEFT • Theft, defined. - is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without violence against or intimidation of persons nor force upon things, shall take personal property of another without the latter’s consent. THEFT • Theft is likewise committed by: 1. Any person who, having found lost property, shall fail to deliver the same to the local authorities or its owner; 2. Any person who, after having maliciously damaged the property of another, shall remove or make use of the fruits or object of the damage caused by him; 3. Any person who shall enter an enclosed estate or a field where trespass is forbidden or which belongs to another and without the consent of its owner, shall hunt or fish upon the same or shall gather fruit, cereals, or other forest or farm products. THEFT • Elements of Theft: 1. That there be taking of personal property. 2. That said property belongs to another. 3. That the taking be done with intent to gain. 4. That the taking be done without the consent of the owner. 5. That the taking be accomplished without the use of violence against or intimidation of persons or force upon things. THEFT • Meaning of “taking” in theft – Theft is consummated when the culprits were able to take possession of the thing taken by them. It is not an indispensable element of theft that the thief carry, more or less far away, the thing taken by him from its owner. – Theft is consummated from the moment the offender had full possession of the thing, even if he did not have an opportunity to dispose of the same. THEFT • Example of Frustrated Theft – When the place is surrounded with fence or wall and one has to pass to check point before going out, thus the timely discovery of the stolen items (bulky box loaded with articles) before it could pass out of the check point, the crime is frustrated theft. (Supra, should be applied only in theft of bulky things). THEFT • Example of Personal Property - Electricity, gas, promissory note and checks, invoice.
• Property belonging to another
- Thus, he who takes away the property pledged by hm to another, without the latter’s consent, does not commit theft, but “estafa”, for he is the owner of the thing taken. THEFT • As to “intent to gain” – In tent to gain is presumed from the unlawful taking of personal property belonging to another. - But if a person takes personal property from another believing it to be his own, the presumption of intent to gain is rebutted and, therefore, he is not guilty of theft. - The defendant is guilty of theft even if he did not take the stolen articles for his own good, thus gave them to another person. THEFT • As to “intent to gain” - Joy ride or using car of another to learn how to drive is sufficient gain.
- By the word gain is meant not only of a thing useful to the
purpose of life but also the benefit which is in any other use may be delivered or expected from the act which is performed. Ex: There is intent to gain when the employees took the papers of his employer and delivered them to the government investigators as an act of revenge. THEFT • Taking without the consent of the owner - The law does not say without the knowledge of the owner of the thing taken. Hence, even if the owner knew the taking, but he did not consent to it, the accused is still liable for theft. Ex: Thus, the accused, who picked the pocket of the offended party while the latter was hearing mass in a church and the latter, on account of solemnity of the act, although noticing the theft, did not do anything to prevent it, took the money of the offended party without his consent. - “There is no theft when the taking of personal property is with the consent of its owner”. THEFT • Force upon things in theft: - Unless the force upon things is employed to enter a building, the taking of the personal property belonging to another with intent to gain is theft and not robbery. Ex: A entered the house of B through an open door and once inside he removed by force, toilet fixtures and carried them away, A is liable for theft in spite of the use of force upon things because the force was not employed to enter the house. THEFT • Method of Operation (modus operandi) on Theft: 1. Ipit-Gang 2. Dura-dura Gang 3. Laglag-barya Gang 4. Salisi 5. Basag-kotse Gang 6. Dougnut-Gang THEFT • Investigative Techniques: 1. Determine the full description and value of stolen articles. 2. Gather physical evidence 3. Determine the modus operandi of the perpetrator. 4. Full description of the get-away vehicle. THEFT • Investigative Techniques: 5. Coordinate with other law enforcement agencies. 6. Exploit investigative leads 7.Take written testimony of the complainant, witnesses. 8. Develop informants in the local underworld 9. Conduct surveillance – people engage in fence, known thieves. 10.Accumulate information on various thieves whether they are in or out of prison.