Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Plain & Reinforced Concrete - II: Lesson No 02: Design Methodology Dr. Musaad Zaheer Nazir Khan

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Plain & reinforced concrete - II

Lesson no 02: Design Methodology

Dr. Musaad Zaheer Nazir Khan


Structural Safety and Serviceability

• A structure must be safe against collapse and serviceable to use


• Safety requires that the strength of the structure be adequate for all loads that may
foreseeably act on it.
• Serviceability requires that deflections be adequately small; that cracks, if any, be
kept to tolerable limits; that vibrations be minimized
• If the strength of a structure, built as designed, could be predicted accurately, and if
the loads and their internal effects (moments, shears, axial forces) were known
accurately, safety could be ensured by providing a carrying capacity just barely in
excess of the known loads.
Structural Materials
• Following are the principle structural materials available which
are used in the construction.
1. Ordinary Reinforced Concrete
2. Prestressed Concrete
3. Structural Steel
4. Composite Construction
5. Timber
6. Masonry
Structural Materials
• Factors affecting choice of structural material.
1. Strength
2. Durability
3. Architectural Requirements
4. Versatility
5. Safety
6. Speed of Construction
7. Maintenance
8. Cost
Structural Materials
Why Reinforced Concrete ?
Reinforced Concrete
• Fundamental assumptions in the design of reinforced
concrete
• Internal forces at any section of the member are in equilibrium
• The strain in the embedded reinforced bar is the same as that of the
• surrounding concrete
• Plane cross-sections continue to be plane in the member under
load.
• Concrete is not capable of resisting any tensile stresses
Basis of Design
• Actual strength of the structure must be large enough to resist foreseeable loads during its life
(with some margin to spare) without failure or other distress
• Select concrete dimensions (proportion members) and reinforcement, so that member
strengths are adequate to resist forces, significantly above loads expected actually to occur in
service.
• This design concept is known as strength design.
Basis of Design
• For reinforced concrete structures close to and at failure, one or both of the materials,
concrete and steel, are invariably in their nonlinear inelastic range.
• Concrete in a structural member reaches its maximum strength and subsequent fracture at
stresses and strains far beyond the initial elastic range.
• Steel close to and at failure of the member is usually stressed beyond its elastic domain
into and even beyond the yield region.
• Consequently, the nominal strength of a member must be calculated on the basis of this
inelastic behavior of the materials.
• A member designed by the strength method must also perform in a satisfactory way
under normal service loading.
– Beam deflections must be limited to acceptable values,
– Flexural cracks at service loads must be controlled.
Basis of Design
• In earlier method, members were proportioned so that stresses in the steel and concrete
under service loads remain within specified limits. Known as allowable stresses, were
only fractions of the failure stresses of the materials.
• It is now referred as service load design.
• Allowable stresses, in practice, were set at about one-half the concrete compressive
strength and one-half the yield stress of the steel.
• Because of the difference in realism and reliability, the strength design method has
displaced the service load design method.
• However, the older method provides the basis for some serviceability checks and is the
design basis for many older structures.
• Strength design is used for design almost exclusively these days.
Design Codes used
• The design of concrete structures is generally done within the framework of codes giving
specific requirements for materials, structural analysis, member proportioning.
• International Building Code (IBC) is an example of a consensus code governing structural
design
• American Concrete Institute - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and
Commentary (ACI–318) serves as a guide in the design and construction of reinforced
concrete buildings.
• Incorporated into the IBC, ACI–318 an authoritative statement of current good practice in
the field of reinforced concrete.
• Most highway bridges in the United States are designed according to the requirements of
the AASHTO bridge specifications
• The design of railway bridges is done according to the specifications of the AREMA
Manual of Railway Engineering

You might also like