Linear Programming Model Formulation & Graphical Method
Linear Programming Model Formulation & Graphical Method
LINEAR
PROGRAMMING
PART 1: MODEL FORMULATION & GRAPHICAL METHOD
To accompany
Quantitative Analysis for Management, Eleventh Edition, Global Edition
by Render, Stair, and Hanna
Power Point slides created by Brian Peterson
Learning Objectives
After completing this topic students will be able to:
1 Introduction
2 Requirements of a Linear Programming Problem
3 Formulating LP Problems
4 Graphical Solution to an LP Problem
5 Solving Minimization Problems
6 Four Special Cases in LP
Table 7.4
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 7-14
Solving Minimization Problems
◦ Many LP problems involve minimizing an objective such as
cost instead of maximizing a profit function.
◦ Minimization problems can be solved graphically by first
setting up the feasible solution region and then using either
the corner point method or an isocost line approach (which is
analogous to the isoprofit approach in maximization
problems) to find the values of the decision variables (e.g.,
X1 and X2) that yield the minimum cost.
No feasible solution
◦ This exists when there is no solution to the problem that
satisfies all the constraint equations.
◦ No feasible solution region exists.
◦ This is a common occurrence in the real world.
◦ Generally one or more constraints are relaxed until a
solution is found.
8–
–
6–
– Region Satisfying
4– Third Constraint
–
2–
–
0– | | | | | | | | | |
Figure 7.12 2 4 6 8 X1
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education Region Satisfying First Two Constraints 7-22
Four Special Cases in LP
Unboundedness
◦ Sometimes a linear program will not have a finite
solution.
◦ In a maximization problem, one or more solution
variables, and the profit, can be made infinitely large
without violating any constraints.
◦ In a graphical solution, the feasible region will be open
ended.
◦ This usually means the problem has been formulated
improperly.
X1 ≥ 5
15 –
X2 ≤ 10
10 –
Feasible Region
5–
X1 + 2X2 ≥ 15
| | | | |
Figure 7.13 0– 5 10 15 X1
Redundancy
◦ A redundant constraint is one that does not affect the
feasible solution region.
◦ One or more constraints may be binding.
◦ This is a very common occurrence in the real world.
◦ It causes no particular problems, but eliminating
redundant constraints simplifies the model.
30 –
25 –
2X1 + X2 ≤ 30
20 –
Redundant
Constraint
15 –
X1 ≤ 25
10 – X1 + X2 ≤ 20
Feasible
Figure 7.14 5– Region
| | | | | |
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 0– 7-26
5 10 15 20 25 30 X1
Four Special Cases in LP
8–
7–
A
6– Optimal Solution Consists of All
Combinations of X1 and X2 Along
5– the AB Segment
4–
2–
B Isoprofit Line for $12
1 – Feasible Overlays Line Segment AB
Figure 7.15
Region
0– | | | | | | | |
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 X1 7-28
Copyright
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United
States of America.