Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

OB Lecture 4

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Organizational behavior & Development

Lecture 4
Personality and Values

by Dawit H. (Assistant professor)


Lecture 4 Objectives

After this lecture you should be able to :


 Define personality, the way it is measured, and the
factors that shape it
 Describe Holland’s personality–job fit theory
 Explain the strengths & weaknesses of the Myers-
Briggs Type Indicator personality framework & the Big
Five model.
 Describe how the situation affects whether personality
predicts behavior.
 Distinguish terminal and instrumental values.
 Differentiate Hofstede’s five value dimensions and the
GLOBE framework.
What is Personality?

Personality
The sum total of ways in which an individual reacts and
interacts with others.
Personality Traits
Enduring characteristics that describe an individual’s
behavior.
Personality Determinants
 Heredity
 Environment
 Situation

1
Measuring Personality

The most common means of measuring personality is


through self-report surveys in which individuals
evaluate themselves on a series of factors
Personality assessments have been increasingly used in
diverse organizational settings.
 Xerox, McDonald’s, and Lowe’s, and schools such as
DePaul University have begun to use personality
tests in their admissions process.
 Personality tests are useful in hiring decisions and
help managers forecast who is best for a job.

2
Cont.

 Another means of measuring personality is called


Observer-ratings surveys.
Here, a coworker or another observer does the rating.
Though the results of self-reports and observer-ratings
surveys are strongly correlated, research suggests that
observer-ratings surveys predict job success more than self-
ratings alone.
 People in individualistic countries trend toward self-
enhancement, while people in collectivist countries like
Taiwan, China, and South Korea trend toward self-
diminishment.

3
Person–Job Fit

 The effort to match job requirements with personality


characteristics is described by John Holland’s
personality–job fit theory, one of the more proven
theories in use internationally.
 The Vocational Preference Inventory questionnaire
contains 160 occupational titles. Respondents indicate
which they like or dislike, and their answers form
personality profiles. Holland presented six personality
types and proposed that satisfaction and the propensity to
leave a position depend on how well individuals match
their personalities to a job.

4
Holland’s Type of Personality & Congruent Occupations

5
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the


most widely used personality assessment instruments in
the world.
It is a 100-question personality test that asks people
how they usually feel or act in situations.
Respondents are classified as:
 Extraverted or introverted (E or I),
 Sensing or intuitive (S or N),
 Thinking or feeling (T or F),
 And judging or perceiving (J or P)

6
Cont.

Extraverted (E) Vs Introverted (I). Extraverted individuals


are outgoing, sociable, and assertive. Introverts are quiet
and shy.
Sensing (S) Vs Intuitive (N). Sensing types are practical &
prefer routine & order, & they focus on details. Intuitives
rely on unconscious processes & look at the big picture.
Thinking (T) Vs Feeling (F). Thinking types use reason
and logic to handle problems. Feeling types rely on their
personal values and emotions.
Judging (J) Vs Perceiving (P). Judging types want control
and prefer order & structure. Perceiving types are flexible
& spontaneous.

7
The Big Five Personality Model

The MBTI may lack strong supporting evidence, but an


impressive body of research supports the Big Five Model,
which proposes that five basic dimensions underlie all
others and encompass most of the significant variation in
human personality.
Test scores of these traits do a very good job of predicting
how people behave in a variety of real-life situations and
remain relatively stable for an individual over time, with
some daily variations.
These are the Big Five factors:

8
Cont.

1. Conscientiousness. The conscientiousness dimension is a


measure of personal consistency and reliability. A highly
conscientious person is responsible, organized, dependable, and
persistent. Those who score low on this dimension are easily
distracted, disorganized, and unreliable.
2. Emotional stability. The emotional stability dimension taps a
person’s ability to withstand stress. People with emotional
stability tend to be calm, self-confident, and secure. High scorers
are more likely to be positive and optimistic and to experience
fewer negative emotions; they are generally happier than low
scorers.

9
Cont.

3. Extraversion. The extraversion dimension captures our


relational approach toward the social world. Extraverts tend to
be gregarious, assertive, and sociable. They experience more
positive emotions than do introverts, and they more freely
express these feelings. On the other hand (low extraversion)
tend to be more thoughtful, reserved, timid, and quiet.
4. Openness to experience. The openness to experience
dimension addresses the range of interests and fascination with
novelty. Open people are creative, curious, and artistically
sensitive. Those at the low end of the category are
conventional and find comfort in the familiar.

10
Cont.

5. Agreeableness. The agreeableness dimension refers


to an individual’s propensity to defer to others.
Agreeable people are cooperative, warm, and trusting.
You might expect agreeable people to be happier than
disagreeable people. They are, but only slightly.
When people choose organizational team members,
agreeable individuals are usually their first choice.
In contrast, people who score low on agreeableness are
cold and antagonistic.

11
Model of How Big Five Traits Influence OB Criteria

12
Review question

1. A high score in which dimension of the Big Five


model predicts good job performance for all
occupational groups?
A. Extroversion
B. Agreeableness
C. Conscientiousness
D. Emotional stability
E. Openness to experience

13
The dark triad

Machiavellianism (often abbreviated Mach) is named


after Niccolo Machiavelli, who wrote in the sixteenth
century about how to gain and use power.
An individual high in Machiavellianism is pragmatic,
maintains emotional distance, and believes ends can
justify means. “If it works, use it” is consistent with a
high-Mach perspective.
High Machs manipulate more, win more, and are
persuaded less by others but persuade others more than
do low Machs.

14
Cont.

The trait is named for the Greek myth about Narcissus, a


youth so vain and proud he fell in love with his own
image.
Narcissism describes a person who has a splendid sense
of self-importance, requires excessive admiration, and is
arrogant. Narcissists often have fantasies of grand
success, a tendency to exploit situations and people, a
sense of entitlement, and a lack of empathy. However,
narcissists can be hypersensitive and fragile people. They
may also experience more anger.

15
Cont.

Psychopathy
It is defined as a lack of concern for others and a lack of
guilt or remorse when actions cause harm.
Measures of psychopathy attempt to assess the
motivation to comply with social norms;
impulsivity; willingness to use deceit to obtain desired
ends; and disregard, that is, lack of empathic concern
for others.

16
Situation strength theory

Situation strength theory proposes that the way personality


translates into behavior depends on the strength of the
situation. By situation strength, we mean the degree to which
norms, cues, or standards dictate appropriate behavior.
 Strong situations show us what the right behavior is,
pressure us to exhibit the right behavior, and discourage the
wrong behavior.
 In weak situations, conversely, “anything goes,” and thus
we are freer to express our personality in behavior. Thus,
personality traits better predict behavior in weak situations
than in strong ones.

17
Cont.

1. Clarity: the degree to which cues about work duties &


responsibilities are available & clear. Jobs high in clarity
produce strong situations because individuals can readily
determine what to do. For e.g., the job of janitor probably
provides higher clarity about each task than the job of nanny.
2. Consistency: the extent to which cues regarding work duties &
responsibilities are compatible with one another. Jobs with
high consistency represent strong situations because all the
cues point toward the same desired behavior. For e.g., the job
of acute care nurse, probably has higher consistency than the
job of manager.

18
Cont.

3. Constraints: The extent to which individuals’ freedom to


decide or act is limited by forces outside their control. Jobs
with many constraints represent strong situations because an
individual has limited individual discretion. E.g. Bank
examiner is probably a job with stronger constraints than forest
ranger.
4. Consequences: The degree to which decisions or actions have
important implications for the organization or its members,
clients, suppliers, and so on. Jobs with important consequences
represent strong situations because the environment is probably
heavily structured to guard against mistakes. E.g. a surgeon’s
job has higher consequences than a foreign-language teacher’s.
19
Values
Values

Values represent basic convictions that “a specific


mode of conduct or end-state of existence is
personally or socially preferable to an opposite or
converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence.”
They contain a judgmental element in that they carry
an individual’s ideas as to what is right, good, or
desirable. Values have both content and intensity
attributes. The content attribute says a mode of
conduct or end-state of existence is important. The
intensity attribute specifies how important it is.

20
Importance
Importance of
ofValues
Values

Values lay the foundation for our understanding of


people’s attitudes and motivation and influence our
perceptions. We enter an organization with
preconceived notions of what “ought” and “ought
not” to be.

Would your attitudes and behavior be different if


your values aligned with the organization’s pay
policies? Most likely.

21
Terminal
TerminalVS
VS Instrumental
InstrumentalValues
Values

Terminal values , refers to desirable end-states. These are


the goals a person would like to achieve during his or her
lifetime. The other set, called Instrumental values , refers
to preferable modes of behavior, or means of achieving the
terminal values.

Prosperity and economic success, Freedom, Health and


well-being, World peace, Social recognition, and Meaning in
life Self-improvement, Autonomy and self-reliance,
Personal discipline, kindness, Ambition, and Goal-
orientation.

22
Hofstede’s
Hofstede’s five
five value
value dimensions
dimensions

Power distance describes the degree to which people in a


country accept that power in institutions and organizations is
distributed unequally. A high rating on power distance means
that large inequalities of power and wealth exist and are
tolerated in the culture, as in a class or caste system that
discourages upward mobility.
Individualism is the degree to which people prefer to act as
individuals rather than as members of groups and believe in
individual rights above all else. Collectivism emphasizes a
tight social framework in which people expect others in groups
of which they are a part to look after them and protect them.

23
Cont.

Masculinity versus femininity. Hofstede’s construct of


masculinity is the degree to which the culture favors
traditional masculine roles such as achievement, power,
and control, as opposed to viewing men and women as
equals.
Uncertainty avoidance. The degree to which people in a
country prefer structured over unstructured situations
defines their uncertainty avoidance . In cultures that
score high on uncertainty avoidance, people have an
increased level of anxiety about uncertainty and
ambiguity and use laws and controls to reduce
uncertainty.
24
Cont.

Long-term versus short-term orientation. This


newest addition to Hofstede’s typology measures a
society’s devotion to traditional values. People in a
culture with long-term orientation look to the future
and value thrift, persistence, and tradition. In a short-
term orientation , people value the here and now; they
accept change more readily and don’t see commitments
as impediments to change.

25
Comparison
Comparisonof
ofHofstede’s
Hofstede’sDimensions
Dimensionsand
andthe
theGLOBE
GLOBEFramework
Framework

26
Implications for Managers

 Consider applicants’ and employees’ fit to the job &


organization in employment decisions. Their
personalities, values, & other characteristics may be
useful to understanding whether they will flourish in
particular assignments, jobs, teams, or organizations.
 Consider screening job candidates for
conscientiousness— & the other Big Five traits —
depending on the criteria your organization finds most
important. Other aspects, such as core self-evaluation
or narcissism, may be relevant in certain situations.

27
Cont.

 Although the MBTI has faults, you can use it in


training and development to help employees better
understand each other, open communication in work
groups, and possibly reduce conflicts.
 An understanding of differences in cultural values
can equip you to interact with others from cultures
that are different from your own.

28
Case 4

Agreeable people tend to be kinder and more accommodating in social


situations, which you might think could add to their success in life.
However, one downside of agreeableness is potentially lower earnings.
Research has shown the answer to this and other puzzles; some of them
may surprise you.
First, perhaps most obvious, agreeable individuals are less adept
at a type of negotiation called distributive bargaining. Distributive
bargaining is less about creating win–win solutions and more about
claiming as large a share of the pie as possible. Because salary
negotiations are generally distributive, agreeable individuals often
negotiate lower salaries for themselves than they might otherwise get.

29
Cont.

Second, agreeable individuals may choose to work in industries or occupations that


earn lower salaries, such as the “caring” industries of education and health care.
Agreeable individuals are also attracted to jobs both in the public sector and in
nonprofit organizations. Third, the earnings of agreeable individuals also may be
reduced by their lower drive to emerge as leaders and by their tendency to engage in
lower degrees of proactive task behaviors, such as thinking of ways to increase
organizational effectiveness.
While being agreeable certainly doesn’t appear to help your paycheck, it does
provide other benefits. Agreeable individuals are better liked at work, more likely to
help others at work, and generally happier at work and in life.
Nice guys and gals may finish last in terms of earnings, but wages do not define a
happy life and, on that front, agreeable individuals have the advantage.

30
Cont.

Questions
1. Do you think employers must choose between agreeable
employees and top performers? Why or why not?
2. The effects of personality often depend on the situation. Can you
think of some job situations in which agreeableness is an
important virtue and some in which it is harmful to job
performance?
3. In some research we’ve conducted, the negative effect of
agreeableness on earnings has been stronger for men than for
women (that is, being agreeable hurt men’s earnings more than
women’s). Why do you think this might be the case?

31
End of Lecture 4

32

You might also like