Yellow Shale Innovative Project
Yellow Shale Innovative Project
Yellow Shale Innovative Project
study Observation)
Conclusion
Organization Details
Mining & Raw Mill AFR & Kiln & Cement Packing
Crushing & Coal Mill SNCR Cooler Mill Plant
01 02 03 04 05 06
Raw Mill
Solid AFR Mill-01
Mines VRM- FLS
Schecnk ,20 TPH Kiln FL Smidth
Muddapur ATOX- 52.5 540
Liquid AFR FL Smidth Ball Mill 4.6 Ǿ Packers
161.87Hectare Halki TPH
PH1 2-4 KLPH ILC- 4.75ǾX74 140 TPH OPC Total- 4 No’s
124.24Hectare Coal Mill
Shredder 5500 TPD Mill-02
Crusher VRM- FLS
Weima Calciner FL Smidth FLS Ventomatic
Make- L&T 900 TPH ATOX- 25.0
20 TPH Low NOx Ball Mill 4.6 Ǿ 12 Spout Double
LS Stacker 50 TPH SA Coal
SNCR ILC- 8.5ǾX52 140 TPH OPC Discharge
Make-FLS Coal Stacker
KHD System MT. Mill-03 180 TPH
1000 TPH Make- FLS
25% Aqueous Cooler- FLS Gebr. Pfeiffer
LS Reclaimer 130 TPH
ammonia solution Cross bar 4X6 VRM- MPS 5600
Make FLS700 TPH Coal Reclaimer
138.8 M2 160 TPH Slag
Make FLS 100 TPH
4
Investigative Study Approach
LIME STONE-
1
Transformation of Raw Mix Team excursion done to RCA done and got the cause; To analyze the mineralogical
to clinker depends on kiln evaluate the reason for LS Piles which shows composition of different
feed burnability; Generally excellency in burnability of burnability improvement yellow shales , free Silica
in our case it is moderate to some Lime Stone Piles. contains yellow shale, which and fusion temperature to
poor. Observed excellent in supports in lowering down identify the suitable shale.
some cases. the fusion temperature,
accelerate the C3S formation
Burnability ∝ 1 1
& decrease in free lime.
F Cao
Methodology (Sample Selection)
Our captive mines has different types of
Shale. The elemental composition of LOI SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Free Silica
various shale from mines were assessed (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
by XRF and determination of free silica ADDITIVE
FE RICH
by wet analysis. And Fusion Temperature PITW MR/S1
21.51 30.78 5.46 2.83 33.11 1.49 26.59
Light yellow
DMP MR/S1
Light yellow with 24.91 28.06 7.18 3.77 32.04 2.27 22.54
reddish bands
DMP MR/S2
10.69 38.74 10.14 18.79 17.31 3.18 11.87
Yellow
DMP SL/S1
26.43 18.25 5.24 3.75 38.22 2.35 16.25
Black with Mud
DMP SL/S3
23.68 34.7 7.61 4.44 29.06 2.67 18.53
Black with Mud
Yellow Shale DMP MR/S2 has lower
fusion temperature.
Methodology (Excursion)
More yellow shale samples were collected from pit DMP MR/S2 to identify the range fusion temperature in
yellow shale .
LIME STONE- Fusion
Description SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO
1 K2O Na2O SO3
Temperature
Yellow Shale-1 42.25 7.90 20.15 12.84 2.31 0.07 0.07 0.03 1150°C
Yellow Shale-2 40.58 8.31 5.31 21.27 2.71 1.08 0.04 0.06 1150°C
Yellow Shale-3 38.74 10.14 18.79 17.31 3.18 0.10 0.05 0.03 900°C
Yellow Shale-4 34.87 7.82 6.87 23.17 3.33 1.05 0.07 0.00 1200°C
Yellow Shale-5 41.82 10.58 18.79 19.19 3.22 0.13 0.08 0.05 1000°C
Yellow Shale-6 46.91 9.23 15.18 19.84 2.98 0.30 0.09 0.05 950°C
The yellow shale contains low free silica & high Fe2O3 % has lowest fusion temperature and the fusion
temperature varied between 900 to 1200°C.
The yellow Shale-3 was selected for further burnability studies with designed Raw Mix.
Methodology (Raw Mix Design)
Raw mix design with & without Yellow shale :
Raw Material Proportion (%) Chemical Composition
Description LIME STONE-
Iron Yellow SiO2 Al2O3 1 Fe2O3 CaO ADDITIVEMgO
Limestone LSF SIM ALM
Additives Shale (%) (%) (%) (%) FE RICH (%)
Raw Mix
98.4 1.8 -- 13.09 3.15 2.80 41.28 2.82 97.80 2.20 1.12
Control
Raw Mix +
97.7 1.3 1.00 13.23 3.20 2.68 41.44 2.82 97.38 2.25 1.20
Yellow Shale
** Prepared incorporating the fuel ash corresponding to the ash absorption in the Plant
Test specimen
preparation for
Burnability
Expansion %
LIME STONE-
1 0.00 ADDITIVE
FE RICH
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
-3.00
Srinkage %
-6.00
-9.00
Temperature (Deg C)
-12.00
The burnability value of Raw Mix Control (without yellow shale) - 21.77
The burnability value of Raw Mix with yellow shale - 12.92
Lower values of BC correspond to a higher burnability of the Raw Mix.
Plant Scale Trial
Pilot Scale Clinkers produced with the two Raw Mixes and The produced clinker was ground to Lab ground
OPC, maintaining SO3 content of 2.4% at Blaine’s fineness of 320 M 2/kg.
Chemical Composition of Pilot Scale Clinkers and physical properties of Resultant OPC
LIME STONE-
1
Chemical Composition Physical Parameter
Content (%)
Raw Mix Strength (Mpa)
F.CaO (%)
Fe2 O3 (%)
C4AF (%)
Al2 O3 (%)
(M2/Kg)
CaO (%)
C3A (%)
SiO2 (%)
C3S (%)
C2S (%)
LOI (%)
Description
Blaine
Liquid
ALM
SIM
LSF
01 03 07 28
Day Days Days Days
Control 20.31 4.95 4.30 62.42 0.42 95.29 2.20 1.15 45.67 25.78 5.84 13.08 2.44 28.05 320 28.6 33.6 37.2 48.3
With Yellow 20.42 5.03 4.10 62.66 0.37 95.26 2.24 1.23 50.06 22.77 6.41 12.46 1.35 27.86 323 30.1 35.4 39.7 50.6
Shale
Day-1 62.37 94.98 47.66 2.26 323 28.9 33.9 37.8 48.9 7,041
B
E Day-2 62.29 95.55 46.71 2.37 311 28.1 33.3 37.4 48.6 7,029
F Day-3 62.23 95.37 48.63 2.11 318 28.5 33.7 37.8 48.1 6,936
O Day-4 62.34 95.69 47.53 2.51 308 28.2 33.1 37.1 47.9 6,929
R Day-5 62.18 95.16 49.11 1.97 321 28.6 33.8 37.5 48.4 6,804
E
Average 62.28 95.35 47.93 2.24 316 28.5 33.6 37.5 48.4 6,948
A Day-1 62.33 94.88 50.12 1.63 317 30.3 35.7 39.6 50.6 7,078
F Day-2 62.24 94.79 50.31 1.49 324 30.6 35.1 39.2 51.1 7,015
T Day-3 62.27 95.18 49.72 1.82 314 30.1 34.8 38.9 50.4 7,079
E
Day-4 62.39 95.36 50.76 1.62 311 30.9 35.6 39.9 51.3 7,087
R
Day-5 62.12 94.79 51.28 1.42 328 31.2 35.6 38.8 50.9 7,013
Average 62.27 95.00 50.44 1.60 319 30.6 35.4 39.3 50.9 7,054
Observation on Plant Scale Production
The Trials with use of yellow shale, indicated a very stable burning conditions of
the kilns with much lower and consistent free lime in clinker with marginally
higher kiln throughputs
The produced clinker showed higher 1 Day strength with 28 Day >50MPa. This
has its benefits in Clinker factor of the blended Cement products
Plant As can be seen that it is a high-MgO clinker, the Trial clinkers showed very much
scale improved performance in Soundness test (LC, AC).
usage Earlier without use of shale the kiln performance was very sensitive and invariable
the team had to increase the clinker Fe2O3 so as to have stable burning condition.
With use of shale use of Ferruginous corrective was reduced.
Subsequently the Mines have created a buffer stock of the Yellow shale and it has
been in use regularly. Able to use overburden of mines which contributes towards
conservation of natural resources.
Conclusion
The judicious data analysis has helped in identifying the beneficial
component from the mines.
The yellow shale had lower fusion temperature than the conventional
clinker liquid formation temperature
Enhancing the C3S formation reactions.
Improving the Kiln feed burnability and pyro processing performance.
Result in improving clinker quality and also result in achieving lower
clinker factor in Blended Cement Products.
In many locations in the country , such low fusion temperature shales/
materials from mines if used in larger percentages could result in heavy
coating in kilns and have productivity issues, a proper diagnostic study by
the Plant Teams along with the Mines Team to assess the suitable usage
levels of such materials could assist in improving productivity of many
Plants.