This document discusses shear wall analysis and design. It defines shear walls as structural elements used in buildings to resist lateral forces through cantilever action. The document classifies different types of shear walls and discusses their behavior under seismic loading. It outlines the steps for designing shear walls, including reviewing layout, analyzing structural systems, determining design forces, and detailing reinforcement. The document emphasizes the importance of properly locating shear walls in a building to resist seismic loads and minimize torsional effects.
The document discusses ductility and ductile detailing in reinforced concrete structures. It states that structures should be designed to have lateral strength, deformability, and ductility to resist earthquakes with limited damage and no collapse. Ductility allows structures to develop their full strength through internal force redistribution. Detailing of reinforcement is important to avoid brittle failure and induce ductile behavior by allowing steel to yield in a controlled manner. Shear walls are also discussed as vertical reinforced concrete elements that help structures resist earthquake loads in a ductile manner.
Shear walls are preferred in seismic regions because they are very effective at resisting lateral forces during earthquakes. Shear walls are vertical structural elements designed to transfer seismic forces throughout the height of the building. They provide large strength, high stiffness, and ductility. Shear wall buildings have performed much better during past earthquakes compared to reinforced concrete frame buildings. Some key advantages of shear walls include good earthquake resistance when designed properly, easy construction, reduced construction costs, and minimized damage to structural and non-structural elements during seismic events.
This document provides information on cable layout and load balancing methods for prestressed concrete beams. It discusses layouts for simple, continuous, and cantilever beams. For simple beams, it describes layouts for pretensioned and post-tensioned beams, including straight, curved, and bent cable configurations. It also compares the load carrying capacities of simple and continuous beams. The document concludes by explaining the load balancing method for design, using examples of how to balance loads in simple, cantilever, and continuous beam configurations.
This document discusses ductile detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) frames according to Indian standards. It explains that detailing involves translating the structural design into the final structure through reinforcement drawings. Good detailing ensures reinforcement and concrete interact efficiently. Key aspects of ductile detailing covered include requirements for beams, columns, and beam-column joints to improve ductility and seismic performance. Specific provisions are presented for longitudinal and shear reinforcement in beams and columns, as well as confining reinforcement and lap splices. The importance of cover and stirrup spacing is also discussed.
Shear walls are vertical structural elements designed to resist lateral forces like winds and earthquakes. They work by transferring shear forces throughout their height and resisting uplift forces. Properly designed and constructed shear wall buildings are very stable and ductile, providing warnings before collapse during severe earthquakes. Common types of shear walls include reinforced concrete, plywood, and steel plate shear walls. Shear walls are an effective and efficient way to resist lateral loads in seismic regions.
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
This document discusses the design of two-way slabs. It defines a two-way slab as having a ratio of long to short spans of less than 2. The main types of two-way slabs described are flat slabs with drop panels, two-way slabs with beams, flat plates, and waffle slabs. The basic steps of two-way slab design are outlined, including choosing the slab type and thickness, the design method, calculating moments, determining reinforcement, and checking shear strength. Two common design methods are described: the direct design method which uses coefficients, and the equivalent frame method which analyzes frames cut between columns.
This document compares reinforced concrete (RC) flat slab and post-tensioned (PT) slab systems. It analyzes slabs of varying panel sizes from 9x9m to 12x12m under different loading conditions using software. The PT slabs were found to have higher moment capacity, require less concrete thickness and rebar, and provide better serviceability than RC slabs. Construction photos of completed PT slab projects are also shown. The document concludes that PT slabs are more cost effective for building floor systems compared to RC flat slabs.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structures
This document discusses seismic analysis of regular and irregular reinforced concrete framed buildings. It analyzes 4 building models - a regular 4-story building, a stiffness irregular building with a soft ground story, and two vertically irregular buildings with setbacks on the 3rd floor and 2nd/3rd floors. Static analysis was performed to compare bending moments, shear forces, story drifts, and joint displacements. Results showed irregular buildings experienced higher seismic demands. The regular building performed best, with the single setback building also performing well. Irregular configurations increase seismic effects and should be minimized in design.
This document provides an overview of foundation design, including:
1) It defines the two major requirements of foundation design as sustaining applied loads without exceeding soil bearing capacity and maintaining uniform settlement within tolerable limits.
2) It differentiates between shallow and deep foundations, with shallow foundations including isolated, combined, strap, and strip footings and deep foundations including pile foundations.
3) It explains considerations for foundation design such as minimum depth, thickness, and determining bending moments and soil bearing capacity.
Pushover analysis has been in the academic-research arena for quite long. The papers published in this field usually deals mostly with proposed improvements to the approach, expecting the reader to know the basics of the topic... while the common structural design practitioner, not knowing the basics, is left out from participating in those discussions. Here I’m making an effort to bridge that gap by explaining the Pushover analysis, from basics, in its simplicity.
A write up on this topic can be found at http://rahulleslie.blogspot.in/p/blog-page.html, though does not cover the full spectrum presented in this slide show.
This document summarizes the design of a single reinforced concrete corbel according to ACI 318-05. The corbel is 300mm wide and 500mm deep with 35MPa concrete and 415MPa steel reinforcement. It was designed to resist a vertical load of 370kN applied 100mm from the face of the column. The design includes checking the vertical load capacity, calculating the required shear friction and main tension reinforcement, and designing the horizontal reinforcement. The provided reinforcement of 3 No.6 bars for tension and 3 No.3 link bars at 100mm spacing was found to meet all design requirements.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF G+3 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY S.MAHAMMAD FROM RAJIV GAND...
Structural design is the primary aspect of civil engineering. The foremost basic in
structural engineering is the design of simple basic components and members of a building viz., Slabs,
Beams, Columns and Footings. In order to design them, it is important to first obtain the plan of the
particular building. Thereby depending on the suitability; plan layout of beams and the position of
columns are fixed.
The document discusses reinforced concrete columns, including their functions, failure modes, classifications, and design considerations. Columns primarily resist axial compression but may also experience bending moments. They can fail due to compression, buckling, or a combination. Design depends on whether the column is short or slender, braced or unbraced. Reinforcement is designed based on the column's expected loads and dimensions using methods specified in design codes like BS 8110.
This document is a project report on the design of a shear wall using STAAD Pro software. It includes an introduction to shear walls, which are vertical structural elements that resist lateral loads like wind and earthquakes. The report discusses the purpose, applications, advantages, and disadvantages of shear walls. It also describes the different types of shear walls and their behavior under loads. The design procedure for shear walls in STAAD Pro and as per reference codes is explained. The conclusion summarizes that shear walls provide strength and stiffness to resist lateral loads in buildings.
IRJET- Analysis of Various Effects on Multistory Building (G+27) by Staad Pro...
This document analyzes the effects of shear walls on a 28-story building modelled in STAAD Pro software. Three models are considered: one without shear walls and two with shear walls in different locations (inward and outward parts of the building). The models are compared based on load transfer and lateral displacement of structural elements. Results show that providing shear walls in suitable locations significantly reduces displacements due to earthquake and wind loads. The document also reviews previous studies on shear wall behavior and modelling approaches. Methodology describes analyzing a 9-story building model with and without shear walls to determine optimal wall locations based on structural displacement and storey drifting.
Reinforced concrete buildings in seismic regions often include vertical shear walls that run from the foundation to the roof. Shear walls help buildings withstand earthquakes by carrying lateral forces down to the foundation. They perform much better when properly designed with features like symmetrical placement, ductile reinforcement, and thickened boundary elements at the ends that experience high stresses. Buildings with sufficient shear walls have shown good performance during past earthquakes, making shear wall construction a popular approach in seismic design.
Horizontal and vertical elements of a building work together to resist horizontal earthquake forces. The horizontal diaphragm elements (roofs and floors) distribute seismic forces to the vertical shear wall elements. Shear walls are the main components that resist earthquake forces and transfer them to the foundation. Masonry shear walls can fail in sliding, shear, or flexural modes depending on their aspect ratio and the magnitude of seismic forces.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Reinforced concrete buildings in seismic regions often include vertical shear walls that run from the foundation to the roof. Shear walls help buildings withstand earthquakes by carrying lateral forces down to the foundation. They perform much better when properly designed to be ductile. Shear walls work best when located symmetrically along exterior walls and in both principal directions. Buildings with sufficient shear walls designed according to seismic standards have demonstrated good performance during past earthquakes.
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Vikas Mehta
This document discusses the calculation of crack width in reinforced concrete flexural members. It provides information on:
1) Crack width is calculated to satisfy serviceability limits and is only relevant for Type 3 pre-stressed concrete members that crack under service loads.
2) Crack width depends on factors like amount of pre-stress, tensile stress in bars, concrete cover thickness, bar diameter and spacing, member depth and location of neutral axis, bond strength, and concrete tensile strength.
3) The method of calculation involves determining the shortest distance from the surface to a bar and using equations involving member depth, neutral axis depth, average strain at the surface level. Permissible crack widths are specified depending on exposure
Reinforced concrete columns and beams are important structural elements that carry compressive and bending loads respectively. Columns can be categorized as short or long based on their height-width ratio and as spiral or tied columns based on their shape. Beams are classified based on their supports as simply supported, fixed, continuous, or cantilever beams. The construction of RCC columns and beams involves laying reinforcement, forming the structure, and pouring concrete to create these load-bearing elements.
shear walls are vertical elements of the horizontal force resisting system. Shear walls are constructed to counter the effects of lateral load acting on a structure.
The document discusses ductility and ductile detailing in reinforced concrete structures. It states that structures should be designed to have lateral strength, deformability, and ductility to resist earthquakes with limited damage and no collapse. Ductility allows structures to develop their full strength through internal force redistribution. Detailing of reinforcement is important to avoid brittle failure and induce ductile behavior by allowing steel to yield in a controlled manner. Shear walls are also discussed as vertical reinforced concrete elements that help structures resist earthquake loads in a ductile manner.
Shear walls are preferred in seismic regions because they are very effective at resisting lateral forces during earthquakes. Shear walls are vertical structural elements designed to transfer seismic forces throughout the height of the building. They provide large strength, high stiffness, and ductility. Shear wall buildings have performed much better during past earthquakes compared to reinforced concrete frame buildings. Some key advantages of shear walls include good earthquake resistance when designed properly, easy construction, reduced construction costs, and minimized damage to structural and non-structural elements during seismic events.
Cable Layout, Continuous Beam & Load Balancing MethodMd Tanvir Alam
This document provides information on cable layout and load balancing methods for prestressed concrete beams. It discusses layouts for simple, continuous, and cantilever beams. For simple beams, it describes layouts for pretensioned and post-tensioned beams, including straight, curved, and bent cable configurations. It also compares the load carrying capacities of simple and continuous beams. The document concludes by explaining the load balancing method for design, using examples of how to balance loads in simple, cantilever, and continuous beam configurations.
This document discusses ductile detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) frames according to Indian standards. It explains that detailing involves translating the structural design into the final structure through reinforcement drawings. Good detailing ensures reinforcement and concrete interact efficiently. Key aspects of ductile detailing covered include requirements for beams, columns, and beam-column joints to improve ductility and seismic performance. Specific provisions are presented for longitudinal and shear reinforcement in beams and columns, as well as confining reinforcement and lap splices. The importance of cover and stirrup spacing is also discussed.
Shear walls are vertical structural elements designed to resist lateral forces like winds and earthquakes. They work by transferring shear forces throughout their height and resisting uplift forces. Properly designed and constructed shear wall buildings are very stable and ductile, providing warnings before collapse during severe earthquakes. Common types of shear walls include reinforced concrete, plywood, and steel plate shear walls. Shear walls are an effective and efficient way to resist lateral loads in seismic regions.
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
This document discusses the design of two-way slabs. It defines a two-way slab as having a ratio of long to short spans of less than 2. The main types of two-way slabs described are flat slabs with drop panels, two-way slabs with beams, flat plates, and waffle slabs. The basic steps of two-way slab design are outlined, including choosing the slab type and thickness, the design method, calculating moments, determining reinforcement, and checking shear strength. Two common design methods are described: the direct design method which uses coefficients, and the equivalent frame method which analyzes frames cut between columns.
This document compares reinforced concrete (RC) flat slab and post-tensioned (PT) slab systems. It analyzes slabs of varying panel sizes from 9x9m to 12x12m under different loading conditions using software. The PT slabs were found to have higher moment capacity, require less concrete thickness and rebar, and provide better serviceability than RC slabs. Construction photos of completed PT slab projects are also shown. The document concludes that PT slabs are more cost effective for building floor systems compared to RC flat slabs.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structuresDaanish Zama
This document discusses seismic analysis of regular and irregular reinforced concrete framed buildings. It analyzes 4 building models - a regular 4-story building, a stiffness irregular building with a soft ground story, and two vertically irregular buildings with setbacks on the 3rd floor and 2nd/3rd floors. Static analysis was performed to compare bending moments, shear forces, story drifts, and joint displacements. Results showed irregular buildings experienced higher seismic demands. The regular building performed best, with the single setback building also performing well. Irregular configurations increase seismic effects and should be minimized in design.
This document provides an overview of foundation design, including:
1) It defines the two major requirements of foundation design as sustaining applied loads without exceeding soil bearing capacity and maintaining uniform settlement within tolerable limits.
2) It differentiates between shallow and deep foundations, with shallow foundations including isolated, combined, strap, and strip footings and deep foundations including pile foundations.
3) It explains considerations for foundation design such as minimum depth, thickness, and determining bending moments and soil bearing capacity.
The Pushover Analysis from basics - Rahul LeslieRahul Leslie
Pushover analysis has been in the academic-research arena for quite long. The papers published in this field usually deals mostly with proposed improvements to the approach, expecting the reader to know the basics of the topic... while the common structural design practitioner, not knowing the basics, is left out from participating in those discussions. Here I’m making an effort to bridge that gap by explaining the Pushover analysis, from basics, in its simplicity.
A write up on this topic can be found at http://rahulleslie.blogspot.in/p/blog-page.html, though does not cover the full spectrum presented in this slide show.
This document summarizes the design of a single reinforced concrete corbel according to ACI 318-05. The corbel is 300mm wide and 500mm deep with 35MPa concrete and 415MPa steel reinforcement. It was designed to resist a vertical load of 370kN applied 100mm from the face of the column. The design includes checking the vertical load capacity, calculating the required shear friction and main tension reinforcement, and designing the horizontal reinforcement. The provided reinforcement of 3 No.6 bars for tension and 3 No.3 link bars at 100mm spacing was found to meet all design requirements.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF G+3 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY S.MAHAMMAD FROM RAJIV GAND...Mahammad2251
Structural design is the primary aspect of civil engineering. The foremost basic in
structural engineering is the design of simple basic components and members of a building viz., Slabs,
Beams, Columns and Footings. In order to design them, it is important to first obtain the plan of the
particular building. Thereby depending on the suitability; plan layout of beams and the position of
columns are fixed.
The document discusses reinforced concrete columns, including their functions, failure modes, classifications, and design considerations. Columns primarily resist axial compression but may also experience bending moments. They can fail due to compression, buckling, or a combination. Design depends on whether the column is short or slender, braced or unbraced. Reinforcement is designed based on the column's expected loads and dimensions using methods specified in design codes like BS 8110.
This document is a project report on the design of a shear wall using STAAD Pro software. It includes an introduction to shear walls, which are vertical structural elements that resist lateral loads like wind and earthquakes. The report discusses the purpose, applications, advantages, and disadvantages of shear walls. It also describes the different types of shear walls and their behavior under loads. The design procedure for shear walls in STAAD Pro and as per reference codes is explained. The conclusion summarizes that shear walls provide strength and stiffness to resist lateral loads in buildings.
IRJET- Analysis of Various Effects on Multistory Building (G+27) by Staad Pro...IRJET Journal
This document analyzes the effects of shear walls on a 28-story building modelled in STAAD Pro software. Three models are considered: one without shear walls and two with shear walls in different locations (inward and outward parts of the building). The models are compared based on load transfer and lateral displacement of structural elements. Results show that providing shear walls in suitable locations significantly reduces displacements due to earthquake and wind loads. The document also reviews previous studies on shear wall behavior and modelling approaches. Methodology describes analyzing a 9-story building model with and without shear walls to determine optimal wall locations based on structural displacement and storey drifting.
Reinforced concrete buildings in seismic regions often include vertical shear walls that run from the foundation to the roof. Shear walls help buildings withstand earthquakes by carrying lateral forces down to the foundation. They perform much better when properly designed with features like symmetrical placement, ductile reinforcement, and thickened boundary elements at the ends that experience high stresses. Buildings with sufficient shear walls have shown good performance during past earthquakes, making shear wall construction a popular approach in seismic design.
Horizontal and vertical elements of a building work together to resist horizontal earthquake forces. The horizontal diaphragm elements (roofs and floors) distribute seismic forces to the vertical shear wall elements. Shear walls are the main components that resist earthquake forces and transfer them to the foundation. Masonry shear walls can fail in sliding, shear, or flexural modes depending on their aspect ratio and the magnitude of seismic forces.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
Reinforced concrete buildings in seismic regions often include vertical shear walls that run from the foundation to the roof. Shear walls help buildings withstand earthquakes by carrying lateral forces down to the foundation. They perform much better when properly designed to be ductile. Shear walls work best when located symmetrically along exterior walls and in both principal directions. Buildings with sufficient shear walls designed according to seismic standards have demonstrated good performance during past earthquakes.
The document discusses various types of tall buildings and earthquake resistant design strategies. It describes bundled tube, framed tube, braced tube, and tube-in-tube structural systems that are used for tall buildings. The document also summarizes the Bhuj earthquake that occurred in Gujarat in 2001 and killed over 19,000 people. It provides steps for seismic design including planning symmetrical buildings, avoiding soft stories, using ductile materials, and providing vertical load paths like shear walls, bracing, and tuned mass dampers.
IRJET- Study of Behaviour of Multi-Storey Building with Shear WallsIRJET Journal
1) Shear walls are structural members designed to resist lateral forces like those caused by earthquakes. They improve a building's stiffness and ability to resist earthquake shaking.
2) The document studies the performance of different positions of shear walls in multi-storey buildings subjected to seismic loads. Shear walls placed along the periphery of the building were found to most efficiently resist seismic loads.
3) Shear walls improve a building's performance during earthquakes by reducing lateral displacement, decreasing vibration period, and limiting induced moments and torsion effects from seismic forces. When properly designed and constructed, shear walls provide effective seismic resistance.
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear wallseSAT Publishing House
This document summarizes research on the performance of reinforced concrete shear walls that have been repaired after damage. It begins with an introduction to shear walls and their failure modes. The literature review then discusses the behavior of original shear walls as well as different repair techniques tested by other researchers, including conventional repair with new concrete, jacketing with steel plates or concrete, and use of fiber reinforced polymers. The document focuses on evaluating the strength retention of shear walls after being repaired with various methods.
IRJET- A Research on Comparing the Effect of Seismic Waves on Multistoried Bu...IRJET Journal
The document compares the effect of seismic waves on multistoried buildings with and without shear walls and flanged concrete columns. Three 10-story building models are analyzed using STAAD Pro: Model 1 without seismic resisting structures, Model 2 with concentrically located shear walls along the exterior, and Model 3 with flanged concrete columns along the exterior. Model 2 and 3 experience approximately 10% less lateral force and base shear compared to Model 1. Introducing shear walls or flanged columns improves seismic performance by increasing stiffness and reducing displacements, stresses, and forces in the building. While shear walls provide the greatest stability, flanged columns also enhance seismic resistance and may be more economical for some applications.
SHEAR WALL ANALYSIS & DESIGN OPTIMIZATION IN HIGH RISE BUILDINGSIRJET Journal
The document discusses the analysis and optimization of shear walls in high-rise buildings. It begins with an abstract that outlines analyzing a 19-story residential building with and without shear walls to compare vertical loads, moments, lateral forces, and torsion moments at each floor. It then discusses using optimization techniques to address structural engineering issues for high-rise buildings, including size and topological optimization while considering stability, safety, and load responses. The remainder of the document provides details on planning, design, and analysis of shear walls, including comparing walls to conventional construction and discussing forces on shear walls. It also covers the scope, literature review, analysis methods using software, and definitions of structural optimization.
IRJET-Effective Location Of Shear Walls and Bracings for Multistoried BuildingIRJET Journal
This document analyzes the effectiveness of different structural configurations for resisting lateral loads in a 10-story building subject to seismic activity. Two structural models are considered: a normal building frame and a dual system with shear walls and bracings placed at the building corners. Both models are analyzed using time history analysis in STAAD-Pro. Results show that the dual system experiences significantly less lateral deflection, with displacements reduced by 86-89% compared to the normal frame building. Additionally, the dual system sees only minor reductions in maximum shear force and bending moment compared to the normal frame building. Therefore, the dual system with corner shear walls and bracings provides greatly enhanced seismic performance over a normal framed building.
Effective Location Of Shear Walls and Bracings for Multistoried BuildingIRJET Journal
This document describes a study analyzing the effective placement of shear walls and bracings in a 10-story building to resist seismic forces. Two structural models are developed - a normal building frame and a dual system with shear walls and bracings at the building corners. Both models are analyzed using time history analysis in STAAD-Pro. The results show that the dual system with shear walls and bracings has significantly less lateral deflection under earthquake loading compared to the normal building frame, with deflections reduced by over 70% at the top story. This demonstrates that a combination of shear walls and bracings located at the building corners can greatly enhance the seismic performance of a multi-story building by reducing lateral displacements and
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structureRadhey Verma
This presentation discusses how to make masonry structures more resistant to earthquakes. It defines earthquake resistant masonry structures as those built from brick, stone or other masonry materials combined with containment reinforcement. It describes stresses in masonry walls during quakes and modeling of walls, then discusses techniques to strengthen buildings like adding flexibility, reinforcing walls and foundations, and containment reinforcement around walls. Shock table testing was also used to evaluate different earthquake resistant building features in masonry models.
This presentation discusses prefabricated building components. It covers prefabrication systems including large panel systems, frame systems, and slab-column systems. Manufacturing processes are described for various components like roof slabs, floor slabs, waffle slabs, wall panels, shear walls, beams, and columns. Specific component types like floor slabs, waffle slabs, wall panels, and shear walls are explained in more detail. Architectural and structural design aspects of using prefabricated components are also addressed.
Performance of shear wall building during seismic excitationsIAEME Publication
This document summarizes a study on the performance of shear wall buildings during seismic excitations. The study analyzed a 25-story building located in seismic zone 3, comparing the performance of two models: one with an L-shaped shear wall and one with a core-type shear wall. Time history analyses found that the building with the L-shaped wall experienced greater maximum displacement than the building with the core wall. Thus, providing shear walls as a core type can reduce story drift. Additionally, as the height of the building increases, shear walls absorb more lateral force than frames. Previous studies have also shown that shear walls with flanges perform better than walls without due to interaction between the flange and web.
This document discusses wall materials and construction techniques for disaster resistant buildings. It covers different types of masonry bonds used in walls like rat trap bond and English bond. It discusses wall geometry and how factors like height, length, and reinforcement placement affect wall strength. It also addresses openings, wall and beam reinforcements, and field testing of construction materials like bricks and cement to ensure quality. The goal is to understand wall design and construction methods that improve a building's ability to withstand disasters.
1) Shear walls are vertical elements that carry lateral loads like wind and seismic forces from the building down to the foundation, forming a box structure for support.
2) Shear walls should be placed on all levels of the building, including the basement, and symmetrically on all four exterior walls to form an effective structure. Interior walls can add strength when exterior walls are not sufficient.
3) Common types of shear walls include reinforced concrete, plywood, steel plate, and hollow concrete block masonry walls. Proper design and ductility improve shear wall performance during seismic events.
Shear walls are concrete or masonry walls that are reinforced with steel rods arranged in a grid pattern. They are designed to resist both vertical and horizontal forces like earthquakes. Shear walls are integrated throughout the building's structure to provide three-dimensional stability. Compared to framed structures, shear wall systems are more effective at withstanding earthquakes due to their larger supporting area relative to the building footprint. Properly designed and detailed shear wall buildings have demonstrated good seismic performance in past earthquakes.
Similar to Shear wall and its design guidelines (20)
Exploring Deep Learning Models for Image Recognition: A Comparative Reviewsipij
Image recognition, which comes under Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a critical aspect of computer vision,
enabling computers or other computing devices to identify and categorize objects within images. Among
numerous fields of life, food processing is an important area, in which image processing plays a vital role,
both for producers and consumers. This study focuses on the binary classification of strawberries, where
images are sorted into one of two categories. We Utilized a dataset of strawberry images for this study; we
aim to determine the effectiveness of different models in identifying whether an image contains
strawberries. This research has practical applications in fields such as agriculture and quality control. We
compared various popular deep learning models, including MobileNetV2, Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNN), and DenseNet121, for binary classification of strawberry images. The accuracy achieved by
MobileNetV2 is 96.7%, CNN is 99.8%, and DenseNet121 is 93.6%. Through rigorous testing and analysis,
our results demonstrate that CNN outperforms the other models in this task. In the future, the deep
learning models can be evaluated on a richer and larger number of images (datasets) for better/improved
results.
A vernier caliper is a precision instrument used to measure dimensions with high accuracy. It can measure internal and external dimensions, as well as depths.
Here is a detailed description of its parts and how to use it.
A brand new catalog for the 2024 edition of IWISS. We have enriched our product range and have more innovations in electrician tools, plumbing tools, wire rope tools and banding tools. Let's explore together!
Profiling of Cafe Business in Talavera, Nueva Ecija: A Basis for Development ...IJAEMSJORNAL
This study aimed to profile the coffee shops in Talavera, Nueva Ecija, to develop a standardized checklist for aspiring entrepreneurs. The researchers surveyed 10 coffee shop owners in the municipality of Talavera. Through surveys, the researchers delved into the Owner's Demographic, Business details, Financial Requirements, and other requirements needed to consider starting up a coffee shop. Furthermore, through accurate analysis, the data obtained from the coffee shop owners are arranged to derive key insights. By analyzing this data, the study identifies best practices associated with start-up coffee shops’ profitability in Talavera. These findings were translated into a standardized checklist outlining essential procedures including the lists of equipment needed, financial requirements, and the Traditional and Social Media Marketing techniques. This standardized checklist served as a valuable tool for aspiring and existing coffee shop owners in Talavera, streamlining operations, ensuring consistency, and contributing to business success.
Online music portal management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
The iMMS is a unique application that is synchronizing both user
experience and copyrights while providing services like online music
management, legal downloads, artists’ management. There are several
other applications available in the market that either provides some
specific services or large scale integrated solutions. Our product differs
from the rest in a way that we give more power to the users remaining
within the copyrights circle.
Response & Safe AI at Summer School of AI at IIITHIIIT Hyderabad
Talk covering Guardrails , Jailbreak, What is an alignment problem? RLHF, EU AI Act, Machine & Graph unlearning, Bias, Inconsistency, Probing, Interpretability, Bias
20CDE09- INFORMATION DESIGN
UNIT I INCEPTION OF INFORMATION DESIGN
Introduction and Definition
History of Information Design
Need of Information Design
Types of Information Design
Identifying audience
Defining the audience and their needs
Inclusivity and Visual impairment
Case study.
A brief introduction to quadcopter (drone) working. It provides an overview of flight stability, dynamics, general control system block diagram, and the electronic hardware.
Natural Is The Best: Model-Agnostic Code Simplification for Pre-trained Large...YanKing2
Pre-trained Large Language Models (LLM) have achieved remarkable successes in several domains. However, code-oriented LLMs are often heavy in computational complexity, and quadratically with the length of the input code sequence. Toward simplifying the input program of an LLM, the state-of-the-art approach has the strategies to filter the input code tokens based on the attention scores given by the LLM. The decision to simplify the input program should not rely on the attention patterns of an LLM, as these patterns are influenced by both the model architecture and the pre-training dataset. Since the model and dataset are part of the solution domain, not the problem domain where the input program belongs, the outcome may differ when the model is trained on a different dataset. We propose SlimCode, a model-agnostic code simplification solution for LLMs that depends on the nature of input code tokens. As an empirical study on the LLMs including CodeBERT, CodeT5, and GPT-4 for two main tasks: code search and summarization. We reported that 1) the reduction ratio of code has a linear-like relation with the saving ratio on training time, 2) the impact of categorized tokens on code simplification can vary significantly, 3) the impact of categorized tokens on code simplification is task-specific but model-agnostic, and 4) the above findings hold for the paradigm–prompt engineering and interactive in-context learning and this study can save reduce the cost of invoking GPT-4 by 24%per API query. Importantly, SlimCode simplifies the input code with its greedy strategy and can obtain at most 133 times faster than the state-of-the-art technique with a significant improvement. This paper calls for a new direction on code-based, model-agnostic code simplification solutions to further empower LLMs.
Natural Is The Best: Model-Agnostic Code Simplification for Pre-trained Large...
Shear wall and its design guidelines
1. SHEAR WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGNSHEAR WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PRESENTED BY
ZAIN-UL-ABDIN
ROLL # RCV-FALL17-012
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
2. CONTENTSCONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
BASIC TERMINALOGIES
CLASSIFICATION OF SHEAR WALLS
BEHAVIOUR UNDER SEISMIC LOADING
LOCATION OF SHEAR WALLS IN A BUILDING
STEPS FOR SHEAR WALL DESIGNING
DETAILS OF SHEAR WALLS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
3. INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Initially shear walls are used in reinforced concrete building to resist wind
force.
Excellent performance of building with shear wall even under seismic
force.
Shear walls are now extensively used for all earthquake resistance design.
It should have good ductility under reversible and repeated overloads.
they impart lateral stiffness to the system and also carry the gravity load.
4. Basic Terminologies in Seismic Analysis And
Design
Seismic Performance Category (SPC from A to E).
Seismic Design Category (SDC from A to F).
Seismic Soil Type (from A to F).
Seismic Zone (0,1,2A,2B,3 and 4).
Seismic Risk Category (Low, Moderate and High).
Lateral Load Resisting System(OMF,IMF,SMF).
Structural Walls.
5. STRUCTURAL WALLSTRUCTURAL WALL
SHEAR WALL
Shear wall represent the most efficient structural element to take lateral
force acting on a multi-storey building and to transfer them to foundation.
Shear wall is a structural element used to resist lateral/horizontal/shear
forces parallel to the plane of the wall by cantilever action .
For building over 20 stories, shear walls may become imperative
(necessary) from the point of view of economy and control of lateral
deflection.
6. CLASSIFICATION OF SHEAR WALLS
1. SIMPLE RECTANGULAR TYPE , BARBELL AND
FLANGED WALLS
2. COUPLED WALLS
3. RIGID FRAME SHEAR WALLS
4. FRAMED WALL WITH INFILLED FRAMES
5. COLUMN SUPPORT SHEAR WALLS
6. CORE TYPE SHEAR WALLS
9. DESIGN STEPS FOR SHEAR WALL
Step -1: Review of the layout of cantilever wall systems.
Step-2: Derivation of gravity loads and equivalent masses
Step- 3: Estimation of earthquake design force
Step-4: Analysis of the structural systems
Step- 5: Determination of design action
Step- 6: Design for flexural strength
Step: 7: Design for shear strength
Step:8: Detailing of reinforcement
10. LOCATION OF SHEAR WALL IN A BUILDING
Shear walls are usually provided between column line, in stair walls, lift
walls and in shaft . When design for wind loading the location of the wall
with in the building plan does not play an important role. Incase of
seismic loading ,however ,wall location are a critical factor .Under wind
loading a fully elastic response is expected ,while during strong
earthquake significant in elastic deformation are anticipated .
For the best torsional resistance ,as many of the walls as possible should
be located at the periphery of the building as it increase moment of inertia.
12. Special Reinforced Concrete Structural
Walls
To reduce the relative inter story drifts due to seismic
forces acting on the multistory buildings.
To reduce damage to the non-structural components by
controlling the story drifts.
To reduce the columns moments due to lateral loads
and 2nd
order effects.
To provide the additional function of carrying axial
loads.
To be used as separate walls in two mutually
perpendicular directions or to combine together as a lift
wall, this can resist lateral loads in two mutually
perpendicular directions.
14. Boundary Element of a Shear Wall.
Elements that increases the strength and ductility
of shear wall.
Placed with in the thickness of the wall or may
have large cross-section.
These elements have larger longitudinal and
transverse reinforcement.
20. Behavior of Shear Wall Depending on Height
to Length Ratio.
The shear wall having height to length ratio less
than 2.0 is called low rise shear wall. In this type
only shear strength of wall is utilized.
The shear wall having height to length ration
greater than 2 is called high rise shear wall and it
provides flexural resistance by acting as a
cantilever beam.
24. Effective Flange Width Of Walls.
flange width from the face of web is taken equal
to smaller of:
One half the distance to an adjacent wall web
25 percent of the total wall height = hw/4
32. Continued
In flanged sections, the boundary element includes the
effective flange width in compression plus at least 300
mm extension in to web.
Horizontal reinforcement in the wall web is anchored to
develop fy with in the confined core of the boundary
element.
The transverse reinforcement at the wall base must extend
in to the support at least equal to the development length
of largest longitudinal reinforcement in the special
boundary element.
33. CONCLUSION
The torsional effects in a building can be minimized by proper location of
vertical resisting elements and mass distribution. Shear walls should be
employed for increasing stiffness where necessary and be uniformly
distributed in both principal direction.
Multi –storied RCC building shear walls are now fast becoming as popular
as an alternate structural form for resisting the earthquake force.
34. REFERENCES
www.weikipedia.com
www.google.com
IS 1893, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure-Part1:2002
IS 13920, Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete structure subjected to
seismic force, 1993
IS 456(2000) Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
Concrete Structure Part II by Zaid Ahmad Siddique
Editor's Notes
The lateral stiffness (force/unit displacement) due to unit displacement. at a story is assumed to be the total lateral stiffness of that story.
Seismic Performance Category (SPC).
Varies from A to E, depending on how the structure is expected to behave during the event of an earthquake which in turn requires different level of detailing requirement.
Seismic Design Category (SDC).
Varies from A to F, depending on how design and detailing is carried out.
Seismic Soil Type.
Varies from A to F, depending on how the waves travel through the soil.
Seismic Zone.
0, 1, 2A, 2B, 3 and 4, depending on maximum ground acceleration of a particular area.
Low Seismic Risk.
Corresponds to zones 1 and 2A of UBC-97, seismic design category (SDC) A and B and Seismic performance category (SPC) A and B.
Moderate Seismic Risk.
Corresponds to zones 2B of UBC-97, seismic design category (SDC) C and Seismic performance category (SPC) C.
High Seismic Risk.
Corresponds to zones 3 and 4 of UBC-97, seismic design category (SDC) D, E and F and Seismic performance category (SPC) D and E.
Lateral Load Resisting System.
Intermediate Moment Frame.
A cast in place frame that can resist lateral loads by flexural action of its beams and columns and that can provide some energy dissipation, relatively better inelastic behavior and intermediate ductility in addition to the properties of ordinary moment frames. These frames must satisfy ACI 21.3.
Ordinary Moment Frame.
A cast in place frame that can resist smaller loads by flexural strength of columns. However, inelastic behavior in the event of severe earthquake is poor. It is not recommended for seismic zones with larger expected seismic activity. These frames must satisfy ACI 21.2.
Special Moment Frame.
A cast in place frame, having column and shear walls, that can resist lateral loads by flexure of its members and has excellent inelastic behavior. The design and detailing of special moment frames is controlled by ACI 21.5 to 21.8.
Structural Walls.
Walls proportioned to resist combination of shears, moments, and axial forces induced by earth quake motions. A shear wall is a structural wall.
Intermediate Pre cast structural wall.
A precast wall with intermediate inelastic deformation capabilities. Requirements for these walls are given in ACI 21.4.
Ordinary reinforced concrete structural wall.
It is used to resist lateral loads but very limited inelastic deformation capabilities.
Ordinary structural plain concrete wall.
It is used for basement walls for residential or light commercial buildings in areas where seismic risk is very low. These wall may be supported by soil, footings, grade beams or other structural members.
Special precast structural wall.
A precast wall complying with the requirements of ACI 21.8. in addition the requirements of ordinary reinforced concrete structural and requirements of ACI 21.2 is satisfied.
Special reinforced concrete structural wall.
A cast in place wall that can be used in high seismic activity regions and has good inelastic deformation capabilities. It fulfilled ACI 21.9.
SDC-D, E, F : Precast and in-situ structural diaphragms and trusses, foundations, frame members, in situ and precast special structural wall requirements, anchors and special moment resisting frame are satisfied. The design of this category may be used for zones 3 and 4 with sharp earth quake.
SDC-A: Simple moment resisting frames or ordinary structural walls are used. Seismic zone 0 and 1 correspond to lowest seismic hazard.
SDC-B: Ordinary moment resisting frame. Seismic zone 0 and 1 correspond to lowest seismic hazard.
SDC-C: Precast structural wall, anchor requirements and moment resisting frame Structures. Seismic zone 2A and 2B correspond to moderately strong ground shaking.
SDC-A: Simple moment resisting frames or ordinary structural walls are used. Provisions of ACI chapter 21 is not applicable. The design of this category may be used for zones 0 and 1 corresponds to lowest seismic hazard.
SDC-B: Analysis and design requirements and ordinary moment resisting frame provisions of ACI chapter 21 applicable. The design of this category may be used for zones 0 and 1.
SDC-C: Analysis and design requirements, precast structural wall requirements, anchor requirements and moment resisting frame provisions of ACI chapter 21 applicable. Structures assigned to SDC-C may be subjected to moderately strong ground shaking. The design of this category may be used for zones 2A and 2B.
SDC-D, E, F : Requirements for analysis and design, materials, precast and in-situ structural diaphragms and trusses, foundations, frame members not part of lateral load resisting system, in situ and precast special structural wall requirements, anchors and special moment resisting frame are satisfied. The design of this category may be used for zones 3 and 4. Almost all provisions of ACI chapter 21 is applicable.
The design and detailing requirement must be compatible with the level of energy dissipation (toughness) assumed in the computation of response modification factor (R) required to calculate design earth quake forces.
Specific Material Requirements.
According to ACI 21. 1. 4 to 21. 1. 7 the minimum value of the specified compressive strength of concrete, 𝑓^′ 𝑐 must be 21 MPa (only for special moment frames and special structural walls). The steel must either satisfy ASTM A 706 without any extra conditions or ASTM A 615 grades 280 and 420 with following requirements.
The actual yield strength must not be greater than 𝑓_𝑦 by more than 125 MPa.
𝑓_𝑢/𝑓_𝑦 ≥ 1.25
The amount of confinement reinforcement must be calculated with the maximum value of 𝑓_𝑦𝑡 equal to 690 MPa in order to limit the width of shear cracks. ACI articles 21. 1. 6 to 21. 1. 7 deal with mechanical splices, welded splices and anchoring to concrete, respectively
Special Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls (Shear Walls) and Coupling Beams. (Interstory drift is the relative displacement of one story relative to the other)
These are reinforced concrete walls that are used for the following purposes.
To reduce the relative inter story drifts due to seismic forces acting on the multistory buildings.
To reduce damage to the non-structural components by controlling the story drifts.
To reduce the columns moments due to lateral loads and 2nd order effects.
To provide the additional function of carrying axial loads.
To be used as separate walls in two mutually perpendicular directions or to combine together as a lift wall, this can resist lateral loads in two mutually perpendicular directions.
Shear wall are most common type of members used to resist lateral loads in tall buildings consisting of flat plate roof slab. In shear walls, in order to resist diagonal tension cracking shear reinforcement is provided and strength of such walls is controlled by flexural resistance. The length of wall acts as depth in providing the resisting stiffness. Such walls actually act as deep vertical cantilever beams providing shear and bending moment capacities for deflection in their own plan, which in turn provide lateral stability to whole of structure. The location of shear wall is carefully planned to make the structure symmetric and avoid any twisting of structure. The center of stiffness of the shear walls must coincide with their center of mass.
These are the element that are added along the edges of the structural walls to increase their strength and ductility as shown in Fig 24.6. These may entirely be placed within the thickness of the wall or may have a large cross-section. However these elements always have much larger longitudinal reinforcement and transverse hoops or spirals.
Coupling Beams.
These are specially designed beams used to connect shear walls/ piers together to provide additional stiffness and energy dissipation. Coupling beams connecting structural walls can provide stiffness and energy dissipation.
Piers.
A vertical wall segment bounded by two window opening is called a pier.
If ℎ_𝑤 is clear height and 𝑙_𝑤 is horizontal length and 𝑏_𝑤 is the thickness of the web of the vertical wall segment, the categorization of walls in to simple walls or wall piers may be made by the criteria to follow. When ℎ_𝑤/𝑙_𝑤 < 2.0 when 𝑙𝑤/𝑏_𝑤 >2.0 but 𝑙𝑤/𝑏_𝑤 >6, the design of member is carried out as a wall. However when ℎ_𝑤/𝑙_𝑤 ≥ 2.0 and 𝑙𝑤/𝑏_𝑤 ≤6, the member is design as a wall pier where ACI 21.9.8.1 is to be additionally satisfied
Behavior of Shear Wall Depending on Height to Length Ratio.
The shear wall having height to length ratio less than 2.0 is called low rise shear wall. In this type only shear strength of wall is utilized and mode of failure is shown in Fig 24.7.
The shear wall having height to length ration greater than 2 is called high rise shear wall and it provides flexural resistance by acting as a cantilever beam as shown in Fig 24.8.
Requirement of Boundary Element of Special RC structural walls.
There are two cases for the boundary element requirement, first is based on displacement and second is based on stress level.
Case 1. Based on Displacement.
For the wall or piers that are effectively continuous from the base of structure to top of wall and designed to have a single critical section for flexure and axial loads, boundary element must be provided if:
C ≥ 𝒍𝒘/(𝟔𝟎𝟎(𝝏/𝒉𝒘))
Where,
lw = length of wall
hw = height of wall
∂= design displacement
C= the largest N.A depth calculated from factored axial force and nominal moment strength consistent with the design displacement ∂.
The minimum value of 𝝏/𝒉𝒘 is 0.007.
Case 2. Based on Stress Level.
Special boundary elements must be provided at boundaries of walls and edges of piers where the maximum extreme fiber compressive strength corresponding to earth quake load combination, exceeds 0.2𝑓^′ 𝑐. these elements may be discontinued vertically where calculated compressive strength is less than 0.15𝑓^′ 𝑐.
Effective Flange Width Of Walls.
flange width from the face of web is taken equal to smaller of:
One half the distance to an adjacent wall web
25 percent of the total wall height = hw/4
Trial Required Area Of Shear Wall.
The shear stress in the shear walls may be allowed up to ∅𝑥0.83√𝑓^′ 𝑐. A value of ∅𝑥0.6√𝑓^′ 𝑐 may be tentatively be taken to calculate the first trial area of the shear walls Acv.
∅ for shear = 0.60
Let V = total service shear of a story or base shear for the lowest floor, N then
V x 1.1 = ∅𝑥0.6√(𝑓^′ 𝑐) x Acv
Acv = (𝑉 𝑥 1.1)/(0.6 𝑥 0.6√(𝑓^′ 𝑐) 𝑥 〖10〗^6 ) 𝑚^2
For w = thickness of shear wall, mm
Total length of shear walls required in one direction = (𝐴𝑐𝑣 𝑥 1000)/𝑤 𝑚
Minimum Recommended Length of Shear Walls.
For length the value of factor ῥ is calculated which is between 1 and 1.5
𝑝=2− 6.1/(𝑟_𝑚𝑎𝑥√𝐴_𝐵 )
For ῥ ≤ 1.0𝑙𝑤 ≥ 0.5 𝑉𝑤/𝑉𝑠√𝐴_𝐵
For ῥ ≤ 1.25 𝑙𝑤 ≥ 0.375 𝑉𝑤/𝑉𝑠√𝐴_𝐵
For ῥ ≤ 1.5𝑙𝑤 ≥ 0.25 𝑉𝑤/𝑉𝑠√𝐴_𝐵
Vs = total storey height
Vw= wall shear
𝐴_𝐵 = ground floor area of structure, 𝑚^2
𝑟_𝑚𝑎𝑥 = maximum element story shear ratio (ri).
𝑟𝑖= maximum value of (3.05 𝑥 𝑉𝑠)/(𝑙𝑤 𝑥 𝑉𝑠) .
Shear Strength of Special Structural Walls.
Design forces 𝑉𝑢 is obtained from the lateral load analysis in using the factored load combinations.
Shear strength 𝑉𝑛 of structural wall is calculated as follow.
𝑉𝑛=𝐴𝑐𝑣 ( 𝛼 λ √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) +𝑝𝑡 𝑓𝑦)
≤0.83 𝐴𝑐𝑤 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) for any one of the individual wall piers
≤0.83 𝐴𝑐𝑤 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) for horizontal wall segments and coupling beams.
≤0.83 𝐴𝑐𝑣 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) for all wall piers sharing a common lateral force.
Axial and Flexural Strengths of Special Structural Walls.
The combined axial and flexural strengths of special structural walls are calculated just like an ordinary eccentrically loaded column, except that ACI 10.3.6 and the non-linear strain requirements of ACI 10.2.2 need not to apply.
Minimum Vertical and horizontal Reinforcement.
If 𝑉𝑢≥0.83 λ 𝐴𝑐𝑣 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) the distributed minimum web reinforcement ratios, (𝑃𝑙)𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑(𝑃𝑡) min〖𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜 0.0025.〗
Maximum reinforcement spacing in each direction must be equal to 450 mm.
Reinforcement contributing to Vn must be continuous and must be distributed across the shear plane.
If 𝑉𝑢>0.17 λ 𝐴𝑐𝑣 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) at least two curtains of reinforcement must be used in the wall.
𝑉𝑢 ≤ 0.83 λ 𝐴𝑐𝑣 √(𝑓^′ 𝑐) 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛
(𝑃𝑙)𝑚𝑖𝑛=0.002 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑢𝑝 𝑡𝑜 𝑁𝑜.16 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑦 not less than 420 Mpa and 0.0015 for other deformed bars.
(𝑃𝑡)𝑚𝑖𝑛=0.0012 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑢𝑝 𝑡𝑜 𝑁𝑜.16 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑦 not less than 420 Mpa and 0.0025 for other deformed bars.
Development of Steel Reinforcement.
Reinforcement in structural walls must be developed or spliced for fy in tension in accordance with following modifications.
The effective depth of the member referenced in ACI 12.10.3 can be taken equal to 0.8 𝑙𝑤 for walls.
The requirement of ACI 12.11, 12.12 and 12.13 need not be satisfied.
At location where yielding of longitudinal reinforcement is likely to occur as a result of lateral displacements, development lengths of longitudinal reinforcement must be 1.25 times the values calculated for 𝑓𝑦 in tension.
For normal weight concrete the value of development length with hook is
𝑙_𝑑ℎ= (𝑓𝑦 𝑥 𝑑𝑏)/(5.4 √𝑓′𝑐) ≥8 𝑑𝑏 ≥150𝑚𝑚
Development length of bars without hook for bar Nos. 10 to 36 is
𝑙_𝑑ℎ=2.5 𝑙_𝑑ℎ 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠≤300𝑚𝑚
𝑙_𝑑ℎ=3.5 𝑙_𝑑ℎ 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠>300𝑚𝑚
Design of Boundary elements.
In case of special boundary element following requirements must be satisfied.
Horizontal dimensions of boundary element from the extreme compression fiber = larger of (𝑐−0.1𝑙𝑤)𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐/2
Where c = the largest neutral axis depth calculated for the factored axial force and nominal moment strength consistent with design displacement.
The height 𝑙𝑜 from the joint face on both side and extend up to the points where flexural yielding is expected due to in-elastic lateral displacement.
𝑙𝑜 = largest of following three
𝑙𝑤 at the joint face where flexural yielding is expected
One sixth of the clear height of the wall
450mm
In flanged sections, the boundary element includes the effective flange width in compression plus at least 300 mm extension in to web.
Horizontal reinforcement in the wall web is anchored to develop fy with in the confined core of the boundary element.
The transverse reinforcement at the wall base must extend in to the support at least equal to the development length of largest longitudinal reinforcement in the special boundary element.