Property talk:P3789
Documentation
this item's username, channel or group on Telegram
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3789#Type Q5, Q43229, Q16334295, Q1190554, Q386724, Q1067164, Q17558136, Q8513, Q4164871, Q102345381, Q2001305, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3789#single best value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3789#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3789#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3789#Scope, SPARQL
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Allow private groups to be linked
[edit]Currently, constraints don't allow linking to private groups. The problem is that some countries, like Iran, block access to public groups, which makes large groups remain private on purpose, to allow inclusivity. This is the case with Wikidata's chat and most of the chats in this list. The regex should be relaxed to allow links with the pattern https://t.me/joinchat/$1
. NMaia (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Privacy concerns, please refer to wmf:Privacy policy. --125.38.13.10 07:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose too for the same reason. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC).
- @NMaia: Oppose All "joinchat" links are temporary, whether the links would change depend on whether the group/channel admins (including the group/channel creator) would click to "revoke link" (or similar name) setting or not. 218.103.196.5 08:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Can we please split this to a User name one, and a Channel name one???
[edit]--125.38.13.10 07:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
No, we cannot. --218.103.196.5 23:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting, @Jura1: needs your opinions. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
I think some kind of split is necessary because group names may have spaces in them. If the objective is "name we can construct a link to" that excludes many groups. It's better to have the option to explicitly state a link. GreenReaper (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
How to find the ID of a group?
[edit]I belong to several groups and wanted to check their IDs/links:
- https://t.me/LinkedDataRussia: yes
- https://t.me/Wikidata: no. Goes to ویکی دیتا with 4 subscribers, but the real group of that name has 722 subscribers
- https://t.me/WikiCite: no
Does a group "owner" need to do something special to create such link? --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- N answered on the Wikidata group: "I think only public groups have urls like those, which we don't because it creates a lot of spam".
- And we see above a refusal to have private group links on WD. Which means that the Wikidata and WikiCite telegram groups cannot be recorded on Wikidata: I think that's a shame. --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 11:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- N: "I think the best solution would be to set the value to "unknown value" and use a qualifier (maybe "described at url") to link to a page which has info about how to join it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Telegram#Wikidata"
- Good! That page has current "joinchat" links (and group IDs for groups that are public). --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- United Arab Emirates-related properties
- All Properties
- Properties with external-id-datatype
- Properties used on 1000+ items
- Properties with format constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with unique value constraints
- Properties with single best value constraints
- Properties with conflicts with constraints
- Properties with qualifiers constraints
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with scope constraints