Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Identification of information search strategies and their impact on learning outcome in learning‐related tasks

Published: 01 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This study aims to identify users' information search strategies in learning‐related tasks and investigates how the search strategies would influence their learning outcome. We conducted a lab‐based user experiment with 36 participants, recorded their search interactions during search process and measured their learning outcome by having them answer multiple choice questions after search. We extracted 14 behavioural features in three dimensions and conducted k‐means clustering analysis. Results showed that there were four types of search strategies: Economic Browsing, Supplementary Browsing, Exhaustive Browsing and Exhaustive Searching. It was found that Supplementary Browsing Strategy achieved the best learning outcome, while Economic Browsing Strategy showed the worst outcome, with Exhaustive Searching Strategy and Exhaustive Browsing Strategy in between. The findings indicated that careful selection of content pages and frequent querying were highly beneficial for users' learning during search. This study provides a deeper understanding of users' search strategies and has valuable implications on optimizing search systems to help users achieve better learning outcome.

References

[1]
Aula, A., Majaranta, P., & Räihä, K. J. (2005). Eye‐tracking reveals the personal styles for search result evaluation. In IFIP Conference on HCI (pp. 1058–1061). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[2]
Bates, M. J. (1979). Information search tactics. JASIS&T, 30(4), 205–214.
[3]
Buscher, G., White, R. W., Dumais, S., & Huang, J. (2012, February). Large‐scale analysis of individual and task differences in search result page examination strategies. In WSDM 12'(pp. 373–382). ACM.
[4]
Dumais, S. T., Buscher, G., & Cutrell, E. (2010, August). Individual differences in gaze patterns for web search. IIiX10'
[5]
Heinström, J. (2006). Broad exploration or precise specificity: Two basic information seeking patterns among students. JASIS&T, 57(11), 1440–1450.
[6]
Järvelin, K., Vakkari, P., Arvola, P., Baskaya, F., Keskustalo, H., & Kumpulainen, S., et al. (2015). Task‐based information interaction evaluation: the viewpoint of program theory. TOIS, 33(1), 1–30.
[7]
Liu, C., & Wei, Y. (2016). The impacts of time constraint on users’ search strategy during search process. ASIS&T, 53(1), 1–9.
[8]
Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41–46.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology  Volume 55, Issue 1
2018
981 pages
EISSN:2373-9231
DOI:10.1002/pra2.2018.55.issue-1
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2019

Author Tags

  1. Search strategy
  2. learning outcome
  3. cluster analysis
  4. learning‐related tasks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media