Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Due date assignments and scheduling a single machine with a general earliness/tardiness cost function

Published: 01 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

We study three different due date assignment problems in scheduling a single machine which differ from each other based upon the objective function and due date assignment method being used. Two different objective functions are considered. The first is a cost function that includes earliness, tardiness and due date assignment penalties and the second is a function that includes penalties due to the number of tardy jobs and due date assignments. We assume that the earliness, tardiness and due date assignment penalties are continuous and non-decreasing functions of the corresponding duration. The goal is to minimize each objective function for two different due date assignment methods. The first is a method in which the assigned due dates are restricted to be equal while the second is a method that allows us to assign different due dates to different jobs.

References

[1]
Baker, K.R. and Scudder, G.D., Sequencing with earliness and tardiness penalties: a review. Operations Research. v38. 22-36.
[2]
Seidmann, A., Panwalkar, S.S. and Smith, M.L., Optimal assignment of due dates for a single processor scheduling problem. International Journal of Production Research. v19. 393-399.
[3]
Panwalkar, S.S., Smith, M.L. and Seidmann, A., Common due date assignment to minimize total penalty for the one machine scheduling problem. Operations Research. v30. 391-399.
[4]
Bagchi, U., Sullivan, R.S. and Chang, Y.L., Minimizing mean absolute deviation of completion times about a common due date. Naval Research Logistics. v33. 227-240.
[5]
Bagchi, U., Sullivan, R.S. and Chang, Y.L., Minimizing mean squared deviation of completion times about a common due date. Management Science. v33. 894-906.
[6]
De, P., Ghosh, J.B. and Wells, C.E., Optimal delivery time quotation and order sequencing. Decision Sciences. v22. 379-390.
[7]
Kahlbacher, H.G. and Cheng, T.C.E., Parallel machine scheduling to minimize costs for earliness and number of tardy jobs. Discrete Applied Mathematics. v47. 139-164.
[8]
Cheng, T.C.E. and Kovalyov, M.Y., Batch scheduling and common due-date assignment on a single machine. Discrete Applied Mathematics. v70. 231-245.
[9]
Mosheiov, G., A common due-date assignment problem on parallel identical machines. Computers and Operations Research. v28 i8. 719-732.
[10]
Birman, M. and Mosheiov, G., A note on due-date assignment in a two-machine flow-shop. Computers and Operations Research. v31 i3. 473-480.
[11]
Gordon, V., Proth, J.M. and Chu, C.B., A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research. European Journal of Operational Research. v139. 1-25.
[12]
Kubiak, W., Completion time variance minimization on a single machine is difficult. Operations Research Letters. v14. 49-59.
[13]
Shabtay D, Steiner G. Two due date assignment problems in scheduling a single machine. Operations Research Letters 2006; 34(6):683-91.
[14]
Graham, R.L., Lawler, E.L., Lenstra, J.K. and Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G., Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics. v5. 287-326.
[15]
Du, J.Y. and Leung, T., Minimizing total tardiness on one machine is NP-hard. Mathematics of Operations Research. v15. 483-495.
[16]
Moore, J.M., An n job, one machine sequencing algorithm for minimizing the number of late jobs. Management Science. v15. 102-109.

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Due date assignment and single machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs to minimize the weighted number of tardy jobsApplied Mathematics and Computation10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.095248:C(503-510)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014
  • (2013)Due-window assignment problems with unit-time jobsApplied Mathematics and Computation10.1016/j.amc.2013.05.045220(487-495)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
  • (2011)Setting due dates to minimize the total weighted possibilistic mean value of the weighted earliness-tardiness costs on a single machineComputers & Mathematics with Applications10.1016/j.camwa.2011.09.06362:11(4126-4139)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers and Operations Research
Computers and Operations Research  Volume 35, Issue 5
May, 2008
380 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2008

Author Tags

  1. Due date assignment
  2. Polynomial time algorithms
  3. Single-machine scheduling

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Due date assignment and single machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs to minimize the weighted number of tardy jobsApplied Mathematics and Computation10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.095248:C(503-510)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014
  • (2013)Due-window assignment problems with unit-time jobsApplied Mathematics and Computation10.1016/j.amc.2013.05.045220(487-495)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
  • (2011)Setting due dates to minimize the total weighted possibilistic mean value of the weighted earliness-tardiness costs on a single machineComputers & Mathematics with Applications10.1016/j.camwa.2011.09.06362:11(4126-4139)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2011
  • (2010)Bicriteria problems to minimize maximum tardiness and due date assignment cost in various scheduling environmentsDiscrete Applied Mathematics10.1016/j.dam.2010.02.010158:10(1090-1103)Online publication date: 1-May-2010
  • (2010)Single machine due date assignment scheduling problem with customer service level in fuzzy environmentApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.00210:3(849-858)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media