Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1133265.1133305acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays

Published: 23 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

We present an experiment that compares volumetric displays to existing 3D display techniques in three tasks that require users to perceive depth in 3D scenes. Because they generate imagery in true 3D space, volumetric displays allow viewers to use their natural physiological mechanisms for depth perception, without requiring special hardware such as head trackers or shutter glasses. However, it is unclear from the literature as to whether these displays are actually better than the status-quo for enabling the perception of 3D scenes, thus motivating the present study. Our results show that volumetric displays enable significantly better user performance in a simple depth judgment task, and better performance in a collision judgment task, but in its current form does not enhance user comprehension of more complex 3D scenes.

References

[1]
Arthur, K., et al. (1993). Evaluating 3D task performance for fish-tank virtual worlds. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(3). p. 239--265.
[2]
Balakrishnan, R. et al. (2001). User interfaces for volumetric displays. IEEE Computer, March 2001. p. 37--45.
[3]
Brooks, F. (1988). Grasping reality through illusion - Interactive graphics serving science. ACM CHI p. 1--11.
[4]
Buxton, W. et al. (1998). HMD's, Caves, & Chameleon: A human-centric analysis of interaction in virtual space. 64--68.
[5]
DeLucia, P. (1995). Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgments about potential collisions in perspective displays. Human Factors, 37. p. 528--538.
[6]
Diamond, R., Wynn, A., Thomsen, K., and Turner, J. (1982). Three-dimensional perception for one-eyed guys, in Computational Crystallography, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
[7]
Ebert, D. et al. (1999). Realizing 3D visualization using crossed-beam volumetric displays. Communications of the ACM, 42(8). p. 101--107.
[8]
Fisher, S. (1982). Viewpoint dependent imaging: An interactive stereoscopic display. Processing and Display of Three-Dimensional Data II. p. 41--45.
[9]
Grossman, T. and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Pointing at trivariate targets in 3D environments. ACM CHI.
[10]
Grossman, T. et al. (2004). Multi finger gestural interaction with 3D volumetric displays. ACM UIST p. 61--70.
[11]
Hubona, G. et al. (1999). The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3). p. 214--242.
[12]
Lucente, M. (1997). Interactive three-dimensional holographic displays: seeing the future in depth. Computer Graphics issue on Current, New, and Emerging Display Systems, May 1997.
[13]
McCauley, M. et al. (1992). Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence, 1(3). p. 311--318.
[14]
McKenna, M. (1992). Interactive viewpoint control and three-dimensional operations. Symp. on I3D Graphics. p. 53--56.
[15]
Pfautz, J. (2000). Depth perception in computer graphics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
[16]
Rosen, P. et al. (2004). Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays. Stereoscopic Displays XI. p. 9--16.
[17]
Shibata, T. et al. (2005). Stereoscopic 3D display with dynamic optical correction for recovering from asthenopia. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XII. p. 1--9.
[18]
Sollenberger, R. and Milgram, P. (1991). A comparative study of rotational and stereoscopic computer graphic depth cues. Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. p. 1452--1456.
[19]
Sollenberger, R. and Milgram, P. (1993). Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task. Human Factors, 35(3). p. 483--499.
[20]
Tyler, T., et al. (2005). The utility of perspecta 3D volumetric display for completion of tasks. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XII. p. 268--279.
[21]
van Orden, K. and Broyles, J. (2000). Visuospatial task performance as a function of two- and three-dimensional display presentation techniques. Displays, 21(1). p. 17--24.
[22]
Wanger, L., (1992). The effect of shadow quality on the perception of spatial relationships in computer generated imagery. ACM Symp. on Interactive 3D Graphics. p. 39--42.
[23]
Wanger, L. et al. (1992). Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications., 12(3). p. 44--51, 54--58.
[24]
Ware, C., Arthur, K., and Booth, K. (1993). Fish tank virtual reality. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 37--42.
[25]
Ware, C. and Franck, G. (1996). Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 15(2). p. 121--140.
[26]
Yonas, A. (1979). Attached and cast shadows, in Perception and pictorial representation. p. 100--109.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Support Lines and Grids for Depth Ordering in Indoor Augmented Reality using Optical See-Through Head-Mounted DisplaysProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682097(1-11)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)PointerVol: A Laser Pointer for Swept Volumetric DisplaysProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676432(1-8)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Effects of Focal Plane Distance on Perceptual Distance Matching with an Automotive AR-HUDProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607166(32-41)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AVI '06: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
    May 2006
    512 pages
    ISBN:1595933530
    DOI:10.1145/1133265
    • General Chair:
    • Augusto Celentano
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 May 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. depth perception
    2. evaluation
    3. volumetric display

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    AVI06

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Support Lines and Grids for Depth Ordering in Indoor Augmented Reality using Optical See-Through Head-Mounted DisplaysProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682097(1-11)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
    • (2024)PointerVol: A Laser Pointer for Swept Volumetric DisplaysProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676432(1-8)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Effects of Focal Plane Distance on Perceptual Distance Matching with an Automotive AR-HUDProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607166(32-41)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Effects of Volumetric Augmented Reality Displays on Human Depth JudgmentsInternational Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction10.4018/IJMHCI.201904010111:2(1-18)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Improving 3D-Editing Workflows via Acoustic LevitationAdjunct Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526114.3561353(1-4)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
    • (2021)ArtScience and the ICECUBE LED Display [ILDm^3]Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3474085.3475524(3720-3727)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Immersive Analytics with Abstract 3D Visualizations: A SurveyComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1443041:1(201-229)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2021
    • (2019)PPAP: Perspective Projection Augment Platform with Pan–Tilt Actuation for Improved Spatial PerceptionSensors10.3390/s1912265219:12(2652)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
    • (2019)Tactile and kinesthetic feedbacks improve distance perception in virtual realityProceedings of the 31st Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/3366550.3372248(1-9)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2019
    • (2019)An Evaluation of Depth and Size Perception on a Spherical Fish Tank Virtual Reality DisplayIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2019.289874225:5(2040-2049)Online publication date: May-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media