Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1502650.1502695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Behavior-driven visualization recommendation

Published: 08 February 2009 Publication History

Abstract

We present a novel approach to visualization recommendation that monitors user behavior for implicit signals of user intent to provide more effective recommendation. This is in contrast to previous approaches which are either insensitive to user intent or require explicit, user specified task information. Our approach, called Behavior-Driven Visualization Recommendation (BDVR), consists of two distinct phases: (1) pattern detection, and (2) visualization recommendation. In the first phase, user behavior is analyzed dynamically to find semantically meaningful interaction patterns using a library of pattern definitions developed through observations of real-world visual analytic activity. In the second phase, our BDVR algorithm uses the detected patterns to infer a user's intended visual task. It then automatically suggests alternative visualizations that support the inferred visual task more directly than the user's current visualization. We present the details of BDVR and describe its implementation within our lab's prototype visual analysis system. We also present study results that demonstrate that our approach shortens task completion time and reduces error rates when compared to behavior-agnostic recommendation.

References

[1]
E. Andre and T. Rist. Intelligent User Interfaces, chapter 4 (The Design of Illustrated Documents as a Planning Task), pages 94--116. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1993.
[2]
L. Bavoil, S. P. Callahan, P. J. Crossno, J. Freire, C. E. Scheidegger, C. T. Silva, and H. T. Vo. Vistrails: Enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations. In IEEE Vis, 2005.
[3]
S. M. Casner. A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Trans. on Graph., 10(2):111--151, April 1991.
[4]
M. Derthick and S. F. Roth. Data exploration across temporal contexts. In IUI, 2000.
[5]
A. N. Dragunov, T. G. Dietterich, K. Johnsrude, M. McLaughlin, L. Li, and J. L. Herlocker. Tasktracer: a desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers. In IUI, pages 75--82, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
[6]
D. Franklin, J. Budzik, and K. Hammond. Plan-based interfaces: keeping track of user tasks and acting to cooperate. In IUI, pages 79--86, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
[7]
D. Gotz, Z. Wen, J. Lu, P. Kissa, M. Zhou, N. Cao, W. H. Qian, and S. X. Liu. Harvest -- visualization and analysis for the masses. In IEEE InfoVis Poster, 2008.
[8]
D. Gotz and M. X. Zhou. Characterizing users' visual analytic activity for insight provenance. In IEEE VAST, 2008.
[9]
D. Gotz and M. X. Zhou. An empirical study of user interaction behavior during visual analysis. Technical Report RC24525, IBM Research, 2008.
[10]
Y. Hijikata. Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback. In IUI, 2004.
[11]
T. Jankun-Kelly, K.-L. Ma, and M. Gertz. A model for the visualization exploration process. In IEEE Vis, 2002.
[12]
A. Kobsa. An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems. In Proc. of InfoVis, 2001.
[13]
M. Kreuseler, T. Nocke, and H. Schumann. A history mechanism for visual data mining. In IEEE InfoVis, 2004.
[14]
J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans. on Graph., 5(2):110--141, 1986.
[15]
D. W. Oard and J. Kim. Implicit feedback for recommender systems. In AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, 1998.
[16]
N. Oliver, G. Smith, C. Thakkar, and A. C. Surendran. Swish: semantic analysis of window titles and switching history. In IUI, 2006.
[17]
A. Perer and B. Shneiderman. Systematic yet flexible discovery: Guiding domain experts through exploratory data analysis. In IUI, 2008.
[18]
M. D. Plumlee and C. Ware. Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive costs of visual comparisons. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 13(2), 2006.
[19]
S. F. Roth, J. Kolojejchick, J. Mattis, and J. Goldstein. Interactive graphic design using automatic presentation knowledge. In CHI, 1994.
[20]
D. M. Russell, M. J. Stefik, P. Pirolli, and S. K. Card. The cost structure of sensemaking. In CHI, 1993.
[21]
J. Shen, L. Li, T. G. Dietterich, and J. L. Herlocker. A hybrid learning system for recognizing user tasks from desktop activities and email messages. In IUI, 2006.
[22]
Y. B. Shrinivasan and J. J. van Wijk. Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization. In CHI, 2008.
[23]
M. X. Zhou and V. Aggarwal. An optimization-based approach to dynamic data content selection in intelligent multimedia interfaces. In UIST, 2004.
[24]
M. X. Zhou and M. Chen. Automated generation of graphical sketches by example. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 65--74, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Predictive Gaze Analytics: A Comparative Case Study of the Foretelling Signs of User Performance during Interaction with Visualizations of Ontology Class HierarchiesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti81000908:10(90)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2024
  • (2024)An empirical study of counterfactual visualization to support visual causal inferenceInformation Visualization10.1177/1473871624122943723:2(197-214)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2024
  • (2024)VisStoryMaker: supporting non-expert analysts in visually exploring datasets and communicating insights with visual annotations and data storiesProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702113(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '09: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
February 2009
522 pages
ISBN:9781605581682
DOI:10.1145/1502650
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 February 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. information visualization
  2. intelligent visualization
  3. user behavior modeling
  4. visualization recommendation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IUI09
IUI09: 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
February 8 - 11, 2009
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Upcoming Conference

IUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Predictive Gaze Analytics: A Comparative Case Study of the Foretelling Signs of User Performance during Interaction with Visualizations of Ontology Class HierarchiesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti81000908:10(90)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2024
  • (2024)An empirical study of counterfactual visualization to support visual causal inferenceInformation Visualization10.1177/1473871624122943723:2(197-214)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2024
  • (2024)VisStoryMaker: supporting non-expert analysts in visually exploring datasets and communicating insights with visual annotations and data storiesProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702113(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The State of the Art in User‐Adaptive VisualizationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15271Online publication date: 4-Dec-2024
  • (2024)DaVE - A Curated Database of Visualization Examples2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)10.1109/VIS55277.2024.00010(11-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Causal Priors and Their Influence on Judgements of Causality in Visualized DataIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345638131:1(765-775)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Beyond Correlation: Incorporating Counterfactual Guidance to Better Support Exploratory Visual AnalysisIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345636931:1(776-786)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Socrates: Data Story Generation via Adaptive Machine-Guided Elicitation of User FeedbackIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332736330:1(131-141)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Supporting Guided Exploratory Visual Analysis on Time Series Data with Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332720030:1(1172-1182)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)A Heuristic Approach for Dual Expert/End-User Evaluation of Guidance in Visual AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332715230:1(997-1007)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media