Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1879082.1879089acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A decision-analytic approach for P2P cooperation policy setting

Published: 03 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

While overall performance of peer-to-peer systems depends strongly on the amount of resource contributions made by individual peers, autonomous and rational peers make decisions on their cooperation policies (resource contributions) according to their individual utilities. To deal with the inherent conflict among individual utilities of the rational peers to improve overall performance of the system, we propose a decision-analytic approach that determines the appropriate cooperation policies of the individual peers in a distributed manner and coordinates their rational decisions in compliance with the social welfare improvement.

References

[1]
M. Feldman, J. Chuang, "Overcoming Free-Riding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Systems," in ACM SIGecom Exchanges, vol. 5, Issue 4, 2005, pp. 41--50.
[2]
H. Park, M. van der Schaar, "A Framework for Foresighted Resource Reciprocation in P2P Networks," in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, vol. 11, no. 1, 2009, pp. 101--116.
[3]
X. Yang, G. Veciana "Performance of peer-to-peer networks - service capacity and role of resource sharing policies," in Performance Evaluation In P2P Computing Systems, vol. 63, no. 3. (March 2006), pp. 175--194.
[4]
M. van der Schaar, D. S. Turaga, R. Sood, "Stochastic Optimization for Content Sharing in P2P Systems," in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, vol. 10, no. 1, 2008, pp. 132--144.
[5]
K Ranganathan, "Incentive Mechanisms for Large Collaborative Resource Sharing," in Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2004, pp. 1--8.
[6]
M Feldman, K Lai, I Stoica, J Chuang "Robust Incentive Techniques for Peer-to-Peer Networks 04," in proceedings of ACM conference on Electronic commerce, USA, 2004, pp. 102--111.
[7]
K Lai, M Feldman, I Stoica, J Chuang, "Incentives for cooperationin Peer-to-Peer Networks," in proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003, CA.
[8]
C. Buragohain, D. Agrawal, and S. Suri, "A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems," in proc. of Int. Conf. Peer-To-Peer Computing, Sweden, 2003, pp. 48--56.
[9]
L. Edelstein-Keshet, "Mathematical models of swarming and social aggregation," in proceedings of International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications, Japan, 2001, pp. 1--7.
[10]
R. B. Myerson, Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
[11]
H. Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
[12]
H. Raiffa, Decision Analysis: Introductory Readings on Choices Under Uncertainty, McGraw Hill, 1997.
[13]
D. Fudenberg, J Tirole, Game Theory. MIT press, Cambridge MA, 1991.
[14]
J. Kennedy, R. C. Eberhart, Swarm Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Academic Press, 2001.
[15]
P. Antoniadis, C. Courcoubetis, and R. Mason, "Comparing Economic Incentives in Peer-to-Peer Networks," in Computer Networks, vol. 46, iss. 1, 2004, pp. 113--146.
[16]
A. Habib, and J. Chuang, "Service Differentiated Peer Selection: An Incentive Mechanism for Peer-to-Peer Media Streaming," in IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 8, no. 3, 2006, pp. 610--621.
[17]
O. Loginova, H. Lu, and X. H. Wang, "Incentive Schemes in Peer-to-Peer Networks," in Theoretical Economics, vol. 9, iss. 1, 2009, Article 2.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NetEcon '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Economics of Networks, Systems, and Computation
October 2010
67 pages
ISBN:9781450373043
DOI:10.1145/1879082
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • USENIX Assoc: USENIX Assoc

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 October 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Pareto efficiency
  2. distributed decision making
  3. game theory
  4. rational peers

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

NetEcon '10
Sponsor:
  • USENIX Assoc

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 10 of 18 submissions, 56%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 45
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media