Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1889863.1889888acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effect of DOF separation in 3D manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays

Published: 22 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Multi-touch displays represent a promising technology for the display and manipulation of data. While the manipulation of 2D data has been widely explored, 3D manipulation with multi-touch displays remains largely uncovered. Based on an analysis of the integration and separation of degrees of freedom, we propose a taxonomy for 3D manipulation techniques with multi-touch displays. Using that taxonomy, we introduce DS3 (Depth-Separated Screen Space), a new 3D manipulation technique based on the separation of translation and rotation. In a controlled experiment, we compare DS3 with Sticky Tools and Screen-Space. Results show that separating the control of translation and rotation significantly affects performance for 3D manipulation, with DS3 being at least 22% faster.

References

[1]
Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Robertson, G. G. 1991. A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 9, 2, 99--122.
[2]
Garner, W. 1974. The Processing of Information and Structure.
[3]
Hancock, M. S., Carpendale, S., Vernier, F. D., Wigdor, D., and Shen, C. 2006. Rotation and translation mechanisms for tabletop interaction. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, 79--88.
[4]
Hancock, M., Carpendale, S., and Cockburn, A. 2007. Shallow-depth 3d interaction: design and evaluation of one-, two- and three-touch techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1147--1156.
[5]
Hancock, M., Cate, T. T., and Carpendale, S. 2009. Sticky tools: Full 6dof force-based interaction for multi-touch tables. In Proceedings of Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces 2009.
[6]
Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Wilson, A. D., Hodges, S., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Butz, A. 2009. Interactions in the air: adding further depth to interactive tabletops. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 139--148.
[7]
Hinckley, K., Tullio, J., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., and Kassell, N. 1997. Usability analysis of 3d rotation techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 1--10.
[8]
Ingram, J. N., Körding, K. P., Howard, I. S., and Wolpert, D. M. 2008. The statistics of natural hand movements. Experimental Brain Research. 188, 2, 223--236.
[9]
Jacob, R. J. K., Sibert, L. E., McFarlane, D. C., and Mullen, J. M. P. 1994. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 1, 3--26.
[10]
Martinet, A., Casiez, G., and Grisoni, L. 2010. The design and evaluation of 3d positioning techniques for multi-touch displays. In 3D User Interfaces, 2010 IEEE Symposium, 115--118.
[11]
Nacenta, M. A., Baudisch, P., Benko, H., and Wilson, A. 2009. Separability of spatial manipulations in multi-touch interfaces. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009, 175--182.
[12]
Reisman, J. L., Davidson, P. L., and Han, J. Y. 2009. A screen-space formulation for 2d and 3d direct manipulation. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 69--78.
[13]
Rekimoto, J. 2002. SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, 113--120.
[14]
Unger, B. J., Nicolaidis, A., Thompson, A., Klatzky, R. L., Hollis, R. L., Berkelman, P. J., and Lederman, S. 2002. Virtual peg-in-hole performance using a 6-dof magnetic levitation haptic device: Comparison with real forces and with visual guidance alone. In Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 263.
[15]
Veit, M., Capobianco, A., and Bechmann, D. 2009. Influence of degrees of freedom's manipulation on performances during orientation tasks in virtual reality environments. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 51--58.
[16]
Wang, Y., MacKenzie, C. L., Summers, V. A., and Booth, K. S. 1998. The structure of object transportation and orientation in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 312--319.
[17]
Wilson, A. D., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Kirk, D. 2008. Bringing physics to the surface. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 67--76.
[18]
Zhai, S., and Milgram, P. 1998. Quantifying coordination in multiple DOF movement and its application to evaluating 6 DOF input devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 320--327.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The effect of DOF separation in 3D manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    VRST '10: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
    November 2010
    244 pages
    ISBN:9781450304412
    DOI:10.1145/1889863
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 3D manipulation task
    2. direct manipulation
    3. multi-touch displays

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    VRST'10

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)6DOF Mobile AR for 3D Content PrototypingExtended Reality10.1007/978-3-031-71707-9_8(130-149)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Investigating the Effects of Individual Spatial Abilities on Virtual Reality Object ManipulationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581004(1-24)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)SIT6Computers and Graphics10.1016/j.cag.2023.10.013117:C(51-60)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Understanding and Creating Spatial Interactions with Distant Displays Enabled by Unmodified Off-The-Shelf SmartphonesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61000946:10(94)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Group-based Object Alignment in Virtual Reality EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3565970.3567682(1-11)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
    • (2022)ARnnotate: An Augmented Reality Interface for Collecting Custom Dataset of 3D Hand-Object Interaction Pose EstimationProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545663(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Hybrid Touch/Tangible Spatial Selection in Augmented RealityComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1455041:3(403-415)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2022
    • (2021)Attribute Spaces: Supporting Design Space Exploration in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2021 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3485279.3485290(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Bi-3D: Bi-Manual Pen-and-Touch Interaction for 3D Manipulation on TabletsThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474741(149-161)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
    • (2021)The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D VisualizationComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1418940:1(293-326)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media