Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1999747.1999785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A study of video-based versus text-based labs for a management information systems course

Published: 27 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we study key differences between video-based and text-based instructions by developing and testing an interactive website for delivering lab material in our Management Information Systems course. In a face-to-face lab setting, we tracked the performance and surveyed the impressions of 80 students where approximately half received video instructions while the other half received text instructions. The results indicate no statistically significant difference in students' correctness in answering lab questions, but slight differences in completion time and impression. We discuss our results and suggest ways to use video instruction effectively based on our results and observations.

References

[1]
Becvar, L. A. 2006. Video and image-based reflective learning tools for professional training environments. In CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1735--1738. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1125451.1125776
[2]
Breimer, E., Cotler, J., and Yoder, R. 2011. Towards an Innovative Web-based Lab Delivery System for a Management Information Systems. Information Systems Education Journal. Accepted, to appear in Volume 9 (Spring 2011).
[3]
Charnigo. L., 2009. Lights! Camera! Action! Producing Library Instruction Video Tutorials Using Camtasia Studio. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 3, 1, 23--30.
[4]
Elsenhiemer, J. 2003. Terms of Engagement: Keeping Learners Online. Learning Circuits, online: http://www.astd.org/LC/2003/0203_elsenheimer.htm.
[5]
Garrett, J. J. 2005. Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications, online: http://adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php
[6]
Nicholson, J., Nicholoson, D. 2010. A Stream Runs through IT: Using Streaming Video to Teach Information Technology. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27,1, 17--24--2010.
[7]
Motulsky, H. 1995. Intuitive Biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
[8]
Staman, M. 2009. Converged communications, video and innovation in pedagogic settings. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on SIG-information technology education (SIGITE '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--206. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1631728.1631788
[9]
Tapscott, D., Williams, A., 2006. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin Group, New York, NY.
[10]
Zahn, C., Hesse, F., Finke, M., Pea, R., Mills, M., and Rosen, J. 2005. Advanced digital video technologies to support collaborative learning in school education and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! (Taipei, Taiwan). CSCL '05. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 737--742.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)What can we learn from enterprise architecture models? An experiment comparing models and documents for capability developmentSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-016-0535-z17:2(695-711)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
  • (2012)Video vs. text for lab instruction and concept learningJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/2184451.218446227:6(42-48)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
June 2011
418 pages
ISBN:9781450306973
DOI:10.1145/1999747
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automated feedback
  2. blended learning
  3. computer lab activities
  4. instruction
  5. management information systems
  6. video-based
  7. web-based labs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)What can we learn from enterprise architecture models? An experiment comparing models and documents for capability developmentSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-016-0535-z17:2(695-711)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
  • (2012)Video vs. text for lab instruction and concept learningJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/2184451.218446227:6(42-48)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media