Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Perceptual Evaluation of Motion Editing for Realistic Throwing Animations

Published: 01 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Animation budget constraints during the development of a game often call for the use of a limited set of generic motions. Editing operations are thus generally required to animate virtual characters with a sufficient level of variety. Evaluating the perceptual plausibility of edited animations can therefore contribute greatly towards producing visually plausible animations. In this article, we study observers’ sensitivity to manipulations of overarm and underarm biological throwing animations. In the first experiment, we modified the release velocity of the ball while leaving the motion of the virtual thrower and the angle of release of the ball unchanged. In the second experiment, we evaluated the possibility of further modifying throwing animations by simultaneously editing the motion of the thrower and the release velocity of the ball, using dynamic time warping. In both experiments, we found that participants perceived shortened underarm throws to be particularly unnatural. We also found that modifying the thrower's motion in addition to modifying the release velocity of the ball does not significantly improve the perceptual plausibility of edited throwing animations. In the third experiment, we modified the angle of release of the ball while leaving the magnitude of release velocity and the motion of the thrower unchanged, and found that this editing operation is efficient for improving the perceptual plausibility of shortened underarm throws. Finally, in Experiment 4, we replaced the virtual human thrower with a mechanical throwing device (a ramp) and found the opposite pattern of sensitivity to modifications of the release velocity, indicating that biological and physical throws are subject to different perceptual rules. Our results provide valuable guidelines for developers of games and virtual reality applications by specifying thresholds for the perceptual plausibility of throwing manipulations while also providing several interesting insights for researchers in visual perception of biological motion.

References

[1]
R. Barzel, J. F. Hughes, and D. N. Wood. 1996. Plausible motion simulation for computer graphics animation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation. 183--197.
[2]
Bozzi, P. 1959. Analisi fenomenologica del moto pendolare armonico. Rivista di Psicologia 52, 4, 281--302.
[3]
D. H. Brainard. 1997. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10, 433--436.
[4]
A. Bruderlin and L. Williams. 1995. Motion signal processing. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’95). 97--104.
[5]
T. Chaminade, J. Hodgins, and M. Kawato. 2007. Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters’ actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2, 3, 206--216.
[6]
J. Clement. 1982. Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics 50, 1, 66--71.
[7]
T. N. Cornsweet. 1962. The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology 75, 3, 485--491.
[8]
M. A. García-Pérez. 2001. Yes-no staircases with fixed step sizes: Psychometric properties and optimal setup. Optometry and Vision Science 78, 1, 56--64.
[9]
M. Gleicher. 1997. Motion editing with spacetime constraints. In Proceedings of the 1997 Aymposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D’97). 139--.
[10]
M. Gleicher. 1998. Retargetting motion to new characters. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’98). 33--42.
[11]
M. Gleicher. 2001. Motion path editing. In Proceedings of the 2001 Aymposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D’01). 195--202.
[12]
S. Guo and J. Robergé, 1996. A high-level control mechanism for human locomotion based on parametric frame space interpolation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation. 95--107.
[13]
H. Hecht and M. Bertamini. 2000. Understanding projectile acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 2, 730--746.
[14]
J. Hodgins, J. O’Brien, and J. Tumblin, 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 4, 4, 307--316.
[15]
L. Hoyet, R. McDonnell, and C. O’Sullivan. 2012. Push it real: Perceiving causality in virtual interactions. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 4, Article 90.
[16]
L. Hoyet, K. Ryall, R. McDonnell, and C. O’Sullivan. 2012. Sleight of hand: Perception of finger motion from reduced marker sets. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (I3D’12). 79--86.
[17]
E. Hsu, M. da Silva, and J. Popović. 2007. Guided time warping for motion editing. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’07). 45--52.
[18]
M. K. Kaiser, D. R. Proffitt, S. Whelan, and H. Hecht. 1992. Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 3, 669--689.
[19]
M. Kleiner, D. Brainard, and D. Pelli. 2007. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
[20]
G. Knoblich and R. Flach. 2001. Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science 12, 6, 467--472.
[21]
T. Komura, E. Ho, and R. Lau. 2005. Animating reactive motion using momentum-based inverse kinematics: Motion capture and retrieval. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 16, 3--4, 213--223.
[22]
C. K. Liu, A. Hertzmann, and Z. Popoví. 2006. Composition of complex optimal multi-character motions. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’06). 215--222.
[23]
A. Majkowska and P. Faloutsos. 2007. Flipping with physics: Motion editing for acrobatics. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’07). 35--44.
[24]
M. McCloskey, A. Caramazza, and B. Green. 1980. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naïve beliefs about the motion of objects. Science 210, 4474, 1139--1141.
[25]
J. Munzert, T. Hohmann, and E. Hossner. 2010. Discriminating throwing distances from point-light displays with masked ball flight. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22, 2, 247--264.
[26]
M. Nusseck, J. Lagarde, B. Bardy, R. Fleming, and H. H. Bülthoff. 2007. Perception and prediction of simple object interactions. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV’07). 27--34.
[27]
C. O’Sullivan, J. Dingliana, T. Giang, and M. K. Kaiser. 2003. Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3, 527--536.
[28]
S. Park, T.-H. Kim, H. Shin, and S. Shin. 2004. On-line motion blending for real-time locomotion generation. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 15, 3--4, 125--138.
[29]
D. G. Pelli. 1997. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10, 437--442.
[30]
N. Pollard and P. Reitsma. 2001. Animation of humanlike characters: Dynamic motion filtering with a physically plausible contact model. In Proceedings of the Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems.
[31]
D. R. Proffitt and D. L. Gilden. 1989. Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 384--393.
[32]
P. S. A. Reitsma, J. Andrews, and N. S. Pollard. 2008. Effect of character animacy and preparatory motion on perceptual magnitude of errors in ballistic motion. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 2, 201--210.
[33]
P. S. A. Reitsma and C. O’Sullivan. 2009. Effect of scenario on perceptual sensitivity to errors in animation. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6, 3, 15:1--15:16.
[34]
S. Runeson and G. Frykholm. 1983. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112, 4, 585--615.
[35]
H. J. Shin and H. S. Oh. 2006. Fat graphs: Constructing an interactive character with continuous controls. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’06). 291--298.
[36]
H. J. Shin, L. Kovar, and M. Gleicher. 2003. Physical touch-up of human motions. In Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications (PG’03). 194--.
[37]
S. Tak and H-S. Ko. 2005. A physically-based motion retargeting filter. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 1, 98--117.
[38]
M. Vicovaro, L. Hoyet, L. Burigana, and C. O’Sullivan. 2012. Evaluating the plausibility of edited throwing animations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’12). 175--182.
[39]
K. Yamane and Y. Nakamura. 2003. Dynamics filter—concept and implementation of online motion generator for human figures. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 19, 3, 421--432.
[40]
T. Y. Yeh, G. Reinman, S. J. Patel, and P. Faloutsos. 2009. Fool me twice: Exploring and exploiting error tolerance in physics-based animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 1, 5:1--5:11.
[41]
V. Zordan, A. Majkowska, B. Chiu, and M. Fast. 2005. Dynamic response for motion capture animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 3, 697--701.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Survey on Realistic Virtual Human Animations: Definitions, Features and EvaluationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1506443:2Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Computational account for the naturalness perception of others’ jumping motion based on a vertical projectile motion modelProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences10.1098/rspb.2024.1490291:2031Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Grounding Intuitive Physics in Perceptual ExperienceJournal of Intelligence10.3390/jintelligence1110018711:10(187)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Perceptual Evaluation of Motion Editing for Realistic Throwing Animations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
    ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 11, Issue 2
    July 2014
    126 pages
    ISSN:1544-3558
    EISSN:1544-3965
    DOI:10.1145/2633908
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 June 2014
    Accepted: 01 April 2014
    Revised: 01 April 2014
    Received: 01 November 2013
    Published in TAP Volume 11, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Perception
    2. graphics
    3. motion capture
    4. motion editing
    5. physics

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Survey on Realistic Virtual Human Animations: Definitions, Features and EvaluationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1506443:2Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Computational account for the naturalness perception of others’ jumping motion based on a vertical projectile motion modelProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences10.1098/rspb.2024.1490291:2031Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Grounding Intuitive Physics in Perceptual ExperienceJournal of Intelligence10.3390/jintelligence1110018711:10(187)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Understanding the stability of deep control policies for biped locomotionThe Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics10.1007/s00371-021-02342-939:1(473-487)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2022)FauxThrow: Exploring the Effects of Incorrect Point of Release in Throwing MotionsACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202210.1145/3548814.3551461(1-5)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Perception of Motion Variations in Large-Scale Virtual Human CrowdsProceedings of the 14th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion, Interaction and Games10.1145/3487983.3488288(1-7)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Intuitive physics and cognitive algebra: A reviewEuropean Review of Applied Psychology10.1016/j.erap.2020.10061071:5(100610)Online publication date: Sep-2021
    • (2021)Perceived Naturalness of Interpolation Methods for Character Upper Body AnimationAdvances in Visual Computing10.1007/978-3-030-90439-5_9(103-115)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2021
    • (2019)Intuitive physics of gravitational motion as shown by perceptual judgment and prediction-motion tasksActa Psychologica10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.02.001194(51-62)Online publication date: Mar-2019
    • (2018)Personality trait and group emotion contagion based crowd simulation for emergency evacuationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-018-6069-3Online publication date: 9-May-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media