Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702329acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gauging Receptiveness to Social Microvolunteering

Published: 18 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Crowd-powered systems that help people are difficult to scale and sustain because human labor is expensive and worker pools are difficult to grow. To address this problem we introduce the idea of social microvolunteering, a type of intermediated friendsourcing in which a person can provide access to their friends as potential workers for microtasks supporting causes that they care about. We explore this idea by creating Visual Answers, an exemplar social microvolunteering application for Facebook that posts visual questions from people who are blind. We present results of a survey of 350 participants on the concept of social microvolunteering, and a deployment of the Visual Answers application with 91 participants, which collected 618 high-quality answers to questions asked over 12 days, illustrating the feasibility of the approach.

References

[1]
André, P. et al. Who Gives A Tweet? Evaluating Microblog Content Value. Proc. CSCW 2012.
[2]
Bernstein, M. et al. Micro-volunteering: helping the helpers in development. Proc. CSCW 2013.
[3]
Bernstein, M.S. et al. Quantifying the Invisible Audience in Social Networks. Proc. CHI 2013.
[4]
Bigham, J.P. et al. VizWiz: Nearly Real-time Answers to Visual Questions. Proc. UIST 2010.
[5]
Bigham, J.P. et al. The Design of Human-Powered Access Technology. Proc. ASSETS 2011.
[6]
Blog, F.O. 2014. News Feed FYI: Giving People More Control Over When They Share from Apps.
[7]
Brady, E. et al. Visual Challenges in the Everyday Lives of Blind People. Proc. CHI 2013.
[8]
Brady, E. et al. Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. Proc. CSCW 2013.
[9]
Demographics of key social networking platforms: PewResearch Internet Project, Dec. 30, 2013.
[10]
Economic News Release - Volunteering in the USA, 2013: www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm.
[11]
Ellison, N.B. et al. Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook. Proc. ICWSM 2013.
[12]
Gray, R. et al. Who Wants to Know? Question-asking and Answering Practices among Facebook Users. Communication Arts. (2013).
[13]
Havens, J. et al. 2006. Charitable Giving: How Much, by Whom, to What, and How? The Non-Profit Sector: A Research Handbook. 542--567.
[14]
Korpela, E. et al. 2001. SETI@HOME -- Massively Distributed Computing for SETI. Computing in Science and Engineering. (2001), 78--83.
[15]
Lampe, C. et al. Help is on the Way: Patterns of Responses to Resource Requests on Facebook. Proc. CSCW 2014.
[16]
Lee, Y.-hao and Hsieh, G. Does Slacktivism Hurt Activism?: The Effects of Moral Balancing and Consistency in Online Activism. Proc. CHI 2013.
[17]
Marichal, J. Political Facebook groups: Micro-activism and the digital front stage. First Monday. 18, 2013.
[18]
Martins, J. et al. 2014. Friendsourcing the Unmet Needs of People with Dementia. W4A 2014.
[19]
Morris, M.R. et al. A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks. Proc. ICWSM 2010.
[20]
Morris, M.R. et al. What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message Q&A Behavior. Proc. CHI 2010.
[21]
Nichols, J. and Kang, J. Asking questions of targeted strangers on social networks. Proc. CHI 2012.
[22]
Paul, S.A. et al. Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study. ICWSM 2011.
[23]
Rahman, S. et al. FRAppE: Detecting Malicious Facebook Applications. Proc. CoNEXT 2012.
[24]
Rzeszotarski, J.M. and Morris, M.R. Estimating the Social Costs of Friendsourcing. Proc. CHI 2014.
[25]
Takagi, H. et al. Social Accessibility: Achieving Accessibility through Collaborative Metadata Authoring. Proc. ASSETS 2008.
[26]
Teodoro, R. and Naaman, M. Fitter with Twitter?: Understanding Personal Health and Fitness Activity in Social Media. Proc. ICWSM 2013.
[27]
Vie, S. 2014. In defense of "slacktivism": The Human Rights Campaign Facebook logo as digital activism. First Monday. 19, 2014.
[28]
Voida, A. et al. Bridging Between Organizations and the Public: Volunteer Coordinators' Uneasy Relationship with Social Computing. Proc. CHI 2012.
[29]
Wu, S. and Adamic, L. Visually Impaired Users on an Online Social Network. Proc. CHI 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Netizen A11y: Engaging Internet Users in Making Visual Media AccessibleCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645247(159-162)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2023)How the Alt Text Gets Made: What Roles and Processes of Alt Text Creation Can Teach Us About Inclusive ImageryACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/358746916:2(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Haptic Auditory Feedback for Enhanced Image Description: A Study of User Preferences and PerformanceHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_14(224-246)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Gauging Receptiveness to Social Microvolunteering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2015
    4290 pages
    ISBN:9781450331456
    DOI:10.1145/2702123
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 April 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. friendsourcing
    3. sns
    4. volunteering

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHI '15
    Sponsor:
    CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 18 - 23, 2015
    Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 486 of 2,120 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Netizen A11y: Engaging Internet Users in Making Visual Media AccessibleCompanion Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640544.3645247(159-162)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
    • (2023)How the Alt Text Gets Made: What Roles and Processes of Alt Text Creation Can Teach Us About Inclusive ImageryACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/358746916:2(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Haptic Auditory Feedback for Enhanced Image Description: A Study of User Preferences and PerformanceHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_14(224-246)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Exploring Team-Sourced Hyperlinks to Address Navigation Challenges for Low-Vision Readers of Scientific PapersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556296:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Exploring Collection of Sign Language Videos through CrowdsourcingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556276:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Understanding Emerging Obfuscation Technologies in Visual Description Services for Blind and Low Vision PeopleProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555706:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Personalized Font Recommendations: Combining ML and Typographic Guidelines to Optimize ReadabilityProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533457(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Mobilizing Digital Volunteers to Support Underserved Communities in India During COVID-19 LockdownsProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3530190.3534827(180-194)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
    • (2022)ASL Wiki: An Exploratory Interface for Crowdsourcing ASL TranslationsProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544827(1-13)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
    • (2021)Case Studies on the Motivation and Performance of Contributors Who Verify and Maintain In-Flux Tabular DatasetsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34795925:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media