Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Understanding Emerging Obfuscation Technologies in Visual Description Services for Blind and Low Vision People

Published: 11 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Blind and low vision people use visual description services (VDS) to gain visual interpretation and build access in a world that privileges sight. Despite their many benefits, VDS have many harmful privacy and security implications. As a result, researchers are suggesting, exploring, and building obfuscation systems that detect and obscure private or sensitive materials. However, as obfuscation depends largely on sight to interpret outcomes, it is unknown whether Blind and low vision people would find such approaches useful. Our work aims to center the perspectives and opinions of Blind and low vision people on the potential of obfuscation to address privacy concerns in VDS. By reporting on interviews with 20 Blind and low vision people who use VDS, our findings reveal that popular research trends in obfuscation fail to capture the needs of Blind and low vision people. While obfuscation might be helpful in gaining more control, tensions around obfuscation misrecognition and confirmation are prominent. We turn to the framework of interdependence to unpack and understand obfuscation in VDS, enabling us to complicate privacy concerns, uncover the labor of Blind and low vision people, and emphasize the importance of safeguards. We provide design directions to move the trajectory of obfuscation research forward.

References

[1]
[n. d.]. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2021-08--18/the-apps-redefining-accessibility-video
[2]
[n. d.]. Aira. https://aira.io/aira-live
[3]
[n. d.]. Aira Privacy Policy. https://aira.io/privacy-policy
[4]
[n. d.]. SeeingAI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/seeing-ai
[5]
2019. The kindness of strangers: Volunteers use app to provide a helpful pair of eyes to those who are blind | CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/the-kindness-of-strangers-volunteers-use-app-toprovide-a-helpful-pair-of-eyes-to-those-who-are-blind-1.5201216
[6]
Ali Abdolrahmani, William Easley, Michele Williams, Stacy Branham, and Amy Hurst. 2017. Embracing errors: Examining how context of use impacts blind individuals' acceptance of navigation aid errors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4158--4169.
[7]
Ali Abdolrahmani, Kevin M Storer, Antony Rishin Mukkath Roy, Ravi Kuber, and Stacy M Branham. 2020. Blind leading the sighted: drawing design insights from blind users towards more productivity-oriented voice interfaces. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 12, 4 (2020), 1--35.
[8]
Alessandro Acquisti, Ralph Gross, and Fred Stutzman. 2014. Face recognition and privacy in the age of augmented reality. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality 6, 2 (2014).
[9]
Dustin Adams, Lourdes Morales, and Sri Kurniawan. 2013. A qualitative study to support a blind photography mobile application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 1--8.
[10]
Paarijaat Aditya, Rijurekha Sen, Peter Druschel, Seong Joon Oh, Rodrigo Benenson, Mario Fritz, Bernt Schiele, Bobby Bhattacharjee, and Tong Tong Wu. 2016. I-pic: A platform for privacy-compliant image capture. In Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. 235--248.
[11]
Tousif Ahmed, Roberto Hoyle, Kay Connelly, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2015. Privacy concerns and behaviors of people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3523--3532.
[12]
Taslima Akter, Bryan Dosono, Tousif Ahmed, Apu Kapadia, and Bryan Semaan. 2020. " I am uncomfortable sharing what I can't see": Privacy Concerns of the Visually Impaired with Camera Based Assistive Applications. In 29th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 20). 1929--1948.
[13]
Kendra Albert, Emily Armbruster, Elizabeth Brundige, Elizabeth Denning, Kimberly Kim, Lorelei Lee, Lindsey Ruff, Korica Simon, and Yueyu Yang. 2020. Fosta in legal context. Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 52 (2020), 1084.
[14]
Rawan Alharbi, Tammy Stump, Nilofar Vafaie, Angela Pfammatter, Bonnie Spring, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2018. I can't be myself: effects of wearable cameras on the capture of authentic behavior in the wild. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 2, 3 (2018), 1--40.
[15]
Rawan Alharbi, Mariam Tolba, Lucia C Petito, Josiah Hester, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2019. To mask or not to mask? balancing privacy with visual confirmation utility in activity-oriented wearable cameras. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--29.
[16]
Mahsa Alimardani and Mona Elswah. 2021. Digital Orientalism:# SaveSheikhJarrah and Arabic Content Moderation. Alimardani, Mahsa and Elswah, Mona. Digital Orientalism:# SaveSheikhJarrah and Arabic Content Moderation (August 5, 2021). In POMEPS Studies 43 (2021).
[17]
Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N Bennett, Kori Inkpen, et al. 2019. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.
[18]
Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. new media & society 20, 3 (2018), 973--989.
[19]
Payal Arora. 2019. Decolonizing privacy studies. Television & New Media 20, 4 (2019), 366--378.
[20]
Ulla Autenrieth. 2018. Family photography in a networked age: Anti-sharenting as a reaction to risk assessment and behaviour adaption. (2018).
[21]
Mauro Avila, Katrin Wolf, Anke Brock, and Niels Henze. 2016. Remote assistance for blind users in daily life: A survey about be my eyes. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 1--2.
[22]
Andrew Begel, John Tang, Sean Andrist, Michael Barnett, Tony Carbary, Piali Choudhury, Edward Cutrell, Alberto Fung, Sasa Junuzovic, Daniel McDuff, et al. 2020. Lessons Learned in Designing AI for Autistic Adults. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--6.
[23]
Cynthia L Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th international acm sigaccess conference on computers and accessibility. 161--173.
[24]
Cynthia L Bennett, Cole Gleason, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jeffrey P Bigham, Anhong Guo, and Alexandra To. 2021. ?It's Complicated": Negotiating Accessibility and (Mis) Representation in Image Descriptions of Race, Gender, and Disability. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--19.
[25]
Cynthia L Bennett and Os Keyes. 2020. What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 125 (2020), 1--1.
[26]
Cynthia L Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. Biographical prototypes: Reimagining recognition and disability in design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 35--47.
[27]
Cynthia L Bennett and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the" Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.
[28]
Cynthia L Bennett, Daniela K Rosner, and Alex S Taylor. 2020. The care work of access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[29]
Patricia Berne, Aurora Levins Morales, David Langstaff, and Sins Invalid. 2018. Ten principles of disability justice. WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 46, 1 (2018), 227--230.
[30]
Jeffrey P Bigham and Patrick Carrington. 2018. Learning from the front: People with disabilities as early adopters of AI. Proceedings of the 2018 HCIC Human-Computer Interaction Consortium (2018).
[31]
Jeffrey P Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samual White, et al. 2010. Vizwiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 333--342.
[32]
Jeffrey P Bigham, Irene Lin, and Saiph Savage. 2017. The Effects of" Not Knowing What You Don't Know" on Web Accessibility for Blind Web Users. In Proceedings of the 19th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. 101--109.
[33]
Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT parents and social media: Advocacy, privacy, and disclosure during shifting social movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 610--622.
[34]
Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 703--712.
[35]
Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2015. Gauging receptiveness to social microvolunteering. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1055--1064.
[36]
Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, Yu Zhong, Samuel White, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2013. Visual challenges in the everyday lives of blind people. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2117--2126.
[37]
Danielle Bragg, Naomi Caselli, Julie A Hochgesang, Matt Huenerfauth, Leah Katz-Hernandez, Oscar Koller, Raja Kushalnagar, Christian Vogler, and Richard E Ladner. 2021. The FATE Landscape of Sign Language AI Datasets: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 14, 2 (2021), 1--45.
[38]
Danielle Bragg, Oscar Koller, Mary Bellard, Larwan Berke, Patrick Boudreault, Annelies Braffort, Naomi Caselli, Matt Huenerfauth, Hernisa Kacorri, Tessa Verhoef, et al. 2019. Sign language recognition, generation, and translation: An interdisciplinary perspective. In The 21st international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. 16--31.
[39]
Danielle Bragg, Oscar Koller, Naomi Caselli, and William Thies. 2020. Exploring Collection of Sign Language Datasets: Privacy, Participation, and Model Performance. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--14.
[40]
Stacy M Branham, Ali Abdolrahmani, William Easley, Morgan Scheuerman, Erick Ronquillo, and Amy Hurst. 2017. " Is Someone There? Do They Have a Gun" How Visual Information about Others Can Improve Personal Safety Management for Blind Individuals. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 260--269.
[41]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[42]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589--597.
[43]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21, 1 (2021), 37--47.
[44]
Robin N Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2018. Understanding the power of control in autonomous vehicles for people with vision impairment. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 185--197.
[45]
Robin N Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2019. Understanding trust, transportation, and accessibility through ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[46]
Robin N Brewer and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. xPress: Rethinking design for aging and accessibility through an IVR blogging system. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--17.
[47]
Jed R Brubaker, Lynn S Dombrowski, Anita M Gilbert, Nafiri Kusumakaulika, and Gillian R Hayes. 2014. Stewarding a legacy: responsibilities and relationships in the management of post-mortem data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4157--4166.
[48]
Amy Bruckman. 2002. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 3 (2002), 217--231.
[49]
Finn Brunton and Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Obfuscation: A user's guide for privacy and protest. Mit Press.
[50]
Michele A Burton, Erin Brady, Robin Brewer, Callie Neylan, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Amy Hurst. 2012. Crowdsourcing subjective fashion advice using VizWiz: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 135--142.
[51]
Kimberle Crenshaw. 1990. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev. 43 (1990), 1241.
[52]
Mary J Culnan and Pamela K Armstrong. 1999. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization science 10, 1 (1999), 104--115.
[53]
Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. " It doesn't win you friends" Understanding Accessibility in Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.
[54]
Terrance de Vries, Ishan Misra, Changhan Wang, and Laurens van der Maaten. 2019. Does object recognition work for everyone?. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 52--59.
[55]
Mariella Dimiccoli, Juan Marín, and Edison Thomaz. 2018. Mitigating bystander privacy concerns in egocentric activity recognition with deep learning and intentional image degradation. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 1--18.
[56]
Paul Dourish. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and ubiquitous computing 8, 1 (2004), 19--30.
[57]
Be My Eyes. [n. d.]. www.bemyeyes.com
[58]
Chancey Fleet. 2021. Digital Frictions and Dark Patterns in Accessible Technology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eX5_iibP54
[59]
Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. interactions 3, 6 (1996), 16--23.
[60]
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2001. Re-shaping, Re-thinking, Re-defining. Center for women policy studies (2001).
[61]
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2002. Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA journal (2002), 1--32.
[62]
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson. 2005. Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of women in Culture and Society 30, 2 (2005), 1557--1587.
[63]
Erving Goffman. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. (1967).
[64]
Erving Goffman et al. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Vol. 21. Harmondsworth London.
[65]
Tamy Guberek, Allison McDonald, Sylvia Simioni, Abraham H Mhaidli, Kentaro Toyama, and Florian Schaub. 2018. Keeping a low profile? Technology, risk and privacy among undocumented immigrants. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[66]
Danna Gurari, Qing Li, Chi Lin, Yinan Zhao, Anhong Guo, Abigale Stangl, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2019. Vizwiz-priv: A dataset for recognizing the presence and purpose of private visual information in images taken by blind people. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 939--948.
[67]
Danna Gurari, Yinan Zhao, Meng Zhang, and Nilavra Bhattacharya. 2020. Captioning images taken by people who are blind. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 417--434.
[68]
Aimi Hamraie and Kelly Fritsch. 2019. Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, 1 (2019), 1--33.
[69]
Vicki L Hanson, Anna Cavender, and Shari Trewin. 2015. Writing about accessibility. Interactions 22, 6 (2015), 62--65.
[70]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.
[71]
Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factorsin Computing Systems. 1--15.
[72]
Nancy Hartsock. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality. Springer, 283--310.
[73]
Rakibul Hasan, Eman Hassan, Yifang Li, Kelly Caine, David J Crandall, Roberto Hoyle, and Apu Kapadia. 2018. Viewer experience of obscuring scene elements in photos to enhance privacy. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[74]
Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2021. Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence. New Media & Society 23, 12 (2021), 3539--3556.
[75]
Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living disability theory: Reflections on access, research, and design. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--13.
[76]
Panagiotis Ilia, Iasonas Polakis, Elias Athanasopoulos, Federico Maggi, and Sotiris Ioannidis. 2015. Face/off: Preventing privacy leakage from photos in social networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 781--792.
[77]
Jane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee, Katherine Mustelier, Mark S Ackerman, and Eric Gilbert. 2021. Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.
[78]
Sins Invalid. 2017. Skin, tooth, and bone--the basis of movement is our people: a disability justice primer.
[79]
Alejandro Jaimes, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Nicu Sebe, and Thomas S Huang. 2007. Guest Editors' Introduction: HumanCentered Computing--Toward a Human Revolution. Computer 40, 5 (2007), 30--34.
[80]
Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Samuel White, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2011. Supporting blind photography. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 203--210.
[81]
Rikke Bjerg Jensen, Lizzie Coles-Kemp, and Reem Talhouk. 2020. When the civic turn turns digital: Designing safe and secure refugee resettlement. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[82]
Hernisa Kacorri, Utkarsh Dwivedi, Sravya Amancherla, Mayanka Jha, and Riya Chanduka. 2020. IncluSet: A data surfacing repository for accessibility datasets. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--4.
[83]
Hernisa Kacorri, Kris M Kitani, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. People with visual impairment training personal object recognizers: Feasibility and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5839--5849.
[84]
Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
[85]
Harmanpreet Kaur, Mitchell Gordon, Yiwei Yang, Jeffrey Bigham, Jaime Teevan, Ece Kamar, and Walter Lasecki. 2017. Crowdmask: Using crowds to preserve privacy in crowd-powered systems via progressive filtering. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 5.
[86]
Os Keyes. 2018. The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--22.
[87]
Katharina Krombholz, Adrian Dabrowski, Matthew Smith, and Edgar Weippl. 2017. Exploring design directions for wearable privacy. (2017).
[88]
Jaewook Lee, Yi-Hao Peng, Jaylin Herskovitz, and Anhong Guo. 2021. Image Explorer: Multi-Layered Touch Exploration to Make Images Accessible. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--4.
[89]
Ada Lerner, Helen Yuxun He, Anna Kawakami, Silvia Catherine Zeamer, and Roberto Hoyle. 2020. Privacy and activism in the transgender community. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[90]
Yifang Li, Nishant Vishwamitra, Bart P Knijnenburg, Hongxin Hu, and Kelly Caine. 2017. Effectiveness and users' experience of obfuscation as a privacy-enhancing technology for sharing photos. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--24.
[91]
Haley MacLeod, Cynthia L Bennett, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Edward Cutrell. 2017. Understanding blind people's experiences with computer-generated captions of social media images. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5988--5999.
[92]
Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 3--10.
[93]
Bill Marczak, Geoffrey Alexander, Sarah McKune, John Scott-Railton, and Ron Deibert. 2017. Champing at the cyberbit: Ethiopian dissidents targeted with new commercial spyware. (2017).
[94]
Allison McDonald, Catherine Barwulor, Michelle L Mazurek, Florian Schaub, and Elissa M Redmiles. 2021. " It's stressful having all these phones": Investigating Sex Workers' Safety Goals, Risks, and Practices Online. In 30th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 21).
[95]
Mia Mingus. 2017. Access Intimacy, Interdependence and Disability Justice. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-interdependence-and-disability-justice/
[96]
Mia Mingus. 2017. Forced Intimacy: An Ableist Norm. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/08/06/forcedintimacy-an-ableist-norm
[97]
Sophie Morlin-Yron. 2017. The app lending eyes to the blind. https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/24/africa/be-specularapp-helps-the-blind/index.html
[98]
Meredith Ringel Morris. 2020. AI and accessibility. Commun. ACM 63, 6 (2020), 35--37.
[99]
Leo Neat, Ren Peng, Siyang Qin, and Roberto Manduchi. 2019. Scene text access: a comparison of mobile OCR modalities for blind users. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 197-- 207.
[100]
Denis Newman-Griffis, Jessica Sage Rauchberg, Rahaf Alharbi, Louise Hickman, and Harry Hochheiser. 2022. Alternative models: Critical examination of disability definitions in the development of artificial intelligence technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08287 (2022).
[101]
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela DR Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical race theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[102]
Tribhuvanesh Orekondy, Mario Fritz, and Bernt Schiele. 2018. Connecting pixels to privacy and utility: Automatic redaction of private information in images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8466--8475.
[103]
Kentrell Owens, Camille Cobb, and Lorrie Cranor. 2021. "You Gotta Watch What You Say": Surveillance of Communication with Incarcerated People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.
[104]
Joon Sung Park, Michael S Bernstein, Robin N Brewer, Ece Kamar, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2021. Understanding the Representation and Representativeness of Age in AI Data Sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.09058 (2021).
[105]
Joon Sung Park, Danielle Bragg, Ece Kamar, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2021. Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 52--63.
[106]
Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: Dreaming disability justice. arsenal pulp press Vancouver.
[107]
Yolanda A Rankin and Jakita O Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (2019), 64--68.
[108]
Nisarg Raval, Animesh Srivastava, Ali Razeen, Kiron Lebeck, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, and Lanodn P Cox. 2016. What you mark is what apps see. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. 249--261.
[109]
Kat Roemmich and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Data Subjects' Conceptualizations of and Attitudes Toward Automatic Emotion Recognition-Enabled Wellbeing Interventions on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--34.
[110]
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Alex Hanna, and Emily Denton. 2021. Do datasets have politics? disciplinary values in computer vision dataset development. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--37.
[111]
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jacob M Paul, and Jed R Brubaker. 2019. How computers see gender: An evaluation of gender classification in commercial facial analysis services. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-ComputerInteraction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--33.
[112]
Ari Schlesinger, W Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5412--5427.
[113]
Susan P Shapiro. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American journal of Sociology 93, 3 (1987), 623--658.
[114]
Ashley Shew. 2020. Ableism, technoableism, and future AI. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 39, 1 (2020), 40--85.
[115]
Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Os Keyes, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Agency of autistic children in technology research-A critical literature review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 6 (2019), 1--40.
[116]
Abigale Stangl, Kristina Shiroma, Bo Xie, Kenneth R Fleischmann, and Danna Gurari. 2020. Visual Content Considered Private by People Who are Blind. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--12.
[117]
Nikki Stevens, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Sarah Florini. 2021. The unremarked optimum: whiteness, optimization, and control in the database revolution. Review of Communication 21, 2 (2021), 113--128.
[118]
Kevin M Storer and Stacy M Branham. 2019. " That's the Way Sighted People Do It" What Blind Parents Can Teach Technology Designers About Co-Reading with Children. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 385--398.
[119]
Cella M Sum, Rahaf Alharbi, Franchesca Spektor, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina N Harrington, Katta Spiel, and Rua Mae Williams. 2022. Dreaming Disability Justice in HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--5.
[120]
Lida Theodorou, Daniela Massiceti, Luisa Zintgraf, Simone Stumpf, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, Matthew Tobias Harris, and Katja Hofmann. 2021. Disability-first Dataset Creation: Lessons from Constructing a Dataset for Teachable Object Recognition with Blind and Low Vision Data Collectors. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--12.
[121]
Anja Thieme, Cynthia L Bennett, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, and Alex S Taylor. 2018. " I can do everything but see!"--How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[122]
Shari Trewin. 2018. AI fairness for people with disabilities: Point of view. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10670 (2018).
[123]
Mika Vanhala, Kaisu Puumalainen, and Kirsimarja Blomqvist. 2011. Impersonal trust. Personnel Review (2011).
[124]
Beatrice Vincenzi, Alex S Taylor, and Simone Stumpf. 2021. Interdependence in Action: People with Visual Impairments and their Guides Co-constituting Common Spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--33.
[125]
Kandrea Wade, Jed R Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2021. Protest Privacy Recommendations: An Analysis of Digital Surveillance Circumvention Advice During Black Lives Matter Protests. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.
[126]
Glen W White, Jamie Lloyd Simpson, Chiaki Gonda, Craig Ravesloot, and Zach Coble. 2010. Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20, 4 (2010), 233--240.
[127]
Meredith Whittaker, Meryl Alper, Cynthia L Bennett, Sara Hendren, Liz Kaziunas, Mara Mills, Meredith Ringel Morris, Joy Rankin, Emily Rogers, Marcel Salas, et al. 2019. Disability, bias, and AI. AI Now Institute (2019).
[128]
Rua M Williams and LouAnne E Boyd. 2019. Prefigurative politics and passionate witnessing. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 262--266.
[129]
Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. Cyborg perspectives on computing research reform. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[130]
Rua M Williams, Kathryn Ringland, Amelia Gibson, Mahender Mandala, Arne Maibaum, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2021. Articulations toward a crip HCI. Interactions 28, 3 (2021), 28--37.
[131]
Richmond Y Wong, Deirdre K Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting values reflections by engaging privacy futures using design workbooks. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--26.
[132]
Richmond Y Wong, Ellen Van Wyk, and James Pierce. 2017. Real-fictional entanglements: Using science fiction and design fiction to interrogate sensing technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 567--579.
[133]
Shaomei Wu, Jeffrey Wieland, Omid Farivar, and Julie Schiller. 2017. Automatic alt-text: Computer-generated image descriptions for blind users on a social network service. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1180--1192.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing ObfuscationProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701602(300-312)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)U.S. Job-Seekers' Organizational Justice Perceptions of Emotion AI-Enabled InterviewsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869938:CSCW2(1-42)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Organizing for More Just and Inclusive Futures: A Community DiscussionCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3687143(689-692)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Emerging Obfuscation Technologies in Visual Description Services for Blind and Low Vision People

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      November 2022
      8205 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3571154
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 November 2022
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. blind and low vision
      2. interdependence
      3. obfuscation
      4. privacy
      5. qualitative
      6. speculative and future technology
      7. visual description services

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)152
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing ObfuscationProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701602(300-312)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
      • (2024)U.S. Job-Seekers' Organizational Justice Perceptions of Emotion AI-Enabled InterviewsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869938:CSCW2(1-42)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Organizing for More Just and Inclusive Futures: A Community DiscussionCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3687143(689-692)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Misfitting With AI: How Blind People Verify and Contest AI ErrorsProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675659(1-17)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and ChallengesProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675635(1-15)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)EditScribe: Non-Visual Image Editing with Natural Language Verification LoopsProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675599(1-19)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Designing Accessible Content Creation Support with Blind and Low Vision CreatorsACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3654768.3654775(1-1)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Designing Accessible Obfuscation Support for Blind Individuals’ Visual Privacy ManagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642713(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Investigating Use Cases of AI-Powered Scene Description Applications for Blind and Low Vision PeopleProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642211(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Salient Object Detection for Images Taken by People With Vision Impairments2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)10.1109/WACV57701.2024.00833(8507-8516)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media