Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2872427.2883074acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detecting Good Abandonment in Mobile Search

Published: 11 April 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Web search queries for which there are no clicks are referred to as abandoned queries and are usually considered as leading to user dissatisfaction. However, there are many cases where a user may not click on any search result page (SERP) but still be satisfied. This scenario is referred to as good abandonment and presents a challenge for most approaches measuring search satisfaction, which are usually based on clicks and dwell time. The problem is exacerbated further on mobile devices where search providers try to increase the likelihood of users being satisfied directly by the SERP. This paper proposes a solution to this problem using gesture interactions, such as reading times and touch actions, as signals for differentiating between good and bad abandonment. These signals go beyond clicks and characterize user behavior in cases where clicks are not needed to achieve satisfaction. We study different good abandonment scenarios and investigate the different elements on a SERP that may lead to good abandonment. We also present an analysis of the correlation between user gesture features and satisfaction. Finally, we use this analysis to build models to automatically identify good abandonment in mobile search achieving an accuracy of 75%, which is significantly better than considering query and session signals alone. Our findings have implications for the study and application of user satisfaction in search systems.

    References

    [1]
    M. S. Bernstein, J. Teevan, S. Dumais, D. Liebling, and E. Horvitz. Direct answers for search queries in the long tail. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 237--246, 2012.
    [2]
    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, K. Zhou, M. Wang, M. Zhang, and S. Ma. Does Vertical Bring more Satisfaction -- Predicting Search Satisfaction in a Heterogeneous Environment. In International Conference on Information and knowledge management (to appear), 2015.
    [3]
    L. B. Chilton and J. Teevan. Addressing people's information needs directly in a web search result page. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 27--36, 2011.
    [4]
    A. Chuklin and P. Serdyukov. Potential good abandonment prediction. In Proceedings of the International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pages 485--486, 2012.
    [5]
    A. Chuklin and P. Serdyukov. Good abandonments in factoid queries. In International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pages 483--484, 2012.
    [6]
    A. Diriye, R. White, G. Buscher, and S. Dumais. Leaving so soon? understanding and predicting web search abandonment rationales. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 1025--1034, 2012. ISBN 9781450311564.
    [7]
    M. Duggan and A. Smith. Cell Internet Use 2013, 2013. URL http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/09/16/cell-internet-use-2013/.
    [8]
    W. Fan. On the optimality of probability estimation by random decision trees. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 336--341, 2004.
    [9]
    J. L. Fleiss. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76 (5): 378--382, 1971.
    [10]
    S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23 (2): 147--168, 2005.
    [11]
    Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Ready to buy or just browsing? detecting web searcher goals from interaction data. In Proceeding of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 130--137, 2010.
    [12]
    Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Beyond dwell time: Estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior. In Proceedings of the International conference on World Wide Web, pages 569--578, New York, New York, USA, 2012. ACM Press.
    [13]
    Q. Guo, S. Yuan, and E. Agichtein. Detecting success in mobile search from interaction. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1229--1230, 2011.
    [14]
    Q. Guo, D. Lagun, and E. Agichtein. Predicting web search success with fine-grained interaction data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 2050--2054, 2012.
    [15]
    Q. Guo, H. Jin, D. Lagun, S. Yuan, and E. Agichtein. Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 153--162, 2013.
    [16]
    A. Hassan. A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval., pages 275--284, 2012.
    [17]
    A. Hassan and R. W. White. Personalized models of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management, pages 2009--2018, 2013.
    [18]
    A. Hassan, R. Jones, and K. L. Klinkner. Beyond dcg: User behavior as a predictor of successful search. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 221--230, 2010.
    [19]
    A. Hassan, X. Shi, N. Craswell, and B. Ramsey. Beyond clicks: Query reformulation as a predictor of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 2019--2028, 2013.
    [20]
    012)}HuangHCIR2012A. D. Jeff Huang. Web user interaction mining from touch-enabled mobile devices. In HCIR Workshop, 2012.
    [21]
    J. Jiang, A. H. Awadallah, R. Jones, U. Ozertem, I. Zitouni, R. G. Kulkarni, and O. Z. Khan. Automatic Online Evaluation of Intelligent Assistants. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 506--516, 2015.
    [22]
    J. Jiang, A. H. Awadallah, X. Shi, and R. W. White. Understanding and Predicting Graded Search Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 57--66, 2015.
    [23]
    M. Kamvar, M. Kellar, R. Patel, and Y. Xu. Computers and iphones and mobile phones, oh my! In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 801--810, 2009.
    [24]
    D. Kelly. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundation and Trents in Information Retrieval, 3 (1--2): 1--224, 2009.
    [25]
    Y. Kim, A. Hassan, R. W. White, and Y.-M. Wang. Playing by the rules: mining query associations to predict search performance. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 133--142, 2013.
    [26]
    Y. Kim, A. Hassan, R. W. White, and I. Zitouni. Comparing client and server dwell time estimates for click-level satisfaction prediction. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 895--898, 2014.
    [27]
    Y. Kim, A. Hassan, R. W. White, and I. Zitouni. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 193--202, 2014.
    [28]
    D. Lagun, C.-H. Hsieh, D. Webster, and V. Navalpakkam. Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 113--122, 2014.
    [29]
    J. Landis and G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, pages 159--174, 1977.
    [30]
    J. Li, S. Huffman, and A. Tokuda. Good abandonment in mobile and pc internet search. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 43--50, 2009.
    [31]
    Z. Liao, Y. Song, L.-w. He, and Y. Huang. Evaluating the effectiveness of search task trails. In Proceedings of the international conference on World Wide Web, pages 489--498, 2012.
    [32]
    Y. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Tang, J. Sun, M. Zhang, S. Ma, and X. Zhu. Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 493--502, 2015.
    [33]
    Y. Song, X. Shi, R. White, and A. H. Awadallah. Context-aware web search abandonment prediction. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 93--102, 2014.
    [34]
    S. Stamou and E. N. Efthimiadis. Interpreting user inactivity on search results. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, volume 5993, pages 100--113, 2010.
    [35]
    R. W. White, M. Richardson, and W.-t. Yih. Questions vs. Queries in Informational Search Tasks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 135--136, 2015.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Investigating the Influence of Featured Snippets on User AttitudesProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578323(211-220)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Predicting information usefulness in health information identification from modal behaviorsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2022.10322060:2(103220)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • (2022)LBDProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3600270.3602690(33400-33413)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Detecting Good Abandonment in Mobile Search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '16: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2016
      1482 pages
      ISBN:9781450341431

      Sponsors

      • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

      Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

      Publication History

      Published: 11 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. good abandonment
      2. implicit relevance feedback
      3. mobile search behavior
      4. touch interaction models

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WWW '16
      Sponsor:
      • IW3C2
      WWW '16: 25th International World Wide Web Conference
      April 11 - 15, 2016
      Québec, Montréal, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 115 of 727 submissions, 16%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Investigating the Influence of Featured Snippets on User AttitudesProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578323(211-220)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
      • (2023)Predicting information usefulness in health information identification from modal behaviorsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2022.10322060:2(103220)Online publication date: Mar-2023
      • (2022)LBDProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3600270.3602690(33400-33413)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Topic-Mono-BERT: A Joint Retrieval-Clustering System for Retrieving Overview PassagesProceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation10.1145/3574318.3574336(54-59)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2022
      • (2022)Featured Snippets and their Influence on Users’ Credibility JudgementsProceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3498366.3505766(113-122)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2022
      • (2022)Why Don't You ClickProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3532082(633-645)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
      • (2020)Learning with Limited Labels via Momentum Damped & Differentially Weighted OptimizationProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3394486.3403394(3416-3425)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2020
      • (2020)Prediction of Good Abandonment Behavior in Mobile SearchProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3343413.3378007(407-411)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2020
      • (2020)The Effect of Queries and Search Result Quality on the Rate of Query Abandonment in Interactive Information RetrievalProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3343413.3377951(523-526)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2020
      • (2019)Constructing Click Model for Mobile Search with Viewport TimeACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/336048637:4(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media