Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2996913.2996962acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Interpreting traffic dynamics using ubiquitous urban data

Published: 31 October 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Given a large collection of urban datasets, how can we find their hidden correlations? For example, New York City (NYC) provides open access to taxi data from year 2012 to 2015 with about half million taxi trips generated per day. In the meantime, we have a rich set of urban data in NYC including points-of-interest (POIs), geo-tagged tweets, weather, vehicle collisions, etc. Is it possible that these ubiquitous datasets can be used to explain the city traffic? Understanding the hidden correlation between external data and traffic data would allow us to answer many important questions in urban computing such as: If we observe a high traffic volume at Madison Square Garden (MSG) in NYC, is it because of the regular peak hour or a big event being held at MSG? If a disaster weather such as a hurricane or a snow storm hits the city, how would the traffic be affected?
    Most of existing studies on traffic dynamics focus only on traffic data itself and do not seek for external datasets to explain traffic. In this paper, we present our results in attempts to understand taxi traffic dynamics in NYC from multiple external data sources. We use four real-world ubiquitous urban datasets, including POIs, weather, geo-tagged tweets, and collision records. To address the heterogeneity of ubiquitous urban data, we present carefully-designed feature representations for these datasets. Our analysis suggests that POIs can well describe the regular traffic patterns. In addition, geo-tagged tweets can be used to explain irregular traffic caused by big events, and weather may account for abnormal traffic drops.

    References

    [1]
    A. Abadi, T. Rajabioun, and P. A. Ioannou. Traffic flow prediction for road transportation networks with limited traffic data. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):653--662, 2015.
    [2]
    K. Y. Chan, T. S. Dillon, J. Singh, and E. Chang. Neural-network-based models for short-term traffic flow forecasting using a hybrid exponential smoothing and levenberg-marquardt algorithm. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 13(2):644--654, 2012.
    [3]
    P.-T. Chen, F. Chen, and Z. Qian. Road traffic congestion monitoring in social media with hinge-loss markov random fields. In ICDM'14. IEEE, 2014.
    [4]
    Fourquare. https://foursquare.com/, 2016.
    [5]
    D. Lian, Y. Ge, F. Zhang, N. J. Yuan, X. Xie, T. Zhou, and Y. Rui. Content-aware collaborative filtering for location recommendation based on human mobility data. In ICDM'15. IEEE, 2015.
    [6]
    Y. Matsubara, Y. Sakurai, W. G. Van Panhuis, and C. Faloutsos. Funnel: automatic mining of spatially coevolving epidemics. In KDD'14. ACM, 2014.
    [7]
    K. P. Murphy. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT press, 2012.
    [8]
    J. Shang, Y. Zheng, W. Tong, E. Chang, and Y. Yu. Inferring gas consumption and pollution emission of vehicles throughout a city. In KDD'14. ACM, 2014.
    [9]
    F. Wu and Z. Li. Where did you go: Personalized annotation of mobility records. In CIKM'16. ACM, 2016.
    [10]
    F. Wu, Z. Li, W.-C. Lee, H. Wang, and Z. Huang. Semantic annotation of mobility data using social media. In WWW'15, 2015.
    [11]
    Y. Xu, Q.-J. Kong, R. Klette, and Y. Liu. Accurate and interpretable bayesian mars for traffic flow prediction. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):2457--2469, 2014.
    [12]
    J. Yuan, Y. Zheng, and X. Xie. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and pois. In KDD'12, 2012.
    [13]
    Y. Zheng, L. Capra, O. Wolfson, and H. Yang. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. TIST, 5(3):38, 2014.
    [14]
    Y. Zheng, F. Liu, and H.-P. Hsieh. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In KDD'13. ACM, 2013.
    [15]
    Y. Zheng, X. Yi, M. Li, R. Li, Z. Shan, E. Chang, and T. Li. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In KDD'15. ACM, 2015.
    [16]
    Y. Zheng, H. Zhang, and Y. Yu. Detecting collective anomalies from multiple spatio-temporal datasets across different domains. In GIS'15. ACM, 2015.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)DeepMeshCity: A Deep Learning Model for Urban Grid PredictionACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/365285918:6(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Synthesizing Human Trajectories Based on Variational Point ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2023.331220936:4(1785-1799)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2023)Effect of Spatio-Temporal Granularity on Demand Prediction for Deep Learning ModelsTransport and Telecommunication Journal10.2478/ttj-2023-000324:1(22-32)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Interpreting traffic dynamics using ubiquitous urban data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGSPACIAL '16: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      October 2016
      649 pages
      ISBN:9781450345897
      DOI:10.1145/2996913
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 31 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. traffic
      2. urban computing

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      SIGSPATIAL'16

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSPACIAL '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 216 submissions, 19%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 220 of 1,116 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)DeepMeshCity: A Deep Learning Model for Urban Grid PredictionACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/365285918:6(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Synthesizing Human Trajectories Based on Variational Point ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2023.331220936:4(1785-1799)Online publication date: Apr-2024
      • (2023)Effect of Spatio-Temporal Granularity on Demand Prediction for Deep Learning ModelsTransport and Telecommunication Journal10.2478/ttj-2023-000324:1(22-32)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Practical Synthetic Human Trajectories Generation Based on Variational Point ProcessesProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599888(4561-4571)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
      • (2023)PAG-TSN: Ridership Demand Forecasting Model for Shared Travel Services of Smart TransportationIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.324858024:12(15876-15889)Online publication date: Dec-2023
      • (2023) M 3 AN: Multitask Multirange Multisubgraph Attention Network for Condition-Aware Traffic Prediction IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2022.321667824:1(218-232)Online publication date: Jan-2023
      • (2023)ST-Bikes: Predicting Travel-Behaviors of Sharing-Bikes Exploiting Urban Big DataIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2022.319777824:7(7676-7686)Online publication date: Jul-2023
      • (2023)FedSTN: Graph Representation Driven Federated Learning for Edge Computing Enabled Urban Traffic Flow PredictionIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2022.315705624:8(8738-8748)Online publication date: Aug-2023
      • (2023)Traffic Flow Forecasting of Graph Convolutional Network Based on Spatio-Temporal Attention MechanismInternational Journal of Automotive Technology10.1007/s12239-023-0083-924:4(1013-1023)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
      • (2022)Predicting Taxi-Calling Demands Using Multi-Feature and Residual Attention Graph Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory NetworksISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi1103018511:3(185)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media