Cited By
View all- Umezu NYuming B(2022)Floor Projection with QR code-based Interactions and Visitor Drawings2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058(318-320)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
Evaluation on perceived sizes using large-scale augmented floor visualization devices
Authors: 
Michael Otto, Eva Lampen, Philipp Agethen, Mareike Langohr, Gerald Masan, Enrico RukzioAuthors Info & Claims
Michael Otto, Eva Lampen, Philipp Agethen, Mareike Langohr, Gerald Masan, Enrico RukzioAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 20, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Large scale output displays are an enabling technology in order to achieve immersive, isometrically registered, virtual environments. Amongst other benefits, pervasive displays allow for more accurate size judgments, better collaboration performance in workshops and less task completion time. Since research still does not offer an holistic view on size perception and reaction time using wall-sized displays, this paper follows a call for research. This evaluation investigates the size judgment accuracy, precision and reaction time using a large scale led floor compared to tablet computer with relative scales. Therefore, an output apparatus is presented using a 54 sqm LED floor surrounded by additional 36 square meters of LED walls. Using this apparatus, 22 participants were provided with the same virtual contents in 3 different scenarios. The baseline scenario (tablet computer) visualizes relative sized geometry, whereas two LED floor scenarios show true to scale (absolute sized) contents. Results indicate that using true to scale visualization of 2D contents on a LED floor reduces mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of spatial estimations significantly and is the user's preferred visualization device. No systematic over- or underestimation of size judgments could be revealed for all three scenarios. In contrast to that, task completion time rises by using such an apparatus.
References
[1]
Philipp Agethen, Michael Otto, Felix Gaisbauer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016-01-01. Presenting a Novel Motion Capture-based Approach for Walk Path Segmentation and Drift Analysis in Manual Assembly. 52 (2016-01-01), 286--291. 00001.
[2]
Jan C. Aurich, Dirk Ostermayer, and C. H. Wagenknecht. 2009. Improvement of manufacturing processes with virtual reality-based CIP workshops. 47, 19 (2009), 5297--5309.
[3]
Anastasia Bezerianos and Petra Isenberg. 2013. Perceptual Affordances of Wall-Sized Displays for Visualization Applications. European Union.
[4]
J Martin Bland and Douglas G Altman. 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8, 2 (1999), 135--160.
[5]
William S. Cleveland and Robert McGill. {n. d.}. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. 79, 387 ({n. d.}), 531--554.
[6]
Carolina Cruz-Neira, Daniel J. Sandin, and Thomas A. DeFanti. 1993. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 135--142.
[7]
Tobi Delbrück, Adrian M. Whatley, Rodney Douglas, Kynan Eng, Klaus Hepp, and Paul FMJ Verschure. 2007. A tactile luminous floor for an interactive autonomous space. 55, 6 (2007), 433--443. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889007000231
[8]
William Epstein. 1963. Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. 66, 1 (1963), 78.
[9]
William Epstein and Krishan D. Broota. 1975. Attitude of judgment and reaction time in estimation of size at a distance. 18, 3 (1975), 201--204.
[10]
Kaj Grønbaek, Ole S. Iversen, Karen Johanne Kortbek, Kaspar Rosengreen Nielsen, and Louise Aagaard. 2007. IGameFloor: A Platform for Co-located Collaborative Games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '07). ACM, 64--71. 00000.
[11]
Kaj Grønbaek, Ole Sejer Iversen, Karen Johanne Kortbek, Kaspar Rosengreen Nielsen, and Louise Aagaard. 2007. Interactive floor support for kinesthetic interaction in children learning environments. In Human-Computer Interaction 2007. Springer, 361--375. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_32
[12]
Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality between HMD and Non-HMD Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4021--4033.
[13]
Akira Ishii, Masaya Tsuruta, Ippei Suzuki, Shuta Nakamae, Tatsuya Minagawa, Junichi Suzuki, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2017. ReverseCAVE Experience: Providing Reverse Perspectives for Sharing VR Experience. (2017).
[14]
Jonathan W. Kelly, Lucia A. Cherep, and Zachary D. Siegel. 2017. Perceived Space in the HTC Vive. 15, 1 (2017), 2:1--2:16.
[15]
Jack M. Loomis and Joshua M. Knapp. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. 11 (2003), 21--46.
[16]
Michael Otto, Michael Prieur, Philipp Agethen, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. Dual Reality for Production Verification Workshops: A Comprehensive Set of Virtual Methods. 44 (2016), 38--43. 00000.
[17]
Michael Otto, Michael Prieur, and Enrico Rukzio. 2014. Using Scalable, Interactive Floor Projection for Production Planning Scenario. ACM, 363--368. 00005.
[18]
Rebekka S. Renner, Boris M. Velichkovsky, and Jens R. Helmert. 2013. The Perception of Egocentric Distances in Virtual Environments - A Review. 46, 2 (2013), 23:1--23:40.
[19]
Justin Talbot, Vidya Setlur, and Anushka Anand. 2014. Four experiments on the perception of bar charts. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2152--2160.
[20]
Mark Wagner. 1985. The metric of visual space. Perception & psychophysics 38, 6 (1985), 483--495.
Index Terms
- Evaluation on perceived sizes using large-scale augmented floor visualization devices
Recommendations
Using large-scale augmented floor surfaces for industrial applications and evaluation on perceived sizes: Personal and ubiquitous computing—theme issue on pervasive displays
AbstractLarge high-resolution displays (LHRDs) provide an enabling technology to achieve immersive, isometrically registered, virtual environments. It has been shown that LHRDs allow better size judgments, higher collaboration performance, and shorter ...
Perceived intensity of click sensation for small touchscreen devices
ITS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces'Click' and 'Tap' are one of the most commonly used gestures UI on touchscreen. There were many studies that aimed to provide realistic tactile feedback when user touched a graphic object on touchscreen. In this study, we analyzed perceived intensity ...
Perceived Egocentric Distances in Real, Image-Based, and Traditional Virtual Environments
VR '02: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2002In virtual environments, perceived egocentric distances are consistently underestimated when compared to the same distance judgments in the real world. The research presented in this paper explores two possible causes for the compressed distance ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2019
223 pages
ISBN:9781450367516
DOI:10.1145/3321335
- General Chairs:
- Mohamed Khamis,
- Salvatore Sorce,
- Program Chairs:
- Jessica R. Cauchard,
- Vito Gentile
Copyright © 2019 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 June 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
PerDis '19
PerDis '19: The 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
June 12 - 14, 2019
Palermo, Italy
Acceptance Rates
PerDis '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 67 submissions, 39%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 213 of 384 submissions, 55%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 95Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Umezu NYuming B(2022)Floor Projection with QR code-based Interactions and Visitor Drawings2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058(318-320)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in