Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

SQL Education: A Systematic Mapping Study and Future Research Agenda

Published: 07 August 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Structured Query Language (SQL) skills are crucial in software engineering and computer science. However, teaching SQL effectively requires both pedagogical skill and considerable knowledge of the language. Educators and scholars have proposed numerous considerations for the betterment of SQL education, yet these considerations may be too numerous and scattered among different fora for educators to find and internalize, as no systematic mappings or literature reviews regarding SQL education have been conducted. The two main goals of this mapping study are to provide an overview of educational SQL research topics, research types, and publication fora, and to collect and propagate SQL teaching practices for educators to utilize. Additionally, we present a short future research agenda based on insights from the mapping process. We conducted a systematic mapping study complemented by snowballing techniques to identify applicable primary studies. We classified the primary studies according to research type and utilized directed content analysis to classify the primary studies by their topic. Out of our selected 89 primary studies, we identified six recurring topics: (i) student errors in query formulation; (ii) characteristics and presentation of the exercise database; (iii) specific and (iv) non-specific teaching approach suggestions; (v) patterns and visualization; and (vi) easing teacher workload. We list 66 teaching approaches the primary studies argued for (and in some cases against). For researchers, we provide a systematic map of educational SQL research and future research agenda. For educators, we present an aggregated body of knowledge on teaching practices in SQL education over a time frame of 30 years. In conclusion, we suggest that replication studies, studies on advanced SQL concepts, and studies on aspects other than data retrieval are needed to further educational SQL research.

    References

    [1]
    Alberto Abelló, Xavier Burgués, María José Casany, Carme Martín, Carme Quer, M. Elena Rodríguez, Óscar Romero, and Toni Urpí. 2016. A software tool for E-assessment of relational database skills. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32, 3 (2016), 1289--1312. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2117/89668.
    [2]
    Alberto Abelló, M. Elena Rodríguez, Toni Urpí, Xavier Burgués, M. José Casany, Carme Martín, and Carme Quer. 2008. LEARN-SQL: Automatic assessment of SQL based on IMS QTI specification. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
    [3]
    Elizabeth S. Adams, Mary Granger, Don Goelman, and Catherine Ricardo. 2004. Managing the introductory database course. In Proceedings of the 35th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’04). ACM Press.
    [4]
    Alireza Ahadi, Vahid Behbood, Arto Vihavainen, Julia Prior, and Raymond Lister. 2016. Students’ syntactic mistakes in writing seven different types of SQL queries and its application to predicting students’ success. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE’16). ACM Press, New York, NY, 401--406.
    [5]
    Alireza Ahadi, Julia Prior, Vahid Behbood, and Raymond Lister. 2015. A quantitative study of the relative difficulty for novices of writing seven different types of SQL queries. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’15). ACM Press, New York, NY, 201--206.
    [6]
    Alireza Ahadi, Julia Prior, Vahid Behbood, and Raymond Lister. 2016. Students’ semantic mistakes in writing seven different types of SQL queries. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’16). ACM Press, New York, NY, 272--277.
    [7]
    Judith D. Ahrens and Chetan S. Sankar. 1993. Tailoring database training for end users. MIS Quart. 17, 4 (1993), 419.
    [8]
    A. AL-Salmi. 2018. A web-based semi-automatic assessment tool for formulating basic SQL statements: Point-and-click interaction method. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU’18), Vol. 1. 191--198.
    [9]
    Brett Allenstein, Andrew Yost, Paul Wagner, and Joline Morrison. 2008. A query simulation system to illustrate database query execution. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). ACM, New York, NY, 493--497.
    [10]
    W. J. Amadio. 2003. The dilemma of team learning: An assessment from the SQL programming classroom. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. 823--828. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-04422784738partnerID=408md5=ffb48d535e80751aaf8b153af6a13c42.
    [11]
    Neal Ashkanasy, Paul L. Bowen, Fiona H. Rohde, and Chiu Yueh Alice Wu. 2007. The effects of user characteristics on query performance in the presence of information request ambiguity. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 1 (2007), 53--82.
    [12]
    Micheal Axelsen, A. Faye Borthick, and Paul L. Bowen. 2001. A model for and the effects of information request ambiguity on end-user query performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. 68. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2001/68.
    [13]
    Heather Bort, David P. Bunde, Zack Butler, Christopher Lynnly Hovey, and Cynthia Taylor. 2019. Propagating educational innovations. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’19). ACM, New York, NY, 167--168.
    [14]
    A. Faye Borthick, Paul L. Bowen, Donald R. Jones, and Michael Hung Kam Tse. 2001. The effects of information request ambiguity and construct incongruence on query development. Dec. Supp. Syst. 32, 1 (Nov. 2001), 3--25.
    [15]
    A. Faye Borthick, Paul L. Bowen, S. T. Liew, and Fiona H. Rohde. 2001. The effects of normalization on end-user query errors: An experimental evaluation. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2, 4 (2001), 195--221.
    [16]
    Paul L. Bowen, Robert A. O’Farrell, and Fiona H. Rohde. 2009. An empirical investigation of end-user query development: The effects of improved model expressiveness vs. complexity. Inf. Syst. Res. 20, 4 (Dec. 2009), 565--584.
    [17]
    Stefan Brass and Christian Goldberg. 2006. Semantic errors in SQL queries: A quite complete list. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May 2006), 630--644.
    [18]
    Jennifer E. Broatch, Suzanne Dietrich, and Don Goelman. 2019. Introducing data science techniques by connecting database concepts and dplyr. J. Stat. Educ. 27, 3 (2019), 147--153.
    [19]
    Peter Brusilovsky, Sergey Sosnovsky, Danielle H. Lee, Michael Yudelson, Vladimir Zadorozhny, and Xin Zhou. 2008. An open integrated exploratorium for database courses. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’08). ACM, New York, NY, 22--26.
    [20]
    Peter Brusilovsky, Sergey Sosnovsky, Michael V. Yudelson, Danielle H. Lee, Vladimir Zadorozhny, and Xin Zhou. 2010. Learning SQL programming with interactive tools: From integration to personalization. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 9, 4 (Jan. 2010).
    [21]
    R. B. Buitendijk. 1988. Logical errors in database SQL retrieval queries. Comput. Sci. Econ. Manag. 1, 2 (1988), 79--96.
    [22]
    Clifford G. Burgess. 1991. A graphical, database-querying interface for casual, naive computer users. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34, 1 (1991), 23--47.
    [23]
    Luca Cagliero, Luigi De Russis, Laura Farinetti, and Teodoro Montanaro. 2018. Improving the effectiveness of SQL learning practice: A data-driven approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC’18), Vol. 01. 980--989.
    [24]
    Gretchen Irwin Casterella and Leo Vijayasarathy. 2013. An experimental investigation of complexity in database query formulation tasks. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 24, 3 (2013), 211--221. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume24/24-3/pdf/Vol24-3pg211.pdf.
    [25]
    Gretchen Irwin Casterella and Leo Vijayasarathy. 2019. Query structure and data model mapping errors in information retrieval tasks. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 30, 3 (2019), 178--190. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume30/n3/JISEv30n3p178.pdf.
    [26]
    Tiziana Catarci, Maria F. Costabile, Stefano Levialdi, and Carlo Batini. 1997. Visual query systems for databases: A survey. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 8, 2 (1997), 215--260.
    [27]
    Claudio Cerullo and Marco Porta. 2007. A system for database visual querying and query visualization: Complementing text and graphics to increase expressiveness. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’07). IEEE.
    [28]
    Donald D. Chamberlin. 2012. Early history of SQL. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 34, 4 (Oct. 2012), 78--82.
    [29]
    Donald D. Chamberlin, M. M. Astrahan, K. P. Eswaran, P. P. Griffiths, R. A. Lorie, J. W. Mehl, P. Reisner, and B. W. Wade. 1976. SEQUEL 2: A unified approach to data definition, manipulation, and control. IBM J. Res. Dev. 20, 6 (Nov. 1976), 560--575.
    [30]
    Donald D. Chamberlin and Raymond F. Boyce. 1974. SEQUEL: A structured English query language. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control (SIGFIDET’74). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 249--264.
    [31]
    Hock Chan, Keng Siau, and Kwok-Kee Wei. 1997. The effect of data model, system and task characteristics on user query performance: An empirical study. ACM SIGMIS Datab.: DATAB. Adv. Inf. Syst. 29, 1 (1997), 31--49.
    [32]
    Hock Chuan Chan. 2007. A two-stage evaluation of user query performance for the relational model and SQL. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS’07). 118. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2007/118.
    [33]
    Hock Chuan Chan, Hock-Hai Teo, and X. H. Zeng. 2005. An evaluation of novice end-user computing performance: Data modeling, query writing, and comprehension. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 8 (2005), 843--853. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.20178.
    [34]
    Hock Chuan Chan, Kwok Kee Wei, and Keng Leng Siau. 1993. User-database interface: The effect of abstraction levels on query performance. MIS Quart. 17, 4 (Dec. 1993), 441.
    [35]
    Hock Chuan Chan, Kwok Kee Wei, and Keng Leng Siau. 1994. An empirical study on end-users’ update performance for different abstraction levels. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 41, 3 (1994), 309--328.
    [36]
    H. C. Chan, K. K. Wei, and K. L. Siau. 1995. The effect of a database feedback system on user performance. Behav. Inf. Technol. 14, 3 (May 1995), 152--162.
    [37]
    Peter Pin-Shan Chen. 1976. The entity-relationship model—Toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Datab. Syst. 1, 1 (Mar. 1976), 9--36.
    [38]
    E. F. Codd. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13, 6 (June 1970), 377--387.
    [39]
    Thomas Connolly and Carolyn Begg. 2015. Database Systems (6th. ed.). Pearson.
    [40]
    Mohammad Dadashzadeh. 2003. A simpler approach to set comparison queries in SQL. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 14, 4 (2003), 345--348. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume14/n4/JISEv14n4p345.pdf.
    [41]
    Mohammad Dadashzadeh. 2007. Teaching tip: Recursive joins to query data hierarchies in Microsoft access. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 18, 1 (2007), 5--10. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume18/n1/JISEv18n1p5.pdf.
    [42]
    Mohammad Dadashzadeh. 2007. Teaching tip: Specification and enforcement of semantic integrity constraints in Microsoft access. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 18, 4 (2007), 393--398. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume18/n4/JISEv18n4p393.pdf.
    [43]
    J. Steve Davis. 1990. Experimental investigation of the utility of data structure and E-R diagrams in database query. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 32, 4 (1990), 449--459.
    [44]
    S. W. Dietrich, D. Goelman, C. M. Borror, and S. M. Crook. 2015. An animated introduction to relational databases for many majors. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58, 2 (May 2015), 81--89.
    [45]
    Doug Downey, Susan Dumais, Dan Liebling, and Eric Horvitz. 2008. Understanding the relationship between searchers’ queries and information goals. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’08). ACM, New York, NY, 449--458.
    [46]
    A. Efendioglu and T. Yanpar Yelken. 2010. Programmed instruction versus meaningful learning theory in teaching basic structured query language (SQL) in computer lesson. Comput. Educ. 55, 3 (2010), 1287--1299.
    [47]
    Andrew Eisenberg, Jim Melton, Krishna Kulkarni, Jan-Eike Michels, and Fred Zemke. 2004. SQL:2003 has been published. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 33, 1 (Mar. 2004), 119.
    [48]
    Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe. 2016. Fundamentals of Database Systems (7th. ed.). Pearson.
    [49]
    Philip Garner and John Amedeo Mariani. 2015. Learning SQL in steps. J. Syst. Cyber. Inf. 13, 4 (2015), 19--24.
    [50]
    Don Goelman. 2008. Databases, non-majors and collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’08). ACM Press.
    [51]
    Venkat N. Gudivada, Jagadeesh Nandigam, and Yonglei Tao. 2007. Enhancing student learning in database courses with large data sets. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’07).
    [52]
    Mario Guimaraes. 2005. Integrating the Kennesaw database courseware and other database coursewares in database classes. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Southeast Regional Conference (ACM-SE’05), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, 15--15.
    [53]
    Qiang Hao, David H. Smith IV, Naitra Iriumi, Michail Tsikerdekis, and Andrew J. Ko. 2019. A systematic investigation of replications in computing education research. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 19, 4 (Aug. 2019).
    [54]
    Joseph E. Hollingsworth. 2008. Teaching query writing: An informed instruction approach. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’08). ACM, New York, NY, 351--351.
    [55]
    A. S. M. L. Hoque, G. M. M. Bashiry, and M. R. Uddin. 2014. Equivalence of problems in problem based e-learning of database. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Technology for Education. 106--109.
    [56]
    Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 9 (2005), 1277--1288.
    [57]
    Ching-yu Huang. 2019. Integrative curriculum for teaching databases. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 34, 3 (Jan. 2019), 131--131. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3306465.3306487.
    [58]
    Gretchen Irwin, Wessel Lark, and Harvey Blackburn. 2012. Teaching case: The animal genetic resource information network (AnimalGRIN) database: A database design 8 implementation case. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 23, 1 (2012), 19--28. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume23/n1/JISEv23n1p19.pdf.
    [59]
    ISO/IEC. 2016. ISO/IEC 9075-1:2016, “SQL—Part 1: Framework.” Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/63555.html.
    [60]
    ISO/IEC. 2016. ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016, “SQL—Part 2: Foundation.” Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/63556.html.
    [61]
    W. J. Kenny Jih, David A. Bradbard, Charles A. Snyder, and Nancy G. A. Thompson. 1989. The effects of relational and entity-relationship data models on query performance of end users. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 31, 3 (Sep. 1989), 257--267.
    [62]
    Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. Technical Report. New York, NY.
    [63]
    Nenad Jukic and Paul Gray. 2008. Using real data to invigorate student learning. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 2 (June 2008), 6--10.
    [64]
    Jai W. Kang, Qi Yu, Edward P. Holden, and Xumin Liu. 2019. Complementing course contents between IT/CS: A case study on database courses. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE’19). ACM, New York, NY, 10--15.
    [65]
    Krishna Kulkarni and Jan-Eike Michels. 2012. Temporal features in SQL:2011. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 41, 3 (Oct. 2012), 34.
    [66]
    Verayuth Lertnattee and Perayot Pamonsinlapatham. 2017. Blended learning for improving flexibility of learning structure query language (SQL). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Blended Learning (ICBL’17). Springer, 343--353.
    [67]
    M. Luo. 2010. Study on design of graduation practical teaching management system based on SQL Server 2008 for Vocational College. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM’10), Vol. 2. V2--292--V2--296.
    [68]
    Maslin Masrom, Halimah Hasan, and Habsah Abdullah. 2007. Using a team-based approach in teaching database course. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Programming Science (ATUR’07), Vol. 5.
    [69]
    Ramon A. Mata-Toledo and Carlos A. Reyes-Garcia. 2002. A model course for teaching database administration with personal Oracle 8i. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 17, 3 (Feb. 2002), 125--130. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772636.772658.
    [70]
    Victor M. Matos and Rebecca Grasser. 2002. Teaching tip: A simpler (and better) SQL approach to relational division. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 13, 2 (2002), 85--88. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume13/Pdf/085.pdf.
    [71]
    Victor M. Matos, Rebecca Grasser, and Paul Jalics. 2006. The case of the missing tuple: Teaching the SQL outer-join operator to undergraduate information systems students. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 22, 1 (Oct. 2006), 23--32. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1181811.1181814.
    [72]
    L. I. McCann. 2003. On making relational division comprehensible. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’03), Vol. 2. F2C--6.
    [73]
    Kirby McMaster, Samuel Sambasivam, Steven Hadfield, and Stuart Wolthuis. 2013. Relational algebra and SQL: Better together. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 11, 1 (2013), 4--13. Retrieved from http://isedj.org/2013-11/N1/ISEDJv11n1p4.pdf.
    [74]
    Janet Metcalfe. 2017. Learning from errors. Annual Rev. Psychol. 68, 1 (2017), 465--489.
    [75]
    Zhengjie Miao, Sudeepa Roy, and Jun Yang. 2019. Explaining wrong queries using small examples. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’19). ACM, New York, NY, 503--520.
    [76]
    Antonija Mitrovic. 1998. Learning SQL with a computerized tutor. In Proceedings of the 29th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’98). ACM, New York, NY, 307--311.
    [77]
    Antonija Mitrovic. 2003. An intelligent SQL tutor on the web. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 13, 2--4 (2003), 173--197. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-850136036338partnerID=408md5=7e8de8bf8e5659c6720ec83f64e2e388.
    [78]
    Antonija Mitrovic. 2006. Large-scale deployment of three intelligent web-based database tutors. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 14, 4 (2006), 275--281.
    [79]
    Keith Moss. 2010. DataBase teaching tools. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON’10).
    [80]
    Barzan Mozafari, Kai Zeng, and Carlo Zaniolo. 2010. K*SQL: A unifying engine for sequence patterns and XML. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1143--1146.
    [81]
    David Olsen and Karina Hauser. 2007. Teaching tip: Teaching advanced SQL skills: Text bulk loading. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 18, 4 (2007), 399--402. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume18/n4/JISEv18n4p399.pdf.
    [82]
    T. Permpool, S. Nalintippayawong, and K. Atchariyachanvanich. 2019. Interactive SQL learning tool with automated grading using MySQL sandbox. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA’19). 928--932.
    [83]
    Kai Petersen, Robert Feldt, Shahid Mujtaba, and Michael Mattsson. 2008. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’08). BCS Learning 8 Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, 68--77. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2227115.2227123.
    [84]
    Kai Petersen, Sairam Vakkalanka, and Ludwik Kuzniarz. 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 64 (2015), 1--18.
    [85]
    Hongsiri Piyayodilokchai, Pintip Ruenwongsa, Watcharee Ketpichainarong, Parames Laosinchai, and Patcharin Panjaburee. 2011. Promoting students’ understanding of SQL in a database management course: A learning cycle approach. Int. J. Learn.: Annual Rev. 17, 11 (2011), 325--338.
    [86]
    Julia Coleman Prior. 2003. Online assessment of SQL query formulation skills. In Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Conference on Computing Education (ACE’03), Vol. 20. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, 247--256. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=858403.858433.
    [87]
    Gary B. Randolph. 2003. The forest and the trees: Using Oracle and SQL server together to teach ANSI-standard SQL. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Information Technology Curriculum (CITC’03). ACM, New York, NY, 234--236.
    [88]
    Christine F. Reilly. 2018. Experience with active learning and formative feedback for a SQL unit. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’18).
    [89]
    Karen Renaud and Judy Van Biljon. 2004. Teaching SQL—Which pedagogical horse for this course? In Proceedings of the British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD’04). Springer, 244--256.
    [90]
    Sangkyu Rho and Salvatore T. March. 1997. An analysis of semantic overload in database access systems using multi-table query formulation. J. Datab. Manag. 8, 2 (1997), 3--15. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/51176.
    [91]
    Gordon Russell and Andrew Cumming. 2004. Improving the student learning experience for SQL using automatic marking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA’04). 281--288.
    [92]
    Edward Sciore. 2007. SimpleDB: A simple Java-based multiuser system for teaching database internals. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’07). ACM, New York, NY, 561--565.
    [93]
    Bilal Shebaro. 2018. Using active learning strategies in teaching introductory database courses. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 33, 4 (Apr. 2018), 28--36. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3199572.3199576.
    [94]
    Yasin N. Silva, Isadora Almeida, and Michell Queiroz. 2016. SQL: From traditional databases to big data. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE’16). ACM, New York, NY, 413--418.
    [95]
    John B. Smelcer. 1995. User errors in database query composition. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 42, 4 (Apr. 1995), 353--381.
    [96]
    M. Soflano, T. M. Connolly, and T. Hainey. 2015. Learning style analysis in adaptive GBL application to teach SQL. Comput. Educ. 86 (2015), 105--119.
    [97]
    Song Jian-gong. 2010. Design and application of collaborative learning system based on web to database experiment teaching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, Vol. 3. V3--140--V3--143.
    [98]
    Toni Taipalus. 2019. Teaching tip: A notation for planning SQL queries. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 30, 3 (2019), 160--166. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume30/n3/JISEv30n3p160.pdf.
    [99]
    Toni Taipalus. 2020. The effects of database complexity on SQL query formulation. J. Syst. Softw. 165 (2020), 110576.
    [100]
    Toni Taipalus and Piia Perälä. 2019. What to expect and what to focus on in SQL query teaching. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’19). ACM, New York, NY, 198--203.
    [101]
    Toni Taipalus, Mikko Siponen, and Tero Vartiainen. 2018. Errors and complications in SQL query formulation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 18, 3(Aug. 2018).
    [102]
    Josh Tenenberg and Robert McCartney. 2010. Why discipline matters in computing education scholarship. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 9, 4 (2010), 1--7.
    [103]
    The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2015. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. Technical Report. ACM, New York, NY. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2965631.
    [104]
    Richard C. Thomas and Rebecca Mancy. 2004. Use of large databases for group projects at the nexus of teaching and research. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’04). ACM Press.
    [105]
    Heikki Topi, Kate M. Kaiser, Janice C. Sipior, Joseph S. Valacich, J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., G. J. de Vreede, and Ryan Wright. 2010. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems. Technical Report. ACM, New York, NY. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/is-2010-acm-final.pdf.
    [106]
    Heikki Topi, Joseph S. Valacich, and Jeffrey A. Hoffer. 2005. The effects of task complexity and time availability limitations on human performance in database query tasks. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 62, 3 (2005), 349--379.
    [107]
    Susan D. Urban and Suzanne W. Dietrich. 2001. Advanced database concepts for undergraduates: Experience with teaching a second course. SIGCSE Bull. 33, 1 (Feb. 2001), 357--361.
    [108]
    Leo Vijayasarathy and Gretchen Casterella. 2016. The effects of information request language and template usage on query formulation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 10 (Oct. 2016), 674--707.
    [109]
    Adam H. Villa. 2016. Big data: Motivating the development of an advanced database systems course. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 31, 3 (2016), 119--128. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2835377.2835395.
    [110]
    Paul J. Wagner, Elizabeth Shoop, and John V. Carlis. 2003. Using scientific data to teach a database systems course. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’03). ACM, New York, NY, 224--228.
    [111]
    R. T. Watson. 2006. The essential skills of data modeling. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 17, 1 (2006), 39--42. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume17/n1/JISEv17n1p39.pdf.
    [112]
    Roel Wieringa, Neil Maiden, Nancy Mead, and Colette Rolland. 2005. Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requir. Eng. 11, 1 (Nov. 2005), 102--107.
    [113]
    Coleen R. Wilder and Ceyhun O. Ozgur. 2015. Business analytics curriculum for undergraduate majors. INFORMS Trans. Educ. 15, 2 (Jan. 2015), 180--187.
    [114]
    Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’14). ACM, New York, NY.
    [115]
    Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto, Emelie Engström, Ivan do Carmo Machado, and Eduardo Santana de Almeida. 2013. On the reliability of mapping studies in software engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 86, 10 (2013), 2594--2610.
    [116]
    David A. Wolff. 2001. MySQL, PostgreSQL, and PHP: Open source technologies for a database management course. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 17, 2 (Dec. 2001), 91--92. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=775339.775358.
    [117]
    Donna Wright. 2013. Database: CSI, Inc.J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 28, 5 (May 2013), 80--81. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2458569.2458586.
    [118]
    Wu Da-sheng and Wu Sheng-yu. 2010. Dynamically maintain the teaching examples of triggers and stored procedures about the course of database application. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, Vol. 1. V1--525--V1--527.
    [119]
    M. Y. Yen and R. W. Scamell. 1993. A human factors experimental comparison of SQL and QBE. IEEE Transa. Softw. Eng. 19, 4 (Apr. 1993), 390--409.
    [120]
    M.-H. Ying, N.-W. Chi, and Y. Hong. 2012. Enhancement of learning by using an online SQL learning system with automatic checking mechanism. Int. J. Dig. Cont. Technol. Applic. 6, 6 (Apr. 2012), 239--248.
    [121]
    Kwok-Bun Yue. 2013. Using a semi-realistic database to support a database course. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 24, 4 (2013), 327--336. Retrieved from http://jise.org/Volume24/n4/JISEv24n4p327.pdf.
    [122]
    Liu Yuelan, Liao Yiwei, Huang Yuyan, and Liu Yuefan. 2011. Study on teaching methods of database application courses. Procedia Eng. 15 (2011), 5425--5428.
    [123]
    Abe Zeid and Sagar Kamarthi. 2008. Best teaching practices in database courses for engineering students. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 24, 5 (2008), 980--989.
    [124]
    Fred Zemke. 2012. What’s new in SQL:2011. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 41, 1 (2012), 67--73.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Feasibility Study on Automated SQL Exercise Generation with ChatGPT-3.5Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Data Systems Education: Bridging education practice with education research10.1145/3663649.3664368(13-19)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
    • (2024)False Positives and Deceptive Errors in SQL Assessment: A Large-Scale Analysis of Online Judge SystemsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365467724:3(1-23)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Feedback Generation for Autograded SQL Statements to Improve Student LearningProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653579(248-254)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 20, Issue 3
    September 2020
    200 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/3406963
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 August 2020
    Online AM: 07 May 2020
    Accepted: 01 May 2020
    Revised: 01 February 2020
    Received: 01 November 2019
    Published in TOCE Volume 20, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Structured Query Language (SQL)
    2. database
    3. education
    4. query language
    5. student

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)183
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Feasibility Study on Automated SQL Exercise Generation with ChatGPT-3.5Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Data Systems Education: Bridging education practice with education research10.1145/3663649.3664368(13-19)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2024
    • (2024)False Positives and Deceptive Errors in SQL Assessment: A Large-Scale Analysis of Online Judge SystemsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365467724:3(1-23)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Feedback Generation for Autograded SQL Statements to Improve Student LearningProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653579(248-254)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
    • (2024)SQL Puzzles: Evaluating Micro Parsons Problems With Different Feedbacks as Practice for NovicesProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641910(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Data-Driven Analysis of Student Engagement in Time-Limited Computer LaboratoriesAlgorithms10.3390/a1610046416:10(464)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Constructing feedback for computer science MCQ wrong answers using semantic profiling (Discussion Paper)Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3631802.3631803(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Framework for SQL Error Message Design: A Data-Driven ApproachACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/360718033:1(1-50)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Student's Learning Challenges with Relational, Document, and Graph Query LanguagesProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Data Systems Education: Bridging education practice with education research10.1145/3596673.3596976(30-36)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Engaging Databases for Data Systems EducationProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588804(334-340)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Toward a Fundamental Understanding of SQL EducationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3568812.3603454(64-68)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media