Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Creating and Evaluating Chatbots as Eligibility Assistants for Clinical Trials: An Active Deep Learning Approach towards User-centered Classification

Published: 30 December 2020 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Clinical trials are important tools to improve knowledge about the effectiveness of new treatments for all diseases, including cancers. However, studies show that fewer than 5% of cancer patients are enrolled in any type of research study or clinical trial. Although there is a wide variety of reasons for the low participation rate, we address this issue by designing a chatbot to help users determine their eligibility via interactive, two-way communication. The chatbot is supported by a user-centered classifier that uses an active deep learning approach to separate complex eligibility criteria into questions that can be easily answered by users and information that requires verification by their doctors. We collected all the available clinical trial eligibility criteria from the National Cancer Institute's website to evaluate the chatbot and the classifier. Experimental results show that the active deep learning classifier outperforms the baseline k-nearest neighbor method. In addition, an in-person experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the chatbot. The results indicate that the participants who used the chatbot achieved better understanding about eligibility than those who used only the website. Furthermore, interfaces with chatbots were rated significantly better in terms of perceived usability, interactivity, and dialogue.

    References

    [1]
    M. Amith, Z. H. U. Anna, R. Cunningham, L. I. N. Rebecca, L. Savas, S. H. A. Y. Laura, and T. A. O. Cui. 2019. Early usability assessment of a conversational agent for HPV vaccination. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 257 (2019), 17--23.
    [2]
    R. F. Azevedo, D. Morrow, J. Graumlich, A. Willemsen-Dunlap, M. Hasegawa-Johnson, T. S. Huang, and D. J. Halpin. 2018. Using conversational agents to explain medication instructions to older adults. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium. 185. American Medical Informatics Association.
    [3]
    C. S. Bennette, S. D. Ramsey, C. L. McDermott, J. J. Carlson, A. Basu, and D. L. Veenstra. 2016. Predicting low accrual in the national cancer institute's cooperative group clinical trials. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 108, 2 (2016).
    [4]
    T. Bickmore, H. Trinh, R. Asadi, and S. Olafsson. 2018. Safety first: Conversational agents for health care. In Studies in Conversational UX Design, 33--57. Springer, Cham.
    [5]
    P. P. Breitfeld, M. Weisburd, J. M. Overhage, G. Sledge Jr, and W. M. Tierney. 1999. Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility. J. Amer. Med. Inf. Assoc. 6, 6 (1999), 466--477.
    [6]
    R. W. Carlson, S. W. Tu, N. M. Lane, T. L. Lai, C. A. Kemper, M. A. Musen, and E. H. Shortliffe. 1995. Computer-based screening of patients with HIV/AIDS for clinical-trial eligibility. Online J. Curr. Clin. Trials 4, 179 (1995).
    [7]
    C. H. Chuan. 2018. Classifying eligibility criteria in clinical trials using active deep learning. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. 305--310.
    [8]
    M. Cuggia, P. Besana, and D. Glasspool. 2011. Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 6 (2011), 371--388.
    [9]
    E. Fink, L. O. Hall, D. B. Goldgof, B. D. Goswami, M. Boonstra, and J. P. Krischer. 2003. Experiments on the automated selection of patients for clinical trials. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 4541--4545.
    [10]
    E. Fink, P. K. Kokku, S. Nikiforou, L. O. Hall, D. B. Goldgof, and J. P. Krischer. 2004. Selection of patients for clinical trials: An interactive web-based system. Artif. Intell. Med. 31, 241--254.
    [11]
    A. Ho, J. Hancock, and A. S. Miner. 2018. Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. J. Commun. 68, 4 (2018), 712--733.
    [12]
    F. Köpcke, D. Lubgan, R. Fietkau, A. Scholler, C. Nau, M. Stürzl, and D. Toddenroth. 2013. Evaluating predictive modeling algorithms to assess patient eligibility for clinical trials from routine data. BMC Med. Inf. Dec. Making 13, 1 (2013), 134.
    [13]
    M. Kusner, Y. Sun, N. Kolkin, and K. Weinberger. 2015. From word embeddings to document distances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 957--966.
    [14]
    L. Laranjo, A. G. Dunn, H. L. Tong, A. B. Kocaballi, J. Chen, R. Bashir, D. Surian, B. Gallego, F. Magrabi, A. Y. Lau, and E. Coiera. 2018. Conversational agents in healthcare: A systematic review. J. Amer. Med. Inf. Assoc. 25, 9 (2018), 1248--1258.
    [15]
    J. Lilleberg, Y. Zhu, and Y. Zhang. 2015. Support vector machines and word2vec for text classification with semantic features. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing. 136--140.
    [16]
    Z. Luo, R. Duffy, S. Johnson, and C. Weng. 2010. Corpus-based approach to creating a semantic lexicon for clinical research eligibility criteria from UMLS. In Proceedings of the AMIA Summit on Clinical Research Informatics. 26--31.
    [17]
    Z. Luo, M. Yetisgen-Yildiz, and C. Weng. 2011. Dynamic categorization of clinical research eligibility criteria by hierarchical clustering. J. Biomed. Inf. 44, 6 (2011), 927--935.
    [18]
    L. V. D. Maaten and G. Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9 (2008), 2579--2605.
    [19]
    J. M. Metz, C. Coyle, C. Hudson, and M. Hampshire. 2005. An internet-based cancer clinical trials matching resource. J. Med. Internet Res. 7, 3 (2005), e24.
    [20]
    T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. 3111--3119.
    [21]
    K. Milian, A. Bucur, and A. Ten Teije. 2012. Formalization of clinical trial eligibility criteria: Evaluation of a pattern-based approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine. 1--4.
    [22]
    K. Milian, A. Ten Teije, A. Bucur, and F. Van Harmelen. 2011. Patterns of clinical trial eligibility criteria. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Knowledge Representation for Health Care. Springer, Berlin, 145--157.
    [23]
    R. Miotto and C. Weng. 2015. Case-based reasoning using electronic health records efficiently identifies eligible patients for clinical trials. J. Amer. Med. Inf. Assoc. 22, e1 (2015), 141--150.
    [24]
    J. L. Z. Montenegro, C. A. da Costa, and R. da Rosa Righi. 2019. Survey of conversational agents in health. Exp. Syst. Applic. 129 (2019), 56--67.
    [25]
    V. H. Murthy, H. M. Krumbolz, and C. P. Gross. 2004. Participation in cancer clinical trials: Race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 291 (2004), 2720--2726.
    [26]
    J. Niland, D. Dorr, G. El Saadawi, P. Embi, R. L. Richesson et al. 2007. Knowledge representation of eligibility criteria in clinical trials. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium.
    [27]
    M. Peleg, S. Tu, J. Bury, P. Ciccarese, J. Fox et al. 2003. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: A case-study approach. J. Amer. Med. Inf. Assoc. 10, (2003) 52--68.
    [28]
    D. Rubin, J. Gennari, S. Srinivas, A. Yuen, H. Kaizer, M. Musen, et al. 1999. Tool support for authoring eligibility criteria for cancer trials. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. 369--373.
    [29]
    I. Sim, B. Olasov, and S. Carini. 2004. An ontology of randomized controlled trials for evidence-based practice: Content specification and evaluation using the competency decomposition method. J. Biomed. Inf. 37 (2004), 108--119.
    [30]
    D. Tang, F. Wei, N. Yang, M. Zhou, T. Liu, and B. Qin. 2014. Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for Twitter sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1 (2014), 1555--1565.
    [31]
    S. W. Tu, M. Peleg, S. Carini, M. Bobak, J. Ross, D. Rubin, and I. Sim. 2011. A practical method for transforming free-text eligibility criteria into computable criteria. J. Biomed. Inf. 44, 2 (2011), 239--250.
    [32]
    D. Utami, B. Barry, T. Bickmore, and M. Paasche-Orlow. 2013. A conversational agent-based clinical trial search engine. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (HCIR’13).
    [33]
    R. Wallace. 2003. The Elements of AIML Style. Alice AI Foundation.
    [34]
    Z. Zhang, T. W. Bickmore, and M. K. Paasche-Orlow. 2017. Perceived organizational affiliation and its effects on patient trust: Role modeling with embodied conversational agents. Patient Educ. Counsel. 100, 9 (2017), 1730--1737.
    [35]
    S. Zhang, F. Liang, W. Li, and I. Tannock. 2016. Comparison of eligibility criteria between protocols, registries, and publications of cancer clinical trials. JNCI: J. Nat. Cancer Ins. 108 (2016), 11.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Beyond Text and Speech in Conversational Agents: Mapping the Design Space of AvatarsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661563(1875-1894)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Knowledge Graph and Deep Learning-based Text-to-GraphQL Model for Intelligent Medical Consultation ChatbotInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10295-026:1(137-156)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2023)A Testing Framework for AI Linguistic Systems (testFAILS)Electronics10.3390/electronics1214309512:14(3095)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Creating and Evaluating Chatbots as Eligibility Assistants for Clinical Trials: An Active Deep Learning Approach towards User-centered Classification

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
          ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare  Volume 2, Issue 1
          Special Issue on Wearable Technologies for Smart Health: Part 2 and Regular Papers
          January 2021
          204 pages
          EISSN:2637-8051
          DOI:10.1145/3446563
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 30 December 2020
          Accepted: 01 May 2020
          Revised: 01 March 2020
          Received: 01 November 2019
          Published in HEALTH Volume 2, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Chatbots
          2. active learning
          3. clinical trials
          4. convolution neural networks
          5. eligibility criteria

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

          Funding Sources

          • University of Miami School of Communication Creative Activity and Research Grants

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)125
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
          Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Beyond Text and Speech in Conversational Agents: Mapping the Design Space of AvatarsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661563(1875-1894)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
          • (2024)Knowledge Graph and Deep Learning-based Text-to-GraphQL Model for Intelligent Medical Consultation ChatbotInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10295-026:1(137-156)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
          • (2023)A Testing Framework for AI Linguistic Systems (testFAILS)Electronics10.3390/electronics1214309512:14(3095)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
          • (2022)Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and ChallengesMathematics10.3390/math1015255210:15(2552)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2022
          • (2022)A systematic review of intelligent assistantsFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2021.09.035128:C(45-62)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
          • (2022)Clinical TrialsThe International Encyclopedia of Health Communication10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0543(1-7)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2022
          • (2021)A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical researchJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association10.1093/jamia/ocab22829:1(197-206)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2021
          • (2021)An empirical evaluation of active learning strategies for profile elicitation in a conversational recommender systemJournal of Intelligent Information Systems10.1007/s10844-021-00683-458:2(337-362)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2021

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          Full Access

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media