Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3441852.3471213acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Deinstitutionalizing Independence: Discourses of Disability and Housing in Accessible Computing

Published: 17 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The meaning of “homes” is complicated for disabled people because of the historical link between (de)institutionalization, housing, and civil rights. But, it is unclear whether and how this history impacts Accessible Computing (AC) research in domestic spaces. We performed Critical Discourse Analysis on 101 AC articles to explore how (de)institutionalization affects domestic AC research. We found (de)institutionalization motivates goals of “independence” for disabled people. Yet, discourses of housing reflected institutional logics which are in tension with “independence”—complicating how goals were set, housing was understood, and design was approached. We outline three discourses of housing in AC and identify parallels to those used to justify institutionalization in the USA. We reflect upon their consequences for AC research. We offer principles derived from the Independent Living Movement as frameworks for challenging institutional conceptions of housing, to open new avenues for more holistic and anti-ableist domestic AC research.

Supplementary Material

VTT File (2140.vtt)
MP4 File (2140-file3.mp4)
Supplemental materials
MP4 File (2140.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
About Independent Living: 2012. https://ncil.org/about/aboutil/. Accessed: 2020-09-13.
[2]
Alves, S., Brito, F., Cordeiro, A., Carriço, L. and Guerreiro, T. 2019. Designing Personalized Therapy Tools for People with Dementia. Proceedings of the 16th Web For All 2019 Personalization - Personalizing the Web (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–10.
[3]
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,AS AMENDED with ADA Amendments Act of 2008: https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm#12101. Accessed: 2019-05-28.
[4]
Ames, M.G., Go, J., Kaye, J. “Jofish” and Spasojevic, M. 2010. Making Love in the Network Closet: The Benefits and Work of Family Videochat. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 145–154.
[5]
Anderson, B., Zhu, S., Yang, K., Wang, J., Anderson, H., Tay, C.X., Tan, V.Y.F. and Wang, Y. 2018. MANA: Designing and Validating a User-Centered Mobility Analysis System. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2018), 321–332.
[6]
Aruanno, B., Garzotto, F., Torelli, E. and Vona, F. 2018. HoloLearn: Wearable Mixed Reality for People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDD). Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2018), 40–51.
[7]
Barnes, C. 2014. Independent living, politics and implications. (2014).
[8]
Becker, E., Arora, R., Phan, S., Vinjumur, J.K. and Makedon, F. 2010. Extending event-driven experiments for human activity for an assistive environment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2010), 1–8.
[9]
Bell, G., Blythe, M. and Sengers, P. 2005. Making by Making Strange: Defamiliarization and the Design of Domestic Technologies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (Jun. 2005), 149–173.
[10]
Bell, G. and Dourish, P. 2007. Back to the shed: gendered visions of technology and domesticity. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 11, 5 (2007), 373–381.
[11]
Belley, C., Gaboury, S., Bouchard, B. and Bouzouane, A. 2013. Activity recognition in smart homes based on electrical devices identification. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, May 2013), 1–8.
[12]
Bennett, C.L., Brady, E. and Branham, S.M. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (2018), 161–173.
[13]
Bennett, C.L. and Rosner, D.K. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the" Other". Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019), 1–13.
[14]
Bhattacharjee, T., Cabrera, M.E., Caspi, A., Cakmak, M. and Srinivasa, S.S. 2019. A Community-Centered Design Framework for Robot-Assisted Feeding Systems. The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2019), 482–494.
[15]
Birnholtz, J. and Jones-Rounds, M. 2010. Independence and interaction: understanding seniors’ privacy and awareness needs for aging in place. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2010), 143–152.
[16]
Bonani, M., Oliveira, R., Correia, F., Rodrigues, A., Guerreiro, T. and Paiva, A. 2018. What My Eyes Can't See, A Robot Can Show Me: Exploring the Collaboration Between Blind People and Robots. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2018), 15–27.
[17]
Boujarwah, F.A., Nazneen, Hong, H., Abowd, G.D. and Arriaga, R.I. 2011. Towards a framework to situate assistive technology design in the context of culture. The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2011), 19–26.
[18]
Branham, S. and Harrison, S. 2013. Designing for collocated couples. Connecting Families. Springer. 15–36.
[19]
Branham, S.M. and Kane, S.K. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 2373–2382.
[20]
Branham, S.M. and Kane, S.K. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 163–171.
[21]
Branham, S.M. and Mukkath Roy, A.R. 2019. Reading Between the Guidelines: How Commercial Voice Assistant Guidelines Hinder Accessibility for Blind Users. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS ’19) (Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 2019).
[22]
Braun, V., Clarke, V. and Terry, G. 2014. Thematic analysis. Qual Res Clin Health Psychol. 24, (2014), 95–114.
[23]
Brewer, R. and Piper, A.M. 2016. “ Tell It Like It Really Is” A Case of Online Content Creation and Sharing Among Older Adult Bloggers. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 5529–5542.
[24]
Brush, A.J.B., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, S., Saroiu, S. and Dixon, C. 2011. Home Automation in the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 2115–2124.
[25]
Caregiver Statistics: Demographics: https://www.caregiver.org/resource/caregiver-statistics-demographics/. Accessed: 2021-07-05.
[26]
Caroux, L., Consel, C., Dupuy, L. and Sauzéon, H. 2014. Verification of daily activities of older adults: a simple, non-intrusive, low-cost approach. Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2014), 43–50.
[27]
Consel, C., Dupuy, L. and Sauzéon, H. 2015. A Unifying Notification System To Scale Up Assistive Services. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2015), 77–87.
[28]
Davis, L., Fulginiti, A., Kriegel, L. and Brekke, J.S. 2012. Deinstitutionalization? Where have all the people gone? Current psychiatry reports. 14, 3 (2012), 259–269.
[29]
Davis, L.J. 1995. Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. Verso.
[30]
Dawe, M. 2006. Desperately Seeking Simplicity: How Young Adults with Cognitive Disabilities and Their Families Adopt Assistive Technologies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 1143–1152.
[31]
Desjardins, A., Wakkary, R. and Odom, W. 2015. Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2015), 3073–3082.
[32]
Deutsch, A. 1948. The shame of the states. (1948).
[33]
van Dijk, B., Dadlani, P., van Halteren, A. and Biemans, M. 2010. Life changes, connection stays: photo sharing and social connectedness for people with special needs. Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2010), 135–142.
[34]
Dimitrov, Y., Gospodinova, Z., Wheeler, R., Žnidaršič, M., Ženko, B., Veleva, V. and Miteva, N. 2019. Social activity modelling and multimodal coaching for active aging. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 608–615.
[35]
DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P. and Brynjarsdóttir, H. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2010), 1975–1984.
[36]
Doelling, K., Shin, J. and Popa, D.O. 2014. Service robotics for the home: a state of the art review. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, May 2014), 1–8.
[37]
Elor, A., Teodorescu, M. and Kurniawan, S. 2018. Project Star Catcher: A Novel Immersive Virtual Reality Experience for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. 11, 4 (Nov. 2018), 20:1-20:25.
[38]
Ferdous, S., Fegaras, L. and Makedon, F. 2010. Applying data warehousing technique in pervasive assistive environment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2010), 1–7.
[39]
Foucault, M. 1970. The archaeology of knowledge. Social Science Information. 9, 1 (Feb. 1970), 175–185.
[40]
Frauenberger, C. 2015. Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 89–96.
[41]
Gerben Dejong, M.P.A. 1979. Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 60, 10 (1979), 435–436.
[42]
Gerling, K.M., Mandryk, R.L. and Kalyn, M.R. 2013. Wheelchair-based game design for older adults. Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2013), 1–8.
[43]
Gugenheimer, J., Plaumann, K., Schaub, F., Di Campli San Vito, P., Duck, S., Rabus, M. and Rukzio, E. 2017. The Impact of Assistive Technology on Communication Quality Between Deaf and Hearing Individuals. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 669–682.
[44]
Hayes, K., Hoagland, G.W., McKearn, M., Fise, P., Workman, M., Weiner, N. and Bayliss, W. 2017. Financing Long-Term Services and Supports: Seeking Bipartisan Solutions in Politically Challenging Times. Bipartisan Policy Center.
[45]
Hernandez, H.A., Ketcheson, M., Schneider, A., Ye, Z., Fehlings, D., Switzer, L., Wright, V., Bursick, S.K., Richards, C. and Graham, T.C.N. 2014. Design and evaluation of a networked game to supportsocial connection of youth with cerebral palsy. Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2014), 161–168.
[46]
Hofmann, M., Kasnitz, D., Mankoff, J. and Bennett, C.L. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2020), 1–13.
[47]
Holbø, K., Bøthun, S. and Dahl, Y. 2013. Safe walking technology for people with dementia: what do they want? Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2013), 1–8.
[48]
Hornof, A., Whitman, H., Sutherland, M., Gerendasy, S. and McGrenere, J. 2017. Designing for the “Universe of One”: Personalized Interactive Media Systems for People with the Severe Cognitive Impairment Associated with Rett Syndrome. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2017), 2137–2148.
[49]
Jain, D., Lin, A., Guttman, R., Amalachandran, M., Zeng, A., Findlater, L. and Froehlich, J. 2019. Exploring Sound Awareness in the Home for People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–13.
[50]
Johnson, H.M. 2003. The disability gulag. The New York Times Magazine. 23, (2003).
[51]
Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S. and Blose, A. 2011. Family Portals: Connecting Families Through a Multifamily Media Space. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 1205–1214.
[52]
Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C. and Kurtz, A.F. 2010. The Family Window: The Design and Evaluation of a Domestic Media Space. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 2361–2370.
[53]
Kannabiran, G., Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. 2011. How HCI Talks About Sexuality: Discursive Strategies, Blind Spots, and Opportunities for Future Research. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 695–704.
[54]
Khan, K.S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J. and Antes, G. 2003. Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 96, 3 (Mar. 2003), 118–121.
[55]
Kidd, C.D., Orr, R., Abowd, G.D., Atkeson, C.G., Essa, I.A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T.E. and Newstetter, W. 1999. The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research. Cooperative Buildings. Integrating Information, Organizations, and Architecture (1999), 191–198.
[56]
Korn, O., Bieber, G. and Fron, C. 2018. Perspectives on Social Robots: From the Historic Background to an Experts’ View on Future Developments. Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2018), 186–193.
[57]
Korn, O. and Tietz, S. 2017. Strategies for Playful Design when Gamifying Rehabilitation: A Study on User Experience. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2017), 209–214.
[58]
Kosch, T., Wennrich, K., Topp, D., Muntzinger, M. and Schmidt, A. 2019. The digital cooking coach: using visual and auditory in-situ instructions to assist cognitively impaired during cooking. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 156–163.
[59]
Kosch, T., Woźniak, P.W., Brady, E. and Schmidt, A. 2018. Smart Kitchens for People with Cognitive Impairments: A Qualitative Study of Design Requirements. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. 1–12.
[60]
Laws, M. 2020. Why we capitalize ‘Black’ (and not ‘white’). Columbia Journalism Review. (Jun. 2020).
[61]
Lazar, A., Edasis, C. and Piper, A.M. 2017. A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI. CHI (2017), 2175–2188.
[62]
Learning Disabilities Association of Ameria Disability and Criminal Justice Reform.
[63]
Liu, G., Ding, X., Yu, C., Gao, L., Chi, X. and Shi, Y. 2019. “I Bought This for Me to Look More Ordinary”: A Study of Blind People Doing Online Shopping. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–11.
[64]
Liu, P., Ding, X. and Gu, N. 2016. “Helping Others Makes Me Happy”: Social Interaction and Integration of People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 1596–1608.
[65]
Lopez, J.P., Martín, D., Moreno, F., Hernández-Peñaloza, G., Álvarez, F., Marín, M., Carrasco, L. and Burgos, M. 2018. Acceptance of Cognitive Games through Smart TV Applications in Patients with Parkinson's Disease. Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2018), 428–433.
[66]
Madjaroff, G. and Mentis, H. 2017. Narratives of Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 140–149.
[67]
Mankoff, J., Hayes, G.R. and Kasnitz, D. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (2010), 3–10.
[68]
Mazmanian, M. and Lanette, S. 2017. “Okay, One More Episode”: An Ethnography of Parenting in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 2273–2286.
[69]
McGee-Lennon, M.R., Wolters, M.K. and Brewster, S. 2011. User-centred multimodal reminders for assistive living. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2011), 2105–2114.
[70]
McNeill, A., Briggs, P., Pywell, J. and Coventry, L. 2017. Functional privacy concerns of older adults about pervasive health-monitoring systems. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2017), 96–102.
[71]
Meliones, A. and Kokkovos, S. 2015. Privacy-preserving intelligent networked video surveillance for patient monitoring and alarm detection. Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2015), 1–8.
[72]
Mentis, H.M., Madjaroff, G. and Massey, A.K. 2019. Upside and Downside Risk in Online Security for Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–13.
[73]
Mulvenna, M., Martin, S., Sävenstedt, S., Bengtsson, J., Meiland, F., Dröes, R.M., Hettinga, M., Moelaert, F. and Craig, D. 2010. Designing & evaluating a cognitive prosthetic for people with mild dementia. Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2010), 11–18.
[74]
Neves, B.B., Franz, R.L., Munteanu, C., Baecker, R. and Ngo, M. 2015. “My Hand Doesn't Listen to Me!”: Adoption and Evaluation of a Communication Technology for the ‘Oldest Old.’ Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2015), 1593–1602.
[75]
Nguyễn, A.T. and Pendleton, M. 2020. Recognizing Race in Language: Why We Capitalize “Black” and “White.” Center for the Study of Social Policy. (Mar. 2020).
[76]
Noll, S. 2018. Institutions for People with Disabilities in North America. The Oxford Handbook of Disability History. (2018), 307.
[77]
Nursing homes site of 40% of US COVID-19 deaths: 2020. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/06/nursing-homes-site-40-us-covid-19-deaths. Accessed: 2020-09-14.
[78]
Oliver, M. 2013. The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & society. 28, 7 (2013), 1024–1026.
[79]
Olmstead Decision: https://www.olmsteadrights.org/about-olmstead/. Accessed: 2020-09-13.
[80]
Parnandi, A., Karappa, V., Son, Y., Shahin, M., McKechnie, J., Ballard, K., Ahmed, B. and Gutierrez-Osuna, R. 2013. Architecture of an automated therapy tool for childhood apraxia of speech. Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2013), 1–8.
[81]
Peirce's Notion of Abduction: 1958. https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=jphil&id=jphil_1958_0055_0014_0593_0597. Accessed: 2020-09-13.
[82]
Peters, C., Hermann, T., Wachsmuth, S. and Hoey, J. 2014. Automatic Task Assistance for People with Cognitive Disabilities in Brushing Teeth - A User Study with the TEBRA System. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. 5, 4 (Mar. 2014), 10:1-10:34.
[83]
Petrie, H. and Darzentas, J. 2017. Older people and robotic technologies in the home: perspectives from recent research literature. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2017), 29–36.
[84]
Pew Research Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech.
[85]
Pradhan, A., Mehta, K. and Findlater, L. 2018. “Accessibility Came by Accident”: Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 459:1-459:13.
[86]
Profita, H., Albaghli, R., Findlater, L., Jaeger, P. and Kane, S.K. 2016. The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 4884–4895.
[87]
Profita, H.P., Stangl, A., Matuszewska, L., Sky, S., Kushalnagar, R. and Kane, S.K. 2018. “Wear It Loud” How and Why Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users Customize Their Devices. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS). 11, 3 (2018), 1–32.
[88]
Ringland, K.E., Nicholas, J., Kornfield, R., Lattie, E.G., Mohr, D.C. and Reddy, M. 2019. Understanding mental ill-health as psychosocial disability: Implications for assistive technology. The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (2019), 156–170.
[89]
Rode, J.A. 2010. The Roles That Make the Domestic Work. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 381–390.
[90]
Scheffler, T., Schindler, S., Lewerenz, M. and Schnor, B. 2011. A privacy-aware localization service for healthcare environments. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (New York, NY, USA, May 2011), 1–8.
[91]
Schildbach, S. and Schildbach, C. 2018. Criminalization through transinstitutionalization: a critical review of the Penrose hypothesis in the context of compensation imprisonment. Frontiers in psychiatry. 9, (2018), 534.
[92]
Schlesinger, A., Edwards, W.K. and Grinter, R.E. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2017), 5412–5427.
[93]
Schön, D.A. 2017. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
[94]
Sharma, S., Achary, K., Kaur, H., Linna, J., Turunen, M., Varkey, B., Hakulinen, J. and Daeeyya, S. 2018. 'Wow! You're Wearing a Fitbit, You're a Young Boy Now!": Socio-Technical Aspirations for Children with Autism in India. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2018), 174–184.
[95]
She, P. and Stapleton, D. 2006. A Review of Disability Data for the Institutional Population: Research Brief. Employment and Disability Institute Collection. (Jan. 2006).
[96]
Shinn, M., Gottlieb, J., Wett, J.L., Bahl, A., Cohen, A. and Baron Ellis, D. 2007. Predictors of homelessness among older adults in New York city: disability, economic, human and social capital and stressful events. Journal of Health Psychology. 12, 5 (Sep. 2007), 696–708.
[97]
Shinohara, K., Bennett, C.L., Pratt, W. and Wobbrock, J.O. 2018. Tenets for social accessibility: Towards humanizing disabled people in design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS). 11, 1 (2018), 1–31.
[98]
Shinohara, K. and Wobbrock, J.O. 2011. In the Shadow of Misperception: Assistive Technology Use and Social Interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 705–714.
[99]
Shinohara, K. and Wobbrock, J.O. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2 (Jan. 2016), 5:1-5:31.
[100]
Sitbon, L., Brown, R. and Fell, L. 2019. Turning Heads: Designing Engaging Immersive Video Experiences to Support People with Intellectual Disability when Learning Everyday Living Skills. The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2019), 171–182.
[101]
Skorupska, K., Nunez, M., Kopec, W. and Nielek, R. 2018. Older Adults and Crowdsourcing: Android TV App for Evaluating TEDx Subtitle Quality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 159:1-159:23.
[102]
Spiel, K., Frauenberger, C., Keyes, O. and Fitzpatrick, G. 2019. Agency of Autistic Children in Technology Research—A Critical Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 26, 6 (Nov. 2019), 38:1-38:40.
[103]
Sterling, T.D., Lichstein, M., Scarpino, F. and Stuebing, D. 1964. Professional Computer Work for the Blind. Commun. ACM. 7, 4 (Apr. 1964), 228–230.
[104]
Storer, K.M. and Branham, S.M. 2019. “ That's the Way Sighted People Do It”: What Blind Parents Can Teach Technology Designers About Co-Reading with Children. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019), 385–398.
[105]
Storer, K.M., Judge, T.K. and Branham, S.M. 2020. “All in the Same Boat:” Tradeoffs of Voice Assistant Ownership for Mixed-Visual-Ability Families. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, Apr. 2020).
[106]
Thayer, A., Bietz, M.J., Derthick, K. and Lee, C.P. 2012. I Love You, Let's Share Calendars: Calendar Sharing As Relationship Work. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 749–758.
[107]
Thieme, A., Bennett, C.L., Morrison, C., Cutrell, E. and Taylor, A.S. 2018. “I Can Do Everything but See!” – How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate Their Abilities in Social Contexts. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 203:1-203:14.
[108]
Vacher, M., Aman, F., Rossato, S., Portet, F. and Lecouteux, B. 2019. Making Emergency Calls More Accessible to Older Adults Through a Hands-free Speech Interface in the House. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. 12, 2 (Jun. 2019), 8:1-8:25.
[109]
Vacher, M., Caffiau, S., Portet, F., Meillon, B., Roux, C., Elias, E., Lecouteux, B. and Chahuara, P. 2015. Evaluation of a Context-Aware Voice Interface for Ambient Assisted Living: Qualitative User Study vs. Quantitative System Evaluation. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. 7, 2 (May 2015), 5:1-5:36.
[110]
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P. and Brittain, K. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 22, 1 (Feb. 2015), 2:1-2:27.
[111]
Viswanathan, P., Little, J.J., Mackworth, A.K. and Mihailidis, A. 2011. Navigation and obstacle avoidance help (NOAH) for older adults with cognitive impairment: a pilot study. The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2011), 43–50.
[112]
Wang, E.Q. and Piper, A.M. 2018. Accessibility in Action: Co-Located Collaboration Among Deaf and Hearing Professionals. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 180:1-180:25.
[113]
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2009. Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 1–33.
[114]
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2015. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. SAGE.
[115]
Yuan, C.W., Hanrahan, B.V., Lee, S., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. 2017. I Didn't Know That You Knew I Knew: Collaborative Shopping Practices Between People with Visual Impairment and People with Vision. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 118:1-118:18.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"Because Some Sighted People, They Don't Know What the Heck You're Talking About:" A Study of Blind Tokers' Infrastructuring Work to Build IndependenceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372978:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2022)Applying Technology in a Hybrid-Fashion to Create Dementia-Inclusive Community SpacesProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3550412(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • (2022)“Just like meeting in person” - Examination of interdependencies in dementia-friendly virtual activities.Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544815(1-15)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Deinstitutionalizing Independence: Discourses of Disability and Housing in Accessible Computing
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2021
        730 pages
        ISBN:9781450383066
        DOI:10.1145/3441852
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 17 October 2021

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Accessibility
        2. Critical Discourse Analysis
        3. Disability
        4. Homes
        5. Housing
        6. Institutionalization

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        ASSETS '21
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 134 submissions, 27%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)211
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
        Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)"Because Some Sighted People, They Don't Know What the Heck You're Talking About:" A Study of Blind Tokers' Infrastructuring Work to Build IndependenceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372978:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2022)Applying Technology in a Hybrid-Fashion to Create Dementia-Inclusive Community SpacesProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3550412(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
        • (2022)“Just like meeting in person” - Examination of interdependencies in dementia-friendly virtual activities.Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544815(1-15)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
        • (2022)Assistive or Artistic Technologies? Exploring the Connections between Art, Disability and Wheelchair UseProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544799(1-14)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media