research-article

Open access

Hybrid Design Tools for Participatory, Embodied Sensemaking: An Applied Framework

Authors:

Bart Hengeveld,

Manfred TscheligiAuthors Info & Claims

TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Article No.: 26, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501332

Published: 13 February 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

In design, we often deal with complex problems that require participatory, embodied sensemaking to solve. There are abundant design tools available – both physical and digital – to support these activities. While digital tools have continued to gain presence in the design processes over the last decades, due to, e.g., widened availability, improved flexibility, and the potential to increase productivity, physical tools and analogue practices still hold a solid place in the design process for many designers. To bridge the gap between the physical and digital, and to benefit from the best of both worlds in tools for design, hybrid tools are being developed. This paper aims to identify design opportunities for future hybrid design tools, by exploring the characteristics of designing for participatory, embodied sensemaking, in the context of physical, digital, and hybrid tools.

References

[1]

Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, and Chris North. 2010. Space to Think: Large High-resolution Displays for Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753336 tex.ids: andrewsSpaceThinkLarge2010a.

Digital Library

[2]

Ernesto Arias, Hal Eden, Gerhard Fischer, Andrew Gorman, and Eric Scharff. 2000. Transcending the individual human mind – creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1(2000), 84–113. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=345015

Digital Library

[3]

Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Peter Dalsgaard, and Kim Halskov. 2017. Design Tools and Materials in Creative Work. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 376–379. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3064869

Digital Library

[4]

Richard Buchanan. 1992. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues 8, 2 (1992), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

[5]

Andy Clark. 2001. Reasons, Robots and the Extended Mind. Mind & Language 16, 2 (2001), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00162 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-0017.00162.

[6]

Nigel Cross. 1982. Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies 3, 4 (1982), 221–227.

[7]

Peter Dalsgaard. 2017. Instruments of Inquiry: Understanding the Nature and Role of Tools in Design. 11, 1 (2017), 13.

[8]

Hanne De Jaegher. 2013. Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00015

[9]

Hanne De Jaegher. 2016. Grasping intersubjectivity: an invitation to embody social interaction research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (2016), 491–523.

[10]

Hanne De Jaegher and Ezequiel Di Paolo. 2007. Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6, 4 (Dec. 2007), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9

[11]

Dries De Roeck, Pieter Jan Stappers, and Achiel Standaert. 2014. Gearing up! a designer-focused evaluation of ideation tools for connected products. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational(NordiCHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639204

Digital Library

[12]

Brenda Dervin. 1998. Sense‐making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management 2, 2 (Dec. 1998), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279810249369

[13]

Laura Devendorf and Daniela K. Rosner. 2017. Beyond Hybrids: Metaphors and Margins in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064705

Digital Library

[14]

Alan Dix and Layda Gongora. 2011. Externalisation and design. In Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design(DESIRE ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079220

Digital Library

[15]

Ozgur Eris, Nikolas Martelaro, and Petra Badke-Schaube. 2014. A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments. 35, 6 (2014), 34.

[16]

Joep Frens and Bart Hengeveld. 2013. To Make is to Grasp. In 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research. Tokyo, Japan. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/3908485/590447512073284.pdf

[17]

Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300619

Digital Library

[18]

Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. The future’s hybrid nature. Interactions 26, 4 (June 2019), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328481

Digital Library

[19]

Gabriela Goldschmidt. 1994. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15, 2 (April 1994), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-1

[20]

Connie Golsteijn, Elise van den Hoven, David Frohlich, and Abigail Sellen. 2014. Reflections on Craft Research for and Through Design. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational(NordiCHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639194

Digital Library

[21]

Camilla Groth. 2017. Making sense through hands: design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition. Ph.D. Dissertation. OCLC: 989751653.

[22]

Emrecan Gulay and Andrés Lucero. 2019. Integrated Workflows: Generating Feedback Between Digital and Physical Realms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300290

Digital Library

[23]

Cornelius Herstatt and Birgit Verworn. 2004. The ‘Fuzzy Front End’ of Innovation. In Bringing Technology and Innovation into the Boardroom. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512771_16

[24]

Caroline Hummels. 2016. Embodied Encounters Studio: A Tangible Platform for Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 3691–3694. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890272

Digital Library

[25]

Caroline Hummels and Jelle van Dijk. 2015. Seven Principles to Design for Embodied Sensemaking. ACM Press, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680577

Digital Library

[26]

Nanna Inie and Peter Dalsgaard. 2020. How Interaction Designers Use Tools to Manage Ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 2 (April 2020), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365104

Digital Library

[27]

Philémonne Jaasma. 2018. Exchanging perspectives: designing for public sphere. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven. OCLC: 8087212825.

[28]

Philémonne Jaasma, Jelle van Dijk, Joep Frens, and Caroline Hummels. 2017. On the Role of External Representations in Designing for Participatory Sensemaking. Proceedings of the Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement - Sense and Sensitivity, DeSForM 2017 (Oct. 2017). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71207 Publisher: IntechOpen.

[29]

Jennifer Jacobs and Leah Buechley. 2013. Codeable Objects: Computational Design and Digital Fabrication for Novice Programmers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466211

Digital Library

[30]

Giulio Jacucci and Ina Wagner. 2007. Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition - C&C ’07. ACM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254971

Digital Library

[31]

I. Jowers, M. Prats, S. Lim, A. McKay, S. Garner, and S. Chase. 2008. Supporting Reinterpretation in Computer-Aided Conceptual Design. In Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Conference on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (Annecy, France) (SBM’08). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 151–158.

[32]

Eija Kaasinen, Heli Väätäjä, Hannu Karvonen, and Yichen Lu. 2014. The fuzzy front end of experience design. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, Helsinki Finland, 797–800. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2654829

Digital Library

[33]

David Kirsh. 2010. Thinking with external representations. AI & SOCIETY 25, 4 (Nov. 2010), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0272-8

Digital Library

[34]

David Kirsh and Paul Maglio. 1994. On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science 18, 4 (1994), 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1.

[35]

Gary Klein, Brian Moon, and Robert R. Hoffman. 2006. Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 4 (July 2006), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.75

Digital Library

[36]

Jon Kolko. 2011. Exposing the magic of design: a practitioner’s guide to the methods and theory of synthesis. Oxford University Press, New York.

[37]

Klaus Krippendorff. 1989. On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That ”Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)”. Design Issues 5, 2 (1989), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512 Publisher: The MIT Press.

[38]

Joanna Kwiatkowska, Wiesław Bartkowski, Olga Górnicka, and David Lamas. 2015. Applying Generative Techniques to Avoid Technology Push Effect in Ideas and Prototypes Created by Technology-oriented People. In Proceedings of the Mulitimedia, Interaction, Design and Innnovation on ZZZ - MIDI ’15. ACM Press, Warsaw, Poland, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2814464.2814480

Digital Library

[39]

Jessica Lindblom and Tom Ziemke. 2003. Social Situatedness of Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vygotsky and Beyond. Adaptive Behavior 11, 2 (June 2003), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123030112002 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM.

[40]

Caroline Lundqvist, Daniel Klinkhammer, Kim Halskov, Stefan Paul Feyer, Jeanette Falk Olesen, Nanna Inie, Harald Reiterer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2018. Physical, digital, and hybrid setups supporting card-based collaborative design ideation. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, Oslo Norway, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240177

Digital Library

[41]

Fiona Maciver and Julian Malins. 2016. Two Heads Are Better Than One: Principles for Collaborative Design Practice. In Collaboration in Creative Design: Methods and Tools, Panos Markopoulos, Jean-Bernard Martens, Julian Malins, Karin Coninx, and Aggelos Liapis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_2

[42]

Valérie Maquil and Eric Ras. 2012. Collaborative Problem Solving with Objects: Physical Aspects of a Tangible Tabletop in Technology-based Assessment. In From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges, Julie Dugdale, Cédric Masclet, Maria Antonietta Grasso, Jean-François Boujut, and Parina Hassanaly (Eds.). Springer London, London, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4093-1_11

[43]

Meredith Ringel Morris, Jarrod Lombardo, and Daniel Wigdor. 2010. WeSearch: Supporting Collaborative Search and Sensemaking on a Tabletop Display. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718987

Digital Library

[44]

Julien Nelson, Xavier Malon, and Nicolas Férey. 2019. Analyzing Interaction Dynamics at the Fuzzy Front-End of Innovation Projects: A Tool for Prospective Ergonomics. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018)(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_102

[45]

Sharoda Paul and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2011. Sensemaking in Collaborative Web Search. Human-Computer Interaction 26, 1 (Jan. 2011), 72–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.559410

[46]

Dorian Peters, Lian Loke, and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2020. Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign 16, 1 (2020), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444.

[47]

Jörgen Sandberg and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2015. Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development: MAKING SENSE OF SENSEMAKING PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Organizational Behavior 36, S1 (Feb. 2015), S6–S32. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1937

[48]

Liz Sanders and George Simons. 2009. A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design. Open Source Business ResourceDecember 2009 (2009). Place: Ottawa Publisher: Talent First Network.

[49]

Donald A. Schön. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Vol. 5126. Basic books.

[50]

Dorothé Smit, Thomas Grah, Martin Murer, Vincent van Rheden, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2018. MacroScope: First-Person Perspective in Physical Scale Models. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173276

Digital Library

[51]

Dorothé Smit, Andreas Lindlbauer, Martin Murer, Bart Hengeveld, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2019. Let the Bot Take Care of It: Exploring #CapIt, a Whiteboard Table Capture System. https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2019_ep16

[52]

Dorothé Smit, Doenja Oogjes, Bruna Goveia de Rocha, Ambra Trotto, Yeup Hur, and Caroline Hummels. 2016. Ideating in Skills: Developing Tools for Embodied Co-Design. ACM Press, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839497

Digital Library

[53]

Sune Vork Steffensen. 2012. Care and conversing in dialogical systems. Language Sciences 34, 5 (Sept. 2012), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.008

[54]

Erik Stolterman, Jamie McAtee, David Royer, and Selvan Thandapani. 2008. Designerly tools. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2008. Sheffield, UK. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_d/1

[55]

Erik Stolterman and James Pierce. 2012. Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on - DIS ’12. ACM Press, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317961

Digital Library

[56]

Lucy Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-Machine Communication.Cambridge University Press, New York.

Digital Library

[57]

Ambra Trotto and Caroline Hummels. 2013. Engage me, do!: engagement catalysers to ignite a (design) conversation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’13. ACM Press, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513521

Digital Library

[58]

Ambra Trotto and Caroline Hummels. 2013. Nurturing Personal Engagement in Design. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Design Research Conference. Tokyo, Japan, 13.

[59]

Karthikeyan Umapathy. 2010. Requirements to support collaborative sensemaking. In CSCW CIS Workshop, Vol. 10.

[60]

Rosa van der Veen, Jeroen Peeters, and Ambra Trotto. 2018. Charged Utopia VR: Exploring Embodied Sense-making in the Virtual Space. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7.

Digital Library

[61]

Jelle van Dijk. 2013. Creating traces, sharing insight: explorations in embodied cognition design. Ph.D. Dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.

[62]

Jelle van Dijk. 2018. Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: A Critical Analysis of the Concept of Embodiment in the Design of Hybrids. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 1 (Feb. 2018), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2010007

[63]

Jelle van Dijk and Caroline Hummels. 2017. Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: Two Cases, Seven Principles and One Framework. ACM Press, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025007

Digital Library

[64]

Jelle van Dijk, Remko van der Lugt, and Caroline Hummels. 2014. Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. ACM Press, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540934

Digital Library

[65]

Jelle Van Dijk and Gerrit Willem Vos. 2011. Traces in creative spaces. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. ACM, 91–94. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2069634

Digital Library

[66]

Jari Varsaluoma, Heli Väätäjä, Eija Kaasinen, Hannu Karvonen, and Yichen Lu. 2015. The Fuzzy Front End of Experience Design: Eliciting and Communicating Experience Goals. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. ACM, Parkville VIC Australia, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838761

Digital Library

[67]

Roberto Verganti. 2008. Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25, 5 (2008), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00313.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00313.x.

[68]

James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, and Carolyn G. MacGregor. 2013. Collaborative Sensemaking on a Digital Tabletop and Personal Tablets: Prioritization, Comparisons, and Tableaux. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3345–3354. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466458

Digital Library

[69]

Christian Weichel, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. SPATA: Spatio-Tangible Tools for Fabrication-Aware Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’14. ACM Press, Stanford, California, USA, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680576

Digital Library

[70]

Robert E. Wendrich. 2013. The Creative Act Is Done on the Hybrid Machine. In DS 75-1: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design. Seoul, Republic of Korea, 399–308.

[71]

Paweł Wozniak, Nitesh Goyal, Przemysław Kucharski, Lars Lischke, Sven Mayer, and Morten Fjeld. 2016. RAMPARTS: Supporting Sensemaking with Spatially-Aware Mobile Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2447–2460. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858491

Digital Library

[72]

Albena Yaneva. 2005. Scaling Up and Down: Extraction Trials in Architectural Design. Social Studies of Science 35, 6 (Dec. 2005), 867–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705053053 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Cited By

Zhang HChen PXie XJiang ZZhou ZSun L(2024)A Hybrid Prototype Method Combining Physical Models and Generative Artificial Intelligence to Support Creativity in Conceptual DesignACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368943331:5(1-34)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689433
Falk JBlumenkranz AKubesch MVetter RHofer LFrauenberger C(2024)Designing Diverse Pathways for ParticipationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642240(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642240
Griva AChandra Kruse LHattinger MHögberg KPappas IConboy K(2024)Making space for time: Strategies for the design of time‐aware hybrid workInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.12552Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12552
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Hybrid Design Tools for Participatory, Embodied Sensemaking: An Applied Framework
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design
PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference

The field of Participatory Design (PD) has grown rapidly over the last 20 to 30 years. For more than two decades non-designers have been increasingly involved in various design activities through a large number of participatory design projects all over ...
Participatory Design Tools: Exploring the Value of Design through Materiality
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

As participatory design (PD) approaches become a normative part of contemporary business practice, it becomes increasingly important to ensure that PD tools and methods are accessible and understandable to a larger audience, to fully mobilise and harness ...
The role of design fiction in participatory design processes
NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Participatory design is in essence very malleable as any design technique could lend itself to it, as long as users and stakeholders are involved. Design fictions however, have more often been used as either a vehicle for critical designs, or as a sheer ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 2022

758 pages

ISBN:9781450391474

DOI:10.1145/3490149

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 February 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

TEI '22: Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 13 - 16, 2022

Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

TEI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

March 4 - 7, 2025

Bordeaux / Talence , France

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
955
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)417
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50

Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang HChen PXie XJiang ZZhou ZSun L(2024)A Hybrid Prototype Method Combining Physical Models and Generative Artificial Intelligence to Support Creativity in Conceptual DesignACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368943331:5(1-34)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689433
Falk JBlumenkranz AKubesch MVetter RHofer LFrauenberger C(2024)Designing Diverse Pathways for ParticipationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642240(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642240
Griva AChandra Kruse LHattinger MHögberg KPappas IConboy K(2024)Making space for time: Strategies for the design of time‐aware hybrid workInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.12552Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12552
Sion YDiaz Reyes CLamas DMokhalled M(2023)Vibmory - Mapping Episodic Memories to Vibrotactile PatternsProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572747(1-12)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569009.3572747
El-Zanfaly DHuang YDong Y(2023)Sand-in-the-loop: Investigating embodied co-creation for shared understandings of generative AICompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596652(256-260)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563703.3596652
Dan PTiwari TBasu P(2023)Fuzzy Front End and Design Thinking Integrated Frugal Innovation Framework for Feature Concept Generation in a Product: Portrayal for a WheelchairProceedings of IDEAS 202210.1007/978-3-031-29129-6_28(301-316)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29129-6_28

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents