research-article

Fostering Youth’s Critical Thinking Competency About AI through Exhibition

Authors:

Sangsu LeeAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 451, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581159

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Today’s youth lives in a world deeply intertwined with AI, which has become an integral part of everyday life. For this reason, it is important for youth to critically think about and examine AI to become responsible users in the future. Although recent attempts have educated youth on AI with focus on delivering critical perspectives within a structured curriculum, opportunities to develop critical thinking competencies that can be reflected in their lives must be provided. With this background, we designed an informal learning experience through an AI-related exhibition to cultivate critical thinking competency. To explore changes before and after the exhibition, 23 participants were invited to experience the exhibition. We found that the exhibition can support the youth in relating AI to their lives through critical thinking processes. Our findings suggest implications for designing learning experiences to foster critical thinking competency for better coexistence with AI.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3581159-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
285.77 MB

References

[1]

Ready AI. 2020. Empowering all students to improve our world with AI.https://www.readyai.org/.

[2]

Selin Akgun and Christine Greenhow. 2021. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics (2021), 1–10.

[3]

Safinah Ali, Blakeley H Payne, Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. Constructionism, ethics, and creativity: Developing primary and middle school artificial intelligence education. In International workshop on education in artificial intelligence k-12 (eduai’19). 1–4.

[4]

Andy Alorwu, Saba Kheirinejad, Niels van Berkel, Marianne Kinnula, Denzil Ferreira, Aku Visuri, and Simo Hosio. 2021. Assessing MyData Scenarios: Ethics, Concerns, and the Promise. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 209, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445213

Digital Library

[5]

Roya Jafari Amineh and Hanieh Davatgari Asl. 2015. Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages 1, 1 (2015), 9–16.

[6]

Arm. 2020. AI Today, AI Tomorrow | Global AI Survey Results. https://www.arm.com/resources/report/ai-today-ai-tomorrow.

[7]

The Barbican. 2019. AI: More Than Human. https://www.barbican.org.uk/whatson/2019/event/ai-more-than-human.

[8]

Constance Barlow and Barry L. Hall. 2007. ‘What about Feelings?’: A Study of Emotion and Tension in Social Work Field Education. Social Work Education 26, 4 (2007), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470601081712 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470601081712

[9]

Joan Boykoff Ed Baron and Robert J Sternberg. 1987. Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice.WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

[10]

Leslie Bedford. 2016. The art of museum exhibitions: How story and imagination create aesthetic experiences. Routledge.

[11]

Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.

Digital Library

[12]

Rodney A Brooks. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial intelligence 47, 1-3 (1991), 139–159.

[13]

Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. mit Press.

[14]

Emanuelle Burton, Judy Goldsmith, and Nicholas Mattei. 2015. Teaching AI Ethics Using Science Fiction. In Aaai workshop: Ai and ethics. Citeseer.

[15]

Judith M. Burton, Robert Horowitz, and Hal Abeles. 2000. Learning in and through the Arts: The Question of Transfer. Studies in Art Education 41, 3 (2000), 228–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2000.11651679 arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00393541.2000.11651679

[16]

Danielle Carter. 2018. Narrative Learning as Theory and Method in Arts and Museum Education. Studies in Art Education 59, 2 (2018), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2018.1442548 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2018.1442548

[17]

Ian Chang. 2021. Life after Bob. http://iancheng.com/.

[18]

PA Cranton. 1985. THE EDUCATIONAL IMAGINATION: ON THE DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF SCHOOL PROGRAM5 (Author: Elliot W. Eisner). McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill 20, 003 (1985).

[19]

Kate Crawford and Trevor Paglen. 2019. Training Humans. http://www.fondazioneprada.org/project/training-humans/?lang=en.

[20]

John Dewey. 1950. Aesthetic experience as a primary phase and as an artistic development. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9, 1 (1950), 56–58.

[21]

John Dewey. 2005. Art as experience. Penguin.

[22]

Manuj Dhariwal and Shruti Dhariwal. 2020. Let’s Chance: Playful Probabilistic Programming for Children. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383071

Digital Library

[23]

Thomas G Dietterich and Eric J Horvitz. 2015. Rise of concerns about AI: reflections and directions. Commun. ACM 58, 10 (2015), 38–40.

Digital Library

[24]

Daniella DiPaola, Blakeley H. Payne, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. Decoding Design Agendas: An Ethical Design Activity for Middle School Students. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (London, United Kingdom) (IDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394396

Digital Library

[25]

Stefania Druga. 2018. Growing up with AI: Cognimates: from coding to teaching machines). Ph. D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[26]

Stefania Druga, Sarah T. Vu, Eesh Likhith, and Tammy Qiu. 2019. Inclusive AI Literacy for Kids around the World. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (New York, NY, USA) (FL2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904

Digital Library

[27]

Lesley Duthie. 1990. What it means to be a docent: Narratives of art gallery experiences. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of British Columbia.

[28]

Ernest Edmonds. 2018. The Art of Interaction: What HCI Can Learn from Interactive Art. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 11, 1(2018), i–73. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00825ED1V01Y201802HCI039 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2200/S00825ED1V01Y201802HCI039

[29]

Amy Eguchi, Hiroyuki Okada, and Yumiko Muto. 2021. Contextualizing AI education for K-12 students to enhance their learning of AI literacy through culturally responsive approaches. KI-Kunstliche Intelligenz 35, 2 (2021), 153–161.

[30]

Carla Evans. 2020. Measuring Student Success Skills: A Review of the Literature on Critical Thinking. 21st Century Success Skills.National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment (2020).

[31]

J Falk and L Dierking. 2000. Learning from museums. visitor experiences and the making of meaning, alta mira.

[32]

John H. Falk, Martin Storksdieck, and Lynn D. Dierking. 2007. Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science 16, 4 (2007), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506064240 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506064240

[33]

Ethan Fast and Eric Horvitz. 2017. Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31, 1 (Feb. 2017). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635

[34]

Logan Fiorella and Richard E Mayer. 2016. Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review 28, 4 (2016), 717–741.

[35]

Ars Electronica Futurelab. 2019. Understanding AI. https://ars.electronica.art/aeblog/en/2019/08/06/understanding-ai-.

[36]

CP Gallery. Accessed 2022. Speculative design. http://celineparkgallery.com/.

[37]

Natalie Garrett, Nathan Beard, and Casey Fiesler. 2020. More Than "If Time Allows": The Role of Ethics in AI Education. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (New York, NY, USA) (AIES ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375868

Digital Library

[38]

Graham R Gibbs. 2007. Thematic coding and categorizing. Analyzing qualitative data 703 (2007), 38–56.

[39]

Herbert P Ginsburg and Sylvia Opper. 1988. Piaget’s theory of intellectual development. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

[40]

Barbara J. Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics across CS Education. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (jul 2019), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330794

Digital Library

[41]

Kelly W Guyotte, Nicola W Sochacka, Tracie E Costantino, Nadia N Kellam, and Joachim Walther. 2015. Collaborative creativity in STEAM: Narratives of art education students’ experiences in transdisciplinary spaces. International journal of education & the arts 16, 15 (2015).

[42]

Mark Guzdial. 2013. Exploring Hypotheses about Media Computation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (San Diego, San California, USA) (ICER ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493397

Digital Library

[43]

Samantha Hautea, Sayamindu Dasgupta, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Youth Perspectives on Critical Data Literacies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025823

Digital Library

[44]

Clint Andrew Heinze, Janet Haase, and Helen Higgins. 2010. An action research report from a multi-year approach to teaching artificial intelligence at the k-6 level. In First AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence.

[45]

Rafael Lozano Hemmer. 2015. Level of Confidence. http://www.lozanohemmer.com/artworks/level_of_confidence.php.

[46]

Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, R. Jordan Crouser, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2009. Comparing the Use of Tangible and Graphical Programming Languages for Informal Science Education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518851

Digital Library

[47]

Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2008. Tangible Programming and Informal Science Learning: Making TUIs Work for Museums. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(Chicago, Illinois) (IDC ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463756

Digital Library

[48]

Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838

Digital Library

[49]

Olga Hubard. 2011. Rethinking Critical Thinking and Its Role in Art Museum Education. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 45, 3 (2011), 15–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jaesteduc.45.3.0015

[50]

William Huitt and John Hummel. 2003. Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive 3, 2 (2003).

[51]

Thomas Humphrey, Joshua Gutwill, Exploratorium APE Team, 2017. Fostering active prolonged engagement. Taylor & Francis New York.

[52]

Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, Knight Simon, Alyssa Wise, Thomas Philip, Maria C Olivares, Sarah Van Wart, Sepehr Vakil, Jessica Marshall, Tapan S Parikh, M Lisette Lopez, 2020. Data literacies and social justice: Exploring critical data literacies through sociocultural perspectives. (2020).

[53]

Steven J. Jackson and Laewoo Kang. 2014. Breakdown, Obsolescence and Reuse: HCI and the Art of Repair. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557332

Digital Library

[54]

Myounghoon Jeon, Rebecca Fiebrink, Ernest A. Edmonds, and Damith Herath. 2019. From rituals to magic: Interactive art and HCI of the past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 131 (2019), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.005 50 years of the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Reflections on the past, present and future of human-centred technologies.

Digital Library

[55]

Britney Johnson, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild, and Carl DiSalvo. 2021. Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.

Digital Library

[56]

Yasmin Kafai, Kristin Searle, Crîstobal Martinez, and Bryan Brayboy. 2014. Ethnocomputing with Electronic Textiles: Culturally Responsive Open Design to Broaden Participation in Computing in American Indian Youth and Communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (SIGCSE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538903

Digital Library

[57]

Laewoo Kang and Steven Jackson. 2021. Tech-Art-Theory: Improvisational Methods for HCI Learning and Teaching. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 82 (apr 2021), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449156

Digital Library

[58]

Laewoo (Leo) Kang, Steven J. Jackson, and Phoebe Sengers. 2018. Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173734

Digital Library

[59]

Ruth R Kennedy. 2009. The power of in-class debates. Active learning in higher education 10, 3 (2009), 225–236.

[60]

Seonghun Kim, Yeonju Jang, Woojin Kim, Seongyune Choi, Heeseok Jung, Soohwan Kim, and Hyeoncheol Kim. 2021. Why and What to Teach: AI Curriculum for Elementary School. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 35, 17 (May 2021), 15569–15576. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17833

[61]

Siu-Cheung Kong, William Man-Yin Cheung, and Guo Zhang. 2022. Evaluating artificial intelligence literacy courses for fostering conceptual learning, literacy and empowerment in university students: Refocusing to conceptual building. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 7 (2022), 100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100223

[62]

Kelly YL Ku. 2009. Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking skills and creativity 4, 1 (2009), 70–76.

[63]

Exposure Labs. 2009. STORIES FOR A BETTER FUTURE. https://www.exposurelabs.com/about/.

[64]

Exposure Labs. 2020. The Social Dilemma. https://www.thesocialdilemma.com/take-action/.

[65]

Emily R Lai. 2011. Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports 6, 1 (2011), 40–41.

[66]

Dale Lane. 2021. Machine learning for kids: A project-based introduction to artificial intelligence. No Starch Press.

[67]

Susan Lechelt, Yvonne Rogers, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2020. Coming to Your Senses: Promoting Critical Thinking about Sensors through Playful Interaction in Classrooms. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (London, United Kingdom) (IDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394401

Digital Library

[68]

Clifford H. Lee, Nimah Gobir, Alex Gurn, and Elisabeth Soep. 2021. In the Black Mirror: Youth Investigations Into Artificial Intelligence: In the Black MirrorYouth Investigations Into Artificial Intelligence. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (aug 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3484495 Just Accepted.

Digital Library

[69]

Irene Lee, Safinah Ali, Helen Zhang, Daniella DiPaola, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2021. Developing Middle School Students’ AI Literacy. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432513

Digital Library

[70]

Sunok Lee, Minha Lee, and Sangsu Lee. 2022. What If Artificial Intelligence Become Completely Ambient in Our Daily Lives? Exploring Future Human-AI Interaction through High Fidelity Illustrations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0(2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080155 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080155

[71]

Sewang Lee, Jiyoung Yun, Soyeong Lee, Yeosol Song, and Hayeon Song. 2022. Will AI Image Synthesis Technology Help Constructivist Education at The Online Art Museum?. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 319, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519788

Digital Library

[72]

Irvin J Lehmann. 1963. Changes in critical thinking, attitudes, and values from freshman to senior years.Journal of Educational Psychology 54, 6 (1963), 305.

[73]

Phoebe Lin and Jessica Van Brummelen. 2021. Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 239, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445377

Digital Library

[74]

Duri Long, Takeria Blunt, and Brian Magerko. 2021. Co-Designing AI Literacy Exhibits for Informal Learning Spaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 293 (oct 2021), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476034

Digital Library

[75]

Duri Long, Mikhail Jacob, and Brian Magerko. 2019. Designing Co-Creative AI for Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (San Diego, CA, USA) (C&C ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325504

Digital Library

[76]

Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Digital Library

[77]

Duri Long, Anthony Teachey, and Brian Magerko. 2022. Family Learning Talk in AI Literacy Learning Activities. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 226, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502091

Digital Library

[78]

Michal Luria, Judeth Oden Choi, Rachel Gita Karp, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2020. Robotic Futures: Learning about Personally-Owned Agents through Performance. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395488

Digital Library

[79]

Caitlin Lustig. 2019. Intersecting Imaginaries: Visions of Decentralized Autonomous Systems. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 210 (nov 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359312

Digital Library

[80]

Machdel Matthee and Marita Turpin. 2019. Teaching critical thinking, problem solving, and design thinking: Preparing IS students for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education 30, 4 (2019), 242–252.

[81]

Eric M. Meyers, Ingrid Erickson, and Ruth V. Small. 2013. Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology 38, 4 (2013), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597

[82]

Ashlyn Munson, Barbara Moskal, Alka Harriger, Tonya Lauriski-Karriker, and Daniel Heersink. 2011. Computing at the high school level: Changing what teachers and students know and believe. Computers & Education 57, 2 (2011), 1836–1849.

Digital Library

[83]

United Nation. Accessed 2022. Who Are the Youth?https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/youth.

[84]

Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung, Kai Wah Samuel Chu, and Maggie Shen Qiao. 2021. AI literacy: definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58, 1 (2021), 504–509.

[85]

Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung, Samuel Kai Wah Chu, and Maggie Shen Qiao. 2021. Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2 (2021), 100041.

[86]

Nils J Nilsson. 2009. The quest for artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

[87]

Andrzej Nowak, Paul Lukowicz, and Pawel Horodecki. 2018. Assessing Artificial Intelligence for Humanity: Will AI be the Our Biggest Ever Advance? or the Biggest Threat [Opinion]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37, 4 (2018), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2876105

[88]

Rizqatun Nufus, Winda Maharani, and Elmi Bonafita Zahro. 2022. Capture The Psychological Image Of Youth Using Tiktok Applications. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICHSS) 1, 1 (Jan. 2022), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1234/ichss.v1i1.64

[89]

Martin T Orne. 2009. Demand characteristics and the concept of quasi-controls. Artifacts in behavioral research: Robert Rosenthal and Ralph L. Rosnow’s classic books 110(2009), 110–137.

[90]

Blakeley H Payne. 2020. Can my algorithm be my opinion?: an AI+ ethics curriculum for middle school students. Ph. D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[91]

Yim Register and Amy J. Ko. 2020. Learning Machine Learning with Personal Data Helps Stakeholders Ground Advocacy Arguments in Model Mechanics. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Virtual Event, New Zealand) (ICER ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406252

Digital Library

[92]

Gillian Russell. 2018. The Critical Design Exhibition: an epistemic space. (2018).

[93]

Stuart J Russell and Peter Norvig. 2016. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Malaysia.

[94]

Roger C. Schank. 1987. What Is AI, Anyway?AI Magazine 8, 4 (Dec. 1987), 59. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v8i4.623

Digital Library

[95]

Katharine Smithrim and Rena Upitis. 2005. Learning through the Arts: Lessons of Engagement. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l’éducation 28, 1/2(2005), 109–127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602156

[96]

Scott S. Snibbe and Hayes S. Raffle. 2009. Social Immersive Media: Pursuing Best Practices for Multi-User Interactive Camera/Projector Exhibits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518920

Digital Library

[97]

Ahuva Sperling and Dorit Lickerman. 2012. Integrating AI and Machine Learning in Software Engineering Course for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Haifa, Israel) (ITiCSE ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325296.2325354

Digital Library

[98]

Peter Stone, Rodney Brooks, Erik Brynjolfsson, Ryan Calo, Oren Etzioni, Greg Hager, Julia Hirschberg, Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan, Ece Kamar, Sarit Kraus, 2016. Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: the one hundred year study on artificial intelligence. (2016).

[99]

Elisabeth Sulmont, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Jeremy R. Cooperstock. 2019. Can You Teach Me To Machine Learn?. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 948–954. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287392

Digital Library

[100]

Dawit Tibebu Tiruneh, An Verburgh, and Jan Elen. 2014. Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review of intervention studies. Higher Education Studies 4, 1 (2014), 1–17.

[101]

Mike Tissenbaum, Josh Sheldon, Lissa Seop, Clifford H Lee, and Natalie Lao. 2017. Critical computational empowerment: Engaging youth as shapers of the digital future. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 1705–1708.

[102]

Tick Tok. 2022. Youth Portal. https://www.tiktok.com/safety/youth-portal?lang=en.

[103]

David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33, 01 (Jul. 2019), 9795–9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795

Digital Library

[104]

Jessica Van Brummelen, Tommy Heng, and Viktoriya Tabunshchyk. 2021. Teaching Tech to Talk: K-12 Conversational Artificial Intelligence Literacy Curriculum and Development Tools. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 35, 17 (May 2021), 15655–15663. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17844

[105]

Moshe Y Vardi. 2012. Artificial intelligence: past and future. Commun. ACM 55, 1 (2012), 5–5.

Digital Library

[106]

Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. A is for Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Activities on Young Children’s Perceptions of Robots. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300677

Digital Library

[107]

Jason Shun Wong. 2018. Design and Fiction: Imagining Civic AI. Interactions 25, 6 (oct 2018), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274568

Digital Library

[108]

Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn Rosé, and John Zimmerman. 2020. Re-Examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301

Digital Library

[109]

Koji Yatani. 2016. Effect sizes and power analysis in hci. Modern statistical methods for hci(2016), 87–110.

[110]

Mary Jane Zander. 2007. Tell Me a Story: The Power of Narrative in the Practice of Teaching Art. Studies in Art Education 48, 2 (2007), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2007.11650099 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2007.11650099

[111]

Xuesong Zhai, Xiaoyan Chu, Ching Sing Chai, Morris Siu Yung Jong, Andreja Istenic, Michael Spector, Jia-Bao Liu, Jing Yuan, and Yan Li. 2021. A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity 2021(2021).

[112]

Helen Zhang, Irene Lee, Safinah Ali, Daniella DiPaola, Yihong Cheng, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2022. Integrating Ethics and Career Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2022), 1–35.

[113]

Xiaofei Zhou, Jessica Van Brummelen, and Phoebe Lin. 2020. Designing AI Learning Experiences for K-12: Emerging Works, Future Opportunities and a Design Framework. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2009.10228

[114]

Michelle Zimmerman. 2018. Teaching AI: exploring new frontiers for learning. International Society for Technology in Education.

[115]

Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, Makenna Turner, Bridget Murphy, Shaun K. Kane, and R. Benjamin Shapiro. 2019. Youth Learning Machine Learning through Building Models of Athletic Moves. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(Boise, ID, USA) (IDC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323139

Digital Library

[116]

Yixin Zou and Florian Schaub. 2018. Concern But No Action: Consumers’ Reactions to the Equifax Data Breach. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188510

Digital Library

Cited By

Lugito NCucunawangsih CSuryadinata NKurniawan AWijayanto RSungono VSabran MAlbert NBudianto CRubismo KPurushotama NZebua A(2024)Readiness, knowledge, and perception towards artificial intelligence of medical students at faculty of medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Indonesia: a cross sectional studyBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-06058-x24:1Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06058-x
Sarkar A(2024)AI Should Challenge, Not ObeyCommunications of the ACM10.1145/3649404Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3649404
Zhou XZhou YGong YCai ZQiu AXiao QAntle ABai Z(2024)"Bee and I need diversity!" Break Filter Bubbles in Recommendation Systems through Embodied AI LearningProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655802(44-61)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655802
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Fostering Youth’s Critical Thinking Competency About AI through Exhibition

Recommendations

Fostering AI Literacy with Embodiment & Creativity: From Activity Boxes to Museum Exhibits
IDC '23: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference

Fostering young learners’ literacy surrounding AI technologies is becoming increasingly important as AI is becoming integrated in many aspects of our lives and is having far-reaching impacts on society. We have developed Knowledge Net and Creature ...
Mathematical Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking Skills: How Does Their Relationship Influence Mathematical Achievement?
ICMSTTL 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Teaching and Learning

This paper examines the correlation of mathematical critical thinking and creative thinking skills towards students' mathematical achievements. A total of 115 eighth grade students from three schools in Sleman Regency were involved as the subject of ...
Science Education and Fostering of Critical Thinking in China
ETT '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Education Technology and Training

The author describes scientific thinking has identification with critical thinking, points out science education is helpful to development and advancement of critical thinking and it has limitations simultaneity, considers now there is a lack of ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
1,534
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)936
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)128

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lugito NCucunawangsih CSuryadinata NKurniawan AWijayanto RSungono VSabran MAlbert NBudianto CRubismo KPurushotama NZebua A(2024)Readiness, knowledge, and perception towards artificial intelligence of medical students at faculty of medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Indonesia: a cross sectional studyBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-06058-x24:1Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06058-x
Sarkar A(2024)AI Should Challenge, Not ObeyCommunications of the ACM10.1145/3649404Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3649404
Zhou XZhou YGong YCai ZQiu AXiao QAntle ABai Z(2024)"Bee and I need diversity!" Break Filter Bubbles in Recommendation Systems through Embodied AI LearningProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655802(44-61)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655802
Zhou XXiong PXiao QBai Z(2024)OptiDot: An Optical Interface for Children to Explore Dot Product and AI RecommendationExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651040(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651040
Vahedian Movahed SDimino JFarrell AIrankhah EGhosh SJain GMahipal VRayavaram PSanusi ISalas EWolkowicz KNarain SMartin F(2024)Introducing Children to AI and ML with Five Software ExhibitsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650991(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650991
Belghith YMahdavi Goloujeh AMagerko BLong DMcklin TRoberts J(2024)Testing, Socializing, Exploring: Characterizing Middle Schoolers’ Approaches to and Conceptions of ChatGPTProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642332(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642332
Choi DLee SKim SLee KYoo HLee SHong H(2024)Unlock Life with a Chat(GPT): Integrating Conversational AI with Large Language Models into Everyday Lives of Autistic IndividualsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641989(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3641989
Mott THigger MBejarano AWilliams T(2024)Degrees of Freedom: A Storytelling Game that Supports Technology Literacy about Social Robots2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN)10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731340(2095-2102)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731340

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents