research-article

Open access

The SMeFT Decks: A Card-Based Ideation Tool for Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play

Authors:

Melissa J. Rogerson,

Lucy A. Sparrow,

Sophie O. FreemanAuthors Info & Claims

OzCHI '22: Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Pages 298 - 309

https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572933

Published: 06 April 2023 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Increasing numbers of people have turned to playing boardgames with physically distant friends and family via technological tools, particularly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, commercial hybrid digital boardgames (HDBs) are designed for co-located, rather than distanced, play and there is a need for more specific tools to support hybrid game design. This paper introduces the SMeFT Decks, a set of card decks to aid in the design of HDBs for distanced play, which support Story, Mechanism, Function and Technology. We describe the use of these cards for design ideation and demonstrate four game concepts for distanced play stemming from the use of these decks in participatory workshops. We report evaluative feedback from a pilot study and from 46 participants who used these cards across nine design workshops and reflect on what we learned from observing this process. Results suggest that the SMeFT Decks are a productive ideation tool for aiding in the design of HDBs for distanced play in collaborative workshop settings.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials: SMeFT Decks and printing instructions, and evaluation survey template (ozchi22-12 Supp Mat.zip)

Download
5.63 MB

References

[1]

Jonathan Belman, Helen Nissenbaum, Mary Flanagan and Jim Diamond. 2011. Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games. Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play.

[2]

Brenda Brathwaite and Ian Schrieber. 2008. Challenges for game designers. Charles River Media.

[3]

Gabriela Carneiro, Gil Barros and Carlos Zibel Costa. 2012. ilo Cards: A tool to support the design of interactive artifacts. Israsena, P., Tangsantikul, J. and Durling, D. eds. Research: Uncertainty Contradiction Value - DRS International Conference 2012, Bangkok, Thailand.

[4]

Gifford Cheung. 2013. Card board: a flexible environment for any game, anyone, any moment. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, ACM, 2627-2630. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479480

Digital Library

[5]

Matt Coward-Gibbs. 2020. Why Don't We Play Pandemic? Analog Gaming Communities in Lockdown. Leisure Sciences. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773986

[6]

Amina H. El-Ashry, Xinran Zhang, Savani Shrotri, Susanna Abler and Foad Hamidi. 2021. Exploring the Collaboration Possibilities of Distributed Making for Storytelling Using 3D Printing Pens. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481755

Digital Library

[7]

Geoffrey Engelstein and Isaac Shalev. 2019. Building blocks of Tabletop Game Design: An Encyclopedia of Mechanisms. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), Boca Raton, FL.

[8]

Timea Farkas, Alena Denisova, Sarah Wiseman and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2022. The Effects of a Soundtrack on Board Game Player Experience. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502110

Digital Library

[9]

Mary Flanagan, Jonathan Belman, Helen Nissenbaum and Jim Diamond. 2007. A Method For Discovering Values in Digital Games. In DiGRA Conference.

[10]

Carlie Forsythe. 2021. Game On! Recreational Play in the Library: Reflections of a Board Game Librarian. Emerging Library & Information Perspectives, 4 (1). 143-156. https://doi.org/10.5206/elip.v4i1.13442

[11]

Jérémy Frey. 2016. Remote Heart Rate Sensing and Projection to Renew Traditional Board Games and Foster Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, ACM, 1865-1871. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892391

Digital Library

[12]

Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300619

Digital Library

[13]

Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2012. The envisioning cards: a toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1145-1148.

Digital Library

[14]

Tracy Fullerton. 2014. Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. CRC Press.

[15]

Saul Greenberg. 2007. Toolkits and interface creativity. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 32 (2). 139-159.

Digital Library

[16]

Lalita Haritaipan, Miki Saijo and Celine Mougenot. 2018. Leveraging creativity of design students with a magic-based inspiration tool. In DS 93: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2018), Dyson School of Engineering, Imperial College, London. 6th-7th September 2018, 265-270.

[17]

Daniel Harley, Stefan Grambart, Rodrigo Skazufka Bergel and Ali Mazalek. 2022. Together Alone: A Tangible Online Narrative. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501311

Digital Library

[18]

Jeremy Holcomb. 2017. The White Box: A game design workshop-in-a-box, Atlas Games, Proctor, MN.

[19]

Eva Hornecker. 2010. Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: the card brainstorming game. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, 101-108.

Digital Library

[20]

Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, San Jose, CA, 1722.

[21]

Ville Kankainen and Janne Paavilainen. 2019. Hybrid Board Game Design Guidelines. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2019, Kyoto, Japan. http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/hybrid-board-game-design-guidelines/

[22]

Nurit Kirshenbaum and Scott Robertson. 2018. PEPA Deck: Bringing Interactivity to Playing Cards. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, ACM, 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271521

Digital Library

[23]

Hannu Korhonen, Markus Montola and Juha Arrasvuori. 2009. Understanding playful user experience through digital games. In International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Citeseer, 13-16.

[24]

Willy C. Kriz. 2020. Gaming in the Time of COVID-19. Simulation & Gaming, 51 (4). 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120931602

Digital Library

[25]

Annakaisa Kultima. 2017. The role of stimuli in game idea generation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131085.3131127

Digital Library

[26]

Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2013. The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 6 (1). 22-43.

[27]

Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2010. PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games, 28-37.

Digital Library

[28]

Bernhard Maurer and Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3 (4). 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040072

[29]

Wendy Mendes, Albert Richard, Tähe-Kai Tillo, Gustavo Pinto, Kiev Gama and Alexander Nolte. 2022. Socio-technical constraints and affordances of virtual collaboration–A study of four online hackathons. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12274.

[30]

Chelsea Mills, Carman Neustaedter and William Odom. 2021. Distributed Letter Jam: Designing Distributed Board Game Play for Social Connection. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481753

Digital Library

[31]

Alanah Mitchell. 2021. Collaboration technology affordances from virtual collaboration in the time of COVID-19 and post-pandemic strategies. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0003

[32]

Florian Mueller, Martin R Gibbs, Frank Vetere and Darren Edge. 2014. Supporting the creative game design process with exertion cards. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2211-2220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557272

Digital Library

[33]

Hendrik Müller, Aaron Sedley and Elizabeth Ferrall-Nunge. 2014. Survey Research in HCI. In Olson, J.S. and Kellogg, W.A. eds. Ways of Knowing in HCI, Springer, New York, 229-266.

[34]

Thomas Neumayr, Hans-Christian Jetter, Mirjam Augstein, Judith Friedl and Thomas Luger. 2018. Domino: A descriptive framework for hybrid collaboration and coupling styles in partially distributed teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (CSCW). 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274397

Digital Library

[35]

Oleksandr Nevskiy and Oleg Sidorenko. 2015. Mysterium, Asmodee, Roseville, MN.

[36]

Janne Paavilainen, Katriina Heljakka, Jonne Arjoranta, Ville Kankainen, Linda Landenperä, Elina Koskinen, Jani Kinnunen, Lilli Sihvonen, Timo Nummenmaa, Frans Mäyrä, Raine Koskimaa and Jaakko Suominen. 2018. Hybrid Social Play Final Report University of Tampere TRIM Research Reports 26, Hybrid Social Play Consortium, University of Tampere Faculty of Communication Sciences, Tampere, Finland.

[37]

Marigo Raftopoulos. 2015. Playful card-based tools for gamification design. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Australian special interest group for computer human interaction, 109-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838797

Digital Library

[38]

Melissa J. Rogerson and Martin Gibbs. 2018. Finding Time for Tabletop: Boardgame Play and Parenting. Games and Culture, 13 (3). 280-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016656324

[39]

Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. More Than a Gimmick – Digital Tools for Boardgame Play. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5 (CHI PLAY). Article 261. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474688

Digital Library

[40]

Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. Unpacking “Boardgames with Apps”: The Hybrid Digital Boardgame Model. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445077

Digital Library

[41]

Jean-Louis Roubira. 2008. Dixit, Asmodée.

[42]

Robin Roy and James P Warren. 2019. Card-based design tools: A review and analysis of 155 card decks for designers and designing. Design Studies, 63. 125-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.002

[43]

Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2004. Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[44]

Jesse Schell. 2015. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

[45]

Dorothé Smit, Bernhard Maurer, Martin Murer, Jens Reinhardt and Katrin Wolf. 2019. Be the Meeple: New Perspectives on Traditional Board Games. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Tempe, Arizona, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295657

Digital Library

[46]

Myrte Thoolen, Francesca Toso, Sebastiaan T.M. Peek, Yuan Lu and Rens Brankaert. 2022. LivingMoments: Bespoke Social Communication for People living with Dementia and their Relatives. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, Article 515. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517430

Digital Library

[47]

Heikki Tyni and Annakaisa Kultima. 2016. The emergence of industry of playful hybrids: developer's perspective Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, Tampere, Finland, 413–421.

[48]

Jelle van Dijk, Melina Kopke, Niels van Huizen, Loes van Uffelen and Laura Beunk. 2019. Empowering young adults on the autistic spectrum. In 4th RTD Conference: Design United. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7855907.v1.

[49]

James Wallis. 2018. The White Box review: DIY or DOA? Tabletop Gaming.

[50]

Andreas Wilde. 2018. Soviet Kitchen Unleashed, HYBR, Dresden, Germany.

[51]

Danielle Wilde. 2020. Design Research Education and Global Concerns. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6 (2). 170-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.003

[52]

Danielle Wilde and Ferran Altarriba Bertran. 2019. Participatory Research through Gastronomy Design: A designerly move towards more playful gastronomy. International Journal of Food Design, 4 (1). 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.3_1

[53]

Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions, XXIII (3). 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069

Digital Library

[54]

Ye Yuan, Jan Cao, Ruotong Wang and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Tabletop Games in the Age of Remote Collaboration: Design Opportunities for a Socially Connected Game Experience. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Association for Computing Machinery, Article 436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445512

Digital Library

[55]

José P Zagal. 2010. Ludoliteracy: Defining, Understanding, and Supporting Games Education. ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA.

[56]

John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through Design in HCI. In Olson, J.S. and Kellogg, W.A. eds. Ways of Knowing in HCI, Springer, New York, 167-190.

[57]

Robert Zubek. 2020. Elements of Game Design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cited By

DAUD SABU YAZID ZMD TAIB NOTHMAN MOSMAN I(2024)Evaluating the Impact of Usability Components on User Satisfaction in Educational Board Games using the MEEGA+ FrameworkInformation Management and Business Review10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I).382116:2(I)(195-206)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I).3821
Farkas THughes NFiebrink R(2024)How Boardgame Players Imagine Interacting With TechnologyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770788:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677078
Retnanto AFaracci ESathya AHung YNakagaki K(2024)CARDinality: Interactive Card-shaped Robots with Locomotion and Haptics using VibrationProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676421(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676421
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The SMeFT Decks: A Card-Based Ideation Tool for Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Systems and tools for interaction design

Recommendations

Unpacking “Boardgames with Apps”: The Hybrid Digital Boardgame Model
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Increasingly, modern boardgames incorporate digital apps and tools to deliver content in novel ways. Despite disparate approaches to incorporating digital tools in otherwise non-digital boardgames, there has to date been no detailed classification of ...
Lessons from Homebrewed Hybridity: Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play

In 2020–2021, under the restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, boardgame players around the world sought out ways to play physical boardgames with each other despite being physically apart. Their creative appropriations of digital ...
Ideation decks: a card-based design ideation tool
DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

Ideation Decks is a project that explores the development of a methodological tool for design ideation It involves the creation and use of bespoke project-specific card based systems which help to define constrained design problems within a broader ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

OzCHI '22: Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

November 2022

373 pages

ISBN:9798400700248

DOI:10.1145/3572921

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

OzCHI '22

OzCHI '22: 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

November 29 - December 2, 2022

ACT, Canberra, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
753
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)457
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35

Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

DAUD SABU YAZID ZMD TAIB NOTHMAN MOSMAN I(2024)Evaluating the Impact of Usability Components on User Satisfaction in Educational Board Games using the MEEGA+ FrameworkInformation Management and Business Review10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I).382116:2(I)(195-206)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I).3821
Farkas THughes NFiebrink R(2024)How Boardgame Players Imagine Interacting With TechnologyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770788:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677078
Retnanto AFaracci ESathya AHung YNakagaki K(2024)CARDinality: Interactive Card-shaped Robots with Locomotion and Haptics using VibrationProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676421(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676421
Sparrow LRogerson M(2023)Lessons from Homebrewed Hybridity: Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced PlayProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110227:CHI PLAY(45-72)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611022

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten