Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3627915.3628024acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Flash-Based Solid-State Storage Reduces LDPC Read Retry Scheme

Published: 21 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Flash memory, with its high performance and low power consumption, has been widely applied in various fields. The increasing storage density of flash memory has led to a gradual increase in Bit Error Rate (BER). Given the users' requirement for data accuracy, the reliability of flash memory has become a research focus. Currently, a common approach to achieve data error correction is by introducing error-correcting code modules. Among them, Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes are widely adopted due to their excellent error correction capability. However, using LDPC codes directly for error correction can introduce significant latency. To reduce the decoding latency of LDPC codes, this paper proposes a combined approach of refreshing and caching. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to the original approach, this scheme can achieve a maximum reduction of 28% in average response time and a maximum improvement of 63% in IOPS.

References

[1]
Y. Cai, Y. Luo, S. Ghose, (2018). Read disturb errors in MLC NAND flash memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.03283, 2018.
[2]
Y. Cai, E. Haratsch, O. Mutlu, (2012). Error patterns in MLC NAND flash memory: Measurement, characterization, and analysis. In DATE, 2012.
[3]
Y. Cai, E. Haratsch, O. Mutlu, (2013). Threshold voltage distribution in NAND flash memory: Characterization, analysis, and modeling. In DATE, 2013.
[4]
Y. Cai, Y. Luo, E. Haratsch, (2015). Data retention in MLC NAND flash memory: Characterization, optimization, and recovery. In HPCA, 2015.
[5]
Y. Cai, O. Mutlu, E. Haratsch, (2013). Program interference in MLC NAND flash memory: Characterization, modeling, and mitigation. In ICCD, 2013.
[6]
N. Mielke, T. Marquart, N. Wu, (2013). Bit error rate in NAND flash memories. In IRPS, 2013.
[7]
L. Grupp, A. Caulfield, J. Coburn, (2009). Characterizing flash memory: Anomalies, observations, and applications. In MICRO, 2009.
[8]
Sun F, Rose K and Zhang T. (2006). On the use of strong BCH codes for improving multilevel NAND flash memory storage capacity[C]. IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS): Design and Implementation. 2006: 5.
[9]
Kai Z, Zhao W, Sun H, (2013). LDPCin-SSD: Making advanced error correction codes work effectively in solid state drives[C]. Proceedings of the 11th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association.
[10]
N. R. Mielke, (2015). Reliability of solid state drives based on NAND flash memory. Proc. IEEE 105 (2017) 1725 (
[11]
Liu C, Chang Y M and Chang Y (2015). Read leveling for flash storage systems[C]. The 8th ACM International Systems and Storage Conference. ACM.
[12]
Kou Y, Lin S and Fossorier M P C (2001). Low-Density Parity-Check Codes Based on Finite Geometries: A Rediscovery and New Results[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(7): 2711-2736.
[13]
Crnkovic D, Rukavina S and Simac M (2022). LDPC codes from cubic semisymmetric graphs[J]. Ars Mathematica Contemporanea, 22(2): 2.
[14]
Ryan W E (2004). An introduction to LDPC codes[J]. CRC Handbook for Coding and Signal Processing for Recording Systems, 1-23.
[15]
K. Zhao, W. Zhao and H. Sun (2013). LDPC-in-SSD: Making advanced error correction codes work effectively in solid state drives. In Proc. FAST, pp. 243–256.
[16]
Y. Du, D. Zou, Q. Li, L. Shi, H. Jin and C. J. Xue (2017). LALDPC: Latency aware LDPC for read performance improvement of solid state drives. In Proc. MSST, pp. 1–11.
[17]
Qi S, Feng D, Su N, (2017). CDF-LDPC: A new error correction method for SSD to improve the read performance[J]. ACM Transactions on Storage, 13(1).
[18]
Du Y, Li Q, Shi L, (2017). Reducing LDPC Soft Sensing Latency by Lightweight Data Refresh for Flash Read Performance Improvement[C]. Design Automation Conference. IEEE.
[19]
R. S. Liu, M. Y. Chuang, C. L. Yang, C. H. Li, K. C. Ho and H. P. Li (2014). EC-Cache: Exploiting error locality to optimize LDPC in NAND flash-based SSDs. 2014 51st ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1-6.
[20]
Y. Lv, L. Shi, Q. Li, C. Gao, C. J. Xue and E. Sha (2019). Optimizing Tail Latency of LDPC based Flash Memory Storage Systems Via Smart Refresh. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS), Enshi, China, 2019, pp. 1-8.
[21]
Cai Y, Yalcin G, Mutlu O, (2012). Flash correct-and-refresh: Retention-aware error management for increased flash memory lifetime[C]. 2012 IEEE 30th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD). IEEE, 94-101.

Index Terms

  1. Flash-Based Solid-State Storage Reduces LDPC Read Retry Scheme

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CSAE '23: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
    October 2023
    358 pages
    ISBN:9798400700590
    DOI:10.1145/3627915
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 December 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Bit Error Rate (BER)
    2. Cache
    3. LDPC
    4. Refresh
    5. SSD

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSAE 2023

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 40
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media