Designing for Dissensus: Socially Engaged Art to access experience and support participation.
Pages 2851 - 2865
Abstract
For social justice-oriented design, pluralistic participatory practices are recognised as important. This paper explores Socially Engaged Art (SEA) as one such practice, which uses dialogical inquiry to address social justice issues. We describe a case study of SEA-informed digital storytelling workshops in a rurban community in Ireland. The workshops aimed to support diverse adolescent participants in identifying and critiquing place-based social issues with a view to imagining alternative and inclusive futures. SEA was instrumental in uncovering contradictory and hidden experiences of community life. We propose incorporating SEA into design processes to: i) challenge assumptions around identity and belonging; ii) recognise diverse experiences; and iii) breakdown social-engagement barriers. As we ask questions on what design is for, who should design, and why design matters, SEA can centre marginalised experiences, support polyvocal participation and help develop participant agency to work towards more equitable futures in rapidly changing environments.
References
[1]
Mariam Asad and Christopher Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Vancouver BC Canada., 1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675212
[2]
Liam Bannon, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Susanne Bødker. 2018. Introduction: Reimagining Participatory Design—Emerging Voices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3177794
[3]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2011. Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the 2011 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, BC, Canada., 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/3068259
[4]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Utopias of Participation: Feminism, Design, and the Futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127359
[5]
Shaowen Bardzell, Jofish Kaye, and Katta Spiel. 2020. Moving Forward Together: Effective Activism for Change. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3378929
[6]
Dave Beech. 2008. Include me out! – Dave Beech on participation in art. Art Monthly. Retrieved April 2, 2023 from https://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/include-me-out-by-dave-beech-april-2008
[7]
Dave Beech. 2009. Inside Out - Dave Beech on the fall of public art. Art Monthly. Retrieved April 2, 2023 from https://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/inside-out-by-dave-beech-september-2009
[8]
Dave Beech. 2010. Encountering Art: Concept of the ‘Emancipated Spectator.’ Art Monthly 336. Retrieved April 25, 2024 from https://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/encountering-art-by-dave-beech-may-2010
[9]
Michael M. Bell. 2007. The two-ness of rural life and the ends of rural scholarship. Journal of Rural Studies 23, 4: 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.03.003
[10]
Ross Birrell. 2008. Jacques Rancière and The (Re)Distribution of the Sensible: Five Lessons in Artistic Research. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods 2.
[11]
Claire Bishop. 2006. The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents. Art Forum. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.artforum.com/features/the-social-turn-collaboration-and-its-discontents-173361/
[12]
Claire Bishop. 2006. Participation. Whitechapel, London.
[13]
Claire Bishop. 2012. Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
[14]
Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8, 2–3: 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577
[15]
Nils Björling and Malin Rönnblom. 2023. Politics of the rurban void. Space and Polity: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2023.2248036
[16]
Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421
[17]
Giovanna Borasi and Mirko Zardini. 2013. The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design Between Art and Politics. Design Issues 29, 1.
[18]
Valeria Borsotti and Pernille Bjørn. 2022. Humor and Stereotypes in Computing: An Equity-focused Approach to Institutional Accountability. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 31, 4: 771–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09440-9
[19]
Brooke Bosley, Christina N. Harrington, Susana M. Morris, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2022. Healing Justice: A Framework for Collective Healing and Well-Being from Systemic Traumas. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533492
[20]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4: 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[21]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 3: 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
[22]
Kirsten E Bray, Christina Harrington, Andrea G Parker, N'Deye Diakhate, and Jennifer Roberts. 2022. Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2022 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New Orleans, LA, USA., 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501945
[23]
Tania Bruguera. 2011. Immigrant Movement International. Retrieved May 17, 2023 from http://immigrant-movement.us/wordpress/
[24]
Anne G. Busck, Marjan C. Hidding, Søren B. P. Kristensen, Christer Persson, and Søren Præstholm. 2008. Managing rurban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden: Comparing planning systems and instruments in three different contexts. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 108, 2: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2008.10649584
[25]
Central Statistics Office. 2018. Population and Birthplace 2016 by Alphabetical List of Towns, CensusYear and Statistic - StatBank - data and statistics. Retrieved January 17, 2023 from https://data.cso.ie
[26]
Central Statistics Office. 2019. Census Reports 1821-2006. Retrieved January 17, 2023 from https://www.cso.ie/en/census/censusreports1821-2006/
[27]
Central Statistics Office. 2023. Census 2022 Small Area Population Statistics. Retrieved November 16, 2023 from https://www.cso.ie/en/census/census2022/census2022smallareapopulationstatistics/
[28]
Yiqun T. Chen, Angela D. R. Smith, Katharina Reinecke, and Alexandra To. 2023. Why, when, and from whom: considerations for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581122
[29]
Rachel Clarke, Jo Briggs, Ann Light, and Pete Wright. 2016. Situated Encounters with Socially Engaged Art in Community-based Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Brisbane QLD Australia., 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901882
[30]
Rachel Clarke and Pete Wright. 2012. Evocative of experience: crafting cross-cultural digital narratives through stories and portraits. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. Copenhagen, Denmark., 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399066
[31]
Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, Madeline Balaam, and John McCarthy. 2013. Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France., 2517–2526. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481348
[32]
Creative Time. 2011. Tania Bruguera Immigrant Movement International Queens, New York 2011. Creative Time. Retrieved May 17, 2023 from https://creativetime.org/projects/immigrant-movement-international/
[33]
Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Design for Politics and Political Design. In Adversarial Design. MIT Press, Boston MA USA.
[34]
Carl DiSalvo, Kirsten Boehner, Nicholas A Knouf, and Phoebe Sengers. 2009. Nourishing the Ground for Sustainable HCI: Considerations from Ecologically Engaged Art. In Proceedings of the 2009 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, MA, USA., 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518763
[35]
Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Volkmar Pipek. 2012. Participatory design for, with, and by communities. In International handbook of participatory design. Routledge, 182–209.
[36]
Carl DiSalvo, Illah Nourbakhsh, and David Holstius. 2008. The Neighborhood Networks project: a case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008. Indianapolis, IN, United States.
[37]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Brisbane QLD Australia., 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861
[38]
Paul Dourish and Scott D. Mainwaring. 2012. Ubicomp's colonial impulse. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’12, 133. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370238
[39]
Michaelanne Dye, Neha Kumar, Ari Schlesinger, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Morgan G. Ames, Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Jacki O'Neill, Joyojeet Pal, and Mary L. Gray. 2018. Solidarity Across Borders: Navigating Intersections Towards Equity and Inclusion. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Jersey City NJ USA., 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273007
[40]
Sheena Erete, Karla Thomas, Denise Nacu, Jessa Dickinson, Naomi Thompson, and Nichole Pinkard. 2021. Applying a Transformative Justice Approach to Encourage the Participation of Black and Latina Girls in Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 21, 4: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451345
[41]
Sarah Fox, Jill Dimond, Lilly Irani, Tad Hirsch, Michael Muller, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Social Justice and Design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022201
[42]
Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Portland, Oregon, USA, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665
[43]
Paulo Freire. 1967. Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. Continuum International Publishing Group, New York.
[44]
João Pedro Fróis and Boyd White. 2013. Words for Artworks: The Aesthetics of Meaning Making. International Journal of Art & Design Education 32, 1: 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01759.x
[45]
Paul Michael Garrett. 2018. Disrupting, destabilising and declassifying: Jacques Rancière's potential contribution to social work. International Social Work 61, 1: 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815603988
[46]
Carlos Garrido Castellano. 2022. Art Activism for an Anticolonial Future: a conversation with Carlos Garrido Castellano. Community Development Journal: bsac027. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac027
[47]
Sucheta Ghoshal, Rishma Mendhekar, and Amy Bruckman. 2020. Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392862
[48]
Danilo Giglitto, Luigina Ciolfi, Caroline Claisse, and Eleanor Lockley. 2019. Bridging cultural heritage and communities through digital technologies: Understanding perspectives and challenges. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities. Vienna, Austria., 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328386
[49]
Indrė Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė and Jurga Vitkuvienė. 2013. How Rural Becomes Rurban – Rural Manor Residencies in the Urban Context: Lithuanian Case. Architecture and Urban Planning 7: 32–37.
[50]
Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, Farirai Gumbonzvanda, and RochelleAnn Burgess. 2021. Decolonising the ‘safe space’ as an African innovation: the Nhanga as quiet activism to improve women's health and wellbeing. Critical Public Health 31, 2: 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1866169
[51]
Jean Hardy and Stefani Vargas. 2019. Participatory Design and the Future of Rural LGBTQ Communities. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323894
[52]
Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI Research: Definitions, Distinctions, Methods, and Opportunities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359298
[53]
Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723
[54]
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318
[55]
Christina Harrington, Shamika Klassen, and Yolanda A. Rankin. 2022. “All that You Touch, You Change”: Expanding the Canon of Speculative Design Towards Black Futuring. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New Orleans, LA, USA., 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502118
[56]
Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir Holmer, Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Thomas Lodato. 2015. Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.003
[57]
bell hooks. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge.
[58]
bell hooks. 1995. Art on My Mind: Visual Politics. The New Press.
[59]
Ole Sejer Iversen, Kim Halskov, and Tuck Wah Leong. 2010. Rekindling values in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900455
[60]
Alex Kershaw. 2015. An Interview with Tania Bruguera. Immigrant Movement International: Five Years and Counting. FIELD–Journal of Socially Engaged Art Criticism 1: 11–26. Retrieved from http://field-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FIELD-01-Bruguera-Interview.pdf
[61]
Grant Kester. 2011. The One and the Many. Duke University Press, Durham and London.
[62]
Rebecca Chiyoko King-O'Riain. 2021. How the Irish became more than white: mixed-race Irishness in historical and contemporary contexts. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, 4: 821–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1654156
[63]
Kari Kuutti and Liam J. Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 2014 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Toronto, ON, Canada., 3543–3552. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111
[64]
Suzanne Lacy. 1997. The Turning Point / Under Construction. Retrieved March 30, 2023 from https://www.suzannelacy.com/performance-installation#/the-turning-point-under-construction/
[65]
Suzanne Lacy. 2013. Silver Action. Retrieved March 30, 2023 from https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/performance-at-tate/case-studies/suzanne-lacy
[66]
Suzanne Lacy. 2018. Across and In-Between. suzannelacy.com. Retrieved May 17, 2023 from https://www.suzannelacy.com/performance-installation#/across-and-in-between/
[67]
Suzanne Lacy. 2019. Uncertain Futures. Retrieved April 25, 2024 from https://www.suzannelacy.com/performance-installation#/uncertain-futures-main-project-page/
[68]
Christopher A. Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Vancouver, BC, Canada., 1348–1358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147
[69]
Joseph Lee. 1994. The Irish psyche: An historical perspective. The Irish Journal of Psychology 15, 2–3: 245–249.
[70]
Minha Lee, Débora De Castro Leal, Max Krüger, Angelika Strohmayer, and Cristina Zaga. 2021. Activated: Decentering activism in and with academia. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481723
[71]
Daniel T. Lichter and James P. Ziliak. 2017. The Rural-Urban Interface: New Patterns of Spatial Interdependence and Inequality in America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672, 1: 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217714180
[72]
Ann Light, Gini Simpson, Lois Weaver, and Patrick G. T. Healey. 2009. Geezers, turbines, fantasy personas: making the everyday into the future. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and Cognition. Berkeley, CA, USA., 39–48.
[73]
Hans Kjetil Lysgård. 2016. The ‘actually existing’ cultural policy and culture-led strategies of rural places and small towns. Journal of Rural Studies 44: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.014
[74]
Shirley Martin, Deirdre Horgan, Jacqui O'Riordan, and Reana Maier. 2023. Refugee and migrant children's views of integration and belonging in school in Ireland – and the role of micro- and meso-level interactions. International Journal of Inclusive Education: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2222304
[75]
Stewart Martin. 2007. Critique of Relational Aesthetics. Third Text 21, 4: 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820701433323
[76]
John McCarthy and Pete Wright. 2015. Taking [a]part. The politics and aesthetics of participation in experience centred design. MIT Press.
[77]
Sharon M. Meagher. 2009. Declarations of independence: Anti‐immigration politics in ‘rurban’ America. City 13, 1: 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902726376
[78]
Victoria Montgomery. 2013. Multicultural Ireland? Muslim Women and Integration in Ireland. Irish Political Studies 28, 3: 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2013.823087
[79]
Maria Murray, Nadia Pantidi, and Trevor Hogan. 2019. Conflict and Belonging: Socially engaged art practice as a resource for resilience-building in rurban communities. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities. Vienna, Austria., 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328388
[80]
Maria Murray, Nadia Pantidi, and John McCarthy. 2023. Agency, Power and Confrontation: the Role for Socially Engaged Art in CSCW with Rurban Communities in Support of Inclusion. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-023-09482-7
[81]
James Nehring. 2020. It matters how you manage diversity: cultural difference in Northern Ireland's secondary schools. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 41, 6: 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1630418
[82]
Valentina Nisi, Paulo Bala, Hollie Bostock, Vanessa Cesário, and Nuno Jardim Nunes. 2023. “Before gentrification, we claim for habitation”: Eliciting Values and Assets through Cultural Heritage Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2423–2436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596124
[83]
Aisling T. O'Donnell, Orla T. Muldoon, Danielle L. Blaylock, Clifford Stevenson, Dominic Bryan, Stephen D. Reicher, and Samuel Pehrson. 2016. ‘Something That Unites Us All’: Understandings of St. Patrick's Day Parades as Representing the Irish National Group. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 26, 1: 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2236
[84]
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392
[85]
Jasper Tran O'Leary, Sara Zewde, Jennifer Mankoff, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Who Gets to Future?: Race, Representation, and Design Methods in Africatown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow, Scotland, UK., 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300791
[86]
Cecilie Sachs Olsen. 2019. Urban space and the politics of socially engaged art. Progress in Human Geography 43, 6: 985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518807756
[87]
Patti O'Malley. 2022. Black-white mixed race young people in Ireland and their lived experiences of racialised exclusion. Irish Journal of Sociology 30, 1: 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035211068435
[88]
Marie Parker-Jenkins and Mary Masterson. 2013. No longer ‘Catholic, White and Gaelic’: schools in Ireland coming to terms with cultural diversity. Irish Educational Studies 32, 4: 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2013.851438
[89]
Jacques Rancière. 2009. Problems and transformations in critical art. In Aesthetics and its Discontents. Polity, 45–60.
[90]
Jacques Rancière. 2011. The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics. In Reading Rancière, Paul Bowman and Richard Stamp (eds.). Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378
[91]
Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen. 2017. A Note on Socially Engaged Art Criticism. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 25, 53. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v25i53.26406
[92]
Sarah Robinson, Nicola J. Bidwell, Roberto Cibin, Conor Linehan, Laura Maye, John Mccarthy, Nadia Pantidi, and Maurizio Teli. 2021. Rural Islandness as a Lens for (Rural) HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 3: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443704
[93]
Devansh Saxena, Erhardt Graeff, Shion Guha, EunJeong Cheon, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Dawn Walker, Christoph Becker, and Kenneth R. Fleischmann. 2020. Collective Organizing and Social Responsibility at CSCW. In Companion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418593
[94]
SECAD. 2017. [NorthRock] Strategic Plan 2018-2022.
[95]
Joshua Paolo Seguin, Delvin Varghese, Misita Anwar, Tom Bartindale, and Patrick Olivier. 2022. Co-designing Digital Platforms for Volunteer-led Migrant Community Welfare Support. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533544
[96]
Jennifer Sherman. 2018. “Not Allowed to Inherit My Kingdom”: Amenity Development and Social Inequality in the Rural West: Not Allowed to Inherit My Kingdom. Rural Sociology 83, 1: 174–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12168
[97]
Jihan Sherman. 2023. Black Feminist Technoscience: Sojourner Truth, Storytelling, and a Framework for Design. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596105
[98]
Geertje Slingerland, Kavita Agneta Gonsalves, and Maria Teresa Murray. 2022. Design Probes in a Pandemic: Two Tales of Hybrid Radical Placemaking from Ireland and Australia. In Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Canberra, ACT, Australia., 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572931
[99]
Clifford Stevenson and Orla T. Muldoon. 2010. Socio-political context and accounts of national identity in adolescence. British Journal of Social Psychology 49, 3: 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X475972
[100]
Maurizio Teli, Myriam Lewkowicz, Chiara Rossitto, and Susanne Bødker. 2021. Understanding, Promoting, and Designing for Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities. Towards a new wave of technological activism: Sustainable Appropriation of Technologies by Grassroots Communities. In C&T ’21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech, 332–335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461564.3468163
[101]
Chrissie Tiller. 2014. The Spectrum of Participation. Create News. Retrieved from ttp://www.create-ireland.ie/images/pdfs/create-news/Create-News-17-October-2014- Chrissie-Tiller.pdf
[102]
Alexandra To, Angela D. R. Smith, Dilruba Showkat, Adinawa Adjagbodjou, and Christina Harrington. 2023. Flourishing in the Everyday: Moving Beyond Damage-Centered Design in HCI for BIPOC Communities. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596057
[103]
André Torre. 2015. New Challenges for Rural Areas in a Fast Moving Environment. European Planning Studies 23, 4: 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.945811
[104]
Kim M Unertl, Chris L Schaefbauer, Terrance R Campbell, Charles Senteio, Katie A Siek, Suzanne Bakken, and Tiffany C Veinot. 2016. Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23, 1: 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv094
[105]
Nina Wallerstein and Bonnie Duran. 2008. The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34282.72648
[106]
Krzysztof Wodiczko. 2015. The Inner Public. FIELD: A Journal of Socially Engaged Art Criticism 1: 27–52.
[107]
Michael Woods. 2022. Refugees, race and the limits of rural cosmopolitanism: Perspectives from Ireland and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies 95: 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.027
[108]
Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2015. The politics and aesthetics of participatory HCI. Interactions 22, 6: 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828428
[109]
2013. Public Projection, Lumiere Derry-Londonderry. Lumiere. Retrieved January 27, 2022 from https://www.lumiere-festival.com/programme-item/public-projection-derrylondonderry
[110]
2015. Gresham's Wooden Horse. Who Are We Project. Retrieved January 27, 2022 from https://whoareweproject.com/2018-programme/artists/isabel-lima.
[111]
2017. Who Are We? Retrieved January 27, 2022 from https://whoareweproject.com/2017-programme
Index Terms
- Designing for Dissensus: Socially Engaged Art to access experience and support participation.
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Situated Encounters with Socially Engaged Art in Community-based Design
DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsWith the increased relevance of digital technologies in civil life comes the challenge of how to design research for citizen engagement. Drawing from three reflexive case studies presenting socially engaged arts (SEA) projects, we describe how, as ...
Agency, Power and Confrontation: the Role for Socially Engaged Art in CSCW with Rurban Communities in Support of Inclusion
AbstractRapidly expanding rural communities (often termed ‘rurban’) face complex social challenges around inclusion of newcomers and resulting changes to long-established community identity. Although participatory CSCW provides resources to support rurban ...
Socially engaged arts practice in HCI
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocially engaged methods are increasingly being used within HCI research, yet arts practice in this context has been little explored. HCI research that aligns with socially engaged arts practices encourages debate around societal challenges; for example ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
3616 pages
ISBN:9798400705830
DOI:10.1145/3643834
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
DIS '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 188Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)188
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in