Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Experiences from Running a Participatory Media Platform for Women and Led by Women in Rural North India

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Patriarchal practices and other socio-cultural norms in rural North India often prevent women from participating in digital platforms. In this paper we present a voice-based participatory community media platform that runs over simple voice-based phone calls. The platform is meant for women users and is led by women and has been used by 12,222 women users over the course of 20 months. We conduct a qualitative study and present several innovations, such as creating a safe space for women, which have contributed to more participation of women on the platform. We present a framework which can serve as a guidance for researchers and practitioners who want to set up digital platforms for women users.

    References

    [1]
    [n.d.]. Forecast of the number of internet users in the World from 2010 to 2025. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/ 1146844/internet-users-in-the-world, note=Accessed: 15th September, 2022.
    [2]
    [n.d.]. India's gendered digital divide: How the absence of digital access is leaving women behind. https://www. orfonline.org/expert-speak/indias-gendered-digital-divide/. Accessed: 15th September, 2022.
    [3]
    [n.d.]. WomenConnect Challenge (WCC) Round 1. https://www.womenconnectchallenge.org/rounds/round-one/. Accessed: 2nd April, 2024.
    [4]
    Bonface Abima, Benard Engotoit, G Mayoka Kituyi, Robert Kyeyune, and Michael Koyola. 2021. Relevant local content, social influence, digital literacy, and attitude toward the use of digital technologies by women in Uganda. Gender, Technology and Development 25, 1 (2021), 87--111.
    [5]
    Richard Anderson, Chad Robertson, Esha Nabi, Urvashi Sahni, and Tanuja Setia. 2012. Facilitated Video Instruction in Low Resource Schools. In Proceedings of the Fifth Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (ICTD '12). Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, 2--12. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160675
    [6]
    Payal Arora. 2012. The leisure divide: Can the 'Third World' come out to play? Information Development 28, 2 (2012), 93--101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666911433607
    [7]
    Payal Arora. 2019. The next billion users. Harvard University Press.
    [8]
    Samarth Bansal. 2017. Indian states and women: where are they empowered, where are they not. https://www. hindustantimes.com/interactives/women-empowerment-index/. Accessed: 10th July, 2021.
    [9]
    Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.
    [10]
    Amna Batool, Samia Razaq, Maham Javaid, Beenish Fatima, and Kentaro Toyama. 2017. Maternal complications: Nuances in mobile interventions for maternal health in urban Pakistan. In Proceedings of the Ninth Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--12.
    [11]
    Laura Bierema. 2003. The role of gender consciousness in challenging patriarchy. Int'l Journal of Lifelong Education 22, 1 (2003), 3--12.
    [12]
    Chiara Boldrini, Kyunghan Lee, Melek Önen, Jörg Ott, and Elena Pagani. 2014. Opportunistic networks. Comput. Commun. 48, 14 (2014), 1--4.
    [13]
    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
    [14]
    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328--352.
    [15]
    Sloane Burke WinkelmAn, Jody Oomen-Early, Ashley D Walker, Lawrence Chu, and Alice Yick-Flanagan. 2015. Exploring cyber harassment among women who use social media. Universal journal of public health 3, 5 (2015), 194.
    [16]
    Nico Carpentier. 2007. Theoretical frameworks for participatory media. Media technologies and democracy in an enlarged Europe 105 (2007).
    [17]
    Dipanjan Chakraborty, Mohd Sultan Ahmad, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2017. Findings from a Civil Society Mediated and Technology Assisted Grievance Redressal Model in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Ninth Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Lahore, Pakistan) (ICTD '17). ACM, NY, USA.
    [18]
    Dipanjan Chakraborty, Akshay Gupta, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2019. Experiences from a Mobile-based Behaviour Change Campaign on Maternal and Child Nutrition in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ahmedabad, India) (ICTD '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287110
    [19]
    Dipanjan Chakraborty and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2013. A participatory video and audio platform for community interaction using DVDs and IVR systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. 1--2.
    [20]
    Rosemary Clark-Parsons. 2018. Building a digital Girl Army: The cultivation of feminist safe spaces online. New Media & Society 20, 6 (2018), 2125--2144.
    [21]
    A Dearden and D Kleine. 2018. Minimum ethical standards in ICTD/ICT4D research: A co-produced document. Published Standards. University of Sheffield (2018).
    [22]
    Mrunal Sanjay Dhaygude, Naitik D Lapsiya, and Dipanjan Chakraborty. 2022. There is No App for That: Manifestations of the Digital Divides During COVID-19 School Closures in India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--26.
    [23]
    Jean Dreze, Amartya Sen, et al. 1999. India: Economic development and social opportunity. OUP Catalogue (1999).
    [24]
    Nicola Döring and M. Rohangis Mohseni. 2019. Male dominance and sexism on YouTube: results of three content analyses. Feminist Media Studies 19, 4 (2019), 512--524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1467945 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1467945
    [25]
    Shimin Guo, Mohammad Hossein Falaki, Earl A Oliver, S Ur Rahman, Aaditeshwar Seth, Matei A Zaharia, and Srinivasan Keshav. 2007. Very low-cost internet access using KioskNet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37, 5 (2007), 95--100.
    [26]
    Martin Hilbert. 2011. Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. In Women's Studies Int'l Forum, Vol. 34. Elsevier, 479--489.
    [27]
    Samia Ibtasam, Lubna Razaq, Maryam Ayub, Jennifer R. Webster, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Richard Anderson. 2019. "My Cousin Bought the Phone for Me. I Never Go to Mobile Shops.": The Role of Family in Women's Technological Inclusion in Islamic Culture. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 46 (nov 2019), 33 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3359148
    [28]
    Naveena Karusala, Apoorva Bhalla, and Neha Kumar. 2019. Privacy, patriarchy, and participation on social media. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 511--526.
    [29]
    Aman Khullar, M Santosh, Praveen Kumar, Shoaib Rahman, Rajeshwari Tripathi, Deepak Kumar, Sangeeta Saini, Rachit Pandey, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2021. Early Results from Automating Voice-based Question-Answering Services Among Low-income Populations in India. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 79--87.
    [30]
    Zahir Koradia, Piyush Aggarwal, Aaditeshwar Seth, and Gaurav Luthra. 2013. Gurgaon idol: A singing competition over community radio and IVRS. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. 1--10.
    [31]
    Neha Kumar, Naveena Karusala, Azra Ismail, and Anupriya Tuli. 2020. Taking the long, holistic, and intersectional view to women's wellbeing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 4 (2020), 1--32.
    [32]
    Ruth Lewis, Elizabeth Sharp, Jenni Remnant, and Rhiannon Redpath. 2015. ?Safe Spaces': Experiences of Feminist Women-Only Space. Sociological Research Online 20, 4 (2015), 105--118. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3781 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3781
    [33]
    Judith Mariscal, Gloria Mayne, Urvashi Aneja, and Alina Sorgner. 2019. Bridging the Gender Digital Gap. Economics 13, 1 (2019), 20190009. https://doi.org/
    [34]
    Gul Aldikacti Marshall and L Allen Furr. 2010. Factors that affect women's attitudes toward domestic violence in Turkey. Violence and victims 25, 2 (2010), 265--277.
    [35]
    Jessica Megarry. 2018. Under the watchful eyes of men: theorising the implications of male surveillance practices for feminist activism on social media. Feminist Media Studies 18, 6 (2018), 1070--1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777. 2017.1387584
    [36]
    Aparna Moitra, Vishnupriya Das, Gram Vaani, Archna Kumar, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2016. Design Lessons from Creating a Mobile-based Community Media Platform in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (ICTD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909670
    [37]
    Aparna Moitra, Archna Kumar, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2018. An analysis of community mobilization strategies of a voice-based community media platform in rural India. Information Technologies & International Development 14 (2018), 18.
    [38]
    Preeti Mudliar. 2018. Public WiFi is for Men and Mobile Internet is for Women: Interrogating Politics of Space and Gender around WiFi Hotspots. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 126 (nov 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274395
    [39]
    Mustafa Naseem, Fouzia Younas, and Maryam Mustafa. 2020. Designing Digital Safe Spaces for Peer Support and Connectivity in Patriarchal Contexts. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 146 (oct 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415217
    [40]
    Martha C Nussbaum. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Vol. 3. Cambridge university press.
    [41]
    Gaurav Paruthi and William Thies. 2011. Utilizing DVD Players as Low-Cost Offline Internet Browsers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, 955--958. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979083
    [42]
    Neil Patel, Sheetal Agarwal, Nitendra Rajput, Amit Nanavati, Paresh Dave, and Tapan S Parikh. 2009. A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 51--54.
    [43]
    Catherine Phipps. 2022. ?You belong in the kitchen": social media, virtual manhood acts, and women strength sport athletes' experiences of gender-based violence online. Feminist Media Studies (2022), 1--17.
    [44]
    Ellie Rennie. 2006. Community media: A global introduction. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [45]
    Orlanda Ruthven. 2021. ?Blind laws' and the bureaucracy of rights migrant industrial workers in post-lockdown India. Journal of Agrarian Change 21, 3 (2021), 651--667.
    [46]
    Nithya Sambasivan, Amna Batool, Nova Ahmed, Tara Matthews, Kurt Thomas, Laura Sanely Gaytán-Lugo, David Nemer, Elie Bursztein, Elizabeth Churchill, and Sunny Consolvo. 2019. "They Don't Leave Us Alone Anywhere We Go": Gender and Digital Abuse in South Asia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300232
    [47]
    Aaditeshwar Seth, Akshay Gupta, Aparna Moitra, Deepak Kumar, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Lamuel Enoch, Orlanda Ruthven, Paramita Panjal, Rafi Ahmad Siddiqi, Rohit Singh, et al. 2020. Reflections from practical experiences of managing participatory media platforms for development. In Proceedings of the 2020 Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--15.
    [48]
    Spencer Sevilla, Matthew Johnson, Pat Kosakanchit, Jenny Liang, and Kurtis Heimerl. 2019. Experiences: Design, Implementation, and Deployment of CoLTE, a Community LTE Solution. In The 25th Annual Int'l Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Los Cabos, Mexico) (MobiCom '19). Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, Article 45, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300061.3345446
    [49]
    Araba Sey and Nancy Hafkin. 2019. Taking stock: Data and evidence on gender equality in digital access, skills and leadership. United Nations University, Tokyo (2019).
    [50]
    Sharmistha Sinha. 2018. Gender digital divide in India: Impacting women's participation in the labour market. In Reflecting on India's development. Springer, 293--310.
    [51]
    Kathleen Stansberry, Janna Anderson, and Lee Rainie. 2019. Leading concerns about the future of digital life. https: //www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/10/28/5-leading-concerns-about-the-future-of-digital-life/. Accessed: 8th July, 2021.
    [52]
    Sharifa Sultana, François Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. Design within a patriarchal society: Opportunities and challenges in designing for rural women in bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
    [53]
    AA Thierer. [n.d.]. Digital Divide" or a Deluge of Opportunity. Washington, DC: Heritage ([n. d.]).
    [54]
    Jayan Jose Thomas and Govindan Parayil. 2008. Bridging the social and digital divides in Andhra Pradesh and Kerala: A capabilities approach. Development and Change 39, 3 (2008), 409--435.
    [55]
    Kentaro Toyama. 2015. Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. PublicAffairs.
    [56]
    Alexandra Tyers-Chowdhury and Gerda Binder. [n.d.]. What we know about the gender digital divide for girls: A literature review. https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/8311/file/What%20we%20know%20about%20the%20gender% 20digital%20divide%20for%20girls:%20A%20literature%20review.pdf, note=Accessed: 15th September, 2022.
    [57]
    USAID. 2014. USAID SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH POLICY. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PBAAD895.pdf. Accessed: 16th January, 2023.
    [58]
    USAID. 2015. ADS Chapter 109 Ethics and Standards of Conduct. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2022- 12/109.pdf. Accessed: 16th January, 2023.
    [59]
    Aditya Vashistha, Abhinav Garg, Richard Anderson, and Agha Ali Raza. 2019. Threats, abuses, flirting, and blackmail: Gender inequity in social media voice forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
    [60]
    Jessica Vitak, Kalyani Chadha, Linda Steiner, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Identifying women's experiences with and strategies for mitigating negative effects of online harassment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1231--1245.
    [61]
    Marisol Wong-Villacres, Carl DiSalvo, Neha Kumar, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2020. Culture in Action: Unpacking Capacities to Inform Assets-Based Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
    [62]
    Hallie Workman and Catherine A Coleman. 2014. ?The Front Page of the Internet": Safe Spaces and Hyperpersonal Communication among Females in an Online Community. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal 29, 2 (2014).
    [63]
    Fouzia Younas, Mustafa Naseem, and Maryam Mustafa. 2020. Patriarchy and social media: Women only facebook groups as safe spaces for support seeking in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 2020 Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--11.

    Index Terms

    1. Experiences from Running a Participatory Media Platform for Women and Led by Women in Rural North India

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2024
      6294 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3661497
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 April 2024
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. digital divide
      2. ivr
      3. participatory media
      4. platform for women

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 27
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media