Investigating User-perceived Impacts of Contextual Factors on Opportune Moments
Authors: 
Yu-Jen Lee, Meng-Hsin Wu, Chung-Chiao Chang, Xi-Jing Chang, Yung-Ju ChangAuthors Info & Claims
Yu-Jen Lee, Meng-Hsin Wu, Chung-Chiao Chang, Xi-Jing Chang, Yung-Ju ChangAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 269, Pages 1 - 28
Abstract
In this exploratory experience sampling method (ESM) research, we examined the perceptions of 74 smartphone users regarding the opportuneness of moments for proceeding through a four-stage notification-response process: the phone generating an alert (Alert), the user roughly glancing at the notification (Glance), engaging with it (Engage), and acting on it (Act). We investigated how the moments perceived as opportune for each of the four stages related to users' self-reported values of 20 contextual factors, and how these factors influenced users' perceived opportuneness of the moments for each stage. Our results reveal that Alert and Glance stages were perceived as more distinct, with Alert being influenced by social-environmental related factors and Glance characterized by a lower threshold for what constitutes an opportune moment. The final two stages - Engage and Act - were the most similar to each other. The findings also indicated how the influence of contextual factors on perceived opportuneness of the moments varied across factors, notification types, stages, and how such variation was manifested in the likelihood, valence, and magnitude of their overall influence.
Supplemental Material
ZIP File
- Download
- 869.03 KB
References
[1]
Piotr D. Adamczyk and Brian P. Bailey. 2004. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '04. ACM Press, Vienna, Austria, 271--278. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985727
[2]
Richard A Armstrong. 2014. When to use the B onferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 34, 5 (2014), 502--508.
[3]
Daniel Avrahami and Scott E. Hudson. 2006. Communication characteristics of instant messaging: effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06. ACM Press, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 505. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180954
[4]
Daniel Avrahami and Scott E. Hudson. 2006. Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 731--740. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124881
[5]
Brian Bailey and Joseph Konstan. 2006. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (July 2006), 685--708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009
[6]
B.P. Bailey, J.A. Konstan, and J.V. Carlis. 2000. Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface. In Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. ?cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions? (cat. no.0, Vol. 2. 757--762 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2000.885940 ISSN: 1062--922X.
[7]
Nikola Banovic, Christina Brant, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind Dey. 2014. ProactiveTasks: the short of mobile device use sessions. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (MobileHCI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 243--252. https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628380
[8]
Jiang Bian, A. Dong, Xiaofeng He, S. Reddy, and Yi Chang. 2013. User Action Interpretation for Online Content Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2012.130
[9]
Seyma Kucukozer Cavdar, Tugba Taskaya-Temizel, Mirco Musolesi, and Peter Tino. 2020. A Multi-perspective Analysis of Social Context and Personal Factors in Office Settings for the Design of an Effective Mobile Notification System. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 1 (March 2020), 15:1--15:38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381000
[10]
Narae Cha, Auk Kim, Cheul Young Park, Soowon Kang, Mingyu Park, Jae-Gil Lee, Sangsu Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2020. Hello There! Is Now a Good Time to Talk? Opportune Moments for Proactive Interactions with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (Sept. 2020), 74:1--74:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411810
[11]
Xi-Jing Chang, Fang-Hsin Hsu, En-Chi Liang, Zih-Yun Chiou, Ho-Hsuan Chuang, Fang-Ching Tseng, Yu-Hsin Lin, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2023. Not Merely Deemed as Distraction: Investigating Smartphone Users? Motivations for Notification-Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--17.
[12]
Yung-Ju Chang, Yi-Ju Chung, and Yi-Hao Shih. 2019. I Think It's Her: Investigating Smartphone Users? Speculation about Phone Notifications and Its Influence on Attendance. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Taipei Taiwan, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3340125
[13]
Yung-Ju Chang, Gaurav Paruthi, Hsin-Ying Wu, Hsin-Yu Lin, and Mark W Newman. 2017. An investigation of using mobile and situated crowdsourcing to collect annotated travel activity data in real-word settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 102 (2017), 81--102.
[14]
Yung-Ju Chang and John C. Tang. 2015. Investigating Mobile Users? Ringer Mode Usage and Attentiveness and Responsiveness to Communication. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Copenhagen Denmark, 6--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785852
[15]
Kuan-Wen Chen, Yung-Ju Chang, and Liwei Chan. 2022. Predicting Opportune Moments to Deliver Notifications in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI'22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 186, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517529
[16]
Yu-Chun Chen, Yu-Jen Lee, Kuei-Chun Kao, Jie Tsai, En-Chi Liang, Wei-Chen Chiu, Faye Shih, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2023. Are you killing time? predicting smartphone users? time-killing moments via fusion of smartphone sensor data and screenshots. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--19.
[17]
Justin Cheng, Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2015. Break It Down: A Comparison of Macro- and Microtasks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4061--4064. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702146
[18]
Chia-En Chiang, Yu-Chun Chen, Fang-Yu Lin, Felicia Feng, Hao-An Wu, Hao-Ping Lee, Chang-Hsuan Yang, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2021. 'I Got Some Free Time': Investigating Task-execution and Task-effort Metrics in Mobile Crowdsourcing Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445477
[19]
Yu-Ling Chou, Yu-Ling Chien, Yu-Hsin Lin, Kung-Pai Lin, Faye Shih, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2022. Because I'm Restricted, 2--4 PM Unable to See Messages: Exploring Users? Perceptions and Likely Practices around Exposing Attention Management Use on IM Online Status. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.
[20]
Yu-Ling Chou, Yi-Hsiu Lin, Tzu-Yi Lin, Hsin Ying You, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2022. Why Did You/I Read but Not Reply? IM Users? Unresponded-to Read-receipt Practices and Explanations of Them. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[21]
Ed Diener and Louis Tay. 2014. Review of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Social Indicators Research 116, 1 (March 2014), 255--267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0279-x
[22]
Tilman Dingler and Martin Pielot. 2015. I'll be there for you: Quantifying Attentiveness towards Mobile Messaging. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1--5.
[23]
Tilman Dingler and Martin Pielot. 2015. I'll be there for you: Quantifying Attentiveness towards Mobile Messaging. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785840
[24]
Tilman Dingler, Benjamin Tag, Sabrina Lehrer, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2018. Reading Scheduler: Proactive Recommendations to Help Users Cope with Their Daily Reading Volume. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239--244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3282917
[25]
Samantha Dockray, Nina Grant, Arthur A. Stone, Daniel Kahneman, Jane Wardle, and Andrew Steptoe. 2010. A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method. Social Indicators Research 99, 2 (Nov. 2010), 269--283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010--9578--7
[26]
Fiona Draxler, Julia Maria Brenner, Manuela Eska, Albrecht Schmidt, and Lewis L Chuang. 2022. Agenda- and Activity-Based Triggers for Microlearning. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Helsinki, Finland) (IUI'22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 620--632. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511133
[27]
Anja Exler, Marcel Braith, Kristina Mincheva, Andrea Schankin, and Michael Beigl. 2018. Smartphone-Based Estimation of a User Being in Company or Alone Based on Place, Time, and Activity. In Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services, Kazuya Murao, Ren Ohmura, Sozo Inoue, and Yusuke Gotoh (Eds.). Vol. 240. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 74--89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--90740--6_5 Series Title: Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering.
[28]
Anja Exler, Zeynep Günes, and Michael Beigl. 2019. Preferred notification modalities depending on the location and the location-based activity. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, London United Kingdom, 1064--1069. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3344842
[29]
Tseng Fang-Ching, Chiou Zih-Yun, Chuang Ho-Hsuan, Su Li-Ting, Lin Yong-Han, Lin Yu-Rou, Lee Yi-Chi, Wang Peng-Jui, Chen Uei-Dar, and Chang Yung-Ju. 2023. Multiple Device Users? Actual and Ideal Cross-Device Usage for Multi-Stage Notifcation-Interactions: An ESM Study Addressing the Usage Gap and Impacts of Device Context. (2023).
[30]
Joel E. Fischer, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2011. Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI '11. ACM Press, Stockholm, Sweden, 181. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037402
[31]
Joel E. Fischer, Nick Yee, Victoria Bellotti, Nathan Good, Steve Benford, and Chris Greenhalgh. 2010. Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '10. ACM Press, Lisbon, Portugal, 103. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851620
[32]
Claudio Forlivesi, Utku Günay Acer, Marc van den Broeck, and Fahim Kawsar. 2018. Mindful interruptions: a lightweight system for managing interruptibility on wearables. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Wearable Systems and Applications (WearSys '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3211960.3211974
[33]
Bo-Jhang Ho, Bharathan Balaji, Mehmet Koseoglu, Sandeep Sandha, Siyou Pei, and Mani Srivastava. 2020. Quick Question: Interrupting Users for Microtasks with Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2007.09515 [cs] (July 2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09515 arXiv: 2007.09515.
[34]
Joyce Ho and Stephen S. Intille. 2005. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '05. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 909. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055100
[35]
Ching-Yu Hsieh, Yi-Shyuan Chiang, Hung-Yu Chiu, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2020. Bridging the Virtual and Real Worlds: A Preliminary Study of Messaging Notifications in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376228
[36]
Scott Hudson, James Fogarty, Christopher Atkeson, Daniel Avrahami, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Johnny Lee, and Jie Yang. 2003. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 257--264. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642657
[37]
Shamsi Iqbal and Brian Bailey. 2006. Leveraging Characteristics of Task Structure to Predict the Cost of Interruption. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2 (April 2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124882
[38]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2008. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08. ACM Press, Florence, Italy, 93. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357070
[39]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2011. Oasis: A framework for linking notification delivery to the perceptual structure of goal-directed tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17, 4 (Dec. 2011), 15:1--15:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1879831.1879833
[40]
E. Isaacs, N. Yee, D. Schiano, Nathaniel Good, Nicolas Ducheneaut, and V. Bellotti. 2010. - 1- Mobile Microwaiting Moments : The Role of Context in Receptivity to Content While on the Go. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1-Mobile-Microwaiting-Moments-%3A-The-Role-of-Context-Isaacs-Yee/cafaaa823351104bddb3f95071241866b3993dbe
[41]
Daniel Kahneman, Alan B. Krueger, David A. Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Arthur A. Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science (New York, N.Y.) 306, 5702 (Dec. 2004), 1776--1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572
[42]
Elizabeth A. Kensinger. 2009. Remembering the Details: Effects of Emotion. Emotion review 1, 2 (2009), 99--113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908100432
[43]
N. Kern, S. Antifakos, B. Schiele, and A. Schwaninger. 2004. A Model for Human Interruptability: Experimental Evaluation and Automatic Estimation from Wearable Sensors. In Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, Arlington, VA, USA, 158--165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2004.3
[44]
Muhammad Faizan Khan, Lu Lu, Muhammad Toseef, Ahmed Musyafa, and Ahmad Amin. 2022. NotifyMiner: rule based user behavioral machine learning approach for context wise personalized notification services. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2022), 1--17.
[45]
Jinhyuk Kim, Hiroe Kikuchi, and Yoshiharu Yamamoto. 2012. Systematic comparison between ecological momentary assessment and day reconstruction method for fatigue and mood states in healthy adults. British journal of health psychology 18 (Sept. 2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12000
[46]
Andreas Komninos, Elton Frengkou, and John Garofalakis. 2018. Predicting user responsiveness to smartphone notifications for edge computing. In European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 3--19.
[47]
Kostadin Kushlev, Bruno Cardoso, and Martin Pielot. 2017. Too tense for candy crush: affect influences user engagement with proactively suggested content. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Vienna Austria, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098569
[48]
Kostadin Kushlev, Jason Proulx, and Elizabeth W. Dunn. 2016. "Silence Your Phones": Smartphone Notifications Increase Inattention and Hyperactivity Symptoms. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 1011--1020. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858359
[49]
Neal Lathia, Veljko Pejovic, Kiran K. Rachuri, Cecilia Mascolo, Mirco Musolesi, and Peter J. Rentfrow. 2013. Smartphones for Large-Scale Behavior Change Interventions. IEEE Pervasive Computing 12, 3 (July 2013), 66--73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2013.56 Conference Name: IEEE Pervasive Computing.
[50]
Hao-Ping Lee, Kuan-Yin Chen, Chih-Heng Lin, Chia-Yu Chen, Yu-Lin Chung, Yung-Ju Chang, and Chien-Ru Sun. 2019. Does Who Matter? Studying the Impact of Relationship Characteristics on Receptivity to Mobile IM Messages. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300756
[51]
Hao-Ping Lee, Tilman Dingler, Chih-Heng Lin, Kuan-Yin Chen, Yu-Lin Chung, Chia-Yu Chen, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2019. Predicting smartphone users? general responsiveness to IM contacts based on IM behavior. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1--6.
[52]
Hao-Ping Hank Lee, Yi-Shyuan Chiang, Yu-Ling Chou, Kung-Pai Lin, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2023. What makes IM users (un) responsive: An empirical investigation for understanding IM responsiveness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 172 (2023), 102983.
[53]
Aniek Lentferink, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Anouk Burgler, Randy Klaassen, Youri Derks, Hilbrand Oldenhuis, Hugo Velthuijsen, and Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen. 2021. On the receptivity of employees to just-in-time self-tracking and eCoaching for stress management: a mixed-methods approach. Behaviour & Information Technology 0, 0 (Feb. 2021), 1--27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1876764 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1876764.
[54]
Tzu-Chieh Lin, Yu-Shao Su, Emily Helen Yang, Yun Han Chen, Hao-Ping Lee, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2021. 'Put it on the Top, I'll Read it Later': Investigating Users? Desired Display Order for Smartphone Notifications. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Number 520. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445384
[55]
Tzu-Chieh Lin, Yu-Shao Su, Emily Helen Yang, Yun Han Chen, Hao-Ping Lee, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2021. 'Put it on the Top, I'll Read it Later': Investigating Users? Desired Display Order for Smartphone Notifications. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445384
[56]
Richard E. Lucas, Carol Wallsworth, Ivana Anusic, and M. Brent Donnellan. 2021. A direct comparison of the day reconstruction method (DRM) and the experience sampling method (ESM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120, 3 (March 2021), 816--835. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000289
[57]
Gloria Mark, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, and Paul Johns. 2015. Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 903--916. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675221
[58]
D. McFarlane. 1999. Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. undefined (1999). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Coordinating-the-Interruption-of-People-in-McFarlane/a4b595558f76fc5449d762a49e6a651af121b9d1
[59]
Daniel C McFarlane. 1999. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In Interact, Vol. 99. 295.
[60]
Abhinav Mehrotra, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. PrefMiner: mining user's preferences for intelligent mobile notification management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1223--1234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971747
[61]
Abhinav Mehrotra, Mirco Musolesi, Robert Hendley, and Veljko Pejovic. 2015. Designing content-driven intelligent notification mechanisms for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '15. ACM Press, Osaka, Japan, 813--824. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807544
[62]
Abhinav Mehrotra, Sandrine R. Müller, Gabriella M. Harari, Samuel D. Gosling, Cecilia Mascolo, Mirco Musolesi, and Peter J. Rentfrow. 2017. Understanding the Role of Places and Activities on Mobile Phone Interaction and Usage Patterns. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131901
[63]
Abhinav Mehrotra, Veljko Pejovic, Jo Vermeulen, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. My Phone and Me: Understanding People's Receptivity to Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 1021--1032. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858566
[64]
Abhinav Mehrotra, Fani Tsapeli, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2017. MyTraces: Investigating Correlation and Causation between Users? Emotional States and Mobile Phone Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 83:1--83:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130948
[65]
Tamir Mendel, Roei Schuster, Eran Tromer, and Eran Toch. 2022. Toward Proactive Support for Older Adults: Predicting the Right Moment for Providing Mobile Safety Help. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 1, Article 25 (mar 2022), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517249
[66]
Tadashi Okoshi, Julian Ramos, Hiroki Nozaki, Jin Nakazawa, Anind K. Dey, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2015. Attelia: Reducing user's cognitive load due to interruptive notifications on smart phones. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, St. Louis, MO, USA, 96--104. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2015.7146515
[67]
Tadashi Okoshi, Kota Tsubouchi, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2018. Real-world large-scale study on adaptive notification scheduling on smartphones. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 50 (Oct. 2018), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.07.005
[68]
Tadashi Okoshi, Kota Tsubouchi, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2019. Real-World Product Deployment of Adaptive Push Notification Scheduling on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2792--2800. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330732
[69]
Chunjong Park, Junsung Lim, Juho Kim, Sung-Ju Lee, and Dongman Lee. 2017. Don't Bother Me. I'm Socializing! A Breakpoint-Based Smartphone Notification System. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 541--554. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998189
[70]
Sameer Patil, Roberto Hoyle, Roman Schlegel, Apu Kapadia, and Adam J. Lee. 2015. Interrupt Now or Inform Later? Comparing Immediate and Delayed Privacy Feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1415--1418. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702165
[71]
Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 897--908. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632062
[72]
Veljko Pejovic, Mirco Musolesi, and Abhinav Mehrotra. 2015. Investigating The Role of Task Engagement in Mobile Interruptibility. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, Copenhagen Denmark, 1100--1105. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794336
[73]
Thomas V Perneger. 1998. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Bmj 316, 7139 (1998), 1236--1238.
[74]
Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond Interruptibility: Predicting Opportune Moments to Engage Mobile Phone Users. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130956
[75]
Martin Pielot, Karen Church, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2014. An in-situ study of mobile phone notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI '14. ACM Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 233--242. https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628364
[76]
Martin Pielot, Rodrigo De Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014. Didn't you see my message? predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3319--3328.
[77]
Martin Pielot, Tilman Dingler, Jose San Pedro, and Nuria Oliver. 2015. When attention is not scarce - detecting boredom from mobile phone usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '15. ACM Press, Osaka, Japan, 825--836. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804252
[78]
Martin Pielot, Amalia Vradi, and Souneil Park. 2018. Dismissed!: a detailed exploration of how mobile phone users handle push notifications. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229445
[79]
Benjamin Poppinga, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Sensor-Based Identification of Opportune Moments for Triggering Notifications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 1 (2014), 22--29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.15
[80]
Stephanie Rosenthal, Anind K. Dey, and Manuela Veloso. 2011. Using Decision-Theoretic Experience Sampling to Build Personalized Mobile Phone Interruption Models. In Pervasive Computing, Kent Lyons, Jeffrey Hightower, and Elaine M. Huang (Eds.). Vol. 6696. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 170--187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--21726--5_11 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[81]
Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 3055--3064. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557189
[82]
Akane Sano, Paul Johns, and Mary Czerwinski. 2017. Designing opportune stress intervention delivery timing using multi-modal data. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). 346--353. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2017.8273623 ISSN: 2156--8111.
[83]
Hillol Sarker, Moushumi Sharmin, Amin Ahsan Ali, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Rummana Bari, Syed Monowar Hossain, and Santosh Kumar. 2014. Assessing the availability of users to engage in just-in-time intervention in the natural environment. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, Seattle Washington, 909--920. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2636082
[84]
Holger Schielzeth, Niels J Dingemanse, Shinichi Nakagawa, David F Westneat, Hassen Allegue, Céline Teplitsky, Denis Réale, Ned A Dochtermann, László Zsolt Garamszegi, and Yimen G Araya-Ajoy. 2020. Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in ecology and evolution 11, 9 (2020), 1141--1152.
[85]
Florian Schulze and Georg Groh. 2014. Studying how character of conversation affects personal receptivity to mobile notifications. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 1729--1734. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581320
[86]
Florian Schulze and Georg Groh. 2016. Conversational context helps improve mobile notification management. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Florence Italy, 518--528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935347
[87]
Alireza Sahami Shirazi and Niels Henze. 2015. Assessment of Notifications on Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, Copenhagen Denmark, 1111--1116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794338
[88]
G. H. (Henri) ter Hofte. 2007. Xensible interruptions from your mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services - MobileHCI '07. ACM Press, Singapore, 178--181. https://doi.org/10.1145/1377999.1378003
[89]
Eran Toch, Hadas Chassidim, and Tali Hatuka. 2020. Can you Turn it Off?: The Spatial and Social Context of Mobile Disturbance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (Oct. 2020), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415162
[90]
J. Gregory Trafton, Erik M Altmann, Derek P Brock, and Farilee E Mintz. 2003. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 5 (May 2003), 583--603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071--5819(03)00023--5
[91]
Liam D. Turner, Stuart M. Allen, and Roger M. Whitaker. 2015. Push or Delay? Decomposing Smartphone Notification Response Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding - Volume 9277. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 69--83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--24195--1_6
[92]
Liam D. Turner, Stuart M. Allen, and Roger M. Whitaker. 2017. Reachable but not receptive: Enhancing smartphone interruptibility prediction by modelling the extent of user engagement with notifications. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 40 (Sept. 2017), 480--494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.01.011
[93]
Niels Van Berkel, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. The experience sampling method on mobile devices. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50, 6 (2017), 1--40.
[94]
Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Peter Koval, Simo Hosio, Tilman Dingler, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Context-informed scheduling and analysis: improving accuracy of mobile self-reports. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[95]
Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Lauri Lovén, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Effect of experience sampling schedules on response rate and recall accuracy of objective self-reports. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 125 (2019), 118--128.
[96]
Niels Van Berkel, Chu Luo, Theodoros Anagnostopoulos, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. A systematic assessment of smartphone usage gaps. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 4711--4721.
[97]
Aku Visuri, Niels van Berkel, Tadashi Okoshi, Jorge Goncalves, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Understanding smartphone notifications? user interactions and content importance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 128 (Aug. 2019), 72--85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.001
[98]
Peter Vorderer, Dorothée Hefner, Leonard Reinecke, and Christoph Klimmt (Eds.). 2018. Permanently online, permanently connected: living and communicating in a POPC world. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York; London.
[99]
Dominik Weber, Alexandra Voit, Gisela Kollotzek, and Niels Henze. 2019. Annotif: A System for Annotating Mobile Notifcations in User Studies. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365611
[100]
Tilo Westermann, Ina Wechsung, and Sebastian Möller. 2016. Smartphone Notifications in Context: a Case Study on Receptivity by the Example of an Advertising Service. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2355--2361. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892383
[101]
Ting-Wei Wu, Yu-Ling Chien, Hao-Ping Lee, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2021. IM Receptivity and Presentation-type Preferences among Users of a Mobile App with Automated Receptivity-status Adjustment. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445209
[102]
Chang XiJing, Hsu Fang-Hsin, Liang En-Chi, Chiou Zih-Yun, Chuang Ho-Hsuan, Tseng Fang-Ching, Lin Yu-Hsin, and Chang Yung-Ju. 2023. Not Merely Deemed as Distraction: Investigating Smartphone Users? Motivations for Notification-Interaction. (2023).
[103]
Qian Yang, Alex Scuito, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018. Investigating How Experienced UX Designers Effectively Work with Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585--596. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196730
[104]
SungHyuk Yoon, Sang-su Lee, Jae-myung Lee, and KunPyo Lee. 2014. Understanding notification stress of smartphone messenger app. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 1735--1740. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581167
[105]
Fengpeng Yuan, Xianyi Gao, and Janne Lindqvist. 2017. How Busy Are You?: Predicting the Interruptibility Intensity of Mobile Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 5346--5360. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025946
Index Terms
- Investigating User-perceived Impacts of Contextual Factors on Opportune Moments
Recommendations
"I Want Lower Tone for Work-Related Notifications": Exploring the Effectiveness of User-Assigned Notification Alerts in Improving User Speculation of and Attendance to Mobile Notifications
MHCIResearch indicates that smartphone users often speculate about notifications upon sensing their arrival, aiding their decision to attend to them. This speculation, however, relies on the presence of sufficient clues to associate with the notification, ...
Not Merely Deemed as Distraction: Investigating Smartphone Users’ Motivations for Notification-Interaction
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsNotifications are commonly considered a distraction when they arrive during a task, and consequently, prior research has consistently sought effective ways of deferring their arrival until task transitions. However, many smartphone users still interact ...
Opportune Moments for the Multi-Stage Notification Responding Process: A Preliminary Investigation
UbiComp/ISWC '21 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable ComputersNotifications are advantageous to users, but they could cause interruptions when appearing at inopportune moments. Research has suggested that multiple stages are possibly involved in the notification responding process, including the phone generating ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
1136 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 September 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue MHCI
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 116Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)116
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in