Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Understanding Instant Social Control of Shared Devices in Public Spaces: A Field Trial

Published: 09 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Public spaces are created for the convenience of visitors, but frequently, their operation does not match individual visitors' needs. We propose instant social control as a new approach for controlling devices deployed in public spaces, envisioning the democratic and inclusive operation of the spaces. It is an approach to embrace individuals in the dynamic and unpredictable situations of public spaces, providing them with a powerful tool of immediate engagement and reflection. This research explores the use of instant social control, focusing on cases where discrepancies and conflicts arise among visitors' preferences for operating public devices. We conducted a field trial by deploying a technology probe to two real-world public spaces: a university auditorium, and a cafeteria. We collected usage logs and surveyed the users' experience with this new way of device control. We further investigated their experience through in-depth interviews with participants. Our field trial revealed a rich set of findings including voting strategies, exploratory device control patterns, users' attempts to communicate with other visitors, considerations of other visitors' discomfort, and acceptance and usefulness of instant social control of public devices.

References

[1]
Christopher Ackad, Andrew Clayphan, Martin Tomitsch, and Judy Kay. 2015. An in-the-wild study of learning mid-air gestures to browse hierarchical information at a large interactive public display. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1227--1238. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807532
[2]
Florian Alt, Thomas Kubitza, Dominik Bial, Firas Zaidan, Markus Ortel, Björn Zurmaar, Tim Lewen, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Digifieds: insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Beijing, China) (MUM '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165--174. https://doi.org/10.1145/2107596.2107618
[3]
Joanna Bergström, Jarrod Knibbe, Henning Pohl, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2022. Sense of Agency and User Experience: Is There a Link? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 4, Article 28 (mar 2022), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490493
[4]
Niclas Braun, Stefan Debener, Nadine Spychala, Edith Bongartz, Peter Sörös, Helge HO Müller, and Alexandra Philipsen. 2018. The senses of agency and ownership: a review. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535
[5]
Harry Brignull and Yvonne Rogers. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In Interact, Vol. 3. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 17--24. https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/conferences/INTERACT2003/INTERACT2003-p17.pdf
[6]
Kristi Bushman and Alexandros Labrinidis. 2022. Set it and forget it: utility-based scheduling for public displays. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 26 (2022), 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01423-1
[7]
David Byrne. 2022. A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & quantity 56, 3 (2022), 1391--1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
[8]
Dipankar Chaki and Athman Bouguettaya. 2021. Adaptive Priority-based Conflict Resolution of IoT Services. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) (2021-09) (ICWS '21). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, USA, 663--668. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS53863.2021.00091
[9]
Minji Cho, Sang-su Lee, and Kun-Pyo Lee. 2019. Once a Kind Friend is Now a Thing: Understanding How Conversational Agents at Home are Forgotten. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1557--1569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322332
[10]
Sarah Clinch, Nigel Davies, Thomas Kubitza, and Adrian Friday. 2014. Ownership and Trust in Cyber-Foraged Displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 168--173. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611010
[11]
Lawrence E. Cohen and Marcus Felson. 1979. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44, 4 (1979), 588--608. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094589
[12]
Paul Michael Cozens, Greg Saville, and David Hillier. 2005. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): a review and modern bibliography. Property management 23, 5 (2005), 328--356. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470510631483
[13]
Humphrey Curtis, Zihao You, William Deary, Miruna-Ioana Tudoreanu, and Timothy Neate. 2023. Envisioning the (In)Visibility of Discreet and Wearable AAC Devices. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 52, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580936
[14]
Nicole David, Albert Newen, and Kai Vogeley. 2008. The "sense of agency" and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition 17, 2 (2008), 523--534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004 Social Cognition, Emotion, and Self-Consciousness.
[15]
Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Sarah Clinch, Ivan Elhart, Adrian Friday, Thomas Kubitza, and Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2014. Personalisation and privacy in future pervasive display networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2357--2366. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557287
[16]
Geraldine Downey and Scott I Feldman. 1996. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology 70, 6 (1996), 1327--1343. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1327
[17]
Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (mar 2000), 59--83. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004
[18]
Patrick Tobias Fischer and Eva Hornecker. 2012. Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 307--316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207719
[19]
Patrick Tobias Fischer, Christian Zöllner, Thilo Hoffmann, Sebastian Piatza, and Eva Hornecker. 2012. Beyond information and utility: Transforming public spaces with media facades. IEEE computer graphics and applications 33, 2 (2012), 38--46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2012.126
[20]
Erving Goffman. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18, 3 (1955), 213--231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
[21]
Zhiming Gou, Bingchen Gou, Wenyi Liao, Yuxue Bao, and Yongqi Deng. 2023. Integrated lighting ergonomics: A review on the association between non-visual effects of light and ergonomics in the enclosed cabins. Building and Environment 243 (2023), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110616
[22]
Santosh K Gupta, Sam Atkinson, Ian O'Boyle, John Drogo, Koushik Kar, Sandipan Mishra, and John T Wen. 2016. BEES: Real-time occupant feedback and environmental learning framework for collaborative thermal management in multi-zone, multi-occupant buildings. Energy and buildings 125 (2016), 142--152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.084
[23]
Luke Hespanhol and Martin Tomitsch. 2015. Strategies for intuitive interaction in public urban spaces. Interacting with Computers 27, 3 (2015), 311--326. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu051
[24]
Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Ian McArthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2015. Vote as you go: blending interfaces for community engagement into the urban space. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Limerick, Ireland). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2768545.2768553
[25]
Elaine M Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays?. In Pervasive Computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 228--243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79576-6_14
[26]
Areg Karapetyan, Sid Chi-Kin Chau, Khaled Elbassioni, Majid Khonji, and Emad Dababseh. 2018. Smart lighting control using oblivious mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments (BuildSys '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 158--167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3276774.3276788
[27]
Jerold S Kayden et al. 2000. Privately owned public space: the New York City experience. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA. https://books.google.com/books?id=OpeNSAfYASoC
[28]
Wonjung Kim, Seungchul Lee, Youngjae Chang, Taegyeong Lee, Inseok Hwang, and Junehwa Song. 2021. Hivemind: social control-and-use of IoT towards democratization of public spaces. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (Virtual Event, Wisconsin) (MobiSys '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467--482. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458864.3466626
[29]
Hannu Kukka, Heidi Oja, Vassilis Kostakos, Jorge Gonçalves, and Timo Ojala. 2013. What makes you click: exploring visual signals to entice interaction on public displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1699--1708. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466225
[30]
Hannu Kukka, Rodolfo Patino, and Timo Ojala. 2009. UbiRockMachine: a multimodal music voting service for shared urban spaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (MUM '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1658550.1658559
[31]
LEED. 2024. Occupant Experience. LEED. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction/v5-public-comment-1-45?view=language
[32]
Joseph F. McCarthy and Theodore D. Anagnost. 1998. MusicFX: an arbiter of group preferences for computer supported collaborative workouts. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 363--372. https://doi.org/10.1145/289444.289511
[33]
Nemanja Memarovic, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2015. Understanding Display Blindness in Future Display Deployments. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Saarbruecken, Germany) (PerDis '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757719
[34]
Nemanja Memarovic, Marc Langheinrich, Florian Alt, Ivan Elhart, Simo Hosio, and Elisa Rubegni. 2012. Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In Proceedings of the Media Architecture Biennale Conference: Participation (Aarhus, Denmark) (MAB '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/2421076.2421086
[35]
Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27, 6 (2011), 562--579. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555299
[36]
Mateusz Mikusz, Peter Shaw, Nigel Davies, Petteri Nurmi, Sarah Clinch, Ludwig Trotter, Ivan Elhart, Marc Langheinrich, and Adrian Friday. 2021. A Longitudinal Study of Pervasive Display Personalisation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 1, Article 2 (jan 2021), 45 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3418352
[37]
Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In Pervasive Computing: 7th International Conference, Pervasive 2009, Nara, Japan, May 11-14, 2009. Proceedings 7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_1
[38]
Maximilian Müller, Nuno Otero, and Marcelo Milrad. 2016. Shared Interactive Music Experiences in Public Spaces: User Engagement and Motivations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada) (ISS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 287--296. https://doi.org/10.1145/2992154.2992183
[39]
NIOSH. 2024. Indoor Environmental Quality. NIOSH. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/indoorenv/resources.html
[40]
NYC. 2022. New York city's privately owned public spaces. NYC. https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/pops/pops.page
[41]
House of Commons of Canada. 2017. Unanimous Consent - The Process of Debate - House of Commons Procedure and Practice (3rd ed.). House of Commons of Canada. https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_12_5-e.html
[42]
Library of Congress. 2024. Glossary of Legislative Terms. Library of Congress. https://www.congress.gov/help/legislative-glossary#u
[43]
Kenton O'Hara, Maxine Glancy, and Simon Robertshaw. 2008. Understanding collective play in an urban screen game. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA) (CSCW '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67--76. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460576
[44]
Kenton O'Hara, Matthew Lipson, Marcel Jansen, Axel Unger, Huw Jeffries, and Peter Macer. 2004. Jukola: democratic music choice in a public space. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (Cambridge, MA, USA) (DIS '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 145--154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013136
[45]
Ray Oldenburg. 1999. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press, Boston, MA, USA. https://books.google.com/books?id=0aOjHGdSKLMC
[46]
OpenHAB. 2023. OpenHAB. OpenHAB. https://www.openhab.org/
[47]
Paul Pedersen. 1994. The five stages of culture shock: Critical incidents around the world. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, New York, NY, USA. https://books.google.com/books?id=EHvDEAAAQBAJ
[48]
Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch! interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1285--1294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255
[49]
Elisa Rubegni, Nemanja Memarovic, and Marc Langheinrich. 2011. Talking to strangers: Using large public displays to facilitate social interaction. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice: First International Conference, DUXU 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011, Proceedings, Part II 1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 195--204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21708-1_23
[50]
U.S. Senate. 2024. Glossary. U.S. Senate. https://www.senate.gov/about/research-tools/glossary.htm#U
[51]
Choonsung Shin, Anind K. Dey, and Woontack Woo. 2008. Mixed-initiative conflict resolution for context-aware applications. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea) (UbiComp '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262--271. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409671
[52]
Vipul Singhvi, Andreas Krause, Carlos Guestrin, James H. Garrett, and H. Scott Matthews. 2005. Intelligent light control using sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (SenSys '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 218--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/1098918.1098942
[53]
Henrik Sørensen and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2012. Distributed interaction: a multi-device, multi-user music experience. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Capri Island, Italy) (AVI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 336--339. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254621
[54]
Rafael Sotelo, Yolanda Blanco, Martin Lopez, Alberto Gil, and Jose Pazos. 2009. TV program recommendation for groups based on multidimensional TV Anytime classifications. In 2009 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics (2009-01) (ICCE '09). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, USA, 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2009.5012309
[55]
David Sprague, Fuqu Wu, and Melanie Tory. 2008. Music selection using the PartyVote democratic jukebox. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Napoli, Italy) (AVI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433--436. https://doi.org/10.1145/1385569.1385652
[56]
Fabius Steinberger, Marcus Foth, and Florian Alt. 2014. Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 44--49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611015
[57]
Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Santa Fe, NM, USA) (UIST '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029656
[58]
Julia Winzen, Frank Albers, and Claudia Marggraf-Micheel. 2014. The influence of coloured light in the aircraft cabin on passenger thermal comfort. Lighting Research & Technology 46, 4 (2014), 465--475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153513484028

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 8, Issue 3
August 2024
1782 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3695755
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2024
Published in IMWUT Volume 8, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Field trial
  2. Instant social control
  3. IoT
  4. Public space operation
  5. Technology probe

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 98
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)98
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)98
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media