Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

'Better than Google': Information Activism for LGBTQ+ Young Adults in a Rural Community

Published: 08 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

For young lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people, and those belonging to other marginalized sexual and gender identities (LGBTQ+), accessing information to develop one's identity and community is essential. Yet information and resource access is a particularly complex process for LGBTQ+ youth living in rural areas and small towns without dense, visible LGBTQ+ networks. While efforts to remove LGBTQ+ resources and demonize LGBTQ+ people intensify, this study asks a group of young LGBTQ+ adults living in and around a college town in the rural Midwestern United States to document their experiences with navigating information landscapes in low-resource settings. Despite the remarkable everyday creativity required to craft their information practices, participants' current efforts produce several vulnerabilities that make local queer information networks precarious and often inaccessible. We lay out several patterns in this data, including experiences of both connectedness and disconnectedness, the role of organizations in information sharing, and the existence of both active and passive information search. Building on prior research that found increasing demand for multi-modal access to relevant information that is digitally enabled, but deeply embedded in localized social geography and LGBTQ+ community, we use this data and complementary interviews to identify problem areas and potential interventions to strengthen rural LGBTQ+ young people's information access. In response to the informational needs and desires of LGBTQ+ youth in this community, we propose a series of imaginative designs. These speculative artifacts are embedded in local communities to strengthen grassroots webs of knowledge. We focus on contributing solutions that fall under three problem areas in participants' information ecosystem: increasing information stumbling, building expert capacity and support, and bridging the disconnected to the connected. We propose speculative conceptual designs that address core challenges in LGBTQ+ information networks, working in the tradition of ''information activism'' to create and maintain access to otherwise precarious and ephemeral resources and spark social change.

References

[1]
Laima Augustaitis, Leland A Merrill, Kristi E Gamarel, and Oliver L Haimson. 2021. Online Transgender Health Information Seeking: Facilitators, Barriers, and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21, Article 205). Association for Computing Machinery, 1--14.
[2]
Robert Beachy. 2014. Gay Berlin: Birthplace of a Modern Identity. Knopf.
[3]
Niall Bolger, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54 (2003), 579--616.
[4]
G Chauncey. 2008. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890--1940. Basic Books.
[5]
Adele E Clarke and Carrie Friese. 2007. Grounded theorizing using situational analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, Antony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz (Eds.). SAGE Publications Ltd, 362--397.
[6]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press.
[7]
Shelley L Craig and Lauren McInroy. 2014. You Can Form a Part of Yourself Online: The Influence of New Media on Identity Development and Coming Out for LGBTQ Youth. J. Gay Lesbian Ment. Health 18, 1 (Jan. 2014), 95--109.
[8]
Roderic N Crooks. 2013. The Rainbow Flag and the Green Carnation: Grindr in The Gay Village. FMRI Tech. Rep. (Nov. 2013).
[9]
Samuel R Delany. 1999. Times Square Red, Times Square Blue. NYU Press.
[10]
Michael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Julia R Fernandez. 2021. Values (Mis)alignment: Exploring Tensions Between Platform and LGBTQ Community Design Values. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--27.
[11]
Carl DiSalvo, Tom Jenkins, and Thomas Lodato. 2016. Designing Speculative Civics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, 4979--4990.
[12]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16. 656--671.
[13]
Aubri A Drake and Arlene Bielefield. 2017. Equitable access: Information seeking behavior, information needs, and necessary library accommodations for transgender patrons. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 39, 3 (July 2017), 160--168.
[14]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press.
[15]
Brianna Dym, Jed R Brubaker, Casey Fiesler, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. 'Coming Out Okay': Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--28.
[16]
Nicole B Ellison, Lindsay Blackwell, Cliff Lampe, and Penny Trieu. 2016. 'The Question Exists, but You Don't Exist With It': Strategic Anonymity in the Social Lives of Adolescents. Social Media Society 2, 4 (Oct. 2016), 2056305116670673.
[17]
Robert M Emerson, Rachel I Fretz, and Linda L Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press.
[18]
Nancy J Evans, Deanna S Forney, Florence M Guido, Lori D Patton, and Kristen A Renn. 2009. Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
[19]
Clare Forstie. 2022. Queering the Midwest: Forging LGBTQ Community. NYU Press.
[20]
Jesse Fox and Rachel Ralston. 2016. Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Comput. Human Behav. 65 (Dec. 2016), 635--642.
[21]
Ron French. 2022. Why LGBTQ books may imperil west Michigan library: 'This isn't New York?. Bridge Michigan (Nov. 2022).
[22]
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29.
[23]
Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI '00). Association for Computing Machinery, 209--216.
[24]
Jen Jack Gieseking. 2017. Messing with the attractiveness algorithm: a response to queering code/space. Gend. Place Cult. 24, 11 (Nov. 2017), 1659--1665.
[25]
Jen Jack Gieseking. 2020. A Queer New York: Geographies of Lesbians, Dykes, and Queers. NYU Press.
[26]
Jane Goodman, Nancy K Schlossberg, and Mary L Anderson. 2006. Counseling adults in transition: Linking practice with theory (3 ed.). Springer Publishing Co Counseling adults in transition.
[27]
Mary L Gray. 2009. Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. NYU Press.
[28]
Oliver L Haimson, Jed R Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, 1176--1190.
[29]
Oliver L Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L Starks, and Zu Weinger. 2020. Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered Solutions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13.
[30]
Jean Hardy. 2019. Queer information literacies: social and technological circulation in the rural Midwestern United States. Information, Communication, Society (June 2019), 1--16.
[31]
Jean Hardy, Caitlin Geier, Stefani Vargas, Riley Doll, and Amy Lyn Howard. 2022. LGBTQ Futures and Participatory Design: Investigating Visibility, Community, and the Future of Future Workshops. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--25.
[32]
Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a Desiring User: Discourse, Rurality, and Design in Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, 13--25.
[33]
Jean Hardy and Stefani Vargas. 2019. Participatory Design and the Future of Rural LGBTQ Communities. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS '19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, 195--199.
[34]
Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI Research: Definitions, Distinctions, Methods, and Opportunities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--33.
[35]
Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21, Article 397). Association for Computing Machinery, 1--15.
[36]
Lynne Hillier, Kimberly J Mitchell, and Michele L Ybarra. 2012. The Internet As a Safety Net: Findings From a Series of Online Focus Groups With LGB and Non-LGB Young People in the United States. J. LGBT Youth 9, 3 (July 2012), 225--246.
[37]
John Howard. 2001. Men Like That: A Southern Queer History. University of Chicago Press.
[38]
Emily Kazyak. 2011. Disrupting Cultural Selves: Constructing Gay and Lesbian Identities in Rural Locales. (2011).
[39]
Vera Khovanskaya, Phoebe Sengers, Melissa Mazmanian, and Charles Darrah. 2017. Reworking the Gaps between Design and Ethnography. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, 5373--5385.
[40]
Christopher A Le Dantec. 2016. Designing Publics. MIT Press.
[41]
Jordan A Levinson, Patricia M Greenfield, and Jenna C Signorelli. 2020. A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescent Responses to YouTube Videos Portraying Sexual and Gender Minority Experiences: Belonging, Community, and Information Seeking. Frontiers in Human Dynamics 2 (2020).
[42]
Calvin A Liang, Katie Albertson, Florence Williams, David Inwards-Breland, Sean A Munson, Julie A Kientz, and Kym Ahrens. 2020. Designing an online sex education resource for gender-diverse youth. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (London, United Kingdom) (IDC '20). Association for Computing Machinery, 108--120.
[43]
Jessa Lingel and Adam Golub. 2015. In Face on Facebook: Brooklyn's Drag Community and Sociotechnical Practices of Online Communication. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 20, 5 (Sept. 2015), 536--553.
[44]
Shaka McGlotten. 2013. Virtual Intimacies: Media, Affect, and Queer Sociality. State University of New York Press.
[45]
Pamela J McKenzie. 2003. A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation 59, 1 (Jan. 2003), 19--40.
[46]
Cait McKinney. 2020. Information Activism: A Queer History of Lesbian Media Technologies. Duke University Press.
[47]
Martin Morris and K R Roberto. 2016. Information-seeking behaviour and information needs of LGBTQ health professionals: a follow-up study. Health Info. Libr. J. 33, 3 (Sept. 2016), 204--221.
[48]
Cameron M Pierson. 2017. Barriers to Access and Information for the LGBTQ Community/Obstacles à l'accès et à l'information pour la communauté LGBTQ. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 41, 4 (2017), 245--262.
[49]
Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze, Paul N Edwards, and Christian Sandvig. 2018. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20, 1 (Jan. 2018), 293--310.
[50]
John Rieman. 1993. The diary study: a workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (CHI '93). Association for Computing Machinery, 321--326.
[51]
Alexandra Teixeira Riggs, Sylvia Janicki, Noura Howell, and Anne Sullivan. 2024. Designing an archive of feelings: Queering tangible interaction with button portraits. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 9. ACM, 1--17.
[52]
Gayle Rubin. 2000. Sites, settlements, and urban sex: archaeology and the study of gay. Archaeologies of sexuality (2000), 62.
[53]
Gayle Rubin. 2011. Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Duke University Press.
[54]
Johnny M Saldaña. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3 ed.). SAGE Publications, London, England.
[55]
Susann Schaller. 2011. Information Needs of LGBTQ College Students. 61, 2 (June 2011), 100--115.
[56]
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--27.
[57]
Ellen Simpson and Bryan Semaan. 2021. For You, or For'You'? Everyday LGBTQ Encounters with TikTok. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3 (Jan. 2021), 1--34.
[58]
Marianne Snow. 2015. Little Free Libraries: A Call for Research into the Tiny Book Depositories. Children and Libraries 13, 4 (Dec. 2015), 30--32.
[59]
Robert Soden, Austin Toombs, and Michaelanne Thomas. 2024. Evaluating Interpretive Research in HCI. Interactions 31, 1 (Jan. 2024), 38--42.
[60]
Robert S Taylor. 1991. Information use environments. Progress in communication sciences 10, 217 (1991), 55.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
November 2024
5177 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3703902
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. diary study
  2. information activism
  3. information searching
  4. interviews
  5. lgbtq
  6. queer hci
  7. rural

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Computing Research Association

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 248
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)248
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)99
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media