Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1795234.1795249acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward?

Published: 01 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Several authors are pointing to the drift in focus from participation as the means to a political agenda to participation as a means to a smooth development and implementation, or sometimes as an end in itself. Other authors are arguing that participatory design (PD) should move forward to include new trends within IS. The aim of this paper is to present a snapshot of where PD stands today, in order to offer suggestions on where we need to be tomorrow. The concluding remarks from the discussion is that there are a number of new trends such as open innovation and distributed participation that have a great deal to gain from the knowledge and experience within the participatory design community. At the same time these new trends could constitute new research fields that would broaden the PD environment and result in interesting findings as exiting methods and theories are applied and tested in new contexts. Hence, the only way to move one step back seems to be to take two steps forward.

References

[1]
Ackoff, R L. (1999). Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21 st Century. Oxford University Press: New York.
[2]
Balka, E. (2006). Inside the Belly of the Beast: The Challenges and Successes of a Reformist Participatory Agenda. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 134--143.
[3]
Barki, H., and J. Hartwick. (1994). Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude. MIS Quarterly March:59--82.
[4]
Barki, H., and J. Hartwick. (1989). Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement. MIS Quarterly March:52--63.
[5]
Baroudi, J J., M H. Olson, B. Ives, and G B. Davis. (1986). An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction. Communications of the ACM March:232--238.
[6]
Beck, E. (2002). P for Political: Participation is not enough. Journal of Information Systems 14 (1):77--92.
[7]
Bekker, M., and J. Long. (2000). User Involvement in the Design of Human-Computer Interactions: Some Similarities and Differences between Design Approaches. In People and Computers XiV: Proceedings of the HCI 2000, edited by S. McDonald and G. Cockton. Springer: New York. 135--147.
[8]
Benson, M L. (1989). Feminism and System Design: Questions of control. In The Effects of Feminist Approaches on Research Methodologies, edited by T. Tomm. Wilfrid Laurier University Press for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities,: Calgary. 205--223.
[9]
Bjerknes, G., and T. Bratteteig. (1995). User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7 (1):73--98.
[10]
Bossen, C. (2006). Participation, Power, Critique: Constructing a Standard for Electronic Patient Records. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 95--104.
[11]
Brandt, E. (2006). Designing Exploratory Design Games: A Framework for Participation in Participatory Design? Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 57--66.
[12]
Cederman-Haysom, T., and M. Brereton. (2006). A participatory design agenda for ubiquitous computing and multimodal interaction: a case study of dental practice. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 11--20.
[13]
Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review Spring: 35--41.
[14]
Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Harvard.
[15]
Chesbrough, H., and M. Appleyard. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review 50 (1):57--76.
[16]
Chesbrough, H., and K. Schwartz. (2007). Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnership. Research Technology Management Jan--Feb:55--59.
[17]
Cotton, L J., A D. Vollrath, L Kirk. Froggatt, L Mark. Lengnick-Hall, and R. Kenneth. Jennings. (1988). Employee Participation: Diverse forms and different Outcomes. Academy of Management Review 13 (1):8--22.
[18]
Dearden, A., A. Lauener, F. Slack, C. Roast, and S. Cassidy. (2006). Make it so! Jean-Luc Picard, Bart Simpson and the Design of E-Public Services. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 67--76.
[19]
Eason, K D. (1995). User-Centred Design: For Users or by Users? Ergonomics 38 (8):1667--1673.
[20]
Eason, K. (1987). Information Technology and Organizational Change. Taylor and Francis: London.
[21]
Elovaara, P., F T. Igira, and C. Mörtberg. (2006). Whose Participation? Whose Knowledge? -- Exploring PD in Tanzania-Zanzibar and Sweden. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 105--114.
[22]
Enkel, E., P-F Javier., and O. Gassmann. (2005). Minimizing Market Risks Through Customer Integration in New Product Development: Learning from Bad Practice. Creativity and Innovation Management 14 (4):425--437.
[23]
Greenbaum, J. (1993). PD: A Personal Statement. Communications of the ACM 36 (4):47.
[24]
Gumm, D C. (2007). Distributed Participatory Design: An Inherent Paradox? Proceedings of 30th Information Systems Research Seminars in Scandinavia, IRIS 30. 11--14 August, at Tampere, Finland.
[25]
Hartwick, J., and H. Barki. (1994). Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use. Management Science 40 (4):440--465.
[26]
Hornecker, E., J. Halloran, G. Fitzpatrick, M. Weal, D. Millard, D. Michaelides, D. Cruickshank, and D. De Roure. (2006). UbiComp in Opportunity Spaces: Challenges for Participatory Design. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 47--56.
[27]
Ives, B., and M. Olson. (1984). User Involvement and MIS Success: A review of Research. Management Science 30 (5):586--603.
[28]
Kanstrup, A M., and P. Bertelsen. (2006). Participatory IT-support. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 87--94.
[29]
Kanstrup, A M., and E. Christiansen. (2006). Selecting and evoking innovators: combining democracy and creativity. Nordic CHI. 14--18 October, at Oslo, Norway.
[30]
Kaulio, M A. (1998). Customer, Consumer and User Involvement in Product Development: A Framework and a Review of Selected Methods. Total Quality Management 9 (9):141--149.
[31]
Kensing, F., and J. Blomberg. (1998). Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7:167--185.
[32]
Lettl, C. (2007). User Involvement Competence for Radical Innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24 (1--2):53--75.
[33]
Lettl, C., C. Herstatt, and H. G. Gemuenden. (2006a). Learning from Users for Radical Innovation. International Journal of Technology Management 33 (1):25--45.
[34]
Lettl, C., C. Herstatt, and H. G. Gemuenden. (2006b). Users' contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R & D Management 36:251--272.
[35]
Lievrouw, L A. (2006). Oppositional and Activist New Media: Remediation, Reconfiguration, Participation. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 115--124.
[36]
Macaulay, L. (1995). Cooperation in Understanding User Needs and Requirements. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 8 (2):155--165.
[37]
Miller, E S. (1993). From System Design to Democracy. Communications of the ACM 36 (4):38.
[38]
Muller, M J., J H. Haslwanter, and T. Dayton. (1997). Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, edited by M. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu. North-Holland: Amsterdam. 255--297.
[39]
Mumford, E. (1981). Participative Systems Design: Structure and Method. Systems, Objectives, Solutions 1 (1):5--19.
[40]
Mumford, E. (1979). Consensus Systems Design: An Evaluation of this Approach. In Design and Implementation of Computer Based Information Systems, edited by N. Szyperski and E. Grochela. Sijthoff and Noordhoff: Groningen.
[41]
Olsson, E. (2004). What Active Users and Designers Contribute in the Design Process. Interacting with Computers 16 (2):377--401.
[42]
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy, Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
[43]
Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires. Review of General Psychology 8 (3):179--193.
[44]
Riisgaard Hansen, T. (2006). Strings of experiments: looking at the design process as a set of socio-technical experiments. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 1--10.
[45]
Robertson, T., T. Mansfield, and L. Loke. (2006). Designing an Immersive Environment for Public Use. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 31--40.
[46]
Srinivasan, R., and K Shilton. (2006). 'The South Asian Web': An Emerging Community Information System in the South Asian Diaspora. Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 1--5 August, at Trento, Italy 125--133.
[47]
Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: Ill.
[48]
Von Hippel, E., and R. Katz. (2002). Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits. Management Science 48 (7):821--833.
[49]
Von Hippel, E. (2001). Perspective: User Toolkit for Innovation. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (4):247--257.
[50]
Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead User: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science 32 (7):791--805.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)LGBTQ Futures and Participatory DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556386:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2018)Member-Owned AlternativesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32743692:CSCW(1-19)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2018)Pdotcapturer and PdotanalyserProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3240167.3240214(622-633)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PDC '08: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008
October 2008
345 pages
ISBN:9780981856100

Sponsors

  • Indiana University: Indiana University

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Indiana University

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2008

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. motives for PD
  2. new trends
  3. participatory design
  4. review
  5. type and degree of PD

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PDC '08
Sponsor:
  • Indiana University
PDC '08: Participatory Design Conference
October 1 - 4, 2008
Indiana, Bloomington

Acceptance Rates

PDC '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 160 submissions, 9%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)LGBTQ Futures and Participatory DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556386:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2018)Member-Owned AlternativesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32743692:CSCW(1-19)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2018)Pdotcapturer and PdotanalyserProceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3240167.3240214(622-633)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018
  • (2018)Acting from a participatory attitude in a networked collaborationProceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 210.1145/3210604.3210642(1-6)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
  • (2018)Amplifying Quiet VoicesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/313939825:1(1-34)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2018
  • (2016)Anchoring and transcendenceProceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 210.1145/2948076.2948077(37-40)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Between-Subjects Elicitation StudiesProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858228(3390-3402)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • (2016)POPProceedings, Part I, of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice - Volume 973110.1007/978-3-319-39510-4_14(141-152)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2016
  • (2015)Formalizing Agreement Analysis for Elicitation StudiesProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702223(1325-1334)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
  • (2014)Stakeholder participation in the development of an electronic medical record system in MalawiProceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 110.1145/2661435.2661444(71-80)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media