research-article

No! Re-imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical Refusal

Authors:

Patricia Garcia,

Tonia Sutherland,

Niloufar Salehi,

Anubha SinghAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 315, Pages 1 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1145/3557997

Published: 11 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Critical refusal is an active process; an informed practice of investigating power differences in order to generate more just and equitable alternatives to the status quo. In this paper, we examine what it means to utilize critical refusal as a tool for investigating unequal power dynamics that are produced and reified by data practices. We illustrate the generative capacity of critical refusal by drawing on declarations from The Feminist Data Manifest-No to examine data practices across three real-world cases. By pairing a conceptual exploration of critical refusal with real-world examples, we make a theoretical contribution that is grounded in concrete approaches for generating alternative data practices in ways that account for interlocking struggles across contexts and communities.

References

[1]

James A Allen. 2019. The color of algorithms: An analysis and proposed research agenda for deterring algorithmic redlining. Fordham Urb. LJ, Vol. 46 (2019), 219.

[2]

Heidrun Allert and Christoph Richter. 2018. Perspectives on Data and Practices. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM New York, NY, USA, New York, NY, USA, 173--176.

Digital Library

[3]

Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, and Madeline Balaam. 2016. HCI and Intimate Care as an Agenda for Change in Women's Health. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2599--2611. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858187

Digital Library

[4]

Amazon. 2020. We are implementing a one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition. https://blog.aboutamazon.com/policy/we-are-implementing-a-one-year-moratorium-on-police-use-of-rekognition

[5]

Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1301--1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521

Digital Library

[6]

Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Utopias of Participation: Feminism, Design, and the Futures. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 25, 1 (Feb. 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3127359 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.

Digital Library

[7]

Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 675--684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041

Digital Library

[8]

Shaowen Bardzell and Eli Blevis. 2010. The Lens of Feminist HCI in the Context of Sustainable Interaction Design. Interactions, Vol. 17, 2 (March 2010), 57--59. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699788 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.

Digital Library

[9]

Shaowen Bardzell, Elizabeth Churchill, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, Rebecca Grinter, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Feminism and interaction design. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979587

Digital Library

[10]

Shaowen Bardzell and Elizabeth F Churchill. 2011. IwC special issue "Feminism and HCI: new perspectives" Special Issue Editors' introduction. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, 5 (2011), iii--xi.

Digital Library

[11]

Jo Bates, David Cameron, Alessandro Checco, Paul Clough, Frank Hopfgartner, Suvodeep Mazumdar, Laura Sbaffi, Peter Stordy, and Antonio de la Vega de León. 2020. Integrating FATE/critical data studies into data science curricula: where are we going and how do we get there?. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York, NY, USA, 425--435.

[12]

Eric PS Baumer, Morgan G Ames, Jed R Brubaker, Jenna Burrell, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 65--68.

Digital Library

[13]

Eric PS Baumer and M Six Silberman. 2011. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2271--2274.

Digital Library

[14]

Rosanna Bellini, Angelika Strohmayer, Ebtisam Alabdulqader, Alex A. Ahmed, Katta Spiel, Shaowen Bardzell, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock, Moving Forward, and Engaging Community. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3185370

Digital Library

[15]

Ruha Benjamin. 2016. Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 41, 6 (2016), 967--990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656059 _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656059.

[16]

Ruha Benjamin. 2017. Benjamin Twitter Post.

[17]

Cynthia Bennett and Os Keyes. 2020. What is the point of fairness? Interactions, Vol. 27, 3 (2020), 35--39.

Digital Library

[18]

Birgitta Berglund, Giovanni B Rossi, James T Townsend, and Leslie R Pendrill. 2012. Measurement with persons: theory, methods, and implementation areas. Psychology Press.

[19]

Danah Boyd and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, Vol. 15, 5 (2012), 662--679.

[20]

Samantha Breslin and Bimlesh Wadhwa. 2017. Gender and Human-Computer Interaction. In The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. Wiley-Blackwell, 71--87. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118976005.ch4

[21]

Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 77--91.

[22]

Stevie Chancellor, Shion Guha, Jofish Kaye, Jen King, Niloufar Salehi, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Elizabeth Stowell. 2019. The Relationships between Data, Power, and Justice in CSCW Research. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102--105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3358609 event-place: Austin, TX, USA.

Digital Library

[23]

Marika Cifor and Patricia Garcia. 2019. Inscribing Gender: A Duoethnographic Examination of Gendered Values and Practices in Fitness Tracker Design. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Manoa, HI, USA, 2132--2141. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/59652

[24]

Marika Cifor and Patricia Garcia. 2020. Gendered by Design: A Duoethnographic Study of Personal Fitness Tracking Systems. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, Vol. 2, 4 (2020), 1--22.

Digital Library

[25]

Marika Cifor, Patricia Garcia, TL Cowan, Jasmine Rault, Tonia Sutherland, Anita Say Chan, Jennifer Rode, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, Niloufar Salehi, and Lisa Nakamura. 2019. Feminist data manifest-no.

[26]

Nora Alba Cisneros. 2018. "To my relations': writing and refusal toward an Indigenous Epistolary Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 31, 3 (2018), 188--196.

[27]

Combahee River Collective. 2014. A black feminist statement. Women's Studies Quarterly (2014), 271--280.

[28]

Patricia Hill Collins. 2002. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

[29]

Patricia Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK. OCLC: 923665818.

[30]

Jessica Colnago, Yuanyuan Feng, Tharangini Palanivel, Sarah Pearman, Megan Ung, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2020. Informing the design of a personalized privacy assistant for the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.

Digital Library

[31]

Kimberle Crenshaw. 1990. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., Vol. 43 (1990), 1241.

[32]

Roderic Crooks. 2019. Cat-and-Mouse games: Dataveillance and performativity in urban schools. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 17, 3/4 (2019), 484--498.

[33]

Craig M Dalton, Linnet Taylor, and Jim Thatcher. 2016. Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society, Vol. 3, 1 (2016), 2053951716648346.

[34]

Mathieu d'Aquin, Pinelopi Troullinou, Noel E O'Connor, Aindrias Cullen, Gráinne Faller, and Louise Holden. 2018. Towards an" Ethics by Design" Methodology for AI Research Projects. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 54--59.

Digital Library

[35]

Lina Dencik, Arne Hintz, Joanna Redden, and Emiliano Treré. 2019. Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 22, 7 (June 2019), 873--881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606268.

[36]

Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google-Books-ID: x5nSDwAAQBAJ.

[37]

Jill P. Dimond, Casey Fiesler, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2011. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 413--421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.006

Digital Library

[38]

Johanna Drucker. 2010. Graphesis: Visual knowledge production and representation. Poetess Archive Journal, Vol. 2, 1 (2010), 1--50.

[39]

Sheena Erete, Yolanda A Rankin, and Jakita O Thomas. 2021. I Can't Breathe: Reflections from Black Women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--23.

Digital Library

[40]

Ingrid Erickson, Libby Hemphill, Amanda Menking, and Stephanie Steinhardt. 2016. On the production of the spirit of feminism. http://doi.org/10.1145/2967098

Digital Library

[41]

Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.

Digital Library

[42]

Melanie Feinberg, Sarah Fox, Jean Hardy, Stephanie Steinhardt, and Palashi Vaghela. 2019. At the Intersection of Culture and Method: Designing Feminist Action. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion ). Association for Computing Machinery, San Diego, CA, USA, 365--368. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319993

Digital Library

[43]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2574--2585. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409

Digital Library

[44]

Sarah Fox. 2015. Feminist Hackerspaces as Sites for Feminist Design. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 341--342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764771

Digital Library

[45]

Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion ). Association for Computing Machinery, Portland, Oregon, USA, 387--393. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022665

Digital Library

[46]

Ester Fritsch, Irina Shklovski, and Rachel Douglas-Jones. 2018. Calling for a Revolution: An Analysis of IoT Manifestos. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173876

Digital Library

[47]

Patricia Garcia and Marika Cifor. 2019. Expanding our reflexive toolbox: Collaborative possibilities for examining socio-technical systems using duoethnography. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23.

Digital Library

[48]

Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw data is an oxymoron. MIT press.

[49]

Ezra Goss, Lily Hu, Manuel Sabin, and Stephanie Teeple. 2020. Manifesting the sociotechnical: experimenting with methods for social context and social justice. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 693--693.

Digital Library

[50]

Daniel Greene, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Luke Stark. 2019. Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences.

[51]

Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 385--392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005

Digital Library

[52]

Sarah Higgins. 2008. The DCC curation lifecycle model. (2008).

[53]

Kashmir Hill. 2020. Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/technology/facial-recognition-arrest.html

[54]

Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2019. Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 22, 7 (June 2019), 900--915. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912.

[55]

Sarah Homewood. 2018. Designing for the Changing Body: A Feminist Exploration of Self-Tracking Technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3173031

Digital Library

[56]

Bell Hooks. 1989. Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Vol. 10. South End Press.

[57]

Andrew Iliadis and Federica Russo. 2016. Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, Vol. 3, 2 (2016), 2053951716674238.

[58]

Jane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee, Katherine Mustelier, Mark S Ackerman, and Eric Gilbert. 2021. Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.

Digital Library

[59]

Rob Kitchin and Tracey Lauriault. 2014. Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. (2014). The Programmable City Working Paper 2; pre-print version of chapter to be published in Eckert, J., Shears, A. and Thatcher, J. (eds) Geoweb and Big Data. University of Nebraska Press. Forthcoming.Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2474112.

[60]

Jacob Leon Kröger, Milagros Miceli, and Florian Müller. 2021. How Data Can Be Used Against People: A Classification of Personal Data Misuses. Available at SSRN 3887097 (2021).

[61]

Temryss MacLean Lane. 2018. The frontline of refusal: indigenous women warriors of standing rock. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 31, 3 (2018), 197--214.

[62]

Bruno Latour. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.

[63]

Josephine Lau, Benjamin Zimmerman, and Florian Schaub. 2018. Alexa, are you listening? privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--31.

Digital Library

[64]

Una Lee. 2017. The Building Consentful Tech Zine is out! https://www.andalsotoo.net/2017/10/24/the-building-consentful-tech-zine-is-out/

[65]

Una Lee and Dann Toliver. 2019. Building Consentful Tech Zine.

[66]

Kristina Lindström and Åsa Ståhl. 2020. Un/making in the aftermath of design. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise-Volume 1. 12--21.

[67]

Audre Lorde. 2020. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Penguin Classics.

[68]

David Lyon. 2018. The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. John Wiley & Sons.

[69]

Mary Madden, Michele Gilman, Karen Levy, and Alice Marwick. 2017. Privacy, poverty, and big data: A matrix of vulnerabilities for poor Americans. Wash. UL Rev., Vol. 95 (2017), 53.

[70]

Carole McGranahan. 2016. Theorizing refusal: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 31, 3 (2016), 319--325.

[71]

Michael Muller, Cecilia Aragon, Shion Guha, Marina Kogan, Gina Neff, Cathrine Seidelin, Katie Shilton, and Anissa Tanweer. 2020. Interrogating Data Science. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 467--473.

[72]

Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational ethics: Re-thinking approaches to formal ethics requirements for human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 105--114.

Digital Library

[73]

Manasee Narvilkar, Josiah Mangiameli, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Azra Ismail, Daniel Schiff, Danielle Schechter, Jordan Chen, Karthik Bhat, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Anusha Vasudeva, Aparna Ramesh, Michaelanne Dye, Naveena Karusala, Pragati Singh, Savanthi Murthy, Shubhangi Gupta, Udaya Lakshmi, and Neha Kumar. 2019. Bringing Shades of Feminism To Human-Centered Computing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310419

Digital Library

[74]

Cathy O'neil. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.

[75]

Antti Oulasvirta, Aurora Pihlajamaa, Jukka Perkiö, Debarshi Ray, Taneli V"ah"akangas, Tero Hasu, Niklas Vainio, and Petri Myllym"aki. 2012. Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 41--50.

Digital Library

[76]

Planned Parenthood. [n.d.]. What Is Sexual Consent?: Facts About Rape & Sexual Assault. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/relationships/sexual-consent

[77]

Samir Passi and Steven J Jackson. 2018. Trust in data science: collaboration, translation, and accountability in corporate data science projects. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--28.

Digital Library

[78]

Aditya Pawar and Johan Redström. 2016. Publics, Participation and the Making of Umetextbackslasha a Pantry. International Journal of Design, Vol. 10, 1 (2016), 73--84.

[79]

Leslie Pendrill. 2014. Man as a measurement instrument. NCSLi Measure, Vol. 9, 4 (2014), 24--35.

[80]

James Pierce. 2012. Undesigning technology: considering the negation of design by design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 957--966.

Digital Library

[81]

James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2014. Counterfunctional things: exploring possibilities in designing digital limitations. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 375--384.

Digital Library

[82]

Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Timnit Gebru, Margaret Mitchell, Joy Buolamwini, Joonseok Lee, and Emily Denton. 2020. Saving face: Investigating the ethical concerns of facial recognition auditing. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 145--151.

Digital Library

[83]

Yolanda A Rankin and India Irish. 2020. A Seat at the Table: Black Feminist Thought as a Critical Framework for Inclusive Game Design. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--26.

Digital Library

[84]

Yolanda A Rankin and Jakita O Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions, Vol. 26, 6 (2019), 64--68.

Digital Library

[85]

Yolanda A Rankin, Jakita O Thomas, and Nicole M Joseph. 2020. Intersectionality in HCI: Lost in translation. Interactions, Vol. 27, 5 (2020), 68--71.

Digital Library

[86]

Joanna Redden, Jessica Brand, and Vanessa Terzieva. 2017. Data harm record. https://datajusticelab.org/data-harm-record/

[87]

Jennifer A Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 23, 5 (2011), 393--400.

Digital Library

[88]

Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity Through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5412--5427. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766 event-place: Denver, Colorado, USA.

Digital Library

[89]

John S Seberger. 2021. Into the archive of ubiquitous computing: the data perfect tense and the historicization of the present. Journal of Documentation (2021).

[90]

Audra Simpson. 2007. On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity,'voice'and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, Vol. 9 (2007), 67--80.

[91]

Amir Sinaeepourfard, Xavier Masip-Bruin, Jordi Garcia, and Eva Mar'in-Tordera. 2015. A survey on data lifecycle models: Discussions toward the 6vs challenges. Technical Report (UPC-DAC-RR-2015--18) (2015).

[92]

Day One Staff. 2019. How Amazon Rekognition helps in the fight against some of the worst types of crime. https://blog.aboutamazon.com/innovation/how-amazon-rekognition-helps-in-the-fight-against-some-of-the-worst-types-of-crime

[93]

Stephanie B. Steinhardt, Amanda Menking, Ingrid Erickson, Andrea Marshall, Asta Zelenkauskaite, and Jennifer Rode. 2015. Feminism and Feminist Approaches in Social Computing. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion ). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303--308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2685561 event-place: Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Digital Library

[94]

Carly Strasser, Robert Cook, William Michener, and Amber Budden. 2012. Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know. (2012).

[95]

Matthias Sutter and Daniela Glätzle-Rützler. 2015. Gender Differences in the Willingness to Compete Emerge Early in Life and Persist. Management Science, Vol. 61, 10 (Oct. 2015), 2339--2354. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1981

Digital Library

[96]

Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard. 2017. Intimate Design: Designing Intimacy As a Critical-Feminist Practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 320--325. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027138

Digital Library

[97]

Linnet Taylor. 2019. Global data justice. Commun. ACM, Vol. 62, 6 (2019), 22--24.

Digital Library

[98]

Andrea K Thomer and Karen M Wickett. 2020. Relational data paradigms: What do we learn by taking the materiality of databases seriously? Big Data & Society, Vol. 7, 1 (2020), 2053951720934838.

[99]

Eve Tuck and K Wayne Yang. 2014. R-words: Refusing research. Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities, Vol. 223 (2014), 248.

[100]

Dawn Walker. 2018. " Data Justice" By Design: Building Engagement Through Civic Technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--4.

Digital Library

[101]

Chelsea-Joy Wardle, Mitchell Green, Christine Wanjiru Mburu, and Melissa Densmore. 2018. Exploring Co-design with Breastfeeding Mothers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174056

Digital Library

[102]

Anne L Washington and Rachel Kuo. 2020. Whose side are ethics codes on? power, responsibility and the social good. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 230--240.

Digital Library

[103]

Craig Willse. 2015. The value of homelessness: Managing surplus life in the United States. U of Minnesota Press.

[104]

Peter Worthy, Ben Matthews, and Stephen Viller. 2016. Trust me: doubts and concerns living with the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 427--434.

Digital Library

[105]

Elizabeth Yakel, Ixchel M Faniel, and Zachary J Maiorana. 2019. Virtuous and vicious circles in the data life-cycle. (2019).

[106]

Serena Zheng, Noah Apthorpe, Marshini Chetty, and Nick Feamster. 2018. User perceptions of smart home IoT privacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--20.

Digital Library

Cited By

Liu JLin C(2024)What Worlds are We Designing For?Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686203(1-5)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686203
Muller MWeisz JHoude SRoss S(2024)Drinking Chai with Your (AI) Programming Partner: Value Tensions in the Tokenization of Future Human-AI Collaborative WorkProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663390(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663384.3663390
Tran ARothschild AKender KOsipova EKinnee BTaylor JMeyer LHaimson OLight ADisalvo C(2024)Making Trouble: Techniques for Queering Data and AI SystemsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658393(381-384)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658393
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

No! Re-imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical Refusal
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
    2. HCI theory, concepts and models

Recommendations

Understanding interaction design practices
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

There is an undesirable gap between HCI research aimed at influencing interaction design practice and the practitioners in question. To close this gap, we advocate a theoretical and methodological focus on the day-to-day, lived experience of designers. ...
Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

With substantial efforts in ubiquitous computing, ICT4D, and sustainable interaction design, among others, HCI is increasingly engaging with matters of social change that go beyond the immediate qualities of interaction. In doing so, HCI takes on ...
Situated Dissemination through an HCI Workplace
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Researchers working in domains such as Research through Design and Feminist HCI have been questioning "dissemination practices" and their impact on our capacity to produce reflexive accounts of research in publications. This paper examines academic ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

CSCW

November 2022

8205 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3571154

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Google

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 November 2022

Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
500
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)232
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Liu JLin C(2024)What Worlds are We Designing For?Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686203(1-5)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686203
Muller MWeisz JHoude SRoss S(2024)Drinking Chai with Your (AI) Programming Partner: Value Tensions in the Tokenization of Future Human-AI Collaborative WorkProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663390(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663384.3663390
Tran ARothschild AKender KOsipova EKinnee BTaylor JMeyer LHaimson OLight ADisalvo C(2024)Making Trouble: Techniques for Queering Data and AI SystemsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3658393(381-384)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3658393
DiSalvo CRothschild ASchenck LShapiro BDiSalvo B(2024)When Workers Want to Say No: A View into Critical Consciousness and Workplace Democracy in Data WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374338:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637433
Zong JMatias J(2024)Data Refusal from Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as DesignACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36301071:1(1-23)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630107
DeVrio AEslami MHolstein K(2024)Building, Shifting, & Employing Power: A Taxonomy of Responses From Below to Algorithmic HarmProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658958(1093-1106)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3658958
Tang NZhi JKuo TKainaroi CNorthup JHolstein KZhu HHeidari HShen H(2024)AI Failure Cards: Understanding and Supporting Grassroots Efforts to Mitigate AI Failures in Homeless ServicesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658935(713-732)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3658935
Janicki SRiggs AHowell NSullivan AStangl A(2024)Queering/Cripping Technologies of ProductivityExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3644067(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3644067
Balasubramaniam GBelitz CChan A(2024)Bridging Informational Divides: A Community-Centered Analysis of “Public Safety” Surveillance TechnologyExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3644046(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3644046
Lysen FWyatt S(2024)Refusing participation: hesitations about designing responsible patient engagement with artificial intelligence in healthcareJournal of Responsible Innovation10.1080/23299460.2023.230016111:1Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2300161
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents