Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1536414.1536472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification

Published: 31 May 2009 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The quantum analogue of the constraint satisfaction problem is the fundamental physics question of finding the minimal energy state of a local Hamiltonian --- each term of the Hamiltonian specifies a local constraint whose violation contributes to the energy of the given quantum state. However, in general it is not meaningful to ask for the probability that a given quantum state violates at least one constraint; the difficulty being that the terms of the Hamiltonian do not commute. We show how to make sense of this notion under mild restrictions on the form of the Hamiltonian. We then provide two main results. We first prove the quantum detectability lemma, which states that the probability of detecting a violation of a constraint in a local Hamiltonian system is bounded from below by some constant times the minimal energy of the system. The proof reveals some intrinsic structure of the Hilbert space of local Hamiltonians, which is captured in the "exponential decay" lemma, and formalized using a novel decomposition of the Hilbert space called the XY decomposition. As an application of the detectability lemma, we prove our second main result: a quantum analogue of the classical gap amplification lemma using random walks over expander graphs, which was the seed for Dinur's celebrated new proof of the PCP theorem [6]. We hope that these results will pave the way to better understandings of the computational properties of local Hamiltonians systems, and to the evolving field of quantum Hamiltonian complexity.

    References

    [1]
    D. Aharonov, I. Arad, Z. Landau, and U. Vazirani. The Detectability Lemma and Quantum Gap Amplification. arXiv:0811.3412, 2008.
    [2]
    M. Ajtai, J. Komlos, and E. Szemeredi. Deterministic simulation in LOGSPACE. In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing, pages 132--140. ACM New York, NY, USA, 1987.
    [3]
    S. Arora and B. Barak. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. to appear: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/theory/complexity.
    [4]
    S. Bravyi. Efficient algorithm for a quantum analogue of 2-SAT. quant-ph/0602108, 2006.
    [5]
    S. Bravyi, D. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, and B. Terhal. Quantum Simulation of Many-Body Hamiltonians Using Perturbation Theory with Bounded-Strength Interactions. Physical Review Letters, 101(7):70503, 2008.
    [6]
    I. Dinur. The pcp theorem by gap amplification. J. ACM, 54(3):12, 2007.
    [7]
    E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution. arXiv:quant-ph/0001106, 2000.
    [8]
    R. Impagliazzo and D. Zuckerman. How to recycle random bits. In Foundations of Computer Science, 1989., 30th Annual Symposium on, pages 248--253, 1989.
    [9]
    S. P. Jordan and E. Farhi. Perturbative gadgets at arbitrary orders. Physical Review A (Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics), 77(6):062329, 2008.
    [10]
    J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev. The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 35(5):1070, 2006.
    [11]
    A. Kitaev, A. Shen, and M. Vyalyi. Classical and Quantum Computation. American Mathematical Society, 2002.
    [12]
    J. ’Lberg, D. Kult, and E. Sjöqvist. Robustness of the adiabatic quantum search. Physical Review A, 71(6):60312, 2005.
    [13]
    D. A. Lidar. Towards fault tolerant adiabatic quantum computation. Physical Review Letters, 100(16):160506, 2008.
    [14]
    C. Marriott and J. Watrous. Quantum arthur-merlin games. Computational Complexity, 14(2):122--152, 2005.
    [15]
    R. Oliveira and B. Terhal. The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice. Quant. Inf. Comp., 8(10):0900--0924, 2008.
    [16]
    J. Roland and N. Cerf. Noise resistance of adiabatic quantum computation using random matrix theory. Physical Review A, 71(3):32330, 2005.
    [17]
    M. Sarandy and D. Lidar. Adiabatic Quantum Computation in Open Systems. Physical Review Letters, 95(25):250503, 2005.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '09: Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      May 2009
      750 pages
      ISBN:9781605585062
      DOI:10.1145/1536414
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 31 May 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. PCP
      2. QMA
      3. detectability lemma
      4. gap amplification
      5. local hamiltonians
      6. quantum computation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      STOC '09
      Sponsor:
      STOC '09: Symposium on Theory of Computing
      May 31 - June 2, 2009
      MD, Bethesda, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Quantum Merkle TreesQuantum10.22331/q-2024-06-18-13808(1380)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Efficient Verification of Ground States of Frustration-Free HamiltoniansQuantum10.22331/q-2024-01-10-12218(1221)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Entropy Decay for Davies Semigroups of a One Dimensional Quantum LatticeCommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-023-04869-5405:2Online publication date: 10-Feb-2024
      • (2024)Interactive Oracle Arguments in the QROM and Applications to Succinct Verification of Quantum ComputationTopics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 202410.1007/978-3-031-58868-6_16(404-429)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
      • (2023)Commitments to Quantum StatesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585198(1579-1588)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
      • (2023)NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum CodesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585114(1090-1096)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
      • (2023)Computational advantage of quantum random samplingReviews of Modern Physics10.1103/RevModPhys.95.03500195:3Online publication date: 20-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Rapid Thermalization of Spin Chain Commuting HamiltoniansPhysical Review Letters10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060401130:6Online publication date: 9-Feb-2023
      • (2022) Random quantum circuits are approximate unitary -designs in depth Quantum10.22331/q-2022-09-08-7956(795)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2022
      • (2022)An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systemsProceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3519935.3519962(12-18)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media