Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1629911.1629978acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating design trade-offs in customizable processors

Published: 26 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The short time-to-market window for embedded systems demands automation of design methodologies for customizable processors. Recent research advances in this direction have mostly focused on single criteria optimization, e.g., optimizing performance though custom instructions under pre-defined area constraint. From the designer's perspective, however, it would be more interesting if the conflicting trade-offs among multiple objectives (e.g., performance versus area) are exposed enabling an informed decision making. Unfortunately, identifying the optimal trade-off points turns out to be computationally intractable. In this paper, we present a polynomial-time approximation algorithm to systematically evaluate the design trade-offs. In particular, we explore performance-area trade-offs in the context of multitasking real-time embedded applications to be implemented on a customizable processor.

References

[1]
M. Arnold and H. Corporaal. Designing domain-specific processors. In CODES, 2001.
[2]
K. Atasu, L. Pozzi, and P. Ienne. Automatic application-specific instruction-set extensions under microarchitectural constraints. In DAC, 2003.
[3]
S. Baruah, A. K. Mok, and L. E. Rosier. Preemptively scheduling hard-real-time sporadic tasks on one processor. In RTSS, 1990.
[4]
N. Cheung, S. Parameswaran, and J. Henkel. INSIDE: INstruction Selection/Identification&Design Exploration for extensible processors. In ICCAD, 2002.
[5]
N. Clark, H. Zhong, and S. Mahlke. Processor acceleration through automated instruction set customization. In MICRO, 2003.
[6]
J. Cong, Y. Fan, G. Han, and Z. Zhang. Application-specific instruction generation for configurable processor architectures. In FPGA, 2004.
[7]
K. Deb. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley&Sons, 2001.
[8]
M. R. Guthaus et al. Mibench: A free, commercially representative embedded benchmark suite. In IEEE Annual Workshop on Workload Characterization, 2001.
[9]
H. P. Huynh and T. Mitra. Instruction-set customization for real-time systems. In DATE, 2007.
[10]
C. Lee, M. Potkonjak, and W. H. Mangione-Smith. Mediabench: a tool for evaluating and synthesizing multimedia and communicatons systems. In MICRO, 1997.
[11]
J. Lee, K. Choi, and N. Dutt. Efficient instruction encoding for automatic instruction set design of configurable ASIPs. In ICCAD, 2002.
[12]
C. L. Liu and James W. Layland. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment. Journal of the ACM, 20(1):46--61, 1973.
[13]
C. H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis. On the approximability of trade-offs and optimal access of web sources. In FOCS, 2000.
[14]
F. Stappert. WCET benchmarks. http://www.c-lab.de/home/en/download.html.
[15]
Tensilica - XPRES Compiler - Optimized Hardware Directly from C. www.tensilica.com/products/devtools/hw_dev/xpres/.
[16]
Trimaran: An infrastructure for research in backend compilation and architecture exploration. http://www.trimaran.org.
[17]
P. Yu and T. Mitra. Scalable custom instructions identification for instruction-set extensible processors. In CASES, 2004.
[18]
P. Yu and T. Mitra. Satisfying real-time constraints with custom instructions. In CODES+ISSS, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating design trade-offs in customizable processors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '09: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference
      July 2009
      994 pages
      ISBN:9781605584973
      DOI:10.1145/1629911
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 July 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ASIP
      2. multi-objective design space exploration
      3. pareto-optimal curve
      4. processor customization

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      DAC '09
      Sponsor:
      DAC '09: The 46th Annual Design Automation Conference 2009
      July 26 - 31, 2009
      California, San Francisco

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,770 of 5,499 submissions, 32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '25
      62nd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 22 - 26, 2025
      San Francisco , CA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2017)Application-Specific ProcessorsHandbook of Hardware/Software Codesign10.1007/978-94-017-7358-4_13-1(1-33)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2017
      • (2017)Application-Specific ProcessorsHandbook of Hardware/Software Codesign10.1007/978-94-017-7267-9_13(377-409)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2017
      • (2014)Design space exploration of multiple loops on FPGAs using high level synthesis2014 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)10.1109/ICCD.2014.6974719(456-463)Online publication date: Oct-2014
      • (2014)Implementation-aware selection of the custom instruction set for extensible processorsMicroprocessors and Microsystems10.1016/j.micpro.2014.05.00738:7(681-691)Online publication date: Oct-2014
      • (2012)Efficient design space exploration for component-based system designProceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design10.1145/2429384.2429480(466-472)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2012
      • (2012)Customizing Instruction Set Extensible Reconfigurable Processors Using GPUsProceedings of the 2012 25th International Conference on VLSI Design10.1109/VLSID.2012.107(418-423)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2012
      • (2012)RAPTOR-DesignProceedings of the 2012 Brazilian Symposium on Computing System Engineering10.1109/SBESC.2012.55(188-191)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2012
      • (2012)Reliability-Aware Instruction Set Customization for ASIPs with Hardened LogicProceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications10.1109/RTCSA.2012.28(164-173)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2012
      • (2012)Exploring metrics tradeoffs in a multithreading extensible processor2012 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics10.1109/ISIE.2012.6237291(1375-1380)Online publication date: May-2012
      • (2011)QsCoresProceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture10.1145/2155620.2155640(163-174)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2011
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media