Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2660267.2660358acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Watching the Watchers: Automatically Inferring TV Content From Outdoor Light Effusions

Published: 03 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The flickering lights of content playing on TV screens in our living rooms are an all too familiar sight at night --- and one that many of us have paid little attention to with regards to the amount of information these diffusions may leak to an inquisitive outsider. In this paper, we introduce an attack that exploits the emanations of changes in light (e.g., as seen through the windows and recorded over 70 meters away) to reveal the programs we watch. Our empirical results show that the attack is surprisingly robust to a variety of noise signals that occur in real-world situations, and moreover, can successfully identify the content being watched among a reference library of tens of thousands of videos within several seconds. The robustness and efficiency of the attack can be attributed to the use of novel feature sets and an elegant online algorithm for performing index-based matches.

References

[1]
M. Backes, M. Durmuth, and D. Unruh. Compromising reflections-or-how to read LCD monitors around the corner. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2008.
[2]
J. L. Bentley. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Communications of the ACM, 18(9): 509--517, 1975.
[3]
A. Buades, B. Coll, and J.-M. Morel. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 4(2):490--530, 2005.
[4]
M. Enev, S. Gupta, T. Kohno, and S. N. Patel. Televisions, video privacy, and powerline electromagnetic interference. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pages 537--550. ACM, 2011.
[5]
C. Faloutsos, M. Ranganathan, and Y. Manolopoulos. Fast subsequence matching in time-series databases. ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), 23(2), 1994.
[6]
D. Gomery. As the dial turns. The Wilson Quarterly, pages 41--46, 1993.
[7]
U. Greveler, B. Justus, and D. Loehr. Multimedia content identification through smart meter power usage profiles. Computers, Privacy and Data Protection, 2012.
[8]
G. E. Healey and R. Kondepudy. Radiometric ccd camera calibration and noise estimation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 16(3):267--276, 1994.
[9]
M. G. Kuhn. Compromising emanations of lcd tv sets. Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on, 55(3): 564--570, 2013.
[10]
B. Langmead, C. Trapnell, M. Pop, S. L. Salzberg, et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short dna sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol, 10(3):R25, 2009.
[11]
J. Liu, Z. Huang, H. Cai, H. T. Shen, C. W. Ngo, and W. Wang. Near-duplicate video retrieval: Current research and future trends. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(4): 44, 2013.
[12]
Y.-S. Moon, K.-Y. Whang, and W.-S. Han. General match: a subsequence matching method in time-series databases based on generalized windows. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 382--393. ACM, 2002.
[13]
R. Raguram, A. M. White, Y. Xu, J.-M. Frahm, P. Georgel, and F. Monrose. On the privacy risks of virtual keyboards: automatic reconstruction of typed input from compromising reflections. Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 10(3):154--167, 2013.
[14]
A. Torralba and W. T. Freeman. Accidental pinhole and pinspeck cameras: revealing the scene outside the picture. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 374--381. IEEE, 2012.
[15]
Y. Tsin, V. Ramesh, and T. Kanade. Statistical calibration of ccd imaging process. In Computer Vision, 2001. ICCV 2001. Proceedings. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, volume 1, pages 480--487. IEEE, 2001.
[16]
B. Widrow and I. Kollár. Quantization noise: roundoff error in digital computation, signal processing, control, and communications. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[17]
Y. Xu, J. Heinly, A. M. White, F. Monrose, and J.-M. Frahm. Seeing double: reconstructing obscured typed input from repeated compromising reflections. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer & communications security, pages 1063--1074. ACM, 2013.
[18]
L. Zhang and Y. Rui. Image search--from thousands to billions in 20 years. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 9(1s):36, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Smart Jamming for Secrecy: Deep Reinforcement Learning Enabled Secure Visible Light CommunicationIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2024.345804623:12(17915-17928)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Activity Recognition Protection for IoT Trigger-Action Platforms2024 IEEE 9th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)10.1109/EuroSP60621.2024.00039(600-616)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Listening Between the Bits: Privacy Leaks in Audio FingerprintsDetection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment10.1007/978-3-031-64171-8_10(184-204)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Watching the Watchers: Automatically Inferring TV Content From Outdoor Light Effusions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CCS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
      November 2014
      1592 pages
      ISBN:9781450329576
      DOI:10.1145/2660267
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. compromising emanation
      2. visual eavesdropping

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CCS'14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CCS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 114 of 585 submissions, 19%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,261 of 6,999 submissions, 18%

      Upcoming Conference

      CCS '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Smart Jamming for Secrecy: Deep Reinforcement Learning Enabled Secure Visible Light CommunicationIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2024.345804623:12(17915-17928)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • (2024)Activity Recognition Protection for IoT Trigger-Action Platforms2024 IEEE 9th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)10.1109/EuroSP60621.2024.00039(600-616)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Listening Between the Bits: Privacy Leaks in Audio FingerprintsDetection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment10.1007/978-3-031-64171-8_10(184-204)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
      • (2022)A Survey on IoT-Enabled Home Automation Systems: Attacks and DefensesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2022.320155724:4(2292-2328)Online publication date: Dec-2023
      • (2022)Assessing smart light enabled cyber-physical attack paths on urban infrastructures and servicesConnection Science10.1080/09540091.2022.207247034:1(1401-1429)Online publication date: 14-May-2022
      • (2022)Survey on Enterprise Internet-of-Things systems (E-IoT)Ad Hoc Networks10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102728125:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2022
      • (2022)Assessing Vulnerabilities and IoT-Enabled Attacks on Smart Lighting SystemsComputer Security. ESORICS 2021 International Workshops10.1007/978-3-030-95484-0_13(199-217)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
      • (2021)The Invisible Shadow: How Security Cameras Leak Private ActivitiesProceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3460120.3484741(2780-2793)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2021
      • (2021)That phone charging hub knows your video playlist!2021 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/IOP/SCI)10.1109/SWC50871.2021.00031(160-169)Online publication date: Oct-2021
      • (2021)A Survey on Device Behavior Fingerprinting: Data Sources, Techniques, Application Scenarios, and DatasetsIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2021.306425923:2(1048-1077)Online publication date: Oct-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media