Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838813acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Bi-Cultural Content Publication on a Digital Noticeboard: a Design and Cultural Differences Case Study

Published: 07 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We present our observations of Aboriginal Australian practices around a custom digital noticeboard and compare our insights to related research on cultural differences, literacy and ICT4D. The digital noticeboard was created, upon a request by the community Elders, to foster communication across the community. The initial design, informed by discussions and consultations, aimed at supporting the local Aboriginal language and English, both in written and spoken form, at supporting the oral tradition, and at accommodating for different perceptions and representations of time. This paper presents observations about the first encounters with the digital noticeboard by those members of the community that took part in its conceptualization. Such observations reinforce existing knowledge on such cultural phenomena as collectivism and time perception, issues related to literacy, moderation and censorship. We contribute to framing such knowledge within a concrete case study and draw implication for design of tools for bi-cultural content publication.

References

[1]
Ames, M. G. Charismatic Technology. In S. Ardzell, S. Bodker, O. S. Iversen, C. N. Klokmose, & H. Korsgaard (Eds.), Proc. 5th Decenn. Aarhus Conf., (2015), 109--120.
[2]
Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. Design matters in participatory design. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, (2012), 37.
[3]
Baskerville, R. F. Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), (2003), 1--14.
[4]
Biakolo, E. A. On the theoretical foundations of orality and literacy. Research in African Literatures, 30(2), (1999), 42--65.
[5]
Bidwell, N. Moving the centre to design social media in rural Africa. AI & SOCIETY, (2014), 1--27.
[6]
Blake, E., Büskens, I., & Dearden, A. Researching for Change in a Globalising Asymmetric World. In S. Ardzell, S. Bodker, O. S. Iversen, C. N. Klokmose, & H. Korsgaard (Eds.), Proc. 5th Decenn. Aarhus Conf., (2015), 23--25.
[7]
Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F., & Lane, P. M. How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. The Executive, 6(4), (1992), 17--26.
[8]
Brereton, M., Roe, P., Schroeter, R., & Lee Hong, A. Beyond Ethnography: Engagement and Reciprocity As Foundations for Design Research out Here. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM, (2014), 1183--1186.
[9]
Brislin, R. W., & Kim, E. S. Cultural Diversity in People's Understanding and Uses of Time. Applied Psychology, 52(3), (2003), 363--382.
[10]
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. Understanding cultural differences, 12, Intercultural press Yarmouth, ME, (1990).
[11]
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), (2010), 61--83.
[12]
Hestres, L. The influence of american culture on software design: Microsoft outlook as a case study. GNOVIS (Georgetown University's Peer-Reviewed Journal of Communication, Culture and Technology (CCT)), (2003).
[13]
Hofstede, G. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values, Sage Publications, (1980).
[14]
Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), (2011), 8.
[15]
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R. E. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM, (2010), 1311--1320.
[16]
Khaslavsky, J. Integrating Culture into Interface Design. In Proc. CHI 1998, ACM, (1998), 365--366.
[17]
Kral, I. The literacy question in remote Indigenous Australia. CAEPR Topical Issue, 6, (2009).
[18]
Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University, 47(1), (1952), viii, 223.
[19]
Nemoto, K., & Gloor, P. A. Analyzing Cultural Differences in Collaborative Innovation Networks by Analyzing Editing Behavior in Different-Language Wikipedias. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 26, (2011), 180--190.
[20]
Ong, W. J. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word, Routledge, (2012).
[21]
Reinecke, K., Nguyen, M. K., Bernstein, A., Näf, M., & Gajos, K. Z. Doodle Around the World: Online Scheduling Behavior Reflects Cultural Differences in Time Perception and Group Decision-making. In Proc. 2013 Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work, ACM, (2013), 45--54.
[22]
Rodil, K. A Participatory Perspective on Cross-Cultural Design. In A. Ebert, G. C. van der Veer, G. Domik, N. D. Gershon, & I. Scheler (Eds.), Build. Bridg. HCI, Vis. Non-formal Model. SE - 4, 8345, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2014), 30--46.
[23]
Shah, N. A blurry vision: reconsidering the failure of the one laptop per child initiative. WR: Journal of the Arts & Sciences Writing Program, (3), (2011).
[24]
Shaw, G., Brereton, M., & Roe, P. Mobile Phone Use in Australian Indigenous Communities: Future Pathways for HCI4D. In Proc. OzCHI 2014, ACM, (2014), 480--483.
[25]
Soro, A., Lee Hong, A., Shaw, G., Roe, P., & Brereton, M. A Noticeboard in "Both Worlds" Unsurprising Interfaces Supporting Easy Bi-Cultural Content Publication. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM, (2015), 2181--2186.
[26]
Therias, E., Bird, J., & Marshall, P. Máás Tecnologia, Más Cambio?: Investigating an Educational Technology Project in Rural Peru. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM, (2015), 447--456.
[27]
Triandis, H. C. Individualism-Collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), (2001), 907--924.
[28]
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), (1988), 323--338.
[29]
Winschiers, H. The Challenges of Participatory Design in a Intercultural Context: Designing for Usability in Namibia. In PDC, (2006), 73--76.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Benefits of Community Voice: A Framework for Understanding Inclusion of Community Voice in HCI4DProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101747:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2020)Scaling Up to Tackle Low Levels of Urban Food Waste RecyclingProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395524(1327-1340)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
  • (2020)Coding on CountryExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382992(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Bi-Cultural Content Publication on a Digital Noticeboard: a Design and Cultural Differences Case Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
    December 2015
    691 pages
    ISBN:9781450336734
    DOI:10.1145/2838739
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 December 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Collectivism
    2. Cultural Differences
    3. Digital Noticeboard
    4. HCI4D
    5. ICT4D
    6. Literacy
    7. Moderation
    8. Time

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    OzCHI '15

    Acceptance Rates

    OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 47 of 97 submissions, 48%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Benefits of Community Voice: A Framework for Understanding Inclusion of Community Voice in HCI4DProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101747:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2020)Scaling Up to Tackle Low Levels of Urban Food Waste RecyclingProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395524(1327-1340)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
    • (2020)Coding on CountryExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382992(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Human-Computer Interaction for Development (HCI4D): The Southern African LandscapeInformation and Communication Technologies for Development. Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_21(253-266)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2019
    • (2018)Co-creating personal augmented reality accessories to enhance social well-being of urban San youthProceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving Communities10.1145/3283458.3283480(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
    • (2018)New literacy theories for participatory designProceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3210586.3210588(1-13)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
    • (2018)“Debrief O'Clock”Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173882(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
    • (2018)From Preserving to Performing Culture in the Digital EraDigitisation of Culture: Namibian and International Perspectives10.1007/978-981-10-7697-8_2(7-28)Online publication date: 10-May-2018
    • (2017)Improving the flow of livelihood information among unemployed youth in an informal settlement of Windhoek, NamibiaProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3083671.3083687(256-265)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2017
    • (2017)Situational WhenProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025936(6461-6474)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media