Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2914586.2914589acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social Media-Based Collaborative Information Access: Analysis of Online Crisis-Related Twitter Conversations

Published: 10 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The notion of implicit (or explicit) collaborative information access refers to systems and practices allowing a group of users to unintentionally (respectively intentionally) seek, share and retrieve information to achieve similar (respectively shared) information-related goals. Despite an increasing adoption in social environments, collaboration behavior in information seeking and retrieval is mainly limited to small-sized groups, generally restricted to working spaces. Much remains to be learned about collaborative information seeking within open web social spaces. This paper is an attempt to better understand either implicit or explicit collaboration by studying Twitter, one of the most popular and widely used social networks. We study in particular the complex intertwinement of human interactions induced by both collaboration and social networking. We empirically explore explicit collaborative interactions based on focused conversation streams during two crisis. We identify structural patterns of temporally representative conversation subgraphs and represent their topics using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) modeling. Our main findings suggest that: 1) the critical mass of collaboration is generally limited to small-sized flat networks, with or without an influential user, 2) users are active as members of weakly overlapping groups and engage in numerous collaborative search and sharing tasks dealing with different topics, and 3) collaborative group ties evolve within the time-span of conversations.

References

[1]
A. Acar and Y. Muraki. Twitter for crisis communication: Lessons learned from japan tsunami disaster. Int. J. Web Based Communities, 7(3):392--402, 2011.
[2]
I. Badache and M. Boughanem. Harnessing social signals to enhance a search. In WI, volume 1, pages 303--309, Aug 2014.
[3]
R. Baeza-Yates and D. Saez-Trumper. Wisdom of the crowd or wisdom of a few? an analysis of users' content generation. In Hypertext and Social Media, pages 69--74. ACM, 2015.
[4]
D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993--1022, 2003.
[5]
R. D. Bock and S. Z. Husain. An adaptation of holzinger's b-coefficients for the analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry, 13(2):pp. 146--153, 1950.
[6]
F. Cacheda, V. Carneiro, D. Fernández, and V. Formoso. Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: Limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems. ACM Trans. Web, 5(1):2:1--2:33, Feb. 2011.
[7]
D. Carmel, N. Zwerdling, I. Guy, S. Ofek-Koifman, N. Har'el, I. Ronen, E. Uziel, S. Yogev, and S. Chernov. Personalized social search based on the user's social network. In CIKM, pages 1227--1236. ACM, 2009.
[8]
C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In WWW, pages 675--684. ACM, 2011.
[9]
P. Cogan, M. Andrews, M. Bradonjic, W. S. Kennedy, A. Sala, and G. Tucci. Reconstruction and analysis of twitter conversation graphs. In HotSocial Workshop, pages 25--31. ACM, 2012.
[10]
M. De Choudhury, M. R. Morris, and R. W. White. Seeking and sharing health information online: Comparing search engines and social media. In CHI. ACM, 2014.
[11]
K. Ehrlich and N. S. Shami. Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. In ICWSM. The AAAI Press, 2010.
[12]
I. Eleta and J. Golbeck. Multilingual use of twitter: Social networks at the language frontier. Computers in Human Behavior, 41:424--432, 2014.
[13]
B. M. Evans and E. H. Chi. Towards a model of understanding social search. In CSCW, pages 485--494. ACM, 2008.
[14]
J. Foster. Collaborative information seeking and retrieval. Annual Rev. Info. Sci & Technol., 40(1), Dec. 2006.
[15]
L. Franco and H. Kawai. News detection in the blogosphere: Two approaches based on structure and content analysis. In ICWSM, 2010.
[16]
J. P. Gene Golovinsky and M. Back. A taxonomy of collaboration in online seeking. In arxiv.org/pdf/0908.0704, CoRR abs/0908.0704, 2009.
[17]
T. Heverin and L. Zach. Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. JASIST, 63(1):34--47, 2012.
[18]
S. R. Hiltz, P. Diaz, and G. Mark. Introduction: Social media and collaborative systems for crisis management. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 18(4):18:1--18:6, 2011.
[19]
T. Holderness and E. Turpin. PetaJakarta.org: Assessing the Role of Social Media for Civic Co-Management During Monsoon Flooding in Jakarta, Indonesia. SMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, 2015.
[20]
D. Horowitz and S. D. Kamvar. The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine. In WWW, pages 431--440. ACM, 2010.
[21]
M. Imran, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and S. Vieweg. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 47(4):67:1--67:38, June 2015.
[22]
M. Imran, S. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and P. Meier. Practical extraction of disaster-relevant information from social media. In WWW, pages 1021--1024, 2013.
[23]
J.-W. Jeong, M. R. Morris, J. Teevan, and D. Liebling. A crowd-powered socially embedded search engine. In ICWSM. AAAI, 2013.
[24]
B. Karweg, C. Huetter, and K. Böhm. Evolving social search based on bookmarks and status messages from social networks. In CIKM, pages 1825--1834. ACM, 2011.
[25]
A. Kavanaugh, S. D. Sheetz, F. Quek, and B. J. Kim. Cell phone use with social ties during crises: The case of the virginia tech tragedy. Using Social and Information Technologies for Disaster and Crisis Management, (84), 2013.
[26]
V. Lampos, T. De Bie, and N. Cristianini. Flu detector: Tracking epidemics on twitter. In ECML PKDD, pages 599--602. Springer-Verlag, 2010.
[27]
J. Leskovec, M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. Glance, and M. Hurst. Cascading behavior in large blog graphs. 2007.
[28]
J. T. Meredith Ringel Morris and K. Panovitch. What do people ask their social networks, and why? a survey study of status messages q&a behaviour. In CHI, pages 1739--1748. ACM, 2010.
[29]
M. R. Morris. Exploring the complementary roles of social networks and search engines. In ICWSM, 2011.
[30]
M. R. Morris. Collaborative search revisited. In CSCW, pages 1181--1192. ACM, 2013.
[31]
F. Morstatter, J. Pfeffer, and H. Liu. When is it biased?: assessing the representativeness of twitter's streaming api. In WWW, 2014.
[32]
L. Palen and K. Starbird. Working and sustaining the virtual disaster desk. In CSCW, 2013.
[33]
J. Pickens. Social and collaborative information seeking: Panel. In CIKM, pages 2647--2648, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[34]
S. Poltrock, J. Grudin, S. Dumais, R. Fidel, H. Bruce, and A. M. Pejtersen. Information seeking and sharing in design teams. In SIGGROUP, pages 239--247, 2003.
[35]
A. Sadilek, H. A. Kautz, and V. Silenzio. Modeling spread of disease from social interactions. In ICWSM, 2012.
[36]
C. Shah. Collaborative Information Seeking - The Art and Science of Making the Whole Greater than the Sum of All, volume 34 of The information retrieval series. Springer, 2012.
[37]
L. Soulier, C. Shah, and L. Tamine. User-driven system-mediated collaborative information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 485--494, 2014.
[38]
L. Soulier, L. Tamine, and W. Bahsoun. On domain expertise-based roles in collaborative information retrieval. IP&M, 50(5):752 -- 774, 2014.
[39]
J. Surowiecki. The Wisdow of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. Random House, pages 78--85, 2004.
[40]
J. C. Tang, M. Cebrian, N. A. Giacobe, H.-W. Kim, T. Kim, and D. B. Wickert. Reflecting on the DARPA Red Balloon Challenge. Commun. ACM, 54(4):78--85, 2011.
[41]
S. Vieweg, A. L. Hugues, K. Starbird, and L. Paeln. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to situational awarness. In CHI, 2010.
[42]
C. Wendling, J. Radisch, and S. Jacobzone. The use of social media in risk and crisis communication. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, (24), 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Metrics for Temporal Text NetworksTemporal Network Theory10.1007/978-3-031-30399-9_8(149-164)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2023
  • (2022)A Comparative Study on the Identification of Informative Tweets Using Deep Neural Networks During CrisisElectronic Systems and Intelligent Computing10.1007/978-981-16-9488-2_66(697-706)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Analysis of Structural Features in Rumor Conversations Detection in TwitterSignal and Data Processing10.52547/jsdp.18.3.4518:3(45-64)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Social Media-Based Collaborative Information Access: Analysis of Online Crisis-Related Twitter Conversations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HT '16: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
    July 2016
    354 pages
    ISBN:9781450342476
    DOI:10.1145/2914586
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 July 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaboration
    2. information access
    3. social networks
    4. topic models
    5. twitter

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • CNRS PEPS EXPAC

    Conference

    HT '16
    Sponsor:
    HT '16: 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
    July 10 - 13, 2016
    Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    HT '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 54 submissions, 30%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 378 of 1,158 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Metrics for Temporal Text NetworksTemporal Network Theory10.1007/978-3-031-30399-9_8(149-164)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2023
    • (2022)A Comparative Study on the Identification of Informative Tweets Using Deep Neural Networks During CrisisElectronic Systems and Intelligent Computing10.1007/978-981-16-9488-2_66(697-706)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Analysis of Structural Features in Rumor Conversations Detection in TwitterSignal and Data Processing10.52547/jsdp.18.3.4518:3(45-64)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
    • (2021)Use of social media information sources: a systematic literature reviewOnline Information Review10.1108/OIR-04-2020-015245:6(1039-1063)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2021
    • (2021)Prediction of brand stories spreading on social networksAdvances in Data Analysis and Classification10.1007/s11634-021-00450-x16:3(559-591)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2021
    • (2019)Survey of Compressed Domain Video Summarization TechniquesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/335539852:6(1-29)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
    • (2019)Metrics for Temporal Text NetworksTemporal Network Theory10.1007/978-3-030-23495-9_8(147-160)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2019
    • (2018)Identifying Sub-events and Summarizing Disaster-Related Information from MicroblogsThe 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3209978.3210030(265-274)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2018
    • (2018)On Algebraic Branching Programs of Small WidthJournal of the ACM10.1145/320966365:5(1-29)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2018
    • (2018)Weakest Precondition Reasoning for Expected Runtimes of Randomized AlgorithmsJournal of the ACM10.1145/320810265:5(1-68)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media