Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Lower Bounds for Constant Query Affine-Invariant LCCs and LTCs

Published: 27 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Affine-invariant codes are codes whose coordinates form a vector space over a finite field and which are invariant under affine transformations of the coordinate space. They form a natural, well-studied class of codes; they include popular codes such as Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon. A particularly appealing feature of affine-invariant codes is that they seem well suited to admit local correctors and testers. In this work, we give lower bounds on the length of locally correctable and locally testable affine-invariant codes with constant query complexity. We show that if a code C ⊂ ΣKn is an r-query affine invariant locally correctable code (LCC), where K is a finite field and Σ is a finite alphabet, then the number of codewords in C is at most exp(OK,r,|Σ|(nr−1)). Also, we show that if C ⊂ ΣKn is an r-query affine invariant locally testable code (LTC), then the number of codewords in C is at most exp(OK,r,|Σ|(nr−2)). The dependence on n in these bounds is tight for constant-query LCCs/LTCs, since Guo, Kopparty, and Sudan (ITCS’13) constructed affine-invariant codes via lifting that have the same asymptotic tradeoffs. Note that our result holds for non-linear codes, whereas previously, Ben-Sasson and Sudan (RANDOM’11) assumed linearity to derive similar results. Our analysis uses higher-order Fourier analysis. In particular, we show that the codewords corresponding to an affine-invariant LCC/LTC must be far from each other with respect to Gowers norm of an appropriate order. This then allows us to bound the number of codewords, using known decomposition theorems, which approximate any bounded function in terms of a finite number of low-degree non-classical polynomials, up to a small error in the Gowers norm.

References

[1]
Sanjeev Arora, Carsten Lund, Rajeev Motwani, Madhu Sudan, and Mario Szegedy. 1998. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. J. ACM 45, 3 (1998), 501--555.
[2]
Sanjeev Arora and Shmuel Safra. 1998. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. J. ACM 45, 1 (1998), 70--122.
[3]
Boaz Barak, Zeev Dvir, Amir Yehudayoff, and Avi Wigderson. 2011. Rank bounds for design matrices with applications to combinatorial geometry and locally correctable codes. ACM, 519--528.
[4]
Omer Barkol, Yuval Ishai, and Enav Weinreb. 2007. On locally decodable codes, self-correctable codes, and t-private PIR. Springer, 311--325.
[5]
Eli Ben-Sasson, Noga Ron-Zewi, and Madhu Sudan. 2012. Sparse affine-invariant linear codes are locally testable. IEEE, 561--570.
[6]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. 2004. Robust locally testable codes and products of codes. 286--297.
[7]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. 2008. Short PCPs with polylog query complexity. 38, 2 (2008), 551--607.
[8]
Eli Ben-Sasson and Madhu Sudan. 2011. Limits on the rate of locally testable affine-invariant codes. Springer, 412--423.
[9]
Arnab Bhattacharyya and Abhishek Bhowmick. 2015. Using higher-order Fourier analysis over general fields. Preprint arXiv:1505.00619 (2015).
[10]
Arnab Bhattacharyya, Zeev Dvir, Amir Shpilka, and Shubhangi Saraf. 2011. Tight lower bounds for 2-query LCCs over finite fields. In 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). IEEE, 638--647.
[11]
Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett. 2015a. Bias vs structure of polynomials in large fields, and applications in effective algebraic geometry and coding theory. Preprint arXiv:1506.02047 (2015).
[12]
Abhishek Bhowmick and Shachar Lovett. 2015b. The list decoding radius of Reed-Muller codes over small fields. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM.
[13]
Manuel Blum and Sampath Kannan. 1995. Designing programs that check their work. J. ACM 42, 1 (1995), 269--291.
[14]
Manuel Blum, Michael Luby, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. 1993. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 47, 3 (1993), 549--595.
[15]
Benny Chor, Eyal Kushilevitz, Oded Goldreich, and Madhu Sudan. 1998. Private information retrieval. J. ACM 45, 6 (1998), 965--981.
[16]
Irit Dinur. 2007. The PCP theorem by gap amplification. J. ACM 54, 3 (2007), 12.
[17]
Zeev Dvir, Shubhangi Saraf, and Avi Wigderson. 2014. Breaking the quadratic barrier for 3-LCC’s over the reals. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, 784--793.
[18]
Zeev Dvir and Amir Shpilka. 2007. Locally decodable codes with two queries and polynomial identity testing for depth 3 circuits. 36, 5 (2007), 1404--1434.
[19]
Oded Goldreich, Howard Karloff, Leonard J. Schulman, and Luca Trevisan. 2012. Lower bounds for linear locally decodable codes and private information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity. IEEE, 175--183.
[20]
Oded Goldreich and Madhu Sudan. 2006. Locally testable codes and PCPs of almost-linear length. J. ACM 53, 4 (July 2006), 558--655.
[21]
William T. Gowers. 2001. A new proof of Szemerédi’s theorem. 11, 3 (2001), 465--588.
[22]
Ben Green. 2006. Montreal lecture notes on quadratic Fourier analysis. Preprint arXiv:math/0604089 (2006).
[23]
Alan Guo, Swastik Kopparty, and Madhu Sudan. 2013. New affine-invariant codes from lifting. ACM, 529--540.
[24]
Alan Xinyu Guo. 2013. Some Closure Features of Locally Testable Affine-invariant Properties. Master’s thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[25]
Venkatesan Guruswami, Madhu Sudan, Ameya Velingker, and Carol Wang. 2015. Limitations on testable affine-invariant codes in the high-rate regime. SIAM, 1312--1325.
[26]
T. Kasami, S. Lin, and W. W. Peterson. 1967. Some results on cyclic codes which are invariant under the affine group and their applications. Inform. and Comput. 11, 5--6 (1967), 475--496.
[27]
Jonathan Katz and Luca Trevisan. 2000. On the efficiency of local decoding procedures for error-correcting codes. ACM, 80--86.
[28]
Tali Kaufman and Madhu Sudan. 2008. Algebraic property testing: The role of invariance. ACM, 403--412.
[29]
Iordanis Kerenidis and Ronald de Wolf. 2003. Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes via a quantum argument. ACM, 106--115.
[30]
Richard J. Lipton. 1990. Efficient checking of computations. Springer, 207--215.
[31]
Or Meir. 2009. Combinatorial construction of locally testable codes. 39, 2 (2009), 491--544.
[32]
Madhu Sudan, Luca Trevisan, and Salil Vadhan. 1999. Pseudorandom generators without the XOR lemma. ACM, 537--546.
[33]
Terence Tao. 2012. Higher Order Fourier Analysis. Vol. 142. American Mathematical Soc.
[34]
Terence Tao and Tamar Ziegler. 2012. The inverse conjecture for the Gowers norm over finite fields in low characteristic. 16, 1 (2012), 121--188.
[35]
Madhur Tulsiani and Julia Wolf. 2014. Quadratic Goldreich-Levin theorems. SIAM J. Comput. 43, 2 (2014), 730--766.
[36]
Michael Viderman. 2015. Explicit strong LTCs with inverse poly-log rate and constant soundness. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 22 (2015), 20.
[37]
David Woodruff. 2007. New lower bounds for general locally decodable codes. In Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), Vol. 14.
[38]
David P. Woodruff. 2012. A quadratic lower bound for three-query linear locally decodable codes over any field. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 27, 4 (2012), 678--686.
[39]
Sergey Yekhanin. 2011. Locally decodable codes. In Computer Science--Theory and Applications. Springer, 289--290.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On Relaxed Locally Decodable Codes for Hamming and Insertion-Deletion ErrorsProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.14(1-25)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Exponential Lower Bounds for Locally Decodable and Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00077(739-750)Online publication date: Feb-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory  Volume 9, Issue 2
June 2017
110 pages
ISSN:1942-3454
EISSN:1942-3462
DOI:10.1145/3086509
Issue’s Table of Contents
Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 April 2017
Accepted: 01 June 2009
Revised: 01 March 2009
Received: 01 February 2007
Published in TOCT Volume 9, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Gowers uniformity norm
  2. Locally correctable code
  3. affine invariance
  4. locally testable code

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • DSTO1358 Ramanujan Fellowship
  • NSF

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On Relaxed Locally Decodable Codes for Hamming and Insertion-Deletion ErrorsProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.14(1-25)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Exponential Lower Bounds for Locally Decodable and Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00077(739-750)Online publication date: Feb-2022

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media